Bladder CancerPhase 3IMMUNOBCGNCT04806178
Immunological Response of Bladder Cancer Patients Under BCG
A Phase 3 study testing Bacillus Calmette Guerin in people with Bladder Cancer and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, run by University of Campinas, Brazil at 2 sites in Brazil.
Trial summary
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and the most successful example of vaccine in cancer treatment, representing an efficient model for studying the importance of systemic and local immune mechanisms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin
- What is being tested?
- Bacillus Calmette Guerin
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesBrazil
- Study dates
- 3 Sep 2021to 18 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- NMIBC with the indication for intravesical BCG treatment;
Who cannot join
- Previous BCG treatment;
- Muscle invasive tumor.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Brazil2 sites
Pontifical Catholic University of Campinas Hospital
Campinas, São Paulo, 13034685
Hospital das Clínicas Unicamp
Campinas, São Paulo, 13083887
About this study
Official title: Systemic Immunological Response of Bladder Cancer Patients Under Bacillus Calmette Guérin Treatment
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and the most successful example of vaccine in cancer treatment, representing an efficient model for studying the importance of systemic and local immune mechanisms. Despite being the standard of treatment for the last 40 years, the exact mode of action of immunotherapy with the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is still poorly defined. In a mechanistic study, the investigators intend to prospectively investigate immunological signatures, including immune-checkpoints, pre and post-treatment in patients with BC, and correlate the cytokines of the immune by-product and BCG administration pathway to understand the independent contributions of BCG priming (prior exposure to BCG) and crosstalk immunotherapy between tumor profiles and immune response of the patient. The proposed research strategy is justified by the need to identify subsets of patients who better respond to an intervention, or to predict why new immunotherapies and drugs may be successful or failed in clinical trials.
Read the detailed description
Recognizing patient-to-patient variability, key data scarcity, and insight into traditional reductionist therapy, the BCG model offers exceptionally compelling opportunities to understand how immune system behavior in health and disease emerges from local, systemic, genetic, epigenetic, cellular, and environmental modulating factors.
The application seeks to change the current clinical practice and research paradigms, by using new theoretical concepts, challenging bladder cancer patients with a highly effective, safe, and affordable immunotherapy, the gold standard in the last 40 years of NMIBC, and in light of new concepts and methodologies brought by the paradigm of immune-checkpoint inhibitors that justified the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2018.
The current proposal has the potential to impact the prognosis and identification of those who are unlikely to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors, scenarios in which important unanswered questions remain, particularly as this class of agents advances along the spectrum of non-metastatic disease.
In a mechanistic approach, patients diagnosed with NMIBC and with the indication for intravesical BCG treatment will be randomized to placebo versus a priming intradermic BCG 14 days before the intravesical treatment and followed up to 180 days.
The investigators will define important clinical paradigms:
- The role of the priming effect on the immune system and better understanding of BCG immunotherapy, with a clear potential for improvement of bladder cancer treatment in NMIBC and MIBC scenarios;
- The potential of BCG, a widely used vaccine, to improve or impair the results of new immunotherapies, given its long-lasting effect;
- Rational to develop future treatment associations of BCG and immune-checkpoints. \
Under the new immunological concepts, a better understanding of tumor-associated immune responses in BC patients could provide more informed clinical decisions and treatment optimization.
Considering the growing need of assessing the value of treatment at the expense of cost, part of our proposal strategy is to limit financial toxicity as an important issue in cancer treatment and new immunotherapies.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin
- Being tested
- Bacillus Calmette Guerin, PLACEBO
- Keywords
- BCG, Bladder cancer, Immunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bacillus Calmette GuerinBiological
Also called BCG
0.1 ml of lyophilized, live, and attenuated BCG intradermal vaccine, containing between 2 and 8 x 1.000.000 C.F.U in a single dose.
