Prostate CancerFLAPPNCT04797078
US/MRI Fusion Local Anestesia TransPerineal Prostate Biopsies for Detection of Prostate Cancer
A study testing Transperineal biopsy and Transrectal biopsy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Karolinska Institutet.
Trial summary
We are conducting a randomised trial comparing outcomes of transperineal prostate biopsies under free-hand software assisted MRI/US fusion with transrectal biopsy guide software assisted MRI/US fusion. Primary outcome is the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Transperineal biopsy and Transrectal biopsy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2023to 15 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Signed written informed consent to participate
- Be aged 18 years and over
- An understanding of the Swedish language sufficient to understand written and verbal information about the trial and consent process
- Be suited and fit for either procedure (transrectal/transperineal)
- Be suitable for a prostate biopsy and clinically due to have a biopsy for diagnostic purpose (following indications for biopsy)
- Biopsy naïve
Show all 9Show fewer
- Men on active surveillance (AS)
- Rebiopsy
- Be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and completion of study questionnaires
Who cannot join
- Severe illness such as metastatic cancers, sever cardio-vascular disease or dementia
- Men with contraindication for a prostate biopsy
- Men without suspect lesions on MRI
- Previous TURP or other BPH treatment (HoLEP, PostaLUND, water-vaporization) is permitted, but men who have had HIFU, cryo, IRE (irreversible electroporation), photodynamic, or microwave therapy to the prostate will not be included.
- Previous treatment with BCG for bladder cancer
- Men who are unable to undergo transrectal ultrasonography
Show all 9Show fewer
- Men who have had previous radiation therapy to the pelvis
- Men not tolerating ciprofloxacin
- Unable to lie down with legs in a stirrup for at least 45 minutes, as assessed by a clinician
About this study
Official title: Prospective Randomized Controlled Study: Free-Hand Transperineal vs. Transrectal Systematic and Image Fusion Targeted Biopsies Under Local Anesthesia Comparing Rate of Significant Cancer Detection and Complication Rates
We are conducting a randomised trial comparing outcomes of transperineal prostate biopsies under free-hand software assisted MRI/US fusion with transrectal biopsy guide software assisted MRI/US fusion. Primary outcome is the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes is rate of complications including infection and sepsis, as well as feasibility and patient tolerability.
Read the detailed description
Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer death among men in the Western world. Early detection of prostate cancer has been shown to decrease mortality. When a test for prostate cancer yields an elevated risk of prostate cancer, tissue sampling from the prostate is warranted. The common practice is to acquire these biopsies has been via transrectal biopsies under ultrasound guidance (TRUL-biopsies). A low estimate of the risk of hospital-requiring infection is 5%, yielding unnecessary and costly sepsis cases.
In addition to suffering and loss of production, as well as healthcare costs, in a material from Taiwan, the mortality risk of biopsy-induced sepsis has been estimated at 0.13%. In a publication from Norway, it is estimated that infection complications from tissue sampling of the prostate cause 10 deaths per year (population 5 million).
Previous international studies show that the risk of infection with bacteria from the gut can be completely eliminated by taking the tissue samples through the skin of the perineum, transperineal biopsies (TPb), with guidance from transrectal ultrasound. This method is well established for systematic biopsies and has been proven safe in large series.
Studies have showed how multiparametric magnetic-resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate accurately can identify lesions harboring clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC, defined as ISUP Gleason Group (GG) ≥ 2)3. Prostate MRI reading and reporting according to the PI-RADS protocol is widely accepted and recommended.
The image material from the MRI can be used to produce maps of the prostate used for tissue sampling of suspected areas. This is referred to as MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy, or targeted biopsies (TBx). Regions of interest are marked as Lesions. Several studies have shown improved cancer detection using MRI and fusion targeted biopsies in clinical-practice cohorts 5,6 78 MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsies can be performed in a variety of ways, where software assisted transrectal biopsies has gained the most attention during the last few years, earning to development of equipment more readily available to the urologist as well as a rise in the quantity and quality of prostate MRI's.
The combination of transperineal prostate biopsies and targeted biopsies can be done with a rigid system of stepper and brachy-grid guiding. Recently, several systems for free-hand transperineal biopsies have been introduced, but data and recommendations on biopsy strategies and accuracy is lacking. The detection rates of cancer has not been evaluated in In comparison with transrectal prostate biopsy, transperineal prostate biopsy has the advantage of better sampling from the anterior area of the prostate, an area that is technically more challenging to sample with the transrectal approach. Other advantages of the transperineal route is believed to be the low risk of infection, and no risk ofrectal bleeding. The main challenge associated with the transperineal method is patient discomfort and pain management.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Transperineal biopsy, Transrectal biopsy
- Keywords
- transperineal biopsy, prostate cancer detection
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transperineal biopsyProcedure or surgery
Transperineal free hand MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy
Transrectal biopsyProcedure or surgery
Transrectal MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transrectal fusion biopsies of the prostate | Active comparator | 1. Transrectal approach, patient in left lateral position, local anestesia 10ml lidocaine 1% at prostate base laterally and apex if indicated.
2. MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies with 4 biopsy cores per lesion, where clinically indicated. 18G biopsy needle.
3. Standard 12-core template for systematic biopsies. 18G biopsy needle.
4. Antibiotic prophylaxis with 750mg ciprofloxaicin, single dose p.o. Receives: Procedure: Transrectal biopsy |
| Transperineal free hand fusion biopsies of the prostate | Experimental | Men randomized to the experimental arm undergoes free-hand targeted transperineal fusion biopsies as defined below.
1. Patient is placed supine in the lithotomy-position. The perineal area is prepared with chlorhexidine 0,5ml/ml.
2. Ropivacain 7,5mg/ml is used as an anesthetic agent. Up to 40ml's (equivalent to 300mg) can be used to anestitize the skin, caudal and cranial part of the urogenital diaphragm and periprostatic tissue.
3. Free-hand MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies with at least 4 biopsy cores per lesion. Coaxial technique with 18G biopsy needle.
4. 10-12 Systematic biopsies according to the modified Barzell 12-core template.
5. No antibiotic profylaxis unless warranted by immunosuppression, previous sepsis or urinary tract infection. Receives: Procedure: Transperineal biopsy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of prostate cancer detection
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as any ISUP >2). Per PIRADS grade group.
Measured: Data available at completed inclusion
Secondary outcomes (2)
Rate of urinary tract infection and sepsis
Rate of infectious complications (defined as treatment with antibiotics) within 30 days after intervention. Stratified on infections requiring hospitalization.
Measured: Data available at completed inclusion + 30 days
Individual complications requiring hospital admission.
Any complication after intervention requiring hotspital admission within 30 days
Measured: Data available at completed inclusion + 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Nov 2025 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Planning halted due to changes in the research group constellation.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- St Goran's Hospital, GHP Urologi Odenplan, Urologifocus Stockholm
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tobias Nordström, Karolinska Institutet
- Investigators
- Tobias Nordström, PhD, Principal investigator, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04797078
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STHLM3FLAPP
- Acronym
- FLAPP
- Status last verified
- Mar 2023
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
PubMed 31493960Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
PubMed 28498624Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
PubMed 30898406Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PubMed 30082150Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
PubMed 31022301Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
PubMed 28110982Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
PubMed 29552975Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):876-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
PubMed 23787356Grummet J, Gorin MA, Popert R, O'Brien T, Lamb AD, Hadaschik B, Radtke JP, Wagenlehner F, Baco E, Moore CM, Emberton M, George AK, Davis JW, Szabo RJ, Buckley R, Loblaw A, Allaway M, Kastner C, Briers E, Royce PL, Frydenberg M, Murphy DG, Woo HH. "TREXIT 2020": why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Mar;23(1):62-65. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0204-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 31932659Kum F, Elhage O, Maliyil J, Wong K, Faure Walker N, Kulkarni M, Namdarian B, Challacombe B, Cathcart P, Popert R. Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting. BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):244-252. doi: 10.1111/bju.14620. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
PubMed 30431694Kuru TH, Wadhwa K, Chang RT, Echeverria LM, Roethke M, Polson A, Rottenberg G, Koo B, Lawrence EM, Seidenader J, Gnanapragasam V, Axell R, Roth W, Warren A, Doble A, Muir G, Popert R, Schlemmer HP, Hadaschik BA, Kastner C. Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg Study Group for Enhanced Prostate Diagnostics. BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):568-77. doi: 10.1111/bju.12132. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
PubMed 23773772Chiu PK, Lo KL, Teoh JY, Ma SF, Leung CH, Wong HF, Li KM, Sae-Lo K, Kwok SW, Li SY, Yee CH, Hou SM, Ng CF. Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):431-438. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00293-1. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
PubMed 32999465Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, Delahunt B, Srigley JR, Humphrey PA; Grading Committee. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
PubMed 26492179
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Randomized Controlled Study: Free-Hand Transperineal vs. Transrectal Systematic and Image Fusion Targeted Biopsies Under Local Anesthesia Comparing Rate of Significant Cancer Detection and Complication Rates
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04797078
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLAPP / STHLM3FLAPP
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- transperineal biopsy, prostate cancer detection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Planning halted due to changes in the research group constellation.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- St Goran's Hospital, GHP Urologi Odenplan, Urologifocus Stockholm
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2023 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Nov 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We are conducting a randomised trial comparing outcomes of transperineal prostate biopsies under free-hand software assisted MRI/US fusion with transrectal biopsy guide software assisted MRI/US fusion. Primary outcome is the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Secondary outcomes is rate of complications including infection and sepsis, as well as feasibility and patient tolerability.
