AzTrials
AzTrials

Emotional DisorderPHP TIESNCT04792151

Youth PHP Pilot Transdiagnostic Treatment Implementation and Effectiveness Study

An observational study of Emotional Disorder, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine patient effectiveness outcomes of a transdiagnostic treatment for youth emotional disorders, implemented in a partial hospitalization program (PHP). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Emotional Disorder
What is being tested?
Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents
How many people
304 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
15 Apr 2021to 25 Apr 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Participants will be youth and parents recruited from the partial hospitalization program at Children's Hospital Colorado.

Who may be able to join

  • youth between the ages of 6 and 17
  • participation in treatment in the Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) PHP program
  • presence of at least one caregiver available and willing to participate in the study.
  • --psychologist, licensed master's-level clinician (i.e., "behavioral health clinician"), or unlicensed "behavioral health specialist" providing clinical services through the CHCO Partial Hospitalization Program during the period of study enrollment

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded from the study if:
  • they are a ward of the state
  • are not enrolled in the Children's Hospital Colorado PHP program.
  • Clinicians will be excluded from the study if:
  • --they are not providing clinical services through the Children's Hospital Colorado PHP program

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Children's Hospital Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: PHP TIES: Pilot Transdiagnostic Treatment Implementation and Effectiveness Study for Youth Emotional Disorders in a Partial Hospitalization Program

The purpose of this study is to examine patient effectiveness outcomes of a transdiagnostic treatment for youth emotional disorders, implemented in a partial hospitalization program (PHP). Participants will be youth between ages 6 to 17 and their families, as well as clinicians, participating in the PHP program at Children's Hospital Colorado. Additionally, the research team will study modifications to the transdiagnostic intervention that are required to feasibly and effectively deliver it in a PHP setting.

Being tested
Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and AdolescentsBehavioural

    The Unified Protocols for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents (UP-C and UP-A) are transdiagnostic, behavioral interventions for youth with emotional disorders, including anxiety, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and irritability.

Study groups in NCT04792151
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PHP YouthYouth ages 6-17 receiving standard of care treatment (i.e., transdiagnostic intervention for emotional disorders) in a partial hospitalization program
Receives: Behavioral: Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children and Adolescents

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Client satisfaction with treatment, as measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) at post-treatment

    The CSQ-8 is an 8-item, self and parent-report measure of satisfaction with treatment services. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with treatment services.

    Measured: 2 month

  2. Client satisfaction with treatment, as measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) at 1 Month follow up

    The CSQ-8 is an 8-item, self and parent-report measure of satisfaction with treatment services. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with treatment services.

    Measured: 2 month

  3. Change in anxiety symptoms, as measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric and Parent Proxy Anxiety Short Forms, Version 2.0

    The PROMIS Pediatric and Parent Proxy Anxiety Short Form, Version 2.0 is an 8-item measuring assessing anxiety symptoms in youth. Total scores range from 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  4. Change in depression symptoms, as measured by the PROMIS Pediatric and Parent Proxy Depressive Symptoms Short Forms, Version 2.0

    The PROMIS Pediatric and Parent Depressive Symptoms Short Form, Version 2.0 is a 6-item measuring assessing depressive symptoms in youth. Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  5. Change in emotional reactivity, as measured by the Emotion Dysregulation Inventory--Reactivity Short Form (EDI-R)

    The EDI-R is a 7-item, parent report measure of emotional reactivity in youth. Total scores range from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating greater emotional reactivity.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  6. Change in functional impairment, as measured by the Brief Impairment Scale (BIS)

    The BIS is a 23-item, parent report measure of functional impairment related to psychiatric symptoms in youth. Total scores range from 0 to 69, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  7. Change in symptoms of disruptive and oppositional behavior, as measured by the Disruptive Behavior Rating Scale (DBRS)

    The DBRS is an 8-item, parent report measure assessing symptoms of disruptive behaviors/oppositional defiant disorder in youth. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating more disruptive/oppositional behaviors.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  8. Change in anxiety sensitivity, as measured by the Childhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index (CASI)

    The CASI is an 18-item self-report measure assessing fear of physiological symptoms of anxiety in youth. Total scores range from 18 to 56, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety sensitivity.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  9. Change in distress intolerance, as measured by the Distress Intolerance Index for Youth (DIIY)

    The DIIY is a 10-item, self and parent-report measure assessing youth perceived inability to tolerate negative emotional states and experiential discomfort. Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater distress intolerance.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in parental accommodation of youth emotional disorder symptoms, as measured by the Family Accommodation Scale (FAS-E), adapted for youth emotional disorders symptoms

