AzTrials
AzTrials

Covid19Phase 3STOP-COVID19NCT04817332

STOP-COVID19: Superiority Trial Of Protease Inhibition in COVID-19

A Phase 3 study testing Brensocatib in people with Covid19, run by University of Dundee at 16 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

COVID-19 is a respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and causes substantial morbidity and mortality. There is currently no vaccine to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 and no therapeutic agent to treat COVID-19. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Covid19
What is being tested?
Brensocatib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
406 participants
Where
16 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
5 Jun 2020to 28 Feb 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 6.1. Inclusion criteria
  • Male or female
  • ≥16 years of age
  • SARS-CoV-2 infection (clinically suspected+ or laboratory confirmed*).
  • Admitted to hospital as in-patient less than 96 hours prior to randomisation^
  • Illness of any duration, and at least one of the following:
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Radiographic infiltrates by imaging (e.g. chest x-ray, computed tomography (CT) scan) OR
  • Evidence of rales/crackles on physical examination OR
  • Peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≤94% on room air prior to randomization OR
  • Requiring supplemental oxygen. OR
  • Lymphocyte count <1 x 109 cells per litre (L)
  • Participant (or legally authorized representative) provides written informed consent
  • Able to take oral medication
  • Participant (or legally authorised representative) understands and agrees to comply with planned trial procedures.
  • Laboratory-confirmed: SARS-CoV-2 infection as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or other commercial or public health assay in any specimen < 96 hours prior to randomization.
  • Clinically suspected: in general, SARS-CoV-2 infection should be suspected when a patient presents with (i) typical symptoms (e.g. influenza-like illness with fever and muscle pain, or respiratory illness with cough and shortness of breath); and (ii) compatible chest X-ray findings (consolidation or ground-glass shadowing); and (iii) alternative causes have been considered unlikely or excluded (e.g. heart failure, influenza). However, the diagnosis remains a clinical one based on the opinion of the managing doctor
  • Where a patient has been admitted to hospital for a non COVID-19 reason and develops COVID-19 symptoms whilst an in-patient, randomisation may occur up to 96 hours from onset of symptoms.

Who cannot join

  • Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 5 times the upper limit of normal, result within 72 hours of randomization (the result closest to randomization should be used if several results are available).
  • History of severe liver disease
  • Stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease or requiring dialysis (i.e. estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate < 30), result within 72 hours of randomization (the result closest to randomization should be used if several results are available)
  • Absolute neutrophil count less than 1.0 x 109 cells per L within 72 hours of randomization (the result closest to randomization should be used if several results are available)
  • Current treatments with potent Cyp3A4 inducers/inhibitors (e.g Itraconazole, Ketoconazole, diltiazem, verapamil, phenytoin or rifampicin)
  • HIV treatments - current treatment with protease/integrase inhibitors or non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors*
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Pregnant or breast feeding.
  • Anticipated transfer to another hospital which is not a trial site within 24 hours.
  • Allergy to Brensocatib
  • Use of any investigational drug within five times of the elimination half-life after the last trial dose or within 30 days, whichever is longer. Co-enrolment with COVID-19 trials is allowed as per co-enrolment agreements and/or individual decision by the Chief Investigator.
  • Women of child-bearing potential must be willing to have pregnancy testing prior to trial entry.
  • The Liverpool HIV checker (https://www.hiv-druginteractions.org/checker) should be used to check for any HIV drug interactions. Simvastatin could be used as a surrogate for Brensocatib as it metabolised similarly by CYP 3A4 pathway.
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

16 sites in 1 country.

16 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom16 sites
  • NHS Grampian

    Aberdeen

  • Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust

    Bath

  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust

    Birmingham

  • Cardiff & Vale University Health Board

    Cardiff

  • NHS Tayside

    Dundee

  • NHS Fife

    Dunfermline

  • Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust

    Frimley

  • Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust

    Harlow

  • NHS Highland

    Inverness

  • NHS Forth Valley

    Larbert

  • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

    Leicester

  • Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Liverpool

  • Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust

    Portsmouth

  • Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

    Sheffield

  • University Hospitals North Midlands NHS Trust

    Stoke-on-Trent

  • NHS Lanarkshire

    Wishaw

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomised Double-blind Placebo-controlled Trial of Brensocatib (INS1007) in Patients With Severe COVID-19

COVID-19 is a respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) and causes substantial morbidity and mortality. There is currently no vaccine to prevent infection with SARS-CoV-2 and no therapeutic agent to treat COVID-19. This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the potential of Brensocatib (INS1007) as a novel host directed therapy for the treatment of adult patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The investigators hypothesise that Brensocatib, by blocking damaging neutrophil proteases, will reduce the incidence of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with COVID-19, thereby resulting in improved clinical outcomes at day 15 and day 29, fewer days dependent on oxygen or mechanical ventilation, and shorter length of hospital stay.

