FallNCT04814459
Prevention Focused Home-Based Physical Therapy Utilizing Community Partnership Referrals
A study testing HOP-UP-PT Program in people with Fall and Risk Reduction, run by Oakland University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This novel study supports the positive benefits of Home Based Older Persons Upstreaming Physical Therapy (HOP-UP-PT) to older adults identified as "at-risk" by their local senior center after participating in a prevention-focused multimodal program provided by physical therapists in their home. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Fall, Risk Reduction
- What is being tested?
- HOP-UP-PT Program
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 144 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2019to 15 May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Greater than or equal to 65 years of age
- Senior Community Center staff identified them as 'at-risk' for decline in community dwelling status due to physical, social, economic, or community-related barriers
- Willingness to participate
Who cannot join
- Received physical therapy services within the prior two months in any setting
- Had been hospitalized within the prior two months
- Were currently receiving palliative or hospice care
- Mini Cog score less than 4 and Trail Making Part B score greater than 273 seconds
- Outcomes American College of Sports Medicine exercise pre-participation health screening indicating physician clearance needed for participation and after evaluation the physician will not clear
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This novel study supports the positive benefits of Home Based Older Persons Upstreaming Physical Therapy (HOP-UP-PT) to older adults identified as "at-risk" by their local senior center after participating in a prevention-focused multimodal program provided by physical therapists in their home.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of Home Based Older Persons Upstreaming Physical Therapy (HOP-UP-PT) program participants and then to compare these outcomes to non-participants. 144 participants (n=72 per group) will be randomized to either the HOP-UP-PT intervention group or the Normal level of activity group. Six Michigan senior centers will refer adults ≥ 65 years who were at-risk for functional decline or falls. Licensed physical therapists will deliver physical, environmental, and health interventions within their approved scope of practice to the HOP-UP-PT intervention group during nine encounters (six in-person, three telerehabilitation) delivered over seven months. The Normal level of activity group participants are told to continue their usual physical activity routines during the same timeframe. Baseline and re-assessments are conducted at 0-, 3-, and 7-months for both the HOP-UP-PT intervention group and Normal level of activity group. Descriptions and comparisons from each assessment encounter will be analyzed.
- Conditions
- Fall, Risk Reduction
- Being tested
- HOP-UP-PT Program
- Keywords
- Older adults
- Medical subject headings
- Risk Reduction Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HOP-UP-PT ProgramOther
Interventions provided to EG participants included; (1) the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) which is a well-established exercise program with evidence that it reduces falls among community-dwelling older adults, (2) motivational interviewing (MI) to optimize positive health behaviors, and (3) home and environmental modification recommendations aimed at safety. Participants were provided with and educated on the use of a wrist-worn activity tracker and an automated BP monitor unit. Finally, when follow up items were identified (e.g., orthostatic hypotension, community exercise classes), these referrals were made and documented.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HOP-UP-PT Program | Experimental | HOP-UP-PT Program group will participate in the 7-month HOP-UP-PT program Receives: Other: HOP-UP-PT Program |
| Normal Level of Activity | No intervention | Normal Level of Activity group will be instructed to continue their normal level of activity throughout the 7-months after which they will be offered the opportunity to receive the HOP-UP-PT program |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Reported Falls
Record of falls in prior year, and between each subsequent visit.
Measured: 7 months
Modified Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
The Modified SPPB uses a 0-12 scale (0 = lowest function, 12 = highest function), calculated using collective outcomes of The Four Test Balance Scale (0= unable to perform, 1 = able to stand: feet together >10 sec, 2 = semi-tandem >10 sec, 4 = tandem stance >10 sec, higher score is better balance), 5 Time Sit to Stand (0 = >60 sec, 1=16.7 to 60 sec, 2 = 13.7 to 16.69 sec, 3 = 11.2 to 13.69 sec, and 4 = <11.19 sec, faster time is higher function), and the 3-meter gait speed test (0 = unable to perform, 1= > 6.52 sec, 2 = 4.66 to 6.52 sec, 3 = 3.62 to 4.65 sec, and 4 = < 3.62 sec, faster time is higher function). Each of the three categories has a highest score of 4 and are summed together for a highest total Modified SPPB score of 12.
