Breast CancerNCT04806724
Opening the Conversation Study
A study testing Opening the Conversation and Side by Side in people with Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer, run by Oregon State University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Young adult survivors of breast and gynecologic cancer face a number of challenges, including interrupted life plans. As many as two-thirds of these young survivors experience negative effects of cancer and cancer treatment on their reproductive health, including sexual function and ability to have children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Opening the Conversation and Side by Side
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 158 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2021to 5 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Cancer survivor participants:
- Cancer diagnosis between ages 18-39 years
- Current age 18-44
- Cancer diagnosis 6 months-5 years prior to enrollment
- Diagnosed with breast and/or gynecologic cancer
- Cancer stage 1-4
Show all 15Show fewer
- Ability to participate in a videoconference intervention
- Has committed partner willing to participate
- English speaking
- High speed internet access via smart phone, tablet and/or computer
- Partner participants:
- Age 18 or older
- English speaking
- Ability to participate in a videoconference intervention
- High speed internet access via smart phone, tablet and/or computer
Who cannot join
- -Cancer survivors and partners are excluded if either partner does not meet eligibility criteria. Both partners must enroll or the dyad will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Opening the Conversation for Couples With Reproductive Health Concerns
Young adult survivors of breast and gynecologic cancer face a number of challenges, including interrupted life plans. As many as two-thirds of these young survivors experience negative effects of cancer and cancer treatment on their reproductive health, including sexual function and ability to have children. These are among the most distressing aspects of life after cancer for young survivors and their partners, and when left unaddressed, lead to poorer mental health and quality of life. Yet, surprisingly, evidence-based programs are not available to help young couples manage this aspect of life after cancer. In this study, we will adapt and evaluate an intervention designed to help young couples cope with and communicate about cancer-related reproductive and sexual health concerns.
Read the detailed description
The specific aims of the study are:
Aim 1 (Phase I). Systematically adapt an empirically supported couple-based skills training intervention to help young breast and gynecologic cancer (BGC) survivors and their partners jointly manage the reproductive and sexual health consequences of cancer.
Aim 2 (Phase II - Quantitative). Evaluate the efficacy of the intervention and hypothesized mediators by conducting a randomized trial. We will evaluate the efficacy of the newly adapted intervention, Opening the Conversation (OC), on survivors' and their partners' reproductive and sexual distress as well as the relationship, sexual, and psychosocial health outcomes. We will determine whether dyadic coping and communication mediate intervention effects on survivors' and partners' reproductive and sexual distress.
Aim 3 (Phase II - Qualitative). Evaluate couples' experiences within and across conditions to gain in-depth knowledge of intervention components that influence hypothesized mediators and outcomes.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer
- Being tested
- Opening the Conversation, Side by Side
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Opening the ConversationBehavioural
The intervention includes 5 weekly sessions (1.5 hours each), plus participant educational materials, and is delivered to couples via videoconference by a trained interventionist. Participants are asked to complete home activities between sessions. Sessions focus on development of communication and coping skills, with a focus on reproductive and sexual health distress.
Side by SideBehavioural
The intervention includes 4 weekly sessions (1.5 hours each), plus participant educational materials, and is delivered to couples via videoconference by a trained interventionist. Participants are asked to complete home activities between sessions. Sessions focus on development of communication and coping skills, with a focus on general cancer-related distress.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Program #1 | Experimental | Participants attend 5 sessions (1.5 hours each) consisting of education and skills training to address cancer-related reproductive and sexual health concerns. Sessions occur via videoconference. Receives: Behavioral: Opening the Conversation |
| Program #2 | Active comparator | Participants attend 4 sessions (1.5 hours each) consisting of education and skills training to address cancer-related concerns. Sessions occur via videoconference. Receives: Behavioral: Side by Side |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in reproductive distress
Relationship concern domain of the Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) scale. 10 items. Range 10-60. Higher score indicates more reproductive distress.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in sexual distress
Sexual and relationship distress (SaRDS). 30 items. Range 0-180. Higher score indicates more sexual distress.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (8)
Change in relationship quality
Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS-7). 7 items. Range 0- 36. Higher score indicates higher relationship quality.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in relationship Intimacy
Miller Social Intimacy Scale (MSIS). 17 items. Range 17-170. Higher score indicates higher levels of intimacy.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in sexual function (female)
Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).19 items. Range 2-36. Higher score indicates higher functioning.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention.
Chang in sexual function (male)
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). 15 items. Range 1-75. Higher score indicates a higher level of sexual functioning.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in global sexual satisfaction
Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction (GMSEX). 5 items. Range 5-35. Higher score indicates higher level of sexual satisfaction.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in depressive symptoms
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8).8 items. Range 0 -24. Higher score indicates higher levels of depression.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in global health-related quality of life
PROMIS Global 10 v1.2. Raw scores (range 10-50) are translated to T scores following PROMIS guidelines. Higher score indicates better functioning.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in self-efficacy to communicate about sex and intimacy (survivor only)
SECSI. 10 items. Range 0-30. Higher score indicates higher self-efficacy.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Sep 2021
- Primary completion5 Aug 2025
- Study completion5 Aug 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon State University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Cancer Society, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jessica Gorman, Oregon State University
- Investigators
- Jessica R Gorman, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, Oregon State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04806724
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 7621; HE-2022-41
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 19 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gorman JR, Choun S, Lyons KS, Acquati C, Harvey SM, Salsman JM, Flexner L, Koneru G, Hayes-Lattin B, Reese JB. Dyadic Latent Profiles of Sexual and Reproductive Distress in Young Adult Cancer Survivors and Their Partners: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Psychooncology. 2026 Aug;35(8):e70587. doi: 10.1002/pon.70587.
