Diabetic Foot UlcerPhase 1/2REVERSENCT04803708
Bacteriophage Therapy TP-102 in Diabetic Foot Ulcers
A Phase 1/2 study testing TP-102 in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection, run by Technophage, SA at 2 sites in Israel.
Trial summary
This is a Phase I/IIa trial designed to evaluate topical bacteriophage therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection, Staphylococcus Aureus Infection
- What is being tested?
- TP-102
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesIsrael
- Study dates
- 22 Mar 2021to 5 Sep 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Both cohorts:
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤10, 5%
- Suitable physical and mental health as determined by the investigator based on medical history and general physical examination.
- Subjects must be medically stable based on clinical laboratory tests, medical history and vital signs. Clinical laboratory tests should be within normal values or not clinically significant, unless directly related to the condition of diabetes.
- Female subjects must fulfil one of the following criteria:
- At least 1 year post-menopausal (amenorrhea >12 months prior to screening);
Show all 16Show fewer
- Surgically sterile (bilateral oophorectomy or hysterectomy);
- If of childbearing potential, must agree to use a highly effective method of birth control from screening until 14 days after the last administration of IP.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
- Male subjects with a female partner of child-bearing potential or pregnant partner must agree to use a condom from screening until 14 days after the last IP application.
- ICF signed voluntarily before any study-related procedure is performed, indicating that the subject understands the purpose of, and procedures required for the study and is willing to participate in the study.
- Part A:
- Non-infected diabetic foot ulcer perfusion grade 1, depth grade 1 and infection grade 1 according to PEDIS classification.
- Part B
- Infected diabetic foot ulcer meeting perfusion grade 1 or 2, depth grade 1 or 2 and infection 2 or 3,except if presence of abscess, fasciitis, osteomyelitis, and septic arthritis, according to PEDIS definition.
- Infected with at least one bacterial strain susceptible to bacteriophage cocktail assessed from culture.
Who cannot join
- Both cohorts:
- Study ulcer less than 2 cm away from other ulcers in case of multiple ulcers.
- History in the 5 previous years of any cancer requiring systemic chemotherapy or radiation.
- A condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise the well being of the subject or course of the study, or prevent the subject from meeting or performing any study requirements.
- Immunocompromised subjects due to illness, organ transplant, or immune suppressive therapies (e.g. oral or parental corticosteroids, methotrexate, immune modulators) 3 months prior to screening. Ad hoc low dose inhaled corticosteroids or topical corticosteroids are not allowed from 2 weeks prior to randomization.
- Being pregnant or breastfeeding.
Show all 18Show fewer
- Currently participating in another clinical trial or having participated in a previous clinical trial with receipt of an investigational product within 30 days of the first administration of IP or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer.
- Subjects that, in the opinion of the Investigator or their treating physician, are dependent of the following therapies for their ulcer treatment:
- Topical antimicrobial treatment (including isobetadine gel/dressing, silver nitrate dressing, topical antibiotic)
- Enzymatic, autolytic, maggot debridement
- Any active wound healing products (e.g., Dermagraft, Apligraf, Regranex, or Tegaderm hydrogel or others.)
- Physical or cleansing modalities, antiseptics, corticosteroids, growth factors, solutions other than sterile normal saline and ulcer treatments.
- Part A:
- Clinically infected ulcers
- Part B:
- Suspected or confirmed abscess, fasciitis, osteomyelitis or septic arthritis.