Measured: 7 Months
Timed Up and Go
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) is a times assessment of sit to stand transfer, 20 foot bought of ambulation with a 180 degree turn at 10 feet concluding with a stand to sit transfer.
Measured: 7 Months
Stopping Elderly Accidents, Death & Injuries (STEADI) Fall Risk Categorization
Low, moderate, and high risk was determined relative to results of the stay independent brochure, subjective report of falls and fall risk and brochure questions, as well as gait, strength, and balance assessment. The Stopping Elderly Accidents, Death \& Injuries (STEADI) Algorithm underwent revisions since the study onset, the 2015 version was utilized as a guide for key outcome metrics reported in this study. Low STEADI risk =0, moderate STEADI risk =1, and high STEADI risk = 2. Low risk participants were categorized based on "no" responses to falls or fall risk questions as well as no gait, strength, or balance problems. Moderate risk participants were categorized by answering "yes" to key questions as well as demonstrating some gait, strength, or balance problems, and had a fall without injury. High risk participants were categorized by answering yes to key questions, demonstrating gait, strength, or balance problems, and had 2 or more falls or 1 fall with an injury.
Measured: 7 Months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Stay Independent Questionnaire
This questionnaire scores a fall risk on a scale from zero to 14, with 4 or more indicating a possible fall risk. Zero is the lowest fall risk score, 14 is a highest fall risk score.
Measured: 3 Months
Modified Falls Efficacy Scale
Measures fear of falling for 10 indoor and 4 outdoor activities. For each statement the participant circles a number that corresponds to their level of confidence, with zero being no confidence and 10 being extreme confidence. Once all 14 items are scored, they are added for a total score maximum of 140 which is then divided by 14. A number closer to 14 equates to more confidence, and a number closer to zero equates to less confidence.
Measured: 3 Months
Health Behavior Questionnaire
Assessment of current behaviors related to physical activity, consuming fruits and vegetables, not smoking, and being at a recommended weight. Patients are categorized using the five levels of the trans-theoretical model of behavior change. The pre-contemplating stage, or not ready for change is scored a 5. The contemplation stage or considering making a change in the next 6 months is scored a four. The preparation or preparing to make the change in the next 6 months is scored a 3. The action stage indicates the participant has made the change and is scored. The maintenance stage indicates the participants have maintained the change for at least 6 months and are scored a 1.
Measured: 3 Months
Functional Comorbidity Index
Self-assessment of disease comorbidity with physical function as the outcome. 18 diagnoses are listed and if the participant has been diagnosed with the condition it would be marked at a 1 and if they do not have the condition it would be marked as a zero. Zero would be the fewest amount of co-morbidities and 18 would be the highest amount of co-morbidities.
Measured: 7 Months
Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (Home FAST)
The tool evaluates 25 home safety domains and includes questions related to lighting, floor surfaces, and properly fitted foot wear. The original tool design was not scored but the investigators have added a scoring system (13 = safest environment to 50 = least safe environment) to quantify each question pertaining to the home environment. 13 home safety questions are scored as either Yes (indicating the recommended safety modifications was present) or No (indicating the recommended safety modifications had not been met). An additional 12 questions have an N/A option to be used in circumstances where a condition was not met (e.g., participant does not have a pet or stairs in the home). The investigators coded the responses as YES=1 point, NO= 2 points, an N/A= null within that category and not included during calculation. Therefore, overall Home FAST scores that decrease over time would suggest diminished home fall and accident risks related to their environment.
Measured: 7 Months
Body Mass Index
Assessment of body fat calculated from height and weight.
Measured: 7 Months
Blood Pressure
Assessment of mean resting blood pressure in seated position.
Measured: 7 Months
Number of Participants With Orthostatic Hypotension
Blood pressure was measured sequentially in supine, seated and standing and orthostatic hypotension was determined by the following parameters: a systolic blood pressure decrease of greater than or equal to 20 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure decrease of greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg between any of the three positions after three minutes in that position.
