Breast CancerAURORANCT04795349
New Techniques to evAlUate Response to neOadjuvant Treatments in bReast cAncer (AURORA)
A study testing Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is well established. Increasing rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) has increased de-escalation of surgical techniques. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2020to Dec 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women with Pathologic diagnosis of breast cancer with indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Who cannot join
- Breast cancer recurrence
- Other synchronic tumour.
- Inflammatory cancer.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Clínica Universidad de Navarra
Madrid, 28027
Carolina Sobrido, MD, PhD, +34948296666 ext. 6022, csobrido@unav.es
Carolina Sobrido, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: New Techniques to evAlUate Response to neOadjuvant Treatments in bReast cAncer: Can Breast Surgery be Avoided
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is well established. Increasing rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) has increased de-escalation of surgical techniques. The objective of the study is to evaluate new radiologic techniques that can accurately detect complete response in order to eliminate breast surgery. . . Currently, there are several imaging techniques for NAC response assessment (magnetic resonance imaging -MRI-, mammography and ultrasound), with good correlation in partial response, but they lack power in predicting complete pathological response. The investigators propose to use IVIM (Intravoxel incoherent motion), Kurtosis (DKI by Diffusion Kurtosis imaging) and diffusion tensor image (DTI) in MRI, contrast enhancement mammography and shear wave elastography for the evaluation of the response to systemic treatment in breast cancer patients. In order to validate the technique, in those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a vacuum-assisted biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen. So the investigators can evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, can be spared breast surgery.
Read the detailed description
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is well established. In inoperable patients at the time of diagnosis, the goal of NAC is to achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) which has shown that it improves disease-free survival when compared to those cases with residual tumoral cells. Detection of the presence of residual disease is crucial for surgical planning; the ultimate goal would be to avoid surgery in those patients who achieve a pCR, though nowadays validated techniques with power enough to detect this residual disease are lacking.
Currently, several imaging techniques for NAC response assessment are being used (magnetic resonance imaging -MRI-, mammography and ultrasound), with good correlation in partial response, but they lack power in predicting complete pathological response; among them, nowadays the most accurate is MRI. In recent years, the use of the diffusion-enhanced images have been proposed for the quantitative characterization and for helping to improve the specificity of dynamic contrast study.
The investigators propose to use a bi-exponential model, IVIM (Intravoxel incoherent motion), which differentiates between microperfusion used by microvascular blood flow from the diffusion of water. Kurtosis (DKI by Diffusion Kurtosis imaging) which quantifies the deviation from the Gaussian pattern and diffusion tensor image (DTI) which provides information on the microstructure and pathophysiology tumor, presenting a statistically significant relationship with tumor cellularity. Preliminary studies have reported promising results for the evaluation of the early response to systemic treatment in breast cancer patients. Its utility for NAC response assessment in these patients will be analysed.
Recent studies have evaluated the application of contrast mammography in the assessment of the response to NAC, with MRI-like results. It is a faster and cheaper technique compared to MRI radiological evaluation of the response after NAC through this technique will be assessed and compared its results with the different techniques used in previous studies / in daily practice.
Shear wave elastography is a very useful tool for the quantitative assessment of the tissue hardness that is widely used for differentiating benign lesions from malignant ones. Nowadays some studies are investigating its usefulness in the assessment of the radiological evaluation after NAC, with promising results in terms of early evaluation. In this study, the elastography will be performed on pre surgical evaluation and its correlation with pathological anatomy.
In order to validate the technique, in those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a stereotactic biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen. If the false negative rate of the presurgical assessment including the biopsy are below 5%, patients could spare surgery when there is a complete radiological response. Objectives :
To evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, in this setting can be spared breast surgery. . - To determine if IVIM, KURTOSIS or DTI diffusion sequences in MRI can assess the response to NAC better than conventional sequences and, thus, be able to avoid the use of intravenous contrast in the MRI study in the future. - To determine whether the study of breast elastography with shear wave technology, is more sensitive or specific in the detection of residual tumor after NAC in breast cancer. - To determining whether contrast enhanced mammography helps us to assess the response to NAC in breast cancer, compared to MRI standard practice.
The expected results are:
False negative rate of pre-surgery biopsy <5%. Achieve a sensitivity >80% for the radiological tests in predicting pCR for selected tumoral subtypes (Triple Negative and HER2 enriched tumors).