- Subjects meeting grade 3 or above PEDIS perfusion criteria
- Planed or anticipated surgery after screening
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Israel2 sites
Hadassah Medical Center, Ein Kerem
Jerusalem, 91091
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 6423906
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind and Randomized Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Doses of TP-102 in Subjects With Non-Infected and Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers
This is a Phase I/IIa trial designed to evaluate topical bacteriophage therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
Read the detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of a topical bacteriophage cocktail in the treatment of non infected and infected diabetic foot ulcers with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and/or Acinetobacter baumanni. Patients will also be evaluated for bacterial clearance and wound reduction.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection, Staphylococcus Aureus Infection, Acinetobacter Infection
- Being tested
- TP-102
- Keywords
- Bacteriophage therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Foot, Pseudomonas Infections, Staphylococcal Infections, Acinetobacter Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TP-102Biological
One mL of IP solution will be applied topically per cm3 of target ulcer. The titer of each bacteriophage in TP 102 is 1x10^9 plaque forming units per milliliter (PFU/mL).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part A- Cohort 1 | Experimental | 8 eligible subjects with non-infected DFU will be enrolled (Cohort 1) and receive IP three times weekly (TIW) every other day for up to one week. Of these 8 enrolled subjects, 6 subjects will be randomized to TP-102 and 2 to placebo. Subjects will be followed-up for 7 days. Receives: Biological: TP-102 |
| Part B- Cohort 2 | Experimental | 18 subjects with a DFU with a grade 2 or 3 infection, as per PEDIS classification, and at least one bacterial strain susceptible to bacteriophage cocktail will be included in Cohort 2. Subjects will receive IP TIW, every other day, up to four weeks and will be randomized at a 2:1 randomization rate to either:
* TP-102 q.d 3x weekly up to four weeks (n=12)
* Placebo q.d. 3x weekly up to four weeks (n=6)
Subjects will be followed-up for 7 days. Receives: Biological: TP-102 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
1. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent solicited local and systemic AEs and relationship to IP from first administration until 1 week after end of treatment (EOT) (end of study -EOS)
Local AEs include erythema/redness, swelling/induration, pain and tenderness Systemic AEs include fatigue, myalgia, fever, headache and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)
Measured: 1 week
2. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent unsolicited AEs and relationship to IP from first administration until EOS.
Measured: 1 week
3. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent SAEs and relationship to IP from first administration until EOS.
Measured: 1 week
Secondary outcomes (4)
Proportion of subjects with significant reduction or eradication from baseline in microbiologic data via culture (cfu) at d3, d8, d15, d22, d26 and EOS
Measured: 35 days
Time (days) to significant reduction or eradication of target bacteria via culture.
Measured: 35 days
Changes in wound/ulcer healing from to baseline in terms of wound size and depth (cm^3) at EOT.
Measured: 35 days
Changes in wound/ulcer healing from to baseline in terms of wound complete closure and partial closure (25%, 50% and 75%) at EOT.
Measured: 35 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2021
- Study start22 Mar 2021
- Primary completion7 Aug 2022
- Study completion5 Sep 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Foot UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Technophage, SA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- VectorB2B
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ran Nir-Paz, MD, Principal investigator, Hadassah Medical OrganizationRonen Ben Ami, MD, Principal investigator, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04803708
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- TP-102_101
- Acronym
- REVERSE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Nir-Paz R, Onallah H, Dekel M, Gellman YN, Haze A, Ben-Ami R, Braunstein R, Hazan R, Dror D, Oster Y, Cherniak M, Attal F, Barbosa AR, Dordio H, Wagner A, Jones-Dias D, Neves J, Barreto M, Leandro C, Corte-Real S, Garcia M. Randomized double-blind study on safety and tolerability of TP-102 phage cocktail in patients with infected and non-infected diabetic foot ulcers. Med. 2025 May 9;6(5):100565. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.11.018. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
PubMed 39740667
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind and Randomized Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Multiple Doses of TP-102 in Subjects With Non-Infected and Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04803708
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REVERSE / TP-102_101
- Conditions
- Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection, Staphylococcus Aureus Infection, Acinetobacter Infection
- Keywords
- Bacteriophage therapy
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Technophage, SAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- VectorB2B
- Study start
- 22 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Sep 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase I/IIa trial designed to evaluate topical bacteriophage therapy in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.
Detailed description
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety of a topical bacteriophage cocktail in the treatment of non infected and infected diabetic foot ulcers with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and/or Acinetobacter baumanni. Patients will also be evaluated for bacterial clearance and wound reduction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part A- Cohort 1 | Experimental | Biological: TP-1028 eligible subjects with non-infected DFU will be enrolled (Cohort 1) and receive IP three times weekly (TIW) every other day for up to one week. Of these 8 enrolled subjects, 6 subjects will be randomized to TP-102 and 2 to placebo. Subjects will be followed-up for 7 days. |
| Part B- Cohort 2 | Experimental | Biological: TP-10218 subjects with a DFU with a grade 2 or 3 infection, as per PEDIS classification, and at least one bacterial strain susceptible to bacteriophage cocktail will be included in Cohort 2. Subjects will receive IP TIW, every other day, up to four weeks and will be randomized at a 2:1 randomization rate to either: * TP-102 q.d 3x weekly up to four weeks (n=12) * Placebo q.d. 3x weekly up to four weeks (n=6) Subjects will be followed-up for 7 days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤10, 5%
- Suitable physical and mental health as determined by the investigator based on medical history and general physical examination.