High rates of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and overwhelming intensive care unit capacity has been the major issue contributing to excess deaths in Italy and Spain during the pandemic and is likely to be a major issue in other countries such as the United Kingdom in the coming weeks. Treatments that could prevent the requirement for mechanical ventilation or shorten the duration of ICU stay by reducing the severity of ARDS are therefore the number 1 target for COVID19 therapy.

Read more

The investigators recently conducted a large phase 2 study of Brensocatib in patients with bronchiectasis designed to test if treatment with Brensocatib could reduce infective exacerbations and reduce neutrophil elastase activity in the lung in bronchiectasis patients. The study met its primary endpoint of time to first exacerbation and key secondary endpoint of the frequency of exacerbations as well as showing marked reductions in neutrophil elastase concentrations in sputum.

Participants will be randomised to receive Brensocatib or placebo 25mg orally once daily for 28 days.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND COVID-19 is a respiratory disease caused by a novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and causes substantial morbidity and mortality.This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the potential of Brensocatib as a novel host directed therapy for the treatment of adult patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The investigators hypothesise that Brensocatib, by blocking damaging neutrophil proteases, will reduce the incidence of acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with COVID-19, thereby resulting in improved clinical outcomes at day 15 and day 29, fewer days dependent on oxygen or mechanical ventilation, and shorter length of hospital stay.

Coronavirus (CoVs) are positive-sense single stranded enveloped Ribonucleic acid (RNA) viruses, many of which are commonly found in humans and cause mild symptoms. Over the past two decades, emerging pathogenic CoVs capable of causing life-threatening disease in humans and animals have been identified, namely severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS- CoV).

In December 2019, the Wuhan Municipal Health Committee (Wuhan, China) identified an outbreak of viral pneumonia cases of unknown cause.5 Coronavirus RNA was quickly identified in some of these patients. This novel coronavirus has been abbreviated as SARS-COV-2 and has 89% nucleotide identity with bat SARS-like-CoVZXC21 and 82% with that of human SARS-CoV. This novel coronavirus has been designated SARS-CoV-2, and the disease caused by this virus has been designated COVID-19. Initial infections were travel associated with individuals having contact with Wuhan or other affected areas but the disease has now spread to affect hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide with widespread community transmission across the globe.

Outbreak forecasting and mathematical modelling suggest that these numbers will continue to rise.

Global efforts to evaluate novel antivirals and therapeutic strategies to treat COVID-19 have intensified but to date dexamethasone is the only therapy shown to reduce mortality in COVID-19 while repurposed antiviral drugs did not show clinical benefits in the World Health Organisation SOLIDARITY trial.

Mortality from COVID-19 has been estimated at between 0.5% and 3.4% of infected patients and occurs most frequently because of the development of ARDS. In contrast to some, particularly bacterial pneumonias, where patients present with acute respiratory failure and sepsis, the dynamics of COVID-19 infection demonstrate a slow deterioration in oxygenation with the development of bilateral infiltrates in a high proportion of patients, consistent with the development of ARDS. Patients subsequently require mechanical ventilation.

Treatments that could prevent the requirement for mechanical ventilation or shorten the duration of intensive care unit stay by reducing the severity of ARDS are therefore the number 1 target for COVID-19 therapy.

Neutrophils in ARDS Neutrophil influx into the extravascular compartments of the lungs is a defining characteristic of ARDS. During ARDS, circulating neutrophils become primed, resulting in reduce deformability and retention within the pulmonary capillary bed. They then migrate across the endothelium through the interstitium and epithelium into the airways themselves. As neutrophils migrate they are activated and release oxidants, proteases and neutrophil extracellular traps. All of these processes are important in killing bacterial pathogens but in ARDS these processes become prolonged and excessive leading to progressive lung damage. Neutrophil elastase and other neutrophil proteases such as proteinase-3 and cathepsin-G cause tissue injury resulting in increased epithelial and endothelial permeability which leads to the influx of protein-rich alveolar oedema.