Noninferiority of contrast mammography compared to breast MRI in determining the response to NAC.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Contrast mammography, Elastography
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vacuum-assisted breast biopsyProcedure or surgery
In those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a stereotactic biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NAC Patients. | Experimental | Breast cancer patients after NAC completion, prior to surgery Receives: Procedure: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete Radiological Response
To evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, in this setting can be spared breast surgery.
Measured: 6 months after NAC initiation
Secondary outcomes (3)
MRI Measurements
To determine if IVIM, KURTOSIS or DTI diffusion sequences in MRI can assess the response to NAC better than conventional sequences and, thus, be able to avoid the use of intravenous contrast in the MRI study in the future.
Measured: 6 months after NAC initiation
Elastography
To determine whether the study of breast elastography with shear wave technology, is more sensitive or specific in the detection of residual tumor after NAC in breast cancer.
Measured: 6 months after NAC initiation
MRI Comparison
To determining whether contrast enhanced mammography helps us to assess the response to NAC in breast cancer, compared to MRI standard practice.
Measured: 6 months after NAC initiation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Dec 2020
- Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04795349
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AURORA
- Acronym
- AURORA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2021
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Heil J, Kuerer HM, Pfob A, Rauch G, Sinn HP, Golatta M, Liefers GJ, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challenges. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.012.
PubMed 31912797Croshaw R, Shapiro-Wright H, Svensson E, Erb K, Julian T. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3160-3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1919-5. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
PubMed 21947594Marinovich ML, Houssami N, Macaskill P, Sardanelli F, Irwig L, Mamounas EP, von Minckwitz G, Brennan ME, Ciatto S. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 6;105(5):321-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs528. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
PubMed 23297042Sun K, Chen X, Chai W, Fei X, Fu C, Yan X, Zhan Y, Chen K, Shen K, Yan F. Breast Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Clinical-Pathologic Factors. Radiology. 2015 Oct;277(1):46-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141625. Epub 2015 May 4.
PubMed 25938679Furman-Haran E, Nissan N, Ricart-Selma V, Martinez-Rubio C, Degani H, Camps-Herrero J. Quantitative evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by diffusion tensor imaging: Initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1080-1090. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25855. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
PubMed 28901594Katyan A, Mittal MK, Mani C, Mandal AK. Strain wave elastography in response assessment to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Radiol. 2019 Jul;92(1099):20180515. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180515. Epub 2019 May 16.
PubMed 31045431
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- New Techniques to evAlUate Response to neOadjuvant Treatments in bReast cAncer: Can Breast Surgery be Avoided
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04795349
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AURORA / AURORA
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Contrast mammography, Elastography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de NavarraUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is well established. Increasing rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) has increased de-escalation of surgical techniques. The objective of the study is to evaluate new radiologic techniques that can accurately detect complete response in order to eliminate breast surgery. . . Currently, there are several imaging techniques for NAC response assessment (magnetic resonance imaging -MRI-, mammography and ultrasound), with good correlation in partial response, but they lack power in predicting complete pathological response. The investigators propose to use IVIM (Intravoxel incoherent motion), Kurtosis (DKI by Diffusion Kurtosis imaging) and diffusion tensor image (DTI) in MRI, contrast enhancement mammography and shear wave elastography for the evaluation of the response to systemic treatment in breast cancer patients. In order to validate the technique, in those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a vacuum-assisted biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen. So the investigators can evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, can be spared breast surgery.
Detailed description
The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer is well established. In inoperable patients at the time of diagnosis, the goal of NAC is to achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR) which has shown that it improves disease-free survival when compared to those cases with residual tumoral cells. Detection of the presence of residual disease is crucial for surgical planning; the ultimate goal would be to avoid surgery in those patients who achieve a pCR, though nowadays validated techniques with power enough to detect this residual disease are lacking.
Currently, several imaging techniques for NAC response assessment are being used (magnetic resonance imaging -MRI-, mammography and ultrasound), with good correlation in partial response, but they lack power in predicting complete pathological response; among them, nowadays the most accurate is MRI. In recent years, the use of the diffusion-enhanced images have been proposed for the quantitative characterization and for helping to improve the specificity of dynamic contrast study.
The investigators propose to use a bi-exponential model, IVIM (Intravoxel incoherent motion), which differentiates between microperfusion used by microvascular blood flow from the diffusion of water. Kurtosis (DKI by Diffusion Kurtosis imaging) which quantifies the deviation from the Gaussian pattern and diffusion tensor image (DTI) which provides information on the microstructure and pathophysiology tumor, presenting a statistically significant relationship with tumor cellularity. Preliminary studies have reported promising results for the evaluation of the early response to systemic treatment in breast cancer patients. Its utility for NAC response assessment in these patients will be analysed.