Measured: 7 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Jan 2019
- Primary completion15 May 2021
- Study completion15 May 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for FallStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Experimental group (EG) participated in the 7-month HOP-UP-PT control group (CG) included only baseline, 3-month, and 7-month assessments. The CG was instructed to continue their normal level of activity throughout the 7-months after which they were offered the opportunity to receive the HOP-UP-PT program. This study reports only the 7-month time frame during which the EG and CG can be directly compared.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oakland University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Michigan Health Endowment Fund
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sara Arena, DScPT, Principal investigator, Oakland University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04814459
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 912215-18
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 11 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared
Publications
Wilson CM, Arena SK, Adcock K, Colling D. A Home-Based Older Person Upstreaming Prevention Physical Therapy (HOP-UP-PT) Program Utilizing Community Partnership Referrals. Home Healthc Now. 2019 Mar/Apr;37(2):88-96. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000716.
PubMed 30829786Arena SK, Wilson CM, Peterson E. Targeted Population Health Utilizing Direct Referral to Home-Based Older Person Upstreaming Prevention Physical Therapy From a Community-Based Senior Center. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2020;31(1):11-21. doi:10.1097/CPT.0000000000000131
Wilson C, Arena SK, Starceski R, Swanson K. Older Adults' Outcomes and Perceptions After Participating in the HOP-UP-PT Program: A Prospective Descriptive Study. Home Healthc Now. 2020 Mar/Apr;38(2):86-91. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000843.
PubMed 32134816Measuring orthostatic blood pressure. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/materials.html
Hill KD, Schwarz JA, Kalogeropoulos AJ, Gibson SJ. Fear of falling revisited. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Oct;77(10):1025-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90063-5.
PubMed 8857881Black B, Marcoux BC, Stiller C, Qu X, Gellish R. Personal health behaviors and role-modeling attitudes of physical therapists and physical therapist students: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther. 2012 Nov;92(11):1419-36. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110037. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
PubMed 22822236Groll DL, To T, Bombardier C, Wright JG. The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.018.
PubMed 15878473Adult BMI Calculator. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2020. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/english_bmi_calculator/bmi_calculator.html
STEADI: Algorithm for FallRisk Screening, Assessment, and Intervention. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2017. Accessed January 28, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/materials.html
Mackenzie L, Byles J, Higginbotham N. Reliability of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST) for identifying older people at increased risk of falls. Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Mar 20;24(5):266-74. doi: 10.1080/09638280110087089.
PubMed 12004972Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 1997 Aug;77(8):812-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.8.812.
PubMed 9256869Four Stage Balance Test. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2017. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/pdf/4-Stage_Balance_Test-print.pdf
Macfarlane DJ, Chou KL, Cheng YH, Chi I. Validity and normative data for thirty-second chair stand test in elderly community-dwelling Hong Kong Chinese. Am J Hum Biol. 2006 May-Jun;18(3):418-21. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20503.
PubMed 16634026Five Time Sit to Stand Test. Shirley Ryan Ability Lab. Published 2021. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.sralab.org/rehabilitation-measures/five-times-sit-stand-test
Tiedemann A, Shimada H, Sherrington C, Murray S, Lord S. The comparative ability of eight functional mobility tests for predicting falls in community-dwelling older people. Age Ageing. 2008 Jul;37(4):430-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn100. Epub 2008 May 16.
