Pelvic Girdle PainNCT04818411
Comparison of Stabilization Exercises Versus Thrust Manipulation Technique on Pelvic Girdle Pain.
A study testing Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises and Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation in people with Pelvic Girdle Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The objective of this research is to compare the efficacy of stabilization exercise versus pelvic girdle pain thrust manipulation technique in females with postpartum pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pelvic Girdle Pain
- What is being tested?
- Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises and Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 18 Aug 2019to 26 Jul 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- • Post-partum females with the normal vaginal delivery present with pelvic girdle pain before the next conception.
- Aged between 18 and 45
- Posterior pelvic girdle pain located distal and/or lateral to the L5-S1
- Pain onset during pregnancy or within 3 weeks after delivery, most recent delivery within 6 to 16 weeks
- Positive posterior pelvic pain provocation (P4) test
Who cannot join
- Patients presenting with the history of:
- Back pain indicating radiculopathy
- Mechanical back pain
- Back pain due to disc herniation
- Rheumatological diseases
- Neurological illness or recent surgery
- Women who have gone through C-section
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The objective of this research is to compare the efficacy of stabilization exercise versus pelvic girdle pain thrust manipulation technique in females with postpartum pain.
Read the detailed description
Pelvic-girdle pain is a mechanical disorder growing rapidly as a consequence of changing delivery pattern and changing lifestyle. Medication with synthetic drugs not only has been unable to effectively curtail the spread of this disease conditions but also is most of the times linked with co-occurring side-effects. The exercise and manual therapy-based approach could lead in reducing the functional limitations and morbidity rate in females with the postpartum pain. This research could also help in spreading the awareness globally, to Prenatal and Postnatal Hospital Caregivers.
- Conditions
- Pelvic Girdle Pain
- Being tested
- Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises, Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation
- Medical subject headings
- Pelvic Girdle Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercisesOther
The program was based on specific training of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles with coactivation of the lumbar multifidus at the lumbosacral region, training of the gluteus maximus, the latissimus dorsi, the oblique abdominal muscles, the erector spinae, the quadratus lumborum, and the hip adductors and abductors. Initially, we focused on the specific contraction of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles. After approximately 2 weeks, loading was progressively increased throughout the intervention period. The women were required to exercise for 30 to 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 3-4 weeks.
Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulationOther
: For high-velocity thrust technique, a modified Chicago technique was used. For this procedure, the lumbopelvic region was targeted. The side to be treated was chosen, based on the subject's report of her most symptomatic side. The physical therapist, performed passively side bend the subject toward the painful side, rotate the upper body in the direction opposite to the side bending, and then deliver a quick posterior and inferior thrust at a grade V including a small-amplitude/high-velocity therapeutic movement. A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted if no pop was heard following the first attempt. If the subject showed improvement of 50% or less after the first treatment, the intervention was categorized as a failure, the examination and intervention were repeated, and the subjects were asked to return 2 to 4 days later. If the subject showed greater than 50% improvement, the intervention was categorized as a success, and study participation was concluded.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises | Active comparator | Stabilization exercises Receives: Other: Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises |
| Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation | Experimental | High-velocity thrust manipulation Receives: Other: Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual analog scale
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Measured: 2 months
Oswestry disability index
The ODI score (index) is calculated as: If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: if 16 (total scored) out of 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed (or not applicable) the score is calculated: If 16 (total scored) / 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5%
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2021
- Study start18 Aug 2019
- Primary completion27 Jun 2020
- Study completion26 Jul 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pelvic Girdle PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Maryam Shabbir, PhD*, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04818411
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-UOL-FAHS/659 Anam Naz
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen CH, Essed GG, van den Brandt PA. A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 May 1;120(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.021.
PubMed 15866079Bergstrom C, Persson M, Mogren I. Sick leave and healthcare utilisation in women reporting pregnancy related low back pain and/or pelvic girdle pain at 14 months postpartum. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Feb 15;24:7. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0088-9. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 26885363Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):60-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00327.x. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
PubMed 19863747Robinson HS, Eskild A, Heiberg E, Eberhard-Gran M. Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact on function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(2):160-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340500410024.
PubMed 16532908Bergstrom C, Persson M, Nergard KA, Mogren I. Prevalence and predictors of persistent pelvic girdle pain 12 years postpartum. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 16;18(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1760-5.
PubMed 28915804Eggen MH, Stuge B, Mowinckel P, Jensen KS, Hagen KB. Can supervised group exercises including ergonomic advice reduce the prevalence and severity of low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy? A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;92(6):781-90. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110119. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
PubMed 22282770
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Stabilization Exercises Versus Thrust Manipulation Technique on Pelvic Girdle Pain.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04818411
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-UOL-FAHS/659 Anam Naz
- Conditions
- Pelvic Girdle Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jul 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this research is to compare the efficacy of stabilization exercise versus pelvic girdle pain thrust manipulation technique in females with postpartum pain.
