Venous PunctureNCT04805372
Video Demonstration and Video Feedback to Reduce Time to Perform Central Vein Cannulation in Junior Residents
A study testing VD+VF group and VD group in people with Venous Puncture and Students, Medical, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Central venous catheterization technique is a compulsory clinical skill for anesthesia resident physician. Because it is difficult to operate and may cause serious complications, teaching this skill is a key and difficult point in clinical teaching of anesthesiology department.This project aims to observe the effect… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Puncture, Students, Medical, Education, Medical
- What is being tested?
- VD+VF group and VD group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 1 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The target population will be junior residents of the Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University with < 3 previous encounters performing central vein operation
Who cannot join
- The target population will be junior residents of the Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University with ≥ 3 previous encounters performing central vein operation
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000
keyan lunli, +86 0571 87783759, keyanlunli_zheer@163.com
About this study
Official title: Application of the Training Bundle With Video Demonstration and Video Feedback as the Core in the Teaching of Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization Skills
Central venous catheterization technique is a compulsory clinical skill for anesthesia resident physician. Because it is difficult to operate and may cause serious complications, teaching this skill is a key and difficult point in clinical teaching of anesthesiology department.This project aims to observe the effect of video demonstration combined with video feedback teaching on the central venous catheterization time of junior residents and to obtain a better training method for central venous catheterization skills.
Read the detailed description
Central venous catheterization technology is a compulsory clinical skill for resident physicians. Because of its difficulty in operation and the possibility of serious complications, teaching this skill is a key and difficult point in clinical teaching in anesthesiology. This skill training has gone through the traditional "apprentice mode" teaching to the current video demonstration teaching, bedside feedback teaching, etc.. The attempts of multiple teaching modes are to help low-age resident doctors master the technology as soon as possible, improve the operation success rate, and reduce the incidence of complications.
The Department of Anesthesiology in our hospital is a key base for the standardized training of anesthesiologists in China. In recent years, the introduction of video demonstration methods for the central venous catheterization technology of low-age residents has achieved some results. Residents watch the demonstration operation videos specially recorded by the department, and perform operation exercises after passing the pre-operation assessment. The trainees self-reported that the teaching mode increased their confidence in learning this skill. However,in the actual training process, bedside comments (feedback teaching) were also involved, and it was discovered that it could cause panic and dissatisfaction of the patient, which was later improved into the paper-based feedback of the teacher.
The video demonstration teaching method was first applied to athletes' competitive training and was found to be effective in improving athletes' competitive skills.It was also used in medical education for surgical operation training, such as laparoscopic operation, which also obtained significant results. Feedback, as a method of attracting learners, has long been regarded as an important part of learning in medical education. We used bedside feedback teaching in the early stage, which was criticized by patients. Research has shown that video feedback may not only be superior to traditional verbal feedback methods alone, but it can also avoid problems from patients. When learners watch their own operation videos, video feedback will occur regardless of whether there is guidance from the instructor. Learners can watch these videos individually or with the teacher who can provide guidance at the same time. This teaching method is believed to be helpful for the assessment of skills. The use of video feedback originated from track and field sports learning. A large number of studies have found that video feedback teaching can be used as an effective means of medical communication skills training. Recently, it has also be used in clinical skills teaching. Current studies have confirmed that this teaching method can improve students' confidence in learning skills, but there is still relatively little research on skill acquisition.
In summary, video demonstration teaching and video feedback teaching are both useful in deliberate practice teaching (such as skill operation training). Skills operation training involves targeted repetitive exercises to improve skills, and feedback is the key to strengthening clinical learning. By video demonstrations, learners can observe and analyze the performance of experts (demonstrators) at key decision points under the guidance of the teacher. And video feedback can help promote self-assessment. It shows that the combination of the two may be more conducive to the integration of observational learning, imitation and self-evaluation, and speed up the progress of skill training. This joint teaching has been studied in sports research, while there are few studies in medical education. At present, a small study found that compared with oral feedback, the combined method can achieve better hernia repair skills, and there are recent research reports in peripheral vein indwelling operation training. But whether it is also suitable for the operation training of high-risk skills with greater difficulty coefficient, it needs to be confirmed by further research.
This project intends to observe the impact of video demonstration combined with video feedback teaching on the central venous catheterization time of low-age resident physicians, aiming to obtain a better method of central venous catheterization skills training, and to improve the learning confidence of students to better master this skill, improve the success rate of operation, reduce complications, and promote the application.