    The FAS-E is a 9-item parent-report measure assessing family accommodation of emotions. Total scores range from 0 to 36, with higher scores indicating greater parent accommodation of emotion.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  2. Change in positive and negative parenting behaviors, as measured by the Alabama Parenting Questionnaire--Short Form (APQ-S)

    The APQ-S is a 9-item, parent-report measure that yields three subscales ("Positive Parenting;" "Inconsistent Discipline," and "Poor Supervision"). Scores on each subscale range from 3 to 15. Higher scores on the Positive Parenting subscale indicate greater use of positive parenting strategies, higher scores on the Inconsistent Discipline scale indicate more inconsistent use of discipline techniques, and higher scores on the Poor Supervision scale indicate poorer parental supervision of youth.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  3. Change in parents' perceived self-efficacy in parenting their child, as measured by the Parenting Sense of Competence--Parenting Self Efficacy Scale (PSOC)

    The PSOC is a 7-item measure assessing parents' perceived parenting self-efficacy. Total scores range from 7 to 42, with higher scores indicating greater parenting self-efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  4. Change in youth cognitive reappraisal, as measured by the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents--Reappraisal Scale (ERQ-CA)

    The ERQ-CA Reappraisal subscale is a 6-item measure assessing youth reappraisal, or the extent to which youth are able to change their thinking about situations that elicit emotions. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater use of reappraisal.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  5. Change in youth perceived self-efficacy, as measured by the PROMIS Self Efficacy scale

    The PROMIS Self Efficacy scale is a 10-item, self-report measure assessing general self-efficacy, or an individual's belief in their capacity to manage daily stressors and have control over meaningful events. Total scores range from 10 to 50, with higher scores indicating greater perceived self-efficacy.

    Measured: Baseline, up to 2 month

  6. Number of modifications made to the transdiagnostic treatment protocol, as measured by the Modification and Adaptation Checklist (MAC)

    The MAC is a 13-item checklist (including clinician self-report and observer report versions) intended to assist in tracking modifications made to an evidence-based treatment protocol. Adaptations and modifications will be tracked during 25% of treatment sessions. Total number of modifications will be summed.

    Measured: Up to 2 months

  7. Type of modifications made to the transdiagnostic treatment protocol, as measured by the Modification and Adaptation Checklist (MAC)

    The MAC is a 13-item checklist (including clinician self-report and observer report versions) intended to assist in tracking modifications made to an evidence-based treatment protocol. Adaptations and modifications will be tracked during 25% of treatment sessions. Types of modifications will be summarized categorically, and number of modifications of each type will be reported.

    Measured: Up to 2 months

  8. Fidelity to the transdiagnostic treatment protocol, as measured by the UP-C Adherence and Competency Checklist, Observer and Clinician Self-Report version

    The UP-C Adherence and Competency Checklist is a tool designed to facilitate tracking of the delivery of core treatment components during therapy sessions. 25% of group therapy sessions will be coded by an observer and by clinicians delivering the intervention, and proportion of core elements delivered will be calculator. Inter-rater reliability among reporters will also be calculated. Score range: 0-170 (scored on a three-point scale) Higher scores indicate greater therapist competence and adherence to the treatment protocol. Scores are represented as percent adherence rather than total (e.g., 90% adherent).

    Measured: Up to 2 months

  9. Fidelity to the transdiagnostic treatment protocol, as measured by the UP-A Adherence and Competency Checklist, Observer and Clinician Self-Report version

    The UP-A Adherence and Competency Checklist is a tool designed to facilitate tracking of the delivery of core treatment components during therapy sessions. 25% of group therapy sessions will be coded by an observer and by clinicians delivering the intervention, and proportion of core elements delivered will be calculator. Inter-rater reliability among reporters will also be calculated. Score range: 0-170 (scored on a three-point scale). Higher scores indicate greater therapist competence and adherence to the treatment protocol. Scores are represented as percent adherence rather than total (e.g., 90% adherent).

    Measured: Up to 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2021
  2. Study start15 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion25 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion25 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
304 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04792151
Sponsor's protocol ID
20-2566
Acronym
PHP TIES
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
15 Jan 2021
Last updated
19 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie results reported in any published studies will be shared upon publication, after deidentification.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Emotional Disorder, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Client satisfaction with treatment, as measured by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8) at post-treatment (time frame: 2 month). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in