PubMed 18487264
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention Focused Home-Based Physical Therapy Utilizing Community Partnership Referrals
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04814459
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 912215-18
- Conditions
- Fall, Risk Reduction
- Keywords
- Older adults
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oakland UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Michigan Health Endowment Fund
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 May 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 11 Oct 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This novel study supports the positive benefits of Home Based Older Persons Upstreaming Physical Therapy (HOP-UP-PT) to older adults identified as "at-risk" by their local senior center after participating in a prevention-focused multimodal program provided by physical therapists in their home.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of Home Based Older Persons Upstreaming Physical Therapy (HOP-UP-PT) program participants and then to compare these outcomes to non-participants. 144 participants (n=72 per group) will be randomized to either the HOP-UP-PT intervention group or the Normal level of activity group. Six Michigan senior centers will refer adults ≥ 65 years who were at-risk for functional decline or falls. Licensed physical therapists will deliver physical, environmental, and health interventions within their approved scope of practice to the HOP-UP-PT intervention group during nine encounters (six in-person, three telerehabilitation) delivered over seven months. The Normal level of activity group participants are told to continue their usual physical activity routines during the same timeframe. Baseline and re-assessments are conducted at 0-, 3-, and 7-months for both the HOP-UP-PT intervention group and Normal level of activity group. Descriptions and comparisons from each assessment encounter will be analyzed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Experimental group (EG) participated in the 7-month HOP-UP-PT control group (CG) included only baseline, 3-month, and 7-month assessments. The CG was instructed to continue their normal level of activity throughout the 7-months after which they were offered the opportunity to receive the HOP-UP-PT program. This study reports only the 7-month time frame during which the EG and CG can be directly compared.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HOP-UP-PT Program | Experimental | Other: HOP-UP-PT ProgramHOP-UP-PT Program group will participate in the 7-month HOP-UP-PT program |
| Normal Level of Activity | No intervention | –Normal Level of Activity group will be instructed to continue their normal level of activity throughout the 7-months after which they will be offered the opportunity to receive the HOP-UP-PT program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Greater than or equal to 65 years of age
- Senior Community Center staff identified them as 'at-risk' for decline in community dwelling status due to physical, social, economic, or community-related barriers
- Willingness to participate
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Received physical therapy services within the prior two months in any setting
- Had been hospitalized within the prior two months
- Were currently receiving palliative or hospice care
- Mini Cog score less than 4 and Trail Making Part B score greater than 273 seconds
- Outcomes American College of Sports Medicine exercise pre-participation health screening indicating physician clearance needed for participation and after evaluation the physician will not clear
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HOP-UP-PT ProgramInterventions provided to EG participants included; (1) the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) which is a well-established exercise program with evidence that it reduces falls among community-dwelling older adults, (2) motivational interviewing (MI) to optimize positive health behaviors, and (3) home and environmental modification recommendations aimed at safety. Participants were provided with and educated on the use of a wrist-worn activity tracker and an automated BP monitor unit. Finally, when follow up items were identified (e.g., orthostatic hypotension, community exercise classes), these referrals were made and documented. | Other | HOP-UP-PT Program |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Reported Falls
Time frame: 7 months
Record of falls in prior year, and between each subsequent visit.
Modified Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time frame: 7 Months
The Modified SPPB uses a 0-12 scale (0 = lowest function, 12 = highest function), calculated using collective outcomes of The Four Test Balance Scale (0= unable to perform, 1 = able to stand: feet together >10 sec, 2 = semi-tandem >10 sec, 4 = tandem stance >10 sec, higher score is better balance), 5 Time Sit to Stand (0 = >60 sec, 1=16.7 to 60 sec, 2 = 13.7 to 16.69 sec, 3 = 11.2 to 13.69 sec, and 4 = <11.19 sec, faster time is higher function), and the 3-meter gait speed test (0 = unable to perform, 1= > 6.52 sec, 2 = 4.66 to 6.52 sec, 3 = 3.62 to 4.65 sec, and 4 = < 3.62 sec, faster time is higher function). Each of the three categories has a highest score of 4 and are summed together for a highest total Modified SPPB score of 12.
Timed Up and Go
Time frame: 7 Months
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) is a times assessment of sit to stand transfer, 20 foot bought of ambulation with a 180 degree turn at 10 feet concluding with a stand to sit transfer.
Stopping Elderly Accidents, Death & Injuries (STEADI) Fall Risk Categorization
Time frame: 7 Months
Low, moderate, and high risk was determined relative to results of the stay independent brochure, subjective report of falls and fall risk and brochure questions, as well as gait, strength, and balance assessment. The Stopping Elderly Accidents, Death \& Injuries (STEADI) Algorithm underwent revisions since the study onset, the 2015 version was utilized as a guide for key outcome metrics reported in this study. Low STEADI risk =0, moderate STEADI risk =1, and high STEADI risk = 2. Low risk participants were categorized based on "no" responses to falls or fall risk questions as well as no gait, strength, or balance problems. Moderate risk participants were categorized by answering "yes" to key questions as well as demonstrating some gait, strength, or balance problems, and had a fall without injury. High risk participants were categorized by answering yes to key questions, demonstrating gait, strength, or balance problems, and had 2 or more falls or 1 fall with an injury.