- Conditions
- Venous Puncture, Students, Medical, Education, Medical
- Being tested
- VD+VF group, VD group
- Keywords
- medical skill training, video modeling, video feedback, venous puncture, phlebotomy, medical education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VD+VF groupOther
where they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation and a video of their own most recent operation, before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews.
VD groupOther
where they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VD+VF group | Experimental | where they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation and a video of their own most recent operation, before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews. Receives: Other: VD+VF group |
| VD group | Placebo comparator | where they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews. Receives: Other: VD group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average time required to complete 5 independent operations in the second week
In the second week, 5 operations were completed under the supervision of the instructor and the required time was recorded
Measured: in the second week
Secondary outcomes (5)
The puncture success rate and complications in the first week
The success and complications of each puncture were recorded
Measured: in the first week
The puncture success rate and complications in the second week
The success and complications of each puncture were recorded
Measured: in the second week
Training satisfaction of trainees
After the training, questionnaire was used to survey the trainees' satisfaction with the training
Measured: the day after the training
Operation success rate and complications in 1 month after the training.
Record the success rate and complications of each independent operation of the trainees after the end of the training
Measured: One month after the training
Operation success rate and complications in 3 month after the training.
Record the success rate and complications of each independent operation of the trainees after the end of the training
Measured: One months after the training
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion1 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Mar 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Venous PunctureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Before the allocation, the instructor led the trainees to watch the demonstration video of the central vein operation and explained the main points of the operation at least 5 times.Before the operation, trainees should complete the operation-related test questions. And trainees should complete at least one central venipuncture model training and one actual operation under the personal guidance of the instructor before allocation.They will then be assigned to review a video of an expert performing central vein operation (VD alone), or both the expert video and a video of their own most recent operation(VD+VF), before returning to do another central vein operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein operation encounters and 5 video reviews.In the second week, each trainee completed at least 5 independent operations under the supervision of the instructor.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- lina Yu, Study chair, 2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04805372
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021-0083
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 18 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Application of the Training Bundle With Video Demonstration and Video Feedback as the Core in the Teaching of Right Internal Jugular Vein Catheterization Skills
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04805372
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021-0083
- Conditions
- Venous Puncture, Students, Medical, Education, Medical
- Keywords
- medical skill training, video modeling, video feedback, venous puncture, phlebotomy, medical education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Feb 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Mar 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Central venous catheterization technique is a compulsory clinical skill for anesthesia resident physician. Because it is difficult to operate and may cause serious complications, teaching this skill is a key and difficult point in clinical teaching of anesthesiology department.This project aims to observe the effect of video demonstration combined with video feedback teaching on the central venous catheterization time of junior residents and to obtain a better training method for central venous catheterization skills.
Detailed description
Central venous catheterization technology is a compulsory clinical skill for resident physicians. Because of its difficulty in operation and the possibility of serious complications, teaching this skill is a key and difficult point in clinical teaching in anesthesiology. This skill training has gone through the traditional "apprentice mode" teaching to the current video demonstration teaching, bedside feedback teaching, etc.. The attempts of multiple teaching modes are to help low-age resident doctors master the technology as soon as possible, improve the operation success rate, and reduce the incidence of complications.
The Department of Anesthesiology in our hospital is a key base for the standardized training of anesthesiologists in China. In recent years, the introduction of video demonstration methods for the central venous catheterization technology of low-age residents has achieved some results. Residents watch the demonstration operation videos specially recorded by the department, and perform operation exercises after passing the pre-operation assessment. The trainees self-reported that the teaching mode increased their confidence in learning this skill. However,in the actual training process, bedside comments (feedback teaching) were also involved, and it was discovered that it could cause panic and dissatisfaction of the patient, which was later improved into the paper-based feedback of the teacher.
The video demonstration teaching method was first applied to athletes' competitive training and was found to be effective in improving athletes' competitive skills.It was also used in medical education for surgical operation training, such as laparoscopic operation, which also obtained significant results. Feedback, as a method of attracting learners, has long been regarded as an important part of learning in medical education. We used bedside feedback teaching in the early stage, which was criticized by patients. Research has shown that video feedback may not only be superior to traditional verbal feedback methods alone, but it can also avoid problems from patients. When learners watch their own operation videos, video feedback will occur regardless of whether there is guidance from the instructor. Learners can watch these videos individually or with the teacher who can provide guidance at the same time. This teaching method is believed to be helpful for the assessment of skills. The use of video feedback originated from track and field sports learning. A large number of studies have found that video feedback teaching can be used as an effective means of medical communication skills training. Recently, it has also be used in clinical skills teaching. Current studies have confirmed that this teaching method can improve students' confidence in learning skills, but there is still relatively little research on skill acquisition.
