Advance Care PlanningNCT04819191
Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients
A study testing SHARING Choices in people with Advance Care Planning and Dementia, run by Johns Hopkins University at 54 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a pragmatic trial of SHARING Choices. Components of SHARING Choices include: 1. A letter from the clinic introducing an initiative to prepare persons and families for Advance Care Planning (ACP); 2. Access to a facilitator trained to lead ACP discussions; 3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Advance Care Planning, Dementia
- What is being tested?
- SHARING Choices
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64,915 participants
- Where
- 54 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 20 Nov 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Practices included in this trial are:
- Affiliated with Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) or MedStar Health;
- A primary care practice, defined as adult internal medicine, family medicine, or geriatric medicine;
- Have 2 or more practicing clinicians; and
- Have more than 500 patients aged 65 and over currently receiving care.
- Patients included in this trial are:
- Age 65 and older, and
- Established patient of primary care clinician at participating practice (>1 prior visit at the clinic). There will be no formal enrollment of participants into this pragmatic trial as this is a clinic-level initiative that will be available and offered to all eligible patients at clinics randomized to the intervention.
Who cannot join
- Primary care practices affiliated with Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) or MedStar Health that are:
- Not a primary care practice, defined as adult internal medicine, family medicine, or geriatric medicine;
- Have fewer than 2 practicing clinicians; and
- Have fewer than 500 patients aged 65 and over currently receiving care.
- Patients under the care of primary care practices affiliated with Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) or MedStar Health that are:
- Less than 65 years of age, or
- Not established patients.
Trial locations and contacts
54 sites in 1 country.
54 sites in 1 country
United States54 sites
MedStar Medical Group at Alexandria
Alexandria, Virginia, 22302
MedStar Greater Annapolis Medical Group
Annapolis, Maryland, 21401
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Remington
Baltimore, Maryland, 21211
MedStar Union Memorial Adult Medicine Specialists at 33rd St.
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Canton Crossing
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
MedStar Medical Group at Wilkens Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
MedStar Health at Federal Hill
Baltimore, Maryland, 21230
MedStar Medical Group at North Parkville Health Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21234
Family Health Center at MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
MedStar Medical Group at Ridge Road
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
The Primary Care Center at MedStar Franklin Square Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21237
MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Faculty Practice
Baltimore, Maryland, 21239
The Center for Successful Aging at MedStar Good Samaritan Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21239
MedStar Medical Group at Old Emmorton Rd
Bel Air, Maryland, 21015
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Water's Edge
Belcamp, Maryland, 21017
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Downtown Bethesda
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814
MedStar Medical Group at Bethesda
Bethesda, Maryland, 20815
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Bowie
Bowie, Maryland, 20715
MedStar Medical Group at MedStar Health at Brandywine
Brandywine, Maryland, 20613
MedStar Medical Group Primary Care at Clinton
Clinton, Maryland, 20735
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Howard County
Columbia, Maryland, 21046
MedStar Medical Group at Dundalk Professional Center
Dundalk, Maryland, 21222
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Annapolis
Edgewater, Maryland, 21037
MedStar Medical Group at Dorsey Hall
Ellicott City, Maryland, 21042
MedStar Medical Group at Forest Hill
Forest Hill, Maryland, 21050
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Frederick
Frederick, Maryland, 21702
MedStar Medical Group Primary Care at Fort Washington
Ft. Washington, Maryland, 20744
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Fulton
Fulton, Maryland, 20759
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Germantown
Germantown, Maryland, 20876
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Glen Burnie
Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Hagerstown
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742
MedStar Medical Group at Hyattsville
Hyattsville, Maryland, 20782
MedStar Medical Group at Laurel
Laurel, Maryland, 20707
MedStar Medical Group at St. Clement's
Leonardtown, Maryland, 20650
MedStar Medical Group at St. Mary's
Leonardtown, Maryland, 20650
Johns Hopkins Health Care & Surgery Center - Green Spring Station
Lutherville, Maryland, 21093
MedStar Medical Group at Mitchellville
Mitchellville, Maryland, 20721
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Odenton
Odenton, Maryland, 21113
MedStar Medical Group 18111 Prince Philip
Olney, Maryland, 20832
MedStar Medical Group at Olney Professional Park
Olney, Maryland, 20832
MedStar Medical Group Family Practice at Olney
Olney, Maryland, 20832
MedStar Medical Group at Honeygo Center
Perry Hall, Maryland, 21128
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Rockville (Montgomery Grove)
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - North Bethesda
Rockville, Maryland, 20852
MedStar Medical Group at Silver Spring
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20902
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - I Street
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20005
MedStar Georgetown University Hospital General Internal Medicine
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
MedStar Medical Group at MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
MedStar Washington Hospital Center Physician Group LLC
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
MedStar Medical Group at New Mexico Avenue
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016
MedStar Medical Group at Lafayette Centre
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20036
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Westminster
Westminster, Maryland, 21157
Johns Hopkins Community Physicians - Charles County
White Plains, Maryland, 20695
About this study
Official title: Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients (SHARING Choices)
This is a pragmatic trial of SHARING Choices. Components of SHARING Choices include:
- A letter from the clinic introducing an initiative to prepare persons and families for Advance Care Planning (ACP);
- Access to a facilitator trained to lead ACP discussions;
- Patient-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of family and stimulate discussion about ACP;
- Facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and family) as desired;
- Education \& resources about Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) for clinic staff.
