Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionHFpEF-CMDNCT04788576
Distribution and Clinical Implication of CMD in Patients With HFpEF Without Significant CAD
An observational study of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
To evaluate the incidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and its' prognostic implication in patients who have diagnosed as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Invasive physiologic evaluation (fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance)
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 25 Jan 2021to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who have diagnosed as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease
Who may be able to join
- Subject must be at least 19 years of age.
- Subject with preserved ejection fraction (ejection fraction > 50%)
- Subject presented with dyspnea on exertion (NYHA Grade 2 or more) and diagnosed as HFpEF using HFA-PEFF scoring system (HFA-PEFF ≥5 or 2-4 with abnormal stress test or invasive hemodynamic test)
- Subject who clinically need coronary angiography
- Subject who is able to voluntarily sign informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Subject with reduced ejection fraction (<50%)
- Subject with significant coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiography (diameter stenosis ≥90% or 50-90% with fractional flow reserve [FFR] ≤0.80)
- Subject who has other obvious causes of dyspnea (ex, lung disease)
- Subject who have non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy <1 year
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351
Ki Hong Choi, MD, 82-2-3410-3419, cardiokh@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Distribution and Clinical Implication of Coronary Flow Reserve and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Without Significant Coronary Artery Disease
To evaluate the incidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and its' prognostic implication in patients who have diagnosed as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease.
Read the detailed description
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome in patients with current or prior symptoms of HF with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50 percent and evidence of cardiac dysfunction as a cause of symptoms (abnormal LV filling and elevated filling pressures). Previous studies have reported that HFpEF is related to various clinical risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, myocardial ischemia with or without significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis, or myocardial infiltrative disease. Although its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, findings from clinical and pre-clinical studies have suggested systemic endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) could be important pathophysiologic mechanisms for HFpEF.
In this regard, recent studies evaluated non-invasively measured coronary flow reserve (CFR) from positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or Doppler echocardiography, and presented the association of depressed global CFR with cardiac diastolic dysfunction and higher risk of clinical events. The presence of CMD can be also evaluated by invasive physiologic assessment using both CFR and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). Nevertheless, there has been limited study which evaluated the association between HFpEF and CMD using invasive physiologic indices and their prognostic implications, especially in patients without significant coronary artery stenosis. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the incidence of CMD and its' prognostic implication in patients who have diagnosed as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease.
- Being tested
- Invasive physiologic evaluation (fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance)
- Keywords
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Coronary physiology, Coronary microvascular dysfunction, HFA-PEFF score
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Invasive physiologic evaluation (fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance)Diagnostic test
In case of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease, coronary angiography with invasive physiologic evaluation including fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance will be performed to evaluate the distribution and clinical implication of coronary microvascular dysfunction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) | Subject with preserved ejection fraction (ejection fraction > 50%) and with dyspnea on exertion (NYHA Grade 2 or more) and diagnosed as HFpEF using HFA-PEFF scoring system (HFA-PEFF ≥5 or 2-4 with abnormal stress test or invasive hemodynamic test) Receives: Diagnostic Test: Invasive physiologic evaluation (fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of CMD in patients with HFpEF
Proportion of CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Secondary outcomes (18)
Correlation between CMD and left ventricular end diastolic pressure
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and left ventricular end diastolic pressure
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and E/e'
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and E/e'
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and HFA-PEFF score
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and HFA-PEFF score
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and NT-proBNP
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and NT-proBNP
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and pulmonary artery wedge pressure
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and pulmonary artery wedge pressure
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and mean pulmonary artery pressure
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and mean pulmonary artery pressure
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
All-cause death
All-cause death during follow-up
Measured: At 2 years after the index procedure
Cardiac death
Cardiac death during follow-up
Measured: At 2 years after the index procedure
Myocardial infarction
Myocardial infarction during follow-up
Measured: At 2 years after the index procedure
Any revascularization
Any revascularization during follow-up
Measured: At 2 years after the index procedure
Readmission due to heart failure
Readmission due to heart failure during follow-up
Measured: At 2 years after the index procedure
Readmission
Readmission during follow-up
Measured: At 2 years after the index procedure
Proportion of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Proportion of progression of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Measured: At 2 years after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and Excercise induced E/e'
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and exercise induced E/e'
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and Exercise induced pulmonary artery wedge pressure
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation exercise induced and pulmonary artery wedge pressure
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and exercise time
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation exercise time
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and mean exercise induced pulmonary artery pressure
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and exercise induced mean pulmonary artery pressure
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and Gas analysis data (Peak exercise oxygen consumption, Respiratory quotient)
Correlation between CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation and exercise induced peak exercise oxygen consumption, Respiratory quotient
Measured: Immediate after the index procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2021
- Study start25 Jan 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection FractionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Samsung Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ki Hong Choi, Samsung Medical Center
- Investigators
- Ki Hong Choi, MD, Principal investigator, Samsung Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04788576
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HFpEF_CMD
- Acronym
- HFpEF-CMD
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Distribution and Clinical Implication of Coronary Flow Reserve and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Without Significant Coronary Artery Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04788576
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HFpEF-CMD / HFpEF_CMD
- Keywords
- Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Coronary physiology, Coronary microvascular dysfunction, HFA-PEFF score
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Samsung Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the incidence of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and its' prognostic implication in patients who have diagnosed as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease.