- Subjects must be medically stable based on clinical laboratory tests, medical history and vital signs. Clinical laboratory tests should be within normal values or not clinically significant, unless directly related to the condition of diabetes.
- Female subjects must fulfil one of the following criteria:
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Study ulcer less than 2 cm away from other ulcers in case of multiple ulcers.
- History in the 5 previous years of any cancer requiring systemic chemotherapy or radiation.
- A condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could compromise the well being of the subject or course of the study, or prevent the subject from meeting or performing any study requirements.
- Immunocompromised subjects due to illness, organ transplant, or immune suppressive therapies (e.g. oral or parental corticosteroids, methotrexate, immune modulators) 3 months prior to screening. Ad hoc low dose inhaled corticosteroids or topical corticosteroids are not allowed from 2 weeks prior to randomization.
- Being pregnant or breastfeeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TP-102One mL of IP solution will be applied topically per cm3 of target ulcer. The titer of each bacteriophage in TP 102 is 1x10^9 plaque forming units per milliliter (PFU/mL). | Biological | Part A- Cohort 1, Part B- Cohort 2 |
Primary outcome
1. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent solicited local and systemic AEs and relationship to IP from first administration until 1 week after end of treatment (EOT) (end of study -EOS)
Time frame: 1 week
Local AEs include erythema/redness, swelling/induration, pain and tenderness Systemic AEs include fatigue, myalgia, fever, headache and gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea)
2. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent unsolicited AEs and relationship to IP from first administration until EOS.
Time frame: 1 week
3. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent SAEs and relationship to IP from first administration until EOS.
Time frame: 1 week
4 secondary outcomes
Proportion of subjects with significant reduction or eradication from baseline in microbiologic data via culture (cfu) at d3, d8, d15, d22, d26 and EOS
Time frame: 35 days
Time (days) to significant reduction or eradication of target bacteria via culture.
Time frame: 35 days
Changes in wound/ulcer healing from to baseline in terms of wound size and depth (cm^3) at EOT.
Time frame: 35 days
Changes in wound/ulcer healing from to baseline in terms of wound complete closure and partial closure (25%, 50% and 75%) at EOT.
Time frame: 35 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39740667Nir-Paz R, Onallah H, Dekel M, Gellman YN, Haze A, Ben-Ami R, Braunstein R, Hazan R, Dror D, Oster Y, Cherniak M, Attal F, Barbosa AR, Dordio H, Wagner A, Jones-Dias D, Neves J, Barreto M, Leandro C, Corte-Real S, Garcia M. Randomized double-blind study on safety and tolerability of TP-102 phage cocktail in patients with infected and non-infected diabetic foot ulcers. Med. 2025 May 9;6(5):100565. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2024.11.018. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetic Foot Ulcer
RecruitingPhase 2
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Live ASCs in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Syndrome.
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
RecruitingObservational study
Efficacy and Safety of a Nitric Oxide Generating Dressing for Diabetic Foot Ulcers (ONWARD)
Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFUs)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Placental Cells for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
RecruitingObservational study
Factors Associated With an Evolution in the Quality of Life of Diabetic Patients With Chronic, Wound-free Charcot Foot
Charcot Joint of Foot, Osteoarthropathy
Not yet recruiting
Subcutaneous Dexpanthenol Administration and Wound Epithelialization
Chronic Wounds, Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ran Nir-Paz, MD principal investigator
Hadassah Medical Organization
Ronen Ben Ami, MD principal investigator
Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing TP-102 in people with Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Infection, run by Technophage, SA at 2 sites in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
1. Incidence and severity of treatment-emergent solicited local and systemic AEs and relationship to IP from first administration until 1 week after end of treatment (EOT) (end of study -EOS) (time frame: 1 week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04803708, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2022.