PLACEBOOther
0.1 ml 0.9% saline in the same volume as the BCG vaccine in a single dose.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BCG intradermal vaccine | Active comparator | Intradermal BCG Group (n=16): 0.1 ml of lyophilized, live, and attenuated BCG intradermal vaccine, containing between 2 and 8 x 1.000.000 C.F.U in a single dose. Receives: Biological: Bacillus Calmette Guerin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo group (n = 16): 0.9% saline solution in the same volume as BCG vaccine in a single dose. Receives: Other: PLACEBO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Flow Cytometry
Cellular Immune Response
Measured: Day 0
Flow Cytometry
Cellular Immune Response
Measured: Day 14
Flow Cytometry
Cellular Immune Response
Measured: Day 21
Flow Cytometry
Cellular Immune Response
Measured: Day 35
Flow Cytometry
Cellular Immune Response
Measured: Day 49
Flow Cytometry
Cellular Immune Response
Measured: Day 180
Secondary outcomes (3)
Adverse Effects and Change from Baseline Voiding Symptoms
American Urological Association Symptom Score Questionnaire - minimum 0 and maximum 35, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Day 21
Adverse Effects and Change from Baseline Voiding Symptoms
American Urological Association Symptom Score Questionnaire - minimum 0 and maximum 35, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Day 35
Adverse Effects and Change from Baseline Voiding Symptoms
American Urological Association Symptom Score Questionnaire - minimum 0 and maximum 35, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Measured: Day 49
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2021
- Study start3 Sep 2021
- Primary completion24 May 2024
- Study completion18 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campinas, Brazil
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Pontifical University Catholic of Campinas
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Leonardo Oliveira Reis, University of Campinas, Brazil
- Investigators
- Leonardo O Reis, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Campinas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04806178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BCG IMMUNO Bladder
- Acronym
- IMMUNOBCG
- Status last verified
- Dec 2024
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ji N, Mukherjee N, Morales EE, Tomasini ME, Hurez V, Curiel TJ, Abate G, Hoft DF, Zhao XR, Gelfond J, Maiti S, Cooper LJN, Svatek RS. Percutaneous BCG enhances innate effector antitumor cytotoxicity during treatment of bladder cancer: a translational clinical trial. Oncoimmunology. 2019 May 25;8(8):1614857. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1614857. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31413921van Puffelen JH, Keating ST, Oosterwijk E, van der Heijden AG, Netea MG, Joosten LAB, Vermeulen SH. Trained immunity as a molecular mechanism for BCG immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Sep;17(9):513-525. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0346-4. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
PubMed 32678343
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Systemic Immunological Response of Bladder Cancer Patients Under Bacillus Calmette Guérin Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04806178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMMUNOBCG / BCG IMMUNO Bladder
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer, Bacillus Calmette-Guerin
- Keywords
- BCG, Bladder cancer, Immunotherapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campinas, BrazilUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, Pontifical University Catholic of Campinas
- Study start
- 3 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 May 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bladder cancer (BC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide and the most successful example of vaccine in cancer treatment, representing an efficient model for studying the importance of systemic and local immune mechanisms. Despite being the standard of treatment for the last 40 years, the exact mode of action of immunotherapy with the bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) is still poorly defined. In a mechanistic study, the investigators intend to prospectively investigate immunological signatures, including immune-checkpoints, pre and post-treatment in patients with BC, and correlate the cytokines of the immune by-product and BCG administration pathway to understand the independent contributions of BCG priming (prior exposure to BCG) and crosstalk immunotherapy between tumor profiles and immune response of the patient. The proposed research strategy is justified by the need to identify subsets of patients who better respond to an intervention, or to predict why new immunotherapies and drugs may be successful or failed in clinical trials.
Detailed description
Recognizing patient-to-patient variability, key data scarcity, and insight into traditional reductionist therapy, the BCG model offers exceptionally compelling opportunities to understand how immune system behavior in health and disease emerges from local, systemic, genetic, epigenetic, cellular, and environmental modulating factors.