Recent studies have evaluated the application of contrast mammography in the assessment of the response to NAC, with MRI-like results. It is a faster and cheaper technique compared to MRI radiological evaluation of the response after NAC through this technique will be assessed and compared its results with the different techniques used in previous studies / in daily practice.
Shear wave elastography is a very useful tool for the quantitative assessment of the tissue hardness that is widely used for differentiating benign lesions from malignant ones. Nowadays some studies are investigating its usefulness in the assessment of the radiological evaluation after NAC, with promising results in terms of early evaluation. In this study, the elastography will be performed on pre surgical evaluation and its correlation with pathological anatomy.
In order to validate the technique, in those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a stereotactic biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen. If the false negative rate of the presurgical assessment including the biopsy are below 5%, patients could spare surgery when there is a complete radiological response. Objectives :
To evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, in this setting can be spared breast surgery. . - To determine if IVIM, KURTOSIS or DTI diffusion sequences in MRI can assess the response to NAC better than conventional sequences and, thus, be able to avoid the use of intravenous contrast in the MRI study in the future. - To determine whether the study of breast elastography with shear wave technology, is more sensitive or specific in the detection of residual tumor after NAC in breast cancer. - To determining whether contrast enhanced mammography helps us to assess the response to NAC in breast cancer, compared to MRI standard practice.
The expected results are:
False negative rate of pre-surgery biopsy <5%. Achieve a sensitivity >80% for the radiological tests in predicting pCR for selected tumoral subtypes (Triple Negative and HER2 enriched tumors).
Noninferiority of contrast mammography compared to breast MRI in determining the response to NAC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NAC Patients. | Experimental | Procedure: Vacuum-assisted breast biopsyBreast cancer patients after NAC completion, prior to surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Women with Pathologic diagnosis of breast cancer with indication of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Breast cancer recurrence
- Other synchronic tumour.
- Inflammatory cancer.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vacuum-assisted breast biopsyIn those patients with a radiological complete response by all the radiological imaging methods, a stereotactic biopsy will be performed before surgery. After that, a comparison will be done between the results of the pre surgical biopsy and the definitive pathology of the specimen. | Procedure or surgery | NAC Patients. |
Primary outcome
Complete Radiological Response
Time frame: 6 months after NAC initiation
To evaluate if patients with complete radiological response after NAC, in this setting can be spared breast surgery.
3 secondary outcomes
MRI Measurements
Time frame: 6 months after NAC initiation
Elastography
Time frame: 6 months after NAC initiation
MRI Comparison
Time frame: 6 months after NAC initiation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31912797Heil J, Kuerer HM, Pfob A, Rauch G, Sinn HP, Golatta M, Liefers GJ, Vrancken Peeters MJ. Eliminating the breast cancer surgery paradigm after neoadjuvant systemic therapy: current evidence and future challenges. Ann Oncol. 2020 Jan;31(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2019.10.012.
- Background: PubMed 21947594Croshaw R, Shapiro-Wright H, Svensson E, Erb K, Julian T. Accuracy of clinical examination, digital mammogram, ultrasound, and MRI in determining postneoadjuvant pathologic tumor response in operable breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Oct;18(11):3160-3. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1919-5. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
- Background: PubMed 23297042Marinovich ML, Houssami N, Macaskill P, Sardanelli F, Irwig L, Mamounas EP, von Minckwitz G, Brennan ME, Ciatto S. Meta-analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 6;105(5):321-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs528. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 25938679Sun K, Chen X, Chai W, Fei X, Fu C, Yan X, Zhan Y, Chen K, Shen K, Yan F. Breast Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with Clinical-Pathologic Factors. Radiology. 2015 Oct;277(1):46-55. doi: 10.1148/radiol.15141625. Epub 2015 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 28901594Furman-Haran E, Nissan N, Ricart-Selma V, Martinez-Rubio C, Degani H, Camps-Herrero J. Quantitative evaluation of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy by diffusion tensor imaging: Initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Apr;47(4):1080-1090. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25855. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 31045431Katyan A, Mittal MK, Mani C, Mandal AK. Strain wave elastography in response assessment to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Br J Radiol. 2019 Jul;92(1099):20180515. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180515. Epub 2019 May 16.
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in people with Breast Cancer, run by Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Carolina Sobrido, MD, PhD (+34948296666 ext. 6022, csobrido@unav.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete Radiological Response (time frame: 6 months after NAC initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04795349, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2021.