AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee ArthropathyNCT04796519

Comparison of Balance and Fall Risk in Unilateral and Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

A study testing Total knee arthroplasty in people with Knee Arthropathy, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Static or dynamic postural control cannot be fully restored in patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Moreover, deficits in balance and postural control may still be present in both extremity after TKA. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 46 to 82 years
Conditions the study is for
Knee Arthropathy
What is being tested?
Total knee arthroplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Apr 2019to 10 Oct 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 46 to 82 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age between 55 to 85 years, patients with bilateral osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4, patients capable of understanding verbal and written instructions.

Who cannot join

  • revision TKA surgery, American Society of Anesthesiologists score >3, neurologic compromise, psychiatric problems, regular hypnotic and/or anxiolytic medication usage, dementia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Pamukkale University

    Denizli, 20010

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: A Comparison of Balance and Fall Risk in Patients With Unilateral and Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

Static or dynamic postural control cannot be fully restored in patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Moreover, deficits in balance and postural control may still be present in both extremity after TKA. However, the contralateral knee OA grade, asymmetrical gait pattern, and postural sways still remain a risk factor for balance deficits and falls. Based on this rationale, the aim of this study is to evaluate the balance and fall risk before and after TKA in patients who suffered from bilateral knee osteoarthritis and to clarify the balance and fall risk difference between unilateral and bilateral TKA patients.

Read the detailed description

Falls are one of the leading causes of increased morbidity and mortality in the elderly population and are substantial contributor to increase healthcare cost burden. Pain, strength deficits, knee joint deformities, balance and proprioceptive impairments associated with severe knee OA, contribute to an increased risk of falling among elderly, and more than 50% of this population experience a fall each year. Static or dynamic postural control cannot be fully restored in patients with Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Moreover, deficits in balance and postural control may still be present in both extremity after TKA. Increased weight-bearing on the operative side after TKA and reduced weight-bearing weight in the contralateral osteoarthritic knee can reduce pain and improve balance-related functions. However, the contralateral knee OA grade, asymmetrical gait pattern, and postural sways still remain a risk factor for balance deficits and falls. Based on this rationale, the aim of this study is to evaluate the balance and fall risk before and after TKA in patients who suffered from bilateral knee osteoarthritis and to clarify the balance and fall risk difference between unilateral and bilateral TKA patients.

Being tested
Total knee arthroplasty
Keywords
fall risk, balance, total knee arthroplasty, function

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Total knee arthroplastyProcedure or surgery

    Surgical procedure

Study groups in NCT04796519
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Unilateral TKAExperimentalUnilateral total knee arthroplasty group (UTKA) consisted of patients who did not undergo a second TKA within 3 months of the first TKA
Receives: Procedure: Total knee arthroplasty
Bilateral TKAExperimentalbilateral total knee arthroplasty group (BTKA) were those who had a second TKA within 12 months after initial TKA
Receives: Procedure: Total knee arthroplasty

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fall risk evaluation

    Fall risk was evaluated using the Biodex Balance System SD (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., Shirley, NY, USA). The Fall Risk test was conducted to identify potential fall candidates. Test results are compared with age-related normative data.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Balance evaluation

    Balance (Postural Stability and Sensory Integration) was evaluated using the Biodex Balance System SD (Biodex Medical Systems Inc., Shirley, NY, USA). Postural Stability Test was applied to determine a patient's ability to maintain the centre of balance. Sensory Integration Test aims to evaluate the individual's ability to both integrate various senses to maintain balance and to compensate when one of these senses is missing. This test included four conditions: Eyes Open-Firm Surface, Eyes Closed-Firm Surface, Eyes Open-Foam Surface, and Eyes Closed-Foam Surface. Each assessment lasted 30 seconds, with 10 seconds of rest in between assessments.

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score

    It is a patient reported questionnaire that evaluates pain, stiffness, and physical function in patients with hip and knee OA. The index consists of 24 questions and is completed in less than 5 minutes. The scores of the questions range from 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) and the results are evaluated over 100 points (minimum score:0 and the maximum score:100). Higher scores indicates worst knee functions.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Quality of life measure

    Patients' quality of life were evaluated with Short Form-12 for seconder outcome. Higher scores indicates better quality of life.

    Measured: 3 months

  3. Sit-to-stand test

    The patient was seated in the middle of a chair with a height of 44 cm, with his back straight, arms crossed in front of his chest, and feet on the ground. The patient was asked to get up from the chair and sit down as much as the patient could for 30 seconds. The exact number of starts made formed the patient's score. Higher scores indicates better overall strength.

    Measured: 3 months

  4. 9-step stair climbing test

    The patient was asked to climb and descend the 9-step 16-20 centimeter ladder as quickly but safely as possible. The patient was allowed to use a handrail or a walking aid, and the method used was recorded. The test was started with the start command and the time stopped when the patient returned to the starting place. The patient was allowed to stop and rest when requested, but the duration was continued. The total time was recorded as a score. Lower scores indicates better knee functions.

    Measured: 3 months

  5. 40 m fast-paced walk test

    Patients were asked to walk along the 10-meter track without running but as fast as possible, turn around the cone at the finish, and complete the 40-meter total distance. After the patient passed the baseline in the last stage, the time was stopped and the total time was recorded. Lower scores indicates better walking capacity.

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Mar 2021
  2. Study start10 Apr 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion10 Oct 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04796519
Sponsor's protocol ID
Balance, Fall risk after TKA
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
4 Mar 2021
Last updated
15 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zora H, Gungor HR, Bayrak G, Savkin R, Buker N. Does mini-midvastus approach have an advantageous effect on rapid recovery protocols over medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty? Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(3):571-581. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.76387.

    PubMed 32962591
  • Vala CH, Karrholm J, Kanis JA, Johansson H, Sten S, Sundh V, Karlsson M, Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D. Risk for hip fracture before and after total knee replacement in Sweden. Osteoporos Int. 2020 May;31(5):887-895. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05241-x. Epub 2019 Dec 12.

    PubMed 31832694
  • Bakirhan S, Angin S, Karatosun V, Unver B, Gunal I. Physical performance parameters during standing up in patients with unilateral and bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(5):367-72. doi: 10.3944/aott.2012.2684.

    PubMed 23268822

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Total knee arthroplasty in people with Knee Arthropathy, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fall risk evaluation (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04796519, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in