AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulp Disease, DentalNCT04793477

Effectiveness of Rotating System and Single File Reciprocating System in Temporal Molars

A study testing instrumentation technique in pulpectomies in people with Pulp Disease, Dental, run by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Is an in vivo study to test the effectiveness of the reciprocating system Reciproc blue and the rotating system VDW.ROTATE in primary molars. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 8 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pulp Disease, Dental
What is being tested?
instrumentation technique in pulpectomies
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
1 May 2021to 1 Jul 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 8 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Vital or non-vital temporary lower second molars.
  • Radiographic absence of external or internal pathological reabsorption.
  • Absence of interadicular radioluscience and/or periapical lesion.
  • Temporary teeth with at least 2/3 of the root intact or a minimum root length of 8mm.
  • Remaining dental structure sufficient for the subsequent placement of a stainless steel crown.
  • Children who have already undergone some previous restorative treatment in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry.

Who cannot join

  • Molars that have less than 2/3 radicular lenght.
  • Have taken analgesics or anti-inflammatories in the last 12 hours.
  • Very uncooperative patients, who require some type of anxiety to be treated.
  • Patients with systemic diseases.
  • Patients with special needs.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Francisco Guinot Jimeno, DDS, MsC contact

935042000

fguinot@uic.es

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

    Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, 08195

    Francisco Guinot Jimeno, DDS, MsC, 0034 93 5045000, fguinot79@hotmail.com

    Francisco Guinot Jimeno, DDS, MsC

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Comparison and Effectiveness of the Manual File System, the Multi-file Rotating System and the Single File Reciprocating System in Temporal Molars

Is an in vivo study to test the effectiveness of the reciprocating system Reciproc blue and the rotating system VDW.ROTATE in primary molars.

Read the detailed description

It is a randomized controlled clinical study to be conducted in the Department of Pediatric Dentistry of the International University of Catalonia (UIC).

The clinical study and data collection will be obtained by the second year students of the master's degree in Pediatric Dentistry. All of them will receive the same practical and theoretical training on the treatment to be performed, and will be calibrated by the principal investigator. The procedure and the data obtained will be reviewed by a trained investigator and blinded with the type of procedure used.

Children from 4 to 8 years old will be selected to visit the Clinica Universitaria de Odontología (CUO) with the master's degree in Pediatric Dentistry. A sample of 60 children will be taken. There will be three study groups, where 20 subjects will be assigned to each, estimating a follow-up loss ratio of 20%.

Once the patient is selected, they will be assigned to one of the groups in order of arrival. For example, patient one will be assigned in group 1, patient two in group 2, patient three in group 3 and so on.

There are 3 study groups groups: Group 1, with Manual instrumentation with K files (Dentsply Caulk, Milfors, DE, USA); group 2, with the VDW.ROTATETM (VDW, Munich, Germany); and group 3, with Reciproc® Blue (RCP, VDW, Munich, Germany) system.

A preliminary clinical and radiographic examination with periapical radiographs will be performed. To anesthetize the tooth, the student will use topical anesthesia (Urricaine gel, Clarben SA Laboratories) and local anesthesia with articaine 4% 1:200,000 epinephrine (Ultracaine; Normon S.A., Madrid, Spain) using a lower alveolar nerve block. The student will work with absolute isolation with rubber dam. The cavities will be removed with a high-speed diamond ball cutter and once the operator are inside the pulp chamber, will continue to remove the coronal pulp with a endo-Z cutter.

The operator will determine the working length (LT) with the Gold Reciproc motor (VDW, Munich, Germany), using K #15 file. LT is to be determined it at 1 mm less than what the locator indicates due to the physiological reabsorptions present in the tooth. Each group will be instrumented according to the manufacturer's instructions, explained above. The duct permeability will be ensured with K #10 file with between files and at the end of the instrumentation. The duct irrigation was carried out with 5ml of 2,5% NaOCl in each duct and a side outlet needle. In the case of group 3, which is a single lime system, the operator will take into account that the irrigation must be similar to that of the other systems.