PubMed 42635443Gorman JR, Lyons KS, Harvey SM, Acquati C, Salsman JM, Kashy DA, Drizin JH, Smith E, Flexner LM, Hayes-Lattin B, Reese JB. Opening the Conversation: study protocol for a Phase III trial to evaluate a couple-based intervention to reduce reproductive and sexual distress among young adult breast and gynecologic cancer survivor couples. Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06665-3.
PubMed 36056413
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Opening the Conversation for Couples With Reproductive Health Concerns
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04806724
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 7621; HE-2022-41
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 158 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oregon State UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Cancer Society, Inc.
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Aug 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Young adult survivors of breast and gynecologic cancer face a number of challenges, including interrupted life plans. As many as two-thirds of these young survivors experience negative effects of cancer and cancer treatment on their reproductive health, including sexual function and ability to have children. These are among the most distressing aspects of life after cancer for young survivors and their partners, and when left unaddressed, lead to poorer mental health and quality of life. Yet, surprisingly, evidence-based programs are not available to help young couples manage this aspect of life after cancer. In this study, we will adapt and evaluate an intervention designed to help young couples cope with and communicate about cancer-related reproductive and sexual health concerns.
Detailed description
The specific aims of the study are:
Aim 1 (Phase I). Systematically adapt an empirically supported couple-based skills training intervention to help young breast and gynecologic cancer (BGC) survivors and their partners jointly manage the reproductive and sexual health consequences of cancer.
Aim 2 (Phase II - Quantitative). Evaluate the efficacy of the intervention and hypothesized mediators by conducting a randomized trial. We will evaluate the efficacy of the newly adapted intervention, Opening the Conversation (OC), on survivors' and their partners' reproductive and sexual distress as well as the relationship, sexual, and psychosocial health outcomes. We will determine whether dyadic coping and communication mediate intervention effects on survivors' and partners' reproductive and sexual distress.
Aim 3 (Phase II - Qualitative). Evaluate couples' experiences within and across conditions to gain in-depth knowledge of intervention components that influence hypothesized mediators and outcomes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Program #1 | Experimental | Behavioral: Opening the ConversationParticipants attend 5 sessions (1.5 hours each) consisting of education and skills training to address cancer-related reproductive and sexual health concerns. Sessions occur via videoconference. |
| Program #2 | Active comparator | Behavioral: Side by SideParticipants attend 4 sessions (1.5 hours each) consisting of education and skills training to address cancer-related concerns. Sessions occur via videoconference. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Cancer diagnosis between ages 18-39 years
- Current age 18-44
- Cancer diagnosis 6 months-5 years prior to enrollment
- Diagnosed with breast and/or gynecologic cancer
- Cancer stage 1-4
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Cancer survivors and partners are excluded if either partner does not meet eligibility criteria. Both partners must enroll or the dyad will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Opening the ConversationThe intervention includes 5 weekly sessions (1.5 hours each), plus participant educational materials, and is delivered to couples via videoconference by a trained interventionist. Participants are asked to complete home activities between sessions. Sessions focus on development of communication and coping skills, with a focus on reproductive and sexual health distress. | Behavioural | Program #1 |
| Side by SideThe intervention includes 4 weekly sessions (1.5 hours each), plus participant educational materials, and is delivered to couples via videoconference by a trained interventionist. Participants are asked to complete home activities between sessions. Sessions focus on development of communication and coping skills, with a focus on general cancer-related distress. | Behavioural | Program #2 |
Primary outcome
Change in reproductive distress
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Relationship concern domain of the Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) scale. 10 items. Range 10-60. Higher score indicates more reproductive distress.
Change in sexual distress
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Sexual and relationship distress (SaRDS). 30 items. Range 0-180. Higher score indicates more sexual distress.
8 secondary outcomes
Change in relationship quality
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in relationship Intimacy
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in sexual function (female)
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention.
Chang in sexual function (male)
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in global sexual satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in depressive symptoms
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in global health-related quality of life
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Change in self-efficacy to communicate about sex and intimacy (survivor only)
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Feb 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42635443Gorman JR, Choun S, Lyons KS, Acquati C, Harvey SM, Salsman JM, Flexner L, Koneru G, Hayes-Lattin B, Reese JB. Dyadic Latent Profiles of Sexual and Reproductive Distress in Young Adult Cancer Survivors and Their Partners: A Cross-Sectional Analysis. Psychooncology. 2026 Aug;35(8):e70587. doi: 10.1002/pon.70587.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36056413Gorman JR, Lyons KS, Harvey SM, Acquati C, Salsman JM, Kashy DA, Drizin JH, Smith E, Flexner LM, Hayes-Lattin B, Reese JB. Opening the Conversation: study protocol for a Phase III trial to evaluate a couple-based intervention to reduce reproductive and sexual distress among young adult breast and gynecologic cancer survivor couples. Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):730. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06665-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of CSF Samples From Participants With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) and HER2+ Breast Cancer With no Prior History Nor Active Radiographically Detectable Brain Metastases
Breast Cancer, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Avera Cancer Sequencing and Analytics Protocol (ASAP)
Cancer, Cancer Diagnosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Internal Mammary Lymph Nodes Irradiation in High-risk Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study to Test the Safety and Tolerability of PF-07220060 in Participants With Advance Solid Tumors
Liposarcoma, Prostate Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Opportunistic Breast Cancer Screening Using Non-Contrast Chest CT
Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jessica R Gorman, PhD, MPH principal investigator
Oregon State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Opening the Conversation and Side by Side in people with Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer, run by Oregon State University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in reproductive distress (time frame: Baseline to 3 months post-intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04806724, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Feb 2026.