Detailed description
Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer death among men in the Western world. Early detection of prostate cancer has been shown to decrease mortality. When a test for prostate cancer yields an elevated risk of prostate cancer, tissue sampling from the prostate is warranted. The common practice is to acquire these biopsies has been via transrectal biopsies under ultrasound guidance (TRUL-biopsies). A low estimate of the risk of hospital-requiring infection is 5%, yielding unnecessary and costly sepsis cases.
In addition to suffering and loss of production, as well as healthcare costs, in a material from Taiwan, the mortality risk of biopsy-induced sepsis has been estimated at 0.13%. In a publication from Norway, it is estimated that infection complications from tissue sampling of the prostate cause 10 deaths per year (population 5 million).
Previous international studies show that the risk of infection with bacteria from the gut can be completely eliminated by taking the tissue samples through the skin of the perineum, transperineal biopsies (TPb), with guidance from transrectal ultrasound. This method is well established for systematic biopsies and has been proven safe in large series.
Studies have showed how multiparametric magnetic-resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate accurately can identify lesions harboring clinically significant prostate cancer (csPC, defined as ISUP Gleason Group (GG) ≥ 2)3. Prostate MRI reading and reporting according to the PI-RADS protocol is widely accepted and recommended.
The image material from the MRI can be used to produce maps of the prostate used for tissue sampling of suspected areas. This is referred to as MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsy, or targeted biopsies (TBx). Regions of interest are marked as Lesions. Several studies have shown improved cancer detection using MRI and fusion targeted biopsies in clinical-practice cohorts 5,6 78 MRI/ultrasound fusion biopsies can be performed in a variety of ways, where software assisted transrectal biopsies has gained the most attention during the last few years, earning to development of equipment more readily available to the urologist as well as a rise in the quantity and quality of prostate MRI's.
The combination of transperineal prostate biopsies and targeted biopsies can be done with a rigid system of stepper and brachy-grid guiding. Recently, several systems for free-hand transperineal biopsies have been introduced, but data and recommendations on biopsy strategies and accuracy is lacking. The detection rates of cancer has not been evaluated in In comparison with transrectal prostate biopsy, transperineal prostate biopsy has the advantage of better sampling from the anterior area of the prostate, an area that is technically more challenging to sample with the transrectal approach. Other advantages of the transperineal route is believed to be the low risk of infection, and no risk ofrectal bleeding. The main challenge associated with the transperineal method is patient discomfort and pain management.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transrectal fusion biopsies of the prostate | Active comparator | Procedure: Transrectal biopsy1. Transrectal approach, patient in left lateral position, local anestesia 10ml lidocaine 1% at prostate base laterally and apex if indicated. 2. MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies with 4 biopsy cores per lesion, where clinically indicated. 18G biopsy needle. 3. Standard 12-core template for systematic biopsies. 18G biopsy needle. 4. Antibiotic prophylaxis with 750mg ciprofloxaicin, single dose p.o. |
| Transperineal free hand fusion biopsies of the prostate | Experimental | Procedure: Transperineal biopsyMen randomized to the experimental arm undergoes free-hand targeted transperineal fusion biopsies as defined below. 1. Patient is placed supine in the lithotomy-position. The perineal area is prepared with chlorhexidine 0,5ml/ml. 2. Ropivacain 7,5mg/ml is used as an anesthetic agent. Up to 40ml's (equivalent to 300mg) can be used to anestitize the skin, caudal and cranial part of the urogenital diaphragm and periprostatic tissue. 3. Free-hand MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies with at least 4 biopsy cores per lesion. Coaxial technique with 18G biopsy needle. 4. 10-12 Systematic biopsies according to the modified Barzell 12-core template. 5. No antibiotic profylaxis unless warranted by immunosuppression, previous sepsis or urinary tract infection. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Signed written informed consent to participate
- Be aged 18 years and over
- An understanding of the Swedish language sufficient to understand written and verbal information about the trial and consent process
- Be suited and fit for either procedure (transrectal/transperineal)
- Be suitable for a prostate biopsy and clinically due to have a biopsy for diagnostic purpose (following indications for biopsy)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Severe illness such as metastatic cancers, sever cardio-vascular disease or dementia
- Men with contraindication for a prostate biopsy
- Men without suspect lesions on MRI
- Previous TURP or other BPH treatment (HoLEP, PostaLUND, water-vaporization) is permitted, but men who have had HIFU, cryo, IRE (irreversible electroporation), photodynamic, or microwave therapy to the prostate will not be included.