Read the detailed description
Engaging family in primary care is particularly important in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) because of the important role assumed in medical decision-making, especially at the end of life. The investigators, study seeks to improve communication in primary care through methods to proactively engage family in ongoing interactions with primary care and stimulate and support Advance Care Planning (ACP) for all older adults and attention to ADRD in primary care throughout the ADRD disease trajectory. The investigators' premise is that individuals and families appreciate primary care involvement in ACP and information and referrals for ADRD needs, but that individual, family, and system factors including time, knowledge, and resources often inhibit these conversations from occurring.
SHARING Choices integrates communication strategies that have been individually found to be effective but have thus far been deployed in isolation of one another. The investigators focus on all older primary care patients because of the importance of addressing ACP early, the under-diagnosis of ADRD and the greater implementation potential of a protocol with broad applicability.
Components of SHARING Choices include:
- A letter from the clinic introducing an initiative to prepare persons and families for Advance Care Planning (ACP);
- Access to a facilitator trained to lead ACP discussions;
- Patient-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of family and stimulate discussion about ACP;
- Facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and family) as desired;
- Education \& resources about ADRD for clinic staff.
- Conditions
- Advance Care Planning, Dementia
- Being tested
- SHARING Choices
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SHARING ChoicesBehavioural
SHARING Choices is a multicomponent communication intervention to proactively engage family members or friends and to support advance care planning in primary care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SHARING Choices | Experimental | Components of SHARING Choices include:
A letter from the clinic introducing an initiative to prepare persons and families for Advance Care Planning (ACP); Access to a facilitator trained to lead ACP discussions; Patient-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of family and stimulate discussion about ACP; Facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and family) as desired; Education \& resources about Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) for clinic staff. Receives: Behavioral: SHARING Choices |
| Usual care | No intervention | Usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients 65 and Older With New Documentation of Any Advance Directive in the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Advance directive will be defined as a durable power of attorney, living will, Maryland Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), or District of Columbia Medical Order for Sustaining Treatment (MOST) based on information that is recorded in each care delivery system's electronic medical record 12 months after study entry. The initial visit date for each candidate patient after the inception of the trial serves as the beginning of the 12-month observation period and will be used to construct comparable observation periods for candidate patients at both intervention and control groups.
Measured: 1 year
Occurrence of Potentially Burdensome Procedures Reported Within 6 Months
Potentially burdensome care will be measured as any (yes/no) procedures within the 6 months that precede death using dates and validated International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for hospital services that will be extracted from CRISP, the regional health information exchange, which includes a repository of all hospital encounters in Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. Specific procedures and codes that will be used to reflect burdensome care include intubation and mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy feeding tube placement, hemodialysis, enteral and parenteral nutrition, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Analysis limited to patients with diagnosis codes indicative of serious illness, for whom these procedures would be considered potentially burdensome, drawing from a list of ICD-10 codes.
Measured: 6 months preceding patient death
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion20 Nov 2023
- Study completion20 Nov 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advance Care PlanningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64,915 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medstar Health Research Institute, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer Wolff, PhD, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04819191
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00224501
- Other IDs
- R33AG061882
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 3 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The following materials will be shared with the research community. * Study Protocol * Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) * Analytic Code
Publications
Walling AM, Sudore RL, Bell D, Tseng CH, Ritchie C, Hays RD, Gibbs L, Rahimi M, Sanz J, Wenger NS. Population-Based Pragmatic Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care in the University of California Health System. J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):72-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0142.