Detailed description
Pelvic-girdle pain is a mechanical disorder growing rapidly as a consequence of changing delivery pattern and changing lifestyle. Medication with synthetic drugs not only has been unable to effectively curtail the spread of this disease conditions but also is most of the times linked with co-occurring side-effects. The exercise and manual therapy-based approach could lead in reducing the functional limitations and morbidity rate in females with the postpartum pain. This research could also help in spreading the awareness globally, to Prenatal and Postnatal Hospital Caregivers.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises | Active comparator | Other: Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercisesStabilization exercises |
| Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation | Experimental | Other: Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulationHigh-velocity thrust manipulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- • Post-partum females with the normal vaginal delivery present with pelvic girdle pain before the next conception.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients presenting with the history of:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercisesThe program was based on specific training of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles with coactivation of the lumbar multifidus at the lumbosacral region, training of the gluteus maximus, the latissimus dorsi, the oblique abdominal muscles, the erector spinae, the quadratus lumborum, and the hip adductors and abductors. Initially, we focused on the specific contraction of the transversely oriented abdominal muscles. After approximately 2 weeks, loading was progressively increased throughout the intervention period. The women were required to exercise for 30 to 60 minutes, 3 days a week, for 3-4 weeks. | Other | Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises |
| Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation: For high-velocity thrust technique, a modified Chicago technique was used. For this procedure, the lumbopelvic region was targeted. The side to be treated was chosen, based on the subject's report of her most symptomatic side. The physical therapist, performed passively side bend the subject toward the painful side, rotate the upper body in the direction opposite to the side bending, and then deliver a quick posterior and inferior thrust at a grade V including a small-amplitude/high-velocity therapeutic movement. A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted if no pop was heard following the first attempt. If the subject showed improvement of 50% or less after the first treatment, the intervention was categorized as a failure, the examination and intervention were repeated, and the subjects were asked to return 2 to 4 days later. If the subject showed greater than 50% improvement, the intervention was categorized as a success, and study participation was concluded. | Other | Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation |
Primary outcome
Visual analog scale
Time frame: 2 months
The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
Oswestry disability index
Time frame: 2 months
The ODI score (index) is calculated as: If all 10 sections are completed the score is calculated as follows: if 16 (total scored) out of 50 (total possible score) x 100 = 32% If one section is missed (or not applicable) the score is calculated: If 16 (total scored) / 45 (total possible score) x 100 = 35.5%
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2021.
- Background: PubMed 15866079Bastiaanssen JM, de Bie RA, Bastiaenen CH, Essed GG, van den Brandt PA. A historical perspective on pregnancy-related low back and/or pelvic girdle pain. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005 May 1;120(1):3-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.11.021.
- Background: PubMed 26885363Bergstrom C, Persson M, Mogren I. Sick leave and healthcare utilisation in women reporting pregnancy related low back pain and/or pelvic girdle pain at 14 months postpartum. Chiropr Man Therap. 2016 Feb 15;24:7. doi: 10.1186/s12998-016-0088-9. eCollection 2016.
- Background: PubMed 19863747Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):60-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00327.x. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
- Background: PubMed 16532908Robinson HS, Eskild A, Heiberg E, Eberhard-Gran M. Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact on function. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(2):160-4. doi: 10.1080/00016340500410024.
- Background: PubMed 28915804Bergstrom C, Persson M, Nergard KA, Mogren I. Prevalence and predictors of persistent pelvic girdle pain 12 years postpartum. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 16;18(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1760-5.
- Background: PubMed 22282770Eggen MH, Stuge B, Mowinckel P, Jensen KS, Hagen KB. Can supervised group exercises including ergonomic advice reduce the prevalence and severity of low back pain and pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy? A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;92(6):781-90. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110119. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pelvic Girdle Pain
Recruiting
Effects of MET With and Without Lumbopelvic Manipulation
Anterior Pelvic Tilt
Active, not recruiting
Osteopathy in Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain
Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain, Postpartum Pelvic Girdle Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Factors Associated With Disability in Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain
Postpartum Lumbopelvic Pain
Active, not recruiting
Pelvic Stabilization Belt Combined With Exercise Therapy on Pelvic Girdle Pain and Mobility in Post-partum Women
Pelvic Girdle Pain
Recruiting
Telehealth: Diaphragmatic vs. Pelvic Exercise in Postpartum Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain
Postpartum, Pregnancy Related
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maryam Shabbir, PhD* principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Routine physical therapy treatment with the Stabilization exercises and Routine physical therapy treatment + High-velocity thrust manipulation in people with Pelvic Girdle Pain, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual analog scale (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04818411, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2021.