AzTrials
AzTrials

PresbyopiaPhase 2READERNCT04806503

A Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of UNR844 in Subjects With Presbyopia.

A Phase 2 study testing UNR844 in people with Presbyopia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 20 sites in 4 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Study of safety and efficacy of UNR844 in subjects with presbyopia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 45 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Presbyopia
What is being tested?
UNR844
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
234 participants
Where
20 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
30 Jun 2021to 14 Oct 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 45 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any assessment is performed
  • Impaired near vision in each eye and when using both eyes, without any near correction
  • Need a certain level of near correction

Who cannot join

  • Impaired distance vision in either eye, with distance correction (if any)
  • Severe short- or long-sightedness
  • Any significant medical or clinical conditions affecting vision, the eyes or general health

Trial locations and contacts

20 sites in 4 countries.

20 sites in 4 countries

United States12 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kingston, Pennsylvania, 18704

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Laguna Hills, California, 92653

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Lake Villa, Illinois, 60046

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Largo, Florida, 33773

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Newport Beach, California, 92660

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Newport Beach, California, 92663

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Smyrna, Tennessee, 37167

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Washington, Missouri, 63090

Other trials in United States

Canada4 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Kitchener, Ontario, N2A 0K5

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 1H6

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Waterloo, Ontario, N2L3G1

Other trials in Canada

Australia2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Sydney, New South Wales, 2052

Other trials in Australia

Japan2 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Shinjuku Ku, Tokyo, 160-0008

  • Novartis Investigative Site

    Suita, Osaka, 565-0853

Other trials in Japan

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-masked, Multi-center, Dose-ranging Study to Evaluate the Safety, and Efficacy of UNR844 in Subjects With Presbyopia

Study of safety and efficacy of UNR844 in subjects with presbyopia.

Read the detailed description

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked,multi-arm, parallel-group, multi-center 13-month study which consisted of:

  • A 1 week run-in period
  • A 3-month treatment course with UNR844 and/or Placebo
  • A 9-month treatment holiday period Participants were randomized equally to one of five treatment arms: UNR844 5 mg/mL,UNR844 13.3 mg/mL, UNR844 23 mg/mL, UNR844 30 mg/mL, or Placebo eye drops twice-a-day for three months.

Participants underwent a 1 week run-in period where they were assessed for entry criteria during the Screening visit. During the run-in period, participants self-administered 1 drop of artificial tears twice-a-day (1 drop in the morning and 1 drop in the evening) in each eye at home. This run-in period was designed to help minimize any potential variability in distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) caused due to initial ocular surface issues and help to establish an accurate baseline prior to randomization. The run-in period was to help exclude participants with a change in DCNVA of 0.10 logMAR difference between Screening and Baseline.

This study was conducted to determine the optimum dose of UNR844 treatment and the duration of effect of UNR844 treatment for further development.

Conditions
Presbyopia
Being tested
UNR844, Placebo
Keywords
loss of elasticity in lens, lens, lens disorder, loss of near vision, Presbyopia, UNR844, farsightedness
Medical subject headings
Presbyopia, Lens Diseases, Hyperopia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • UNR844Drug

    Also called EV06

    Ophthalmic solution for topical ocular administration

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called Vehicle

    Placebo

Study groups in NCT04806503
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
UNR844 5 mg/mLExperimentalUNR844 5 mg/mL ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
Receives: Drug: UNR844
UNR844 13.3 mg/mLExperimentalUNR844 13.3 mg/mL 1 ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
Receives: Drug: UNR844
UNR844 23 mg/mLExperimentalUNR844 23 mg/mL ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
Receives: Drug: UNR844
UNR844 30 mg/mLExperimentalUNR844 30 mg/mL ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
Receives: Drug: UNR844
Placebo Ophthalmic SolutionPlacebo comparatorplacebo ophthalmic solution; one drop twice-a-day for three months
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Characterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3

    Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in binocular DCNVA (without near correction) in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3

    Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40 cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3

  2. Characterize Dose Response of UNR844 as Measured by Change From Baseline in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3

    Characterize dose response of UNR844 as measured by change from baseline at Month 3 in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR), at 40cm. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3

  3. Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3

    Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in binocular DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

    Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3

  4. Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Worse-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3

    Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (worse-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

    Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3

  5. Percentage of Participants Gaining at Least 0.30 logMAR in Monocular (Better-seeing Eye) Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) (Without Near Correction) From Baseline at Month 3

    Percentage of participants gaining at least 0.3 logMAR in monocular (better-seeing eye) DCNVA compared to baseline at Month 3. DCNVA is measured in Logarithm of Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) at 40 cm, with subjects corrected for any distance refraction error. A low logMAR score represents good vision while a high logMAR score represents bad vision.

    Percentages were derived from Rubin's rule by integrating all results from multiple imputations. For subjects with missing DCNVA at Month 3, the value of DCNVA was imputed and dichotomized to derive the endpoint of gaining of 3 lines.

    Measured: Baseline, Month 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2021
  2. Study start30 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion27 Jul 2022
  4. Study completion14 Oct 2022

Why it stopped: The study was discontinued by the Sponsor because it did not achieve the primary objective.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
234 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04806503
Sponsor's protocol ID
CUNR844A2202
Acronym
READER
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
16 Mar 2021
Last updated
20 Jun 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com/.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing UNR844 in people with Presbyopia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 20 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 20 sites in United States, Canada, Australia, Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Characterize Dose-response of UNR844 for Change From Baseline in Binocular Distance-corrected Near Visual Acuity (DCNVA) at Month 3 (time frame: Baseline, Month 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in