AzTrials
AzTrials

VaccinationNCT04813770

The Impact of Theory-based Messaging on Covid-19 Vaccination Intentions

A study testing Theory-based messages and General messages in people with Vaccination and Covid19, run by University of Glasgow at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Uptake of vaccination against COVID-19 is key to controlling the pandemic. However, a significant proportion of people report that they do not intend to have a vaccine, often because of concerns they have about its side effects or safety. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vaccination, Covid19
What is being tested?
Theory-based messages and General messages
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,113 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
6 Apr 2021to 26 Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial
  • Aged 18 years or above
  • Resident in Scotland

Who cannot join

  • Received at least one COVID-19 vaccination dose

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • University of Glasgow

    Glasgow

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Uptake of vaccination against COVID-19 is key to controlling the pandemic. However, a significant proportion of people report that they do not intend to have a vaccine, often because of concerns they have about its side effects or safety. It is important to identify ways to communicate information about the vaccines that facilitate informed decisions rather than promoting uptake through coercion. This study will assess whether theory-based messages can change beliefs and increase intentions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine in Scotland. The messages will be based on publicly available information about the need for COVID-19 vaccination and the safety of the vaccines, and structured to address specific types of treatment beliefs. Participants will be randomised to either a group shown the messages or a control group shown general information messages about the COVID-19 virus and vaccination programme. By comparing the two groups we aim to test what impact the theory-based messages have on intentions and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccination.

Conditions
Vaccination, Covid19
Being tested
Theory-based messages, General messages
Keywords
vaccine hesitancy, vaccination uptake, messaging, illness beliefs, treatment beliefs
Medical subject headings
COVID-19, Vaccination Hesitancy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Theory-based messagesBehavioural

    COVID-19 vaccination information structured to address vaccination necessity and concerns.

  • General messagesBehavioural

    General messages about the COVID-19 virus and the vaccination programme.

Study groups in NCT04813770
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Theory-based messagesExperimentalTheory-based health messages about COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination, the necessity of COVID-19 vaccination to oneself and others, and COVID-19 vaccine regulatory approval processes. These messages are based on publicly available information and are hypothesised to increase perceived necessity and reduce concerns about vaccination, and target known barriers to vaccine uptake.
Receives: Behavioral: Theory-based messages
General messagesActive comparatorGeneral messages about the COVID-19 virus and the vaccination programme. These messages do not target necessity and concerns, but are anticipated to promote understanding of the pandemic.
Receives: Behavioral: General messages

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Covid-19 vaccination intention measured by a single item and aggregated as the proportion of intenders.

    Participants will be asked: "If you were invited to have a COVID-19 vaccination would you take the vaccine?" Those responding "yes, probably" or "yes, definitely" will be treated as intenders. Those responding "don't know", "probably not" or "definitely not" will be treated as non-intenders.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Mean COVID-19 illness coherence score as assessed by the IPQ-R

    Self-reported COVID-19 illness coherence as assessed by the the illness coherence subscale of the revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), with a minimum score of 5, a maximum score of 25 and a higher score representing greater personal understanding of COVID-19.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

  2. Mean perceived necessity score as assessed by the BMQ

    Self-reported perceived necessity of a COVID-19 vaccine as assessed by the Specific-Necessity subscale of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), with a minimum score of 5, a maximum score of 25 and a higher score representing greater perceived necessity of a COVID-19 vaccine.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

  3. Mean perceived concerns score as assessed by the BMQ

    Self-reported perceived concerns about a COVID-19 vaccine as assessed by the Specific-Concerns subscale of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), with a minimum score of 5, a maximum score of 25 and a higher score representing greater perceived concerns about a COVID-19 vaccine.

    Measured: Immediately post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2021
  2. Study start6 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion26 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion26 Apr 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
1,113 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04813770
Sponsor's protocol ID
200200052
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
23 Mar 2021
Last updated
10 May 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymised individual level study data will be shared via the University of Glasgow's repository Enlighten: Research Data.

Publications

  • Young B, Kotzur M, Gatting L, Bonner C, Ayre J, McConnachie A, Batcup C, McCaffery K, O'Carroll R, Robb KA. The impact of theory-based messages on COVID-19 vaccination intentions: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Apr 29;22(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05277-7.

    PubMed 33926540

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Theory-based messages and General messages in people with Vaccination and Covid19, run by University of Glasgow at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Covid-19 vaccination intention measured by a single item and aggregated as the proportion of intenders. (time frame: Immediately post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04813770, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in