Once the instrumentation is finished,the elapsed time will be recorded from the beginning to the end of the instrumentation with the disinfection of the appropriate irrigant. The operator will record the minutes and seconds evaluated with an analog stopwatch. The ducts will be dried with sterile paper tips and place the sealing material, calcium hydroxide with iodophormic paste (Vitapex; Neo Dental International Inc., Federal Way, WA, USA). The sealing material will be placed with the applicator tip that comes with the product and at the end we will compact the sealing with a cotton ball in the chamber. The application material procedure will be carried out in this way, to know if the success of the sealing depends on the system of files used. The tooth will remain with a temporary Eugenol Zinc Oxide (IRM; Dentsply Caulk, Milfors, DE, USA) filler until the next visit, which will be a week later, to place a stainless steel crown (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) cemented with glass ionomer cement (Ktac-Cem;3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA).

To finish the treatment, a periapical radiography will be done to the patient. With the final periapical radiography, a researcher blinded to the study groups, will evaluate the quality and quantity of the seal without the need for auxiliary elements such as léntulos or files. The filling will be evaluated if it's optimal, under-filled, over-filled or with the presence of gaps.

To determine the patient's anxiety during dental treatment, the operator will use a pulse oximeter (digital Onyx, NONIN, Plymouth, MN, USA). The child's heart rate will be evaluated in the following moments: 3 min before the application of topical anesthesia, at the topical anesthesia aplication, during the application of the local anesthetic, when the rubber dam is placed, during the instrumentation and removal of coronal pulp tissue, during the instrumentation with each file system, and finally when the rubber dam is removed. The average heart rate will be determined for each period by a set of values in a period of 1 minute.

At the end of the treatment the operator will evaluate the behavior of the child with the Frankl scale where 1 is very uncooperative and 4 is very collaborative; and will see if it is similar to the behavior of previous visits with conservative treatment.

To determine the ease of operation, a numerical scale from 0 to 10 is will be used, where 0 means very easy to use and 10 very difficult. It will be taken into account that if there are more than one operator, they have the same acquired skills and the same familiarity with the file systems used.

In the evaluation of postoperative pain, that same day the patient's parents will be given a questionnaire where the parents will have to write down at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours and a week later, the pain felt. The pain will be evaluated with the Wong-Baker scale because facial scales are usually easier for the pediatric patient. All patients will be given a 2% junifen prescription with a weight-appropriate dose in case of postoperative pain. Parents will be advised that the prescription should only be used in cases of more severe pain, and will need to be noted on the data collection sheet. When these patients need taking medication, the marked value at the Wong-Baker station will not be taken into account. It will be noted that they are patients who have required medication. The operator will collect the data a week, coinciding with the stainless steel crown placement.

All the data obtained from the patients participating in the study will be recorded in two sheets: One for the operator, where the age, sex, the assigned study group, and all the variables studied will be recorded: instrumentation time, filler quality, operator's ease, behavior and anxiety of the patient; The other sheet will be for parents to record at home the postoperative pain felt by the child.

Statistical analysis will be caried out with Statgraphics Plus 5.1 version and Microsoft Excel.

An absolute and relative frequency shall be used in categorical variables to describe the data. For the numerical variables the mean and standard deviation or median and first and third quartile will be used, depending on whether the data is parametric or not. To be able to make comparisons between files, the Chi-square T will be used for categorical variables and the T-student or Mann Whitney test for numerical variables. The SHAPIRO WILKS contrast will be used to compare the normality of the data.

For this study, a 95% confidence interval is to be taken into account, taking as statistically significant reference a p value ≤ 0.05.

Being tested
instrumentation technique in pulpectomies
Keywords
Pulpectomy, Rotary files, Reciprocating files
Medical subject headings
Dental Pulp Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • instrumentation technique in pulpectomiesDevice

    comparison of three file systems for pulpectomies in primary molars

Study groups in NCT04793477
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
K files (Dentsply Caulk, Milfors, DE, USA)ExperimentalInstrumentation with manual files shall be performed with balanced forces (Roane) technique consist of placing the instrument as apically as it can go and then turning it clockwise (less than 180º). This is followed by a counterclockwise rotation (of at least 120º) with slight apical pressure. This is repeated until the desired working length is obtained.
Receives: Device: instrumentation technique in pulpectomies
VDW.ROTATE (VDW, Munich, Germany).ExperimentalInstrumentation with VDW.ROTATE files shall be performed with a glide path to WL using VDW.ROTATETM 15.04 until reaching working length (1.3cNm and 300-400 rpm), the next instrument in the sequence is VDW.ROTATETM 20.05 until reaching working length (2.1cNm and 300-400rpm). and finally instrument with VDW.ROTATETM 25.04 (2.3cNm and 300-400rpm)
Receives: Device: instrumentation technique in pulpectomies
Reciproc® blue (RCP, VDW, Munich, Germany)ExperimentalInstrumentation with Reciproc blue files shall be performed with only one file and move it in a pecking motion (the amplitude will not exceed 3mm). All the instruments shall be cleaned after 3 pecks.
Receives: Device: instrumentation technique in pulpectomies