Detailed description
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a clinical syndrome in patients with current or prior symptoms of HF with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50 percent and evidence of cardiac dysfunction as a cause of symptoms (abnormal LV filling and elevated filling pressures). Previous studies have reported that HFpEF is related to various clinical risk factors such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, myocardial ischemia with or without significant epicardial coronary artery stenosis, or myocardial infiltrative disease. Although its pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, findings from clinical and pre-clinical studies have suggested systemic endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) could be important pathophysiologic mechanisms for HFpEF.
In this regard, recent studies evaluated non-invasively measured coronary flow reserve (CFR) from positron emission tomography (PET), cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or Doppler echocardiography, and presented the association of depressed global CFR with cardiac diastolic dysfunction and higher risk of clinical events. The presence of CMD can be also evaluated by invasive physiologic assessment using both CFR and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR). Nevertheless, there has been limited study which evaluated the association between HFpEF and CMD using invasive physiologic indices and their prognostic implications, especially in patients without significant coronary artery stenosis. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the incidence of CMD and its' prognostic implication in patients who have diagnosed as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) | – | Diagnostic Test: Invasive physiologic evaluation (fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance)Subject with preserved ejection fraction (ejection fraction > 50%) and with dyspnea on exertion (NYHA Grade 2 or more) and diagnosed as HFpEF using HFA-PEFF scoring system (HFA-PEFF ≥5 or 2-4 with abnormal stress test or invasive hemodynamic test) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who have diagnosed as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Subject must be at least 19 years of age.
- Subject with preserved ejection fraction (ejection fraction > 50%)
- Subject presented with dyspnea on exertion (NYHA Grade 2 or more) and diagnosed as HFpEF using HFA-PEFF scoring system (HFA-PEFF ≥5 or 2-4 with abnormal stress test or invasive hemodynamic test)
- Subject who clinically need coronary angiography
- Subject who is able to voluntarily sign informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject with reduced ejection fraction (<50%)
- Subject with significant coronary artery stenosis on coronary angiography (diameter stenosis ≥90% or 50-90% with fractional flow reserve [FFR] ≤0.80)
- Subject who has other obvious causes of dyspnea (ex, lung disease)
- Subject who have non-cardiac co-morbid conditions with life expectancy <1 year
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Invasive physiologic evaluation (fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance)In case of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction confirmed by HFA-PEFF scoring system without functionally significant coronary artery disease, coronary angiography with invasive physiologic evaluation including fractional flow reserve, coronary flow reserve, and index of microcirculatory resistance will be performed to evaluate the distribution and clinical implication of coronary microvascular dysfunction. | Diagnostic test | Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) |
Primary outcome
Proportion of CMD in patients with HFpEF
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Proportion of CMD confirmed by invasive physiologic evaluation
18 secondary outcomes
Correlation between CMD and left ventricular end diastolic pressure
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and E/e'
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and HFA-PEFF score
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and NT-proBNP
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and pulmonary artery wedge pressure
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and mean pulmonary artery pressure
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
All-cause death
Time frame: At 2 years after the index procedure
Cardiac death
Time frame: At 2 years after the index procedure
Myocardial infarction
Time frame: At 2 years after the index procedure
Any revascularization
Time frame: At 2 years after the index procedure
Readmission due to heart failure
Time frame: At 2 years after the index procedure
Readmission
Time frame: At 2 years after the index procedure
Proportion of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Time frame: At 2 years after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and Excercise induced E/e'
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and Exercise induced pulmonary artery wedge pressure
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and exercise time
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and mean exercise induced pulmonary artery pressure
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Correlation between CMD and Gas analysis data (Peak exercise oxygen consumption, Respiratory quotient)
Time frame: Immediate after the index procedure
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2024.
Related trials for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Descriptive Study of Circulating Gene or Protein Inflammatory Biomarkers and Bioimpedance Parameters in a Population of Patients Hospitalized for Decompensated Heart Failure With Preserved or Mildly Reduced Cardiac Function
Inflammation Biomarkers, Heart Failure
Recruiting
Remote Rehabilitation in Patients With HFpEF (PATRON-HF)
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
ELEVATE-HFpEF Clinical Study
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ki Hong Choi, MD principal investigator
Samsung Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction, run by Samsung Medical Center at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ki Hong Choi, MD (82-2-3410-1246, cardiokh@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of CMD in patients with HFpEF (time frame: Immediate after the index procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2024.