AzTrials
AzTrials

Perceived StressFORESTNCT04817995

Stress Recovery Program FOREST for Healthcare Staff

A study testing FOREST in people with Perceived Stress, run by Vilnius University at 1 site in Lithuania.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of an internet-based stress recovery intervention among healthcare staff during COVID-19 pandemic. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Perceived Stress
What is being tested?
FOREST
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
208 participants
Where
1 siteLithuania
Study dates
22 Apr 2021to 31 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • at least 18 years old;
  • comprehending Lithuanian language;
  • access to internet;
  • high levels of stress.

Who cannot join

  • acute psychiatric crisis;
  • high suicide risk;
  • interpersonal violence;
  • alcohol / drug addiction.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Lithuania1 site
  • Vilnius University

    Vilnius

Other trials in Lithuania

About this study

Official title: Stress Recovery Program FOREST for Healthcare Staff: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of an internet-based stress recovery intervention among healthcare staff during COVID-19 pandemic.

Read the detailed description

Intervention is going to take the form of an internet-based stress recovery intervention consisting of six modules. The themes include introduction, psychological detachment, distancing, mastery, control, and keeping the change alive. These themes were chosen after considering topics that might be the most useful for healthcare staff experiencing high levels of stress. Each module consists of psychoeducation and exercise parts. Psychologist provide individual feedback on completed exercises as well as can be reached on demand.

The effect of the intervention will be compared against a waiting list control group. Intervention is in Lithuanian.

Being tested
FOREST
Keywords
Healthcare staff, Perceived stress, Internet intervention, Recovery, Efficacy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FORESTBehavioural

    Intervention is going to take the form of an internet-based stress recovery intervention consisting of six modules. The themes include introduction, psychological detachment, distancing, mastery, control, and keeping the change alive. These themes were chosen after considering topics that might be the most useful for healthcare staff experiencing high levels of stress. Each module consists of psychoeducation and exercise parts. Psychologist provide individual feedback on completed exercises as well as can be reached on demand.

Study groups in NCT04817995
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalThe intervention group will get a 6-week internet-based stress recovery intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: FOREST
Control groupNo interventionThe waiting list will get no intervention while the intervention group is getting the intervention. The waiting list has the possibility to get an intervention after the intervention group finishes it.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change on Recovery Experience Questionnaire

    Changes on stress recovery are measured. Recovery Experiences Questionnaire (Sonnentag \& Fritz, 2007) is a self-report measure and consists of 16 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 1 (Totally disagree) to 5 (Totally agree). Higher score indicates more pronounced recovery.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change on International Trauma Questionnaire

    Changes on post-traumatic stress disorder are measured. International Trauma Questionanaire (ITQ, Cloitre et al., 2018) is a self-report measure and consists of 18 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Higher score indicates more pronounced symptoms.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatment

  2. Change on Moral Injury Outcome Scale

    Changes on moral injury are measured. Moral Injury Outcome Scale (MIOS, Litz et al., 2020) is a self-report measure and consists of 15 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (Strongly disagree) to 4 (Strongly agree). Higher score indicates more pronounced moral injury.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatment

  3. Change on Perceived Stress Scale

    Changes on perceived stress are measured. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4, Cohen et al., 1983) is a self-report measure and consists of 4 questions. All items are answered on a 5-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (Never) to 4 (Very often). Higher score indicates more pronounced perceived stress.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatment

  4. Change on Patient Health Questionnaire

    Changes on depression and anxiety are measured. Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4, Kroenke et al., 2009) is a self-report measure and consists of 4 questions. All items are answered on a 4-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (Nearly every day). Higher score indicates more pronounced depression and anxiety.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatment

  5. Change on Well-being Index

    Changes on well-being are measured. Well-being Index (WHO-5, Bech, 2004) is a self-report measure and consists of 5 questions. All items are answered on a 6-point Likert scale that ranges from 0 (At no time) to 5 (All of the time). Higher score indicates more pronounced well-being.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2021
  2. Study start22 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion22 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly allocated either to the intervention or control groups. The control group is a waiting list. The control group will participate in the intervention after it will be completed for the intervention group.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
208 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04817995
Sponsor's protocol ID
2021-03-22/61
Acronym
FOREST
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
23 Mar 2021
Last updated
18 Jan 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Dumarkaite A, Truskauskaite I, Andersson G, Jovarauskaite L, Jovaisiene I, Nomeikaite A, Kazlauskas E. The efficacy of the internet-based stress recovery intervention FOREST for nurses amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A randomized controlled trial. Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Feb;138:104408. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104408. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

    PubMed 36527859
  • Jovarauskaite L, Murphy D, Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene I, Dumarkaite A, Andersson G, Kazlauskas E. Associations between moral injury and ICD-11 post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD among help-seeking nurses: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022 May 9;12(5):e056289. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056289.

    PubMed 35534083
  • Jovarauskaite L, Dumarkaite A, Truskauskaite-Kuneviciene I, Jovaisiene I, Andersson G, Kazlauskas E. Internet-based stress recovery intervention FOREST for healthcare staff amid COVID-19 pandemic: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021 Aug 21;22(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05512-1.

    PubMed 34419114

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing FOREST in people with Perceived Stress, run by Vilnius University at 1 site in Lithuania.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Lithuania. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change on Recovery Experience Questionnaire (time frame: Pre-treatment, after 6 weeks, 3 months post-treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04817995, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in