Fetal Position and Presentation AbnormalitiesNCT04813237
Clinical Implications of Fetal Positioning During Delivery
An observational study of Fetal Position and Presentation Abnormalities, run by Żelazna Medical Centre, LLC at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
The project aims to find a relationship between the positioning of the foetus before and during birth and the results of obstetrics and to determine their incidence in the Polish population. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Fetal Position and Presentation Abnormalities
- What is being tested?
- n a
- How many people
- 300 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 31 Mar 2021to 30 Dec 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: women coming to the 3rd level hospital with a birth house. During a physiological pregnancy, with no severe coexisting diseases.
Who may be able to join
- during childbirth,
- in a single pregnancy,
Who cannot join
- pelvic position of the fetus
- in whom labor is induced for reasons other than post-term pregnancy,
- women who came to the hospital in the second stage of labor
- severe diseases mother or foetus.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Żelazna Medical Centre, LLC
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 01-004
Baranowska Baranowska, PhD, 509083263, bbaranowska@gmail.com
About this study
The project aims to find a relationship between the positioning of the foetus before and during birth and the results of obstetrics and to determine their incidence in the Polish population. The study will be conducted by combining the use of ultrasound diagnostics, midwives observations during childbirth, analysis of medical documentation and a questionnaire on the activity of examined women. The obtained results will be used to prepare guidelines for the birth in a particular foetus position.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the examination is to describe the difficulties associated with delivery in a non-optimal position of the fetus. Initial observations show that such childbirth is perceived as difficult by both the women giving birth and the staff. The aim of the study is to describe the level of difficulty of this labor, expressed as the experience of the woman, as well as all the elements that may affect the difficulty of this labor, for example, slower or no progress in labor, disturbances in systolic function, injuries, the need to use epidural anesthesia, increased blood loss.
- Being tested
- n a
- Keywords
- fetal malposition, fetal left occiput position, fetal right occiput position
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
n aOther
the participants are not subjected to any type of intervention
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mode of delivery
Mode of delivery as measured by number of women who had a vaginal, instrumental or operational delivery.
Measured: immediately after delivery
Secondary outcomes (9)
Duration of delivery
the time of 1,2,3 and 4 stage of labor
Measured: immediately after birth
Uterine contractions
uterine contractions as measured by number of contractions and assessment of uterine contractile coordination
Measured: during birth
Labor progress
Labor progress as measured by assessment of the head insertion, advancement in the birth canal,
Measured: during birth
Epidural
as measured by epidural or not
Measured: immediately after delivery
Perineum injury
as measured by number and extent of injury
Measured: immediately after delivery
Episiotomy
as measured by episiotomy or not
Measured: immediately after delivery
Methods of placental separation
as measured by number of Duncan or SchultZ methods
Measured: immediately after delivery
Blood loss
postpartum blood loss (ml)
Measured: immediately after delivery
Difficulty of childbirth
difficulty of childbirth as measured by subjective assessment of the woman and the midwife
Measured: immediately after delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2021
- Study start31 Mar 2021
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Fetal Position and Presentation AbnormalitiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Żelazna Medical Centre, LLC
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Foundation for St. Sophia Specialist Hospital in Warsaw
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Barbara Baranowska, Żelazna Medical Centre, LLC
- Investigators
- Baranowska Baranowska, PhD, Study chair, Żelazna Medical Centre, LLC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04813237
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PN/29/2020
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Ahmad A, Webb SS, Early B, Sitch A, Khan K, Macarthur C. Association between fetal position at onset of labor and mode of delivery: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):176-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.13189.
PubMed 23929533Matsuo K, Shimoya K, Ushioda N, Kimura T. Maternal positioning and fetal positioning in utero. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Jun;33(3):279-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00524.x.