8 secondary outcomes
Stay Independent Questionnaire
Time frame: 3 Months
Modified Falls Efficacy Scale
Time frame: 3 Months
Health Behavior Questionnaire
Time frame: 3 Months
Functional Comorbidity Index
Time frame: 7 Months
Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (Home FAST)
Time frame: 7 Months
Body Mass Index
Time frame: 7 Months
Blood Pressure
Time frame: 7 Months
Number of Participants With Orthostatic Hypotension
Time frame: 7 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Oct 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 30829786Wilson CM, Arena SK, Adcock K, Colling D. A Home-Based Older Person Upstreaming Prevention Physical Therapy (HOP-UP-PT) Program Utilizing Community Partnership Referrals. Home Healthc Now. 2019 Mar/Apr;37(2):88-96. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000716.
- BackgroundArena SK, Wilson CM, Peterson E. Targeted Population Health Utilizing Direct Referral to Home-Based Older Person Upstreaming Prevention Physical Therapy From a Community-Based Senior Center. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2020;31(1):11-21. doi:10.1097/CPT.0000000000000131
- Background: PubMed 32134816Wilson C, Arena SK, Starceski R, Swanson K. Older Adults' Outcomes and Perceptions After Participating in the HOP-UP-PT Program: A Prospective Descriptive Study. Home Healthc Now. 2020 Mar/Apr;38(2):86-91. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000843.
- BackgroundMeasuring orthostatic blood pressure. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/materials.html
- Background: PubMed 8857881Hill KD, Schwarz JA, Kalogeropoulos AJ, Gibson SJ. Fear of falling revisited. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Oct;77(10):1025-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90063-5.
- Background: PubMed 22822236Black B, Marcoux BC, Stiller C, Qu X, Gellish R. Personal health behaviors and role-modeling attitudes of physical therapists and physical therapist students: a cross-sectional study. Phys Ther. 2012 Nov;92(11):1419-36. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110037. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
- Background: PubMed 15878473Groll DL, To T, Bombardier C, Wright JG. The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Jun;58(6):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.018.
- BackgroundAdult BMI Calculator. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2020. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/adult_bmi/english_bmi_calculator/bmi_calculator.html
- BackgroundSTEADI: Algorithm for FallRisk Screening, Assessment, and Intervention. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2017. Accessed January 28, 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/materials.html
- Background: PubMed 12004972Mackenzie L, Byles J, Higginbotham N. Reliability of the Home Falls and Accidents Screening Tool (HOME FAST) for identifying older people at increased risk of falls. Disabil Rehabil. 2002 Mar 20;24(5):266-74. doi: 10.1080/09638280110087089.
- Background: PubMed 9256869Shumway-Cook A, Baldwin M, Polissar NL, Gruber W. Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults. Phys Ther. 1997 Aug;77(8):812-9. doi: 10.1093/ptj/77.8.812.
- BackgroundFour Stage Balance Test. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Published 2017. Accessed January 25, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/steadi/pdf/4-Stage_Balance_Test-print.pdf
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared
Related trials for Fall
Recruiting
A Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effects of Adrenal Adapt on Sleep Quality, Daytime Energy, Stress Resilience, and Cognitive Performance.
Improves Daytime Energy Levels, Reduces Afternoon Energy Crashes and Midday Fatigue
Recruiting
Decoding the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Postural Instability and Gait Dysfunction in Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease, Freezing of Gait
Recruiting
Investigating the Increased Risk of Falls in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease Treated With Deep Brain Stimulation
Deep Brain Stimulation, PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Repeat Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Sickle Cell Disease and Falling Donor Myeloid Chimerism Levels
Myeloid Chimerism
Recruiting
Effects of a Community-based Multicomponent Physical Exercise Program on Physical Function, Frailty, and Sarcopenia in Older Adults From the Municipality of Santoña: a Quasi-experimental Study.
Frailty/Sarcopenia, Frailty in Older Adults
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sara Arena, DScPT principal investigator
Oakland University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HOP-UP-PT Program in people with Fall and Risk Reduction, run by Oakland University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Reported Falls (time frame: 7 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04814459, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2021.