Mortality in ARDS correlates directly with the extent of neutrophilia in the lung. Both human clinical data and murine studies demonstrate a key role for neutrophils in ARDS. Neutrophil depletion in multiple models of ARDS including those induced by lipopolysaccharide, acid, ventilator lung injury, transfusion and other stimuli, reduces the severity of acute lung injury including endothelial-epithelial cell damage and capillary-alveolar permeability.

Neutrophil proteases and particularly neutrophil elastase are believed to be central to the neutrophil induced lung damage. Neutrophil elastase is a serine protease contained within primary neutrophil granules which is released in response to neutrophil activation or neutrophil extracellular trap formation. It is involved in the pathogenesis of multiple inflammatory diseases and therapeutic development of neutrophil elastase inhibitors for use in ARDS has been ongoing for many years. Neutrophil elastase is markedly elevated in human ARDS samples and the inhibition of neutrophil elastase has been demonstrated to reduce epithelial injury in multiple animal models of lung injury across multiple stimuli including lipopolysaccharide (LPS), bleomycin, ventilation, sepsis and many others. Neutrophil elastase is critical to the development of neutrophil extracellular traps, which are highly damaging webs of DNA studded with proteases and other neutrophil derived toxins. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation and the failure to clear NETs have been strongly implicated in the development and poor outcomes from ARDS. Inhibition of neutrophil elastase reduces the formation of NETs.

A challenge therapeutically has been how to inhibit neutrophil elastase since administration of competitive inhibitors either orally or through the inhaled route may not be sufficient to block elastase activity in the lung.

RATIONALE Neutrophil elastase, proteinase-3 and cathepsin-G are activated during neutrophil maturation in the bone marrow through dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1; also known as cathepsin C), which removes the N-terminal dipeptide sequence of neutrophil serine proteases allowing active enzymes to be packaged into granules prior to release of neutrophils into the circulation. Brensocatib (INS1007, formerly AZD7986) is an orally delivered selective, competitive, and reversible inhibitor of DPP1. Brensocatib has been shown to inhibit neutrophil serine protease activity in blood in both animal models and healthy volunteers.

The investigators recently conducted a large phase 2 study of Brensocatib in patients with bronchiectasis designed to test if treatment with Brensocatib could reduce infective exacerbations and reduce neutrophil elastase activity in the lung in bronchiectasis patients. The study met its primary endpoint of time to first exacerbation and key secondary endpoint of the frequency of exacerbations as well as showing marked reductions in neutrophil elastase concentrations in sputum. Due to the need to replace the circulating pool of neutrophils with new neutrophils which are deficient in elastase, Brensocatib does not have its effect immediately, but rather over several days. Elastase concentrations were reduced at the first time point at day 14 in the phase 2 study, with very large reductions observed at the second time point at day 28.

In a cohort of 191 hospitalised COVID-19 patients with a completed outcome, the median time from illness onset to discharge was 22·0 days (IQR 18·0-25·0) and the median time to death was 18·5 days (15·0-22·0). Thirty-two patients (17%) required invasive mechanical ventilation and the median time from onset to mechanical ventilation was 14.5 days. The investigators hypothesise that the mechanism of action of Brensocatib to reduce protease activity will be more rapid in COVID-19 patients compared to bronchiectasis due to a more rapid turnover of neutrophils in acute illness. The objective is to test whether by reducing neutrophil protease activity in neutrophils the investigatorscan prevent or reverse the development of ARDS and thereby improve outcomes in individuals with COVID-19 infection.

Conditions
Covid19
Being tested
Brensocatib, Placebo
Medical subject headings
COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • BrensocatibDrug

    Also called INS1007

    Selective, competitive, and reversible inhibitor of DPP1

  • PlaceboDrug

    Matched placebo

Study groups in NCT04817332
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
BrensocatibExperimentalBrensocatib oral tablet, 25mg once per day for 28 days
Receives: Drug: Brensocatib
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorPlacebo oral tablet, 25mg once per day for 28 days
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of Participant Clinical Status Between Treatment Arms

    To determine the participant clinical status on a 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome:

    1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities
    2. Not hospitalised, limitation on activities;
    3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen;
    4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen;
    5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices;
    6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
    7. Death.