In summary, video demonstration teaching and video feedback teaching are both useful in deliberate practice teaching (such as skill operation training). Skills operation training involves targeted repetitive exercises to improve skills, and feedback is the key to strengthening clinical learning. By video demonstrations, learners can observe and analyze the performance of experts (demonstrators) at key decision points under the guidance of the teacher. And video feedback can help promote self-assessment. It shows that the combination of the two may be more conducive to the integration of observational learning, imitation and self-evaluation, and speed up the progress of skill training. This joint teaching has been studied in sports research, while there are few studies in medical education. At present, a small study found that compared with oral feedback, the combined method can achieve better hernia repair skills, and there are recent research reports in peripheral vein indwelling operation training. But whether it is also suitable for the operation training of high-risk skills with greater difficulty coefficient, it needs to be confirmed by further research.
This project intends to observe the impact of video demonstration combined with video feedback teaching on the central venous catheterization time of low-age resident physicians, aiming to obtain a better method of central venous catheterization skills training, and to improve the learning confidence of students to better master this skill, improve the success rate of operation, reduce complications, and promote the application.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Before the allocation, the instructor led the trainees to watch the demonstration video of the central vein operation and explained the main points of the operation at least 5 times.Before the operation, trainees should complete the operation-related test questions. And trainees should complete at least one central venipuncture model training and one actual operation under the personal guidance of the instructor before allocation.They will then be assigned to review a video of an expert performing central vein operation (VD alone), or both the expert video and a video of their own most recent operation(VD+VF), before returning to do another central vein operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein operation encounters and 5 video reviews.In the second week, each trainee completed at least 5 independent operations under the supervision of the instructor.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VD+VF group | Experimental | Other: VD+VF groupwhere they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation and a video of their own most recent operation, before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews. |
| VD group | Placebo comparator | Other: VD groupwhere they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The target population will be junior residents of the Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University with < 3 previous encounters performing central vein operation
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The target population will be junior residents of the Department of Anesthesiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University with ≥ 3 previous encounters performing central vein operation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VD+VF groupwhere they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation and a video of their own most recent operation, before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews. | Other | VD+VF group |
| VD groupwhere they should review a video of an expert performing central vein operation before returning to do another operation. This will be repeated for a total of 5 central vein cannulation encounters and 5 video reviews. | Other | VD group |
Primary outcome
Average time required to complete 5 independent operations in the second week
Time frame: in the second week
In the second week, 5 operations were completed under the supervision of the instructor and the required time was recorded
5 secondary outcomes
The puncture success rate and complications in the first week
Time frame: in the first week
The puncture success rate and complications in the second week
Time frame: in the second week
Training satisfaction of trainees
Time frame: the day after the training
Operation success rate and complications in 1 month after the training.
Time frame: One month after the training
Operation success rate and complications in 3 month after the training.
Time frame: One months after the training
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Mar 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Venous Puncture
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Beta-hCG Levels When Using Venous Puncture Blood and Peripheral Finger Stick Blood
Pregnancy
Active, not recruiting
Investigating the Impact of Ice Application on the Venous Puncture Pain in the Pediatric Population
Venous Puncture Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Three Access Routes for Implanting an Electronic Intracardiac Device
Primary Implantation of an Intracardiac Electronic Device Indication
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of A-DIVA Score Effectiveness at Admission for Preserving Venous Capital in Patients With Difficult Access
Internal Medicine, Surgery
RecruitingObservational study
The Freiburg Registry on SpontanEous IntercrAnial Hypotension (SIH) & Post-duraL Puncture Headache (PDPH)
CerebroSpinal Fluid (CSF) Leak
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
lina Yu study chair
2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VD+VF group and VD group in people with Venous Puncture and Students, Medical, run by Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact lina Yu (+86 13958033387, zryulina@zju.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average time required to complete 5 independent operations in the second week (time frame: in the second week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Mar 2021.