- Previous treatment with BCG for bladder cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transperineal biopsyTransperineal free hand MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy | Procedure or surgery | Transperineal free hand fusion biopsies of the prostate |
| Transrectal biopsyTransrectal MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy | Procedure or surgery | Transrectal fusion biopsies of the prostate |
Primary outcome
Rate of prostate cancer detection
Time frame: Data available at completed inclusion
Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as any ISUP >2). Per PIRADS grade group.
2 secondary outcomes
Rate of urinary tract infection and sepsis
Time frame: Data available at completed inclusion + 30 days
Individual complications requiring hospital admission.
Time frame: Data available at completed inclusion + 30 days
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2023.
- Background: PubMed 31493960Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 28498624Chiu PK, Alberts AR, Venderbos LDF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ. Additional benefit of using a risk-based selection for prostate biopsy: an analysis of biopsy complications in the Rotterdam section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. BJU Int. 2017 Sep;120(3):394-400. doi: 10.1111/bju.13913. Epub 2017 Jun 5.
- Background: PubMed 30898406Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, Tempany CM, Choyke PL, Cornud F, Margolis DJ, Thoeny HC, Verma S, Barentsz J, Weinreb JC. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 30082150Alberts AR, Roobol MJ, Verbeek JFM, Schoots IG, Chiu PK, Osses DF, Tijsterman JD, Beerlage HP, Mannaerts CK, Schimmoller L, Albers P, Arsov C. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators. Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):310-318. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.07.031. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 31022301Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 28110982Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, Collaco-Moraes Y, Ward K, Hindley RG, Freeman A, Kirkham AP, Oldroyd R, Parker C, Emberton M; PROMIS study group. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32401-1. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
- Background: PubMed 29552975Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, Briganti A, Budaus L, Hellawell G, Hindley RG, Roobol MJ, Eggener S, Ghei M, Villers A, Bladou F, Villeirs GM, Virdi J, Boxler S, Robert G, Singh PB, Venderink W, Hadaschik BA, Ruffion A, Hu JC, Margolis D, Crouzet S, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Pinto P, Gill I, Allen C, Giganti F, Freeman A, Morris S, Punwani S, Williams NR, Brew-Graves C, Deeks J, Takwoingi Y, Emberton M, Moore CM; PRECISION Study Group Collaborators. MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801993. Epub 2018 Mar 18.
- Background: PubMed 23787356Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, Catto J, Emberton M, Nam R, Rosario DJ, Scattoni V, Lotan Y. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. Eur Urol. 2013 Dec;64(6):876-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.049. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
- Background: PubMed 31932659Grummet J, Gorin MA, Popert R, O'Brien T, Lamb AD, Hadaschik B, Radtke JP, Wagenlehner F, Baco E, Moore CM, Emberton M, George AK, Davis JW, Szabo RJ, Buckley R, Loblaw A, Allaway M, Kastner C, Briers E, Royce PL, Frydenberg M, Murphy DG, Woo HH. "TREXIT 2020": why the time to abandon transrectal prostate biopsy starts now. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Mar;23(1):62-65. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0204-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30431694Kum F, Elhage O, Maliyil J, Wong K, Faure Walker N, Kulkarni M, Namdarian B, Challacombe B, Cathcart P, Popert R. Initial outcomes of local anaesthetic freehand transperineal prostate biopsies in the outpatient setting. BJU Int. 2020 Feb;125(2):244-252. doi: 10.1111/bju.14620. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 23773772Kuru TH, Wadhwa K, Chang RT, Echeverria LM, Roethke M, Polson A, Rottenberg G, Koo B, Lawrence EM, Seidenader J, Gnanapragasam V, Axell R, Roth W, Warren A, Doble A, Muir G, Popert R, Schlemmer HP, Hadaschik BA, Kastner C. Definitions of terms, processes and a minimum dataset for transperineal prostate biopsies: a standardization approach of the Ginsburg Study Group for Enhanced Prostate Diagnostics. BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):568-77. doi: 10.1111/bju.12132. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
- Background: PubMed 32999465Chiu PK, Lo KL, Teoh JY, Ma SF, Leung CH, Wong HF, Li KM, Sae-Lo K, Kwok SW, Li SY, Yee CH, Hou SM, Ng CF. Sectoral cancer detection and tolerability of freehand transperineal prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Jun;24(2):431-438. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-00293-1. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tobias Nordström, PhD principal investigator
Karolinska Institutet
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transperineal biopsy and Transrectal biopsy in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Karolinska Institutet.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of prostate cancer detection (time frame: Data available at completed inclusion). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04797078, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2023.