    Measured: Up to 29 days

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Improvement of One Category From Admission Using 7-point Ordinal Scale.

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome:

    1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities
    2. Not hospitalised, limitations on activities
    3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen
    4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen
    5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices
    6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
    7. Death

    Measured: Day 29

  2. Participant Clinical Status on 7-point Ordinal Scale

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome:

    1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities
    2. Not hospitalised, limitations on activities
    3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen
    4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen
    5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices
    6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
    7. Death

    Measured: Day 15

  3. Mean Change in the 7-point Ordinal Scale

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: 7-point ordinal scale, minimum value 1, maximum value 7. Higher values indicate a worse outcome:

    1. Not hospitalised, no limitations on activities
    2. Not hospitalised, limitations on activities
    3. Hospitalised, not requiring supplemental oxygen
    4. Hospitalised, requiring supplemental oxygen
    5. Hospitalised, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices
    6. Hospitalised, on invasive mechanical ventilation or Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)
    7. Death

    Measured: Baseline to days 3, 5, 8, 11 and 29

  4. Number of Participants Discharged or to a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) of Equal or Less Than 2 and Maintained for 24 Hours, Whichever Occurs First.

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: National Early Warning Score (NEWS). NEWS is a system that scores 6 physiological parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new-onset confusion, temperature) to give an aggerate score. Minimum score is 1, maximum score is 20.. Higher scores indicate worsening clinical outcomes.

    Measured: Up to 29 days

  5. Change From Baseline of National Early Warning Score (NEWS).

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: National Early Warning Score. NEWS is a system that scores 6 physiological parameters (respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new-onset confusion, temperature) to give an aggerate score. Minimum score is 1, maximum score is 20.. Higher scores indicate worsening clinical outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline to day 15

  6. Number of Oxygen Therapy Free Days

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: oxygenation

    Measured: 1-29 days

  7. Incidence and Duration of New Oxygen Therapy Use During the Trial

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: oxygenation

    Measured: 0-29 days

  8. Number of Mechanical Ventilator Free Days

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: Mechanical ventilation

    Measured: 1-29 days

  9. Incidence and Duration of New Mechanical Ventilation Use During the Trial.

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: Mechanical ventilation

    Measured: 1-29 days

  10. Duration of Hospitalisation (Days).

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: hospitalisation

    Measured: Duration between date of admission and discharge assessed up to 29 days.

  11. 28-day Mortality

    Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of Brensocatib relative to standard care: mortality. Survival analysis was used to compare 28-day mortality between the treatment arms. Participants who did not die were censored on the last study day. Those who withdrew or were loss to follow-up and their day 29 status was unknown were censored at the date of loss to follow-up/withdrawal. Other participants were censored 28 days from randomisation in study time.

    Measured: Day 1 to 29

  12. Cumulative Incidence of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 29 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: 1-29 days

  13. Discontinuation or Temporary Suspension of Treatment

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: 1-29 days

  14. Changes in White Cell Count (x10^9/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: Day 29

  15. Changes in Haemoglobin (g/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: Day 29

  16. Changes in Platelets (x10^9/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: Day 29

  17. Changes in Creatinine (Umol/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: Day 29

  18. Changes in Total Bilirubin (Umol/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: Day 29

  19. Changes in Alanine Aminotransferase (U/L) Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: Day 29

  20. Changes in Aspartate Aminotransferase U/L Over Time (Hospitalised Participants Only)

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 28 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: Day 29

  21. Adverse Events of Special Interest- Hyperkeratosis, Infections and Dental Complications

    Evaluation of the safety of the intervention through 29 days of follow-up as compared to the control arm

    Measured: 1-29 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2021
  2. Study start5 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
406 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04817332
Sponsor's protocol ID
01.01.20
Other IDs
2020-001643-13, 281986
Acronym
STOP-COVID19
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
25 Jan 2021
Last updated
22 Aug 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Brensocatib in people with Covid19, run by University of Dundee at 16 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 16 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of Participant Clinical Status Between Treatment Arms (time frame: Up to 29 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in