PubMed 17578355Guittier MJ, Othenin-Girard V, de Gasquet B, Irion O, Boulvain M. Maternal positioning to correct occiput posterior fetal position during the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):2199-2207. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13855. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
PubMed 26806596Choi SK, Park YG, Lee da H, Ko HS, Park IY, Shin JC. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during labor for the prediction of labor dystocia and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Dec;29(24):3988-92. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1152250. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
PubMed 26948718Khan KS. Optimal fetal positioning: a theory in tatters-time to rewrite textbooks. BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):2207. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13872. Epub 2016 Jan 25. No abstract available.
PubMed 26810973
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Implications of Fetal Positioning During Delivery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04813237
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PN/29/2020
- Keywords
- fetal malposition, fetal left occiput position, fetal right occiput position
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Żelazna Medical Centre, LLCUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Foundation for St. Sophia Specialist Hospital in Warsaw
- Study start
- 31 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The project aims to find a relationship between the positioning of the foetus before and during birth and the results of obstetrics and to determine their incidence in the Polish population. The study will be conducted by combining the use of ultrasound diagnostics, midwives observations during childbirth, analysis of medical documentation and a questionnaire on the activity of examined women. The obtained results will be used to prepare guidelines for the birth in a particular foetus position.
Detailed description
The purpose of the examination is to describe the difficulties associated with delivery in a non-optimal position of the fetus. Initial observations show that such childbirth is perceived as difficult by both the women giving birth and the staff. The aim of the study is to describe the level of difficulty of this labor, expressed as the experience of the woman, as well as all the elements that may affect the difficulty of this labor, for example, slower or no progress in labor, disturbances in systolic function, injuries, the need to use epidural anesthesia, increased blood loss.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- women coming to the 3rd level hospital with a birth house. During a physiological pregnancy, with no severe coexisting diseases.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- during childbirth,
- in a single pregnancy,
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- pelvic position of the fetus
- in whom labor is induced for reasons other than post-term pregnancy,
- women who came to the hospital in the second stage of labor
- severe diseases mother or foetus.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| n athe participants are not subjected to any type of intervention | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Mode of delivery
Time frame: immediately after delivery
Mode of delivery as measured by number of women who had a vaginal, instrumental or operational delivery.
9 secondary outcomes
Duration of delivery
Time frame: immediately after birth
Uterine contractions
Time frame: during birth
Labor progress
Time frame: during birth
Epidural
Time frame: immediately after delivery
Perineum injury
Time frame: immediately after delivery
Episiotomy
Time frame: immediately after delivery
Methods of placental separation
Time frame: immediately after delivery
Blood loss
Time frame: immediately after delivery
Difficulty of childbirth
Time frame: immediately after delivery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 23929533Ahmad A, Webb SS, Early B, Sitch A, Khan K, Macarthur C. Association between fetal position at onset of labor and mode of delivery: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):176-82. doi: 10.1002/uog.13189.
- Background: PubMed 17578355Matsuo K, Shimoya K, Ushioda N, Kimura T. Maternal positioning and fetal positioning in utero. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Jun;33(3):279-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00524.x.
- Background: PubMed 26806596Guittier MJ, Othenin-Girard V, de Gasquet B, Irion O, Boulvain M. Maternal positioning to correct occiput posterior fetal position during the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):2199-2207. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13855. Epub 2016 Jan 24.
- Background: PubMed 26948718Choi SK, Park YG, Lee da H, Ko HS, Park IY, Shin JC. Sonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during labor for the prediction of labor dystocia and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Dec;29(24):3988-92. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1152250. Epub 2016 Mar 7.
- Background: PubMed 26810973Khan KS. Optimal fetal positioning: a theory in tatters-time to rewrite textbooks. BJOG. 2016 Dec;123(13):2207. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13872. Epub 2016 Jan 25. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Baranowska Baranowska, PhD study chair
Żelazna Medical Centre, LLC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Fetal Position and Presentation Abnormalities, run by Żelazna Medical Centre, LLC at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Magdalena Witkiewicz, BA (603 404 799, magdawitkiewicz@o2.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mode of delivery (time frame: immediately after delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04813237, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2021.