The application seeks to change the current clinical practice and research paradigms, by using new theoretical concepts, challenging bladder cancer patients with a highly effective, safe, and affordable immunotherapy, the gold standard in the last 40 years of NMIBC, and in light of new concepts and methodologies brought by the paradigm of immune-checkpoint inhibitors that justified the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2018.
The current proposal has the potential to impact the prognosis and identification of those who are unlikely to respond to immune-checkpoint inhibitors, scenarios in which important unanswered questions remain, particularly as this class of agents advances along the spectrum of non-metastatic disease.
In a mechanistic approach, patients diagnosed with NMIBC and with the indication for intravesical BCG treatment will be randomized to placebo versus a priming intradermic BCG 14 days before the intravesical treatment and followed up to 180 days.
The investigators will define important clinical paradigms:
- The role of the priming effect on the immune system and better understanding of BCG immunotherapy, with a clear potential for improvement of bladder cancer treatment in NMIBC and MIBC scenarios;
- The potential of BCG, a widely used vaccine, to improve or impair the results of new immunotherapies, given its long-lasting effect;
- Rational to develop future treatment associations of BCG and immune-checkpoints. \
Under the new immunological concepts, a better understanding of tumor-associated immune responses in BC patients could provide more informed clinical decisions and treatment optimization.
Considering the growing need of assessing the value of treatment at the expense of cost, part of our proposal strategy is to limit financial toxicity as an important issue in cancer treatment and new immunotherapies.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BCG intradermal vaccine | Active comparator | Biological: Bacillus Calmette GuerinIntradermal BCG Group (n=16): 0.1 ml of lyophilized, live, and attenuated BCG intradermal vaccine, containing between 2 and 8 x 1.000.000 C.F.U in a single dose. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PLACEBOPlacebo group (n = 16): 0.9% saline solution in the same volume as BCG vaccine in a single dose. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- NMIBC with the indication for intravesical BCG treatment;
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Previous BCG treatment;
- Muscle invasive tumor.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bacillus Calmette GuerinAlso: BCG0.1 ml of lyophilized, live, and attenuated BCG intradermal vaccine, containing between 2 and 8 x 1.000.000 C.F.U in a single dose. | Biological | BCG intradermal vaccine |
| PLACEBO0.1 ml 0.9% saline in the same volume as the BCG vaccine in a single dose. | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Flow Cytometry
Time frame: Day 0
Cellular Immune Response
Flow Cytometry
Time frame: Day 14
Cellular Immune Response
Flow Cytometry
Time frame: Day 21
Cellular Immune Response
Flow Cytometry
Time frame: Day 35
Cellular Immune Response
Flow Cytometry
Time frame: Day 49
Cellular Immune Response
Flow Cytometry
Time frame: Day 180
Cellular Immune Response
3 secondary outcomes
Adverse Effects and Change from Baseline Voiding Symptoms
Time frame: Day 21
Adverse Effects and Change from Baseline Voiding Symptoms
Time frame: Day 35
Adverse Effects and Change from Baseline Voiding Symptoms
Time frame: Day 49
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2024.
- Background: PubMed 31413921Ji N, Mukherjee N, Morales EE, Tomasini ME, Hurez V, Curiel TJ, Abate G, Hoft DF, Zhao XR, Gelfond J, Maiti S, Cooper LJN, Svatek RS. Percutaneous BCG enhances innate effector antitumor cytotoxicity during treatment of bladder cancer: a translational clinical trial. Oncoimmunology. 2019 May 25;8(8):1614857. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1614857. eCollection 2019.
- Background: PubMed 32678343van Puffelen JH, Keating ST, Oosterwijk E, van der Heijden AG, Netea MG, Joosten LAB, Vermeulen SH. Trained immunity as a molecular mechanism for BCG immunotherapy in bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Sep;17(9):513-525. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0346-4. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Cyclic Sighing Breathing Exercise on CRBD, Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing TUR
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Leonardo O Reis, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Campinas
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Bacillus Calmette Guerin in people with Bladder Cancer and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, run by University of Campinas, Brazil at 2 sites in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Flow Cytometry (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04806178, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2024.