AzTrials
AzTrials

Vesico-Ureteral RefluxNCT04798443

Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Versus Ureteral Reimplantation In Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux

A study testing subureteral endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (Dexell) and open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir) in people with Vesico-Ureteral Reflux, run by Elsayed Salih.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the outcomes of Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dexell®) and extravesical reimplantation (Lich- Gregoir) procedures for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) grades III and IV in children. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 16 years
Conditions the study is for
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
What is being tested?
subureteral endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (Dexell) and open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
4 Jun 2015to 14 Jun 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children over one year with primary Vesico-Ureteral reflux grade III and IV.

Who cannot join

  • Secondary Vesico-Ureteral reflux.
  • Active urinary tract infection
  • Untreated voiding dysfunction.

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Subureteral Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid and Lich-Gregoir Ureteral Reimplantation In the Treatment of Pediatric Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux: Prospective Randomized Study

In this study, the investigators aim to compare the outcomes of Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dexell®) and extravesical reimplantation (Lich- Gregoir) procedures for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) grades III and IV in children.

Read the detailed description

A total of 60 patients with 93 renal unites were prospectively enrolled in a comparative intervention study. Patients were randomly allocated by simple randomization at a 1: 1 ratio into 2 groups, where dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dexell) injection was used in Group A (30 patients with 45 renal units) and Lich-Gregoir in Group B (30 patients with 48 renal units).

Children over 1 year with primary VUR grade III \& IV based on recent VCUG included in the study.

This study and method of attaining consent were approved by clinical research and ethical committee of our department. Written consents were taken from patients' guardians involved in the study. the investigators offered all of patients with symptomatic VUR entry into a prospective protocol between June 2015 and February 2018 at the Urology Department, Al Hussein University Hospital, Al-Azhar University.

Surgical Technique:

  1. dextranomer/hyaluronic acid injection: The endoscopic procedure was done under general anesthesia, and all patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. the investigators used the subureteral injection technique (STING), as described by O'Donnell and Puri . The volume of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid was injected until ureteral orifice collapse in all patients. The needle was held for 30 s.
  2. ureteral reimplantation (lich-gregoir): The juxtavesical ureter is dissected and a submucosal groove is created extending laterally from the ureteral hiatus along the course of the ureter. The ureter is placed in the groove and the detrusor is closed over the ureter with ureteric stent fixation for 21 days. Urethral catheter for bladder drainage for 3-5 days.

Postoperative Care All children were maintained on prophylaxis until resolution of reflux documented on the VCUG. Patients were assessed by general examination, serial urinalysis and urine C.S. renal ultrasound at 1,3 months and at 1 year after the procedure and a VCUG at 3-6 months. MRU at 1 year. DMSA scintigraphy were done at 6 months after the procedure. the investigators analyzed the outcome in these 2 surgical groups in terms of success rate at short-term follow-up, contralateral reflux, de novo hydronephrosis, urinary tract infections and complications.

The investigators considered that a patient was cured from reflux when there was no VUR on VCUG.

Being tested
subureteral endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (Dexell), open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir)
Keywords
Extravesical Reimplantation, Subureteral Injection, Vesico-ureteral reflux, Endoscopic, Dexell
Medical subject headings
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • subureteral endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (Dexell)Procedure or surgery

    Also called Dexell subureteral injection

    The subureteral endoscopic injection was done under general anesthesia. the investigators used the subureteral injection technique (STING), as described by O'Donnell and Puri. The volume of Dexell was injected until ureteral orifice collapse in all patients. The needle was held for 30 s.

  • open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir)Procedure or surgery

    Also called extra-vesical (Lich-Gregoir) ureteroneocystostomy

    The juxtavesical ureter is dissected by open surgery and a submucosal groove is created extending laterally from the ureteral hiatus along the course of the ureter. The ureter is placed in the groove and the detrusor is closed over the ureter with ureteric stent fixation for 21 days. the surgical wound is closed in layers. Urethral catheter for bladder drainage for 3-5 days.

Study groups in NCT04798443
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Subureteral endoscopic injectionActive comparatorThe endoscopic procedure was done under general anesthesia, and all patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. We used the subureteral injection technique (STING), as described by O'Donnell and Puri (1984). The volume of Dx/HA was injected until ureteral orifice collapse in all patients. The needle was held for 30 s.
Receives: Procedure: subureteral endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (Dexell)
open ureteral reimplantation (lich-gregoir)Active comparatorextravesical ureteral reimplantation (lich-gregoir) by open surgery
Receives: Procedure: open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. surgical success

    The outcomes between both groups were analyzed according to surgical success rate. The child was considered to have been cured when there was no reflux on VCUG.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. complications

    contralateral reflux, de novo hydronephrosis, urinary tract infections and other complications.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. median costs

    median costs in US dollars compared between two groups

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Mar 2021
  2. Study start4 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion5 Aug 2018
  4. Study completion14 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04798443
Sponsor's protocol ID
Uro-surg./R/2015/0011
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
9 Mar 2021
Last updated
15 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: all IPD that underlie results in the publication including the Study Protocol Statistical Analysis Plan, Clinical Study Report, and Analytic Code.

Publications

  • Garcia-Aparicio L, Rovira J, Blazquez-Gomez E, Garcia-Garcia L, Gimenez-Llort A, Rodo J, Morales L. Randomized clinical trial comparing endoscopic treatment with dextranomer hyaluronic acid copolymer and Cohen's ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: long-term results. J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Aug;9(4):483-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

    PubMed 23602843
  • Karakus SC, User IR, Kilic BD, Akcaer V, Ceylan H, Ozokutan BH. The comparison of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid and polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymers in endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1496-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.092. Epub 2016 Mar 12.

    PubMed 27061353
  • Salih EM, Eldamanhory H, Selmy GI, Galal HA. Comparison of Subureteral Endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid and Lich-Gregoir Ureteral Reimplantation in the Treatment of Pediatric Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Prospective Randomized Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):719-723. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0973. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

    PubMed 33751917

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing subureteral endoscopic Injection of Dextranomer/Hyaluronic acid (Dexell) and open ureteral reimplantation (Lich-Gregoir) in people with Vesico-Ureteral Reflux, run by Elsayed Salih.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

surgical success (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04798443, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in