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate instrumentation time with K, Rotate and Reciproc Blue files.

    Once the instrumentation and irrigation is finished, the operator will record the time elapsed from the beginning to the end of the instrumentation with the disinfection of the appropriate irrigant. The operator will record the minutes and seconds evaluated with an analog stopwatch.

    Measured: Immediately after instrumentation. From the beginning to the end of the instrumentation with the files

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Evaluate the postoperative pain with the K files, the Rotate and the Reciproc Blue.

    In the evaluation of postoperative pain, that same day the patient's parents will be given a questionnaire where they will have to write down at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours and a week later, the pain felt. The pain will be evaluated with the Wong-Baker scale because facial scales are usually easier for the pediatric patient.The scale goes from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst possible pain. All patients will be given a 2% junifen prescription with a weight-appropriate dose in case of postoperative pain. Parents will be advised that the prescription should only be used in cases of more severe pain, and will need to be noted on the data collection sheet. When these patients need taking medication, the marked value at the Wong-Baker station will not be taken into account. It will be noted that they are patients who have required medication.

    Measured: at 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 hours and a week later

  2. Evaluate the quality of the filling of the duct without the need of any auxiliary elements with the files K, the Rotate and the Reciproc Blue.

    A periapical radiography will be done to the patient. With the final periapical radiography, a researcher blinded to the study groups, will evaluate the quality of the seal without the need for auxiliary elements. The filling will be evaluated if it's optimal, under-filled, over-filled or with the presence of gaps.

    Measured: Immediately after the procedure

  3. Evaluate the child's behavior comparing to some previous restorative treatment with K, Rotate and Reciproc Blue files.

    At the end of the treatment the operator will evaluate the behavior of the child with the Frankl scale where 1 is very uncooperative and 4 is very collaborative; and the operator will see if it is similar to the behavior of previous visits with conservative treatment.

    Measured: Immediately after the procedure

  4. Evaluate the child's heart rate during instrumentation with K, Rotate and Reciproc Blue files.

    The operator will use a pulse oximeter (digital Onyx, NONIN, Plymouth, MN, USA). The child's heart rate will be evaluated in the following moments: 3 minutes before the application of topical anesthesia, at the topical anesthesia aplication, during the application of the local anesthetic, when the rubber dam is placed, during the instrumentation and removal of coronal pulp tissue, during the instrumentation with each file system, and finally when the rubber dam is removed. The average heart rate will be determined for each period by a set of values in a period of 1 minute.

    Measured: During one week. Evaluation 3 minutes before topical anesthesia, topical anesthesia, local anesthesia, rubber dam, caries removal and coronal pulp tissue elimination, duct instrumentation, rubber dam removed.

  5. Evaluate the operator ease during instrumentation with K, Rotate and Reciproc Blue files.

    To determine the ease of operation, the researcher use a numerical scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means very easy to use and 10 very difficult. It will be taken into account that if there are more than one operator, they have the same acquired skills and the same familiarity with the file systems used

    Measured: Immediately after the procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Mar 2021
  2. Study start1 May 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04793477
Sponsor's protocol ID
UIC-ODP-LIMAS
Status last verified
Apr 2024
First submitted
29 Jan 2021
Last updated
5 Apr 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing instrumentation technique in pulpectomies in people with Pulp Disease, Dental, run by Universitat Internacional de Catalunya at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Apr 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Francisco Guinot Jimeno, DDS, MsC (935042000, fguinot@uic.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate instrumentation time with K, Rotate and Reciproc Blue files. (time frame: Immediately after instrumentation. From the beginning to the end of the instrumentation with the files). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Apr 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in