PubMed 31486723Wasp GT, Alam SS, Brooks GA, Khayal IS, Kapadia NS, Carmichael DQ, Austin AM, Barnato AE. End-of-life quality metrics among medicare decedents at minority-serving cancer centers: A retrospective study. Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(5):1911-1921. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2752. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
PubMed 31925998Barnato AE, Farrell MH, Chang CC, Lave JR, Roberts MS, Angus DC. Development and validation of hospital "end-of-life" treatment intensity measures. Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1098-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181993191.
PubMed 19820614Wolff JL, Roter DL, Boyd CM, Roth DL, Echavarria DM, Aufill J, Vick JB, Gitlin LN. Patient-Family Agenda Setting for Primary Care Patients with Cognitive Impairment: the SAME Page Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1478-1486. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4563-y. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
PubMed 30022409Hammes BJ, Rooney BL. Death and end-of-life planning in one midwestern community. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Feb 23;158(4):383-90. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.4.383.
PubMed 9487236Pecanac KE, Repenshek MF, Tennenbaum D, Hammes BJ. Respecting Choices(R) and advance directives in a diverse community. J Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;17(3):282-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0047. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
PubMed 24325558Briggs LA, Kirchhoff KT, Hammes BJ, Song MK, Colvin ER. Patient-centered advance care planning in special patient populations: a pilot study. J Prof Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.001.
PubMed 15011193Dy SM, Scerpella DL, Cotter V, Colburn J, Roth DL, McGuire M, Giovannetti ER, Walker KA, Hussain N, Sloan DH, Boyd CM, Cockey K, Sharma N, Saylor MA, Smith KM, Wolff JL; SHARING Choices investigators. SHARING Choices: Design and rationale for a pragmatic trial of an advance care planning intervention for older adults with and without dementia in primary care. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106818. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106818. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
PubMed 35690262Smith KM, Scerpella D, Guo A, Hussain N, Colburn JL, Cotter VT, Aufill J, Dy SM, Wolff JL. Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221137251. doi: 10.1177/21501319221137251.
PubMed 36398937Colburn JL, Scerpella DL, Chapin M, Walker KA, Dy SM, Saylor MA, Sharma N, Rebala S, Anderson RE, McGuire M, Hussain N, Rawlinson C, Cotter V, Cockey K, Roth DL, Nicholson KLC, Giovannetti ER, Sancho MB, Echavarria D, Boyd CM, Wolff JL, Smith KM. SHARING Choices: Lessons Learned from a Primary-Care Focused Advance Care Planning Intervention. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):e255-e264. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
PubMed 37100306Cotter VT, Sloan DH, Scerpella DL, Smith KM, Abshire Saylor M, Wolff JL. Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Aug;42(8):785-791. doi: 10.1177/10499091241282087. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
PubMed 39226471Wolff JL, Scerpella D, Cockey K, Hussain N, Funkhouser T, Echavarria D, Aufill J, Guo A, Sloan DH, Dy SM, Smith KM; SHARING Choices Investigators. SHARING Choices: A Pilot Study to Engage Family in Advance Care Planning of Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Impairment in the Primary Care Context. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1314-1321. doi: 10.1177/1049909120978771. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
PubMed 33325729Dy SM, Scerpella DL, Hanna V, Walker KA, Sloan DH, Green CM, Cotter V, Wolff JL, Giovannetti ER, McGuire M, Hussain N, Smith KM, Saylor MA. Qualitative evaluation of the SHARING Choices trial of primary care advance care planning for adults with and without dementia. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3413-3426. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19154. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
PubMed 39211999Wolff JL, Scerpella D, Giovannetti ER, Roth DL, Hanna V, Hussain N, Colburn JL, Saylor MA, Boyd CM, Cotter V, McGuire M, Rawlinson C, Sloan DH, Richards TM, Walker K, Smith KM, Dy SM; SHARING Choices Investigators. Advance Care Planning, End-of-Life Preferences, and Burdensome Care: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):162-170. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6215.
PubMed 39621341
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients (SHARING Choices)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04819191
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00224501
- Conditions
- Advance Care Planning, Dementia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64,915 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medstar Health Research Institute, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Nov 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 3 Mar 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pragmatic trial of SHARING Choices. Components of SHARING Choices include:
- A letter from the clinic introducing an initiative to prepare persons and families for Advance Care Planning (ACP);
- Access to a facilitator trained to lead ACP discussions;
- Patient-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of family and stimulate discussion about ACP;
- Facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and family) as desired;
- Education \& resources about Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) for clinic staff.
Detailed description
Engaging family in primary care is particularly important in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) because of the important role assumed in medical decision-making, especially at the end of life. The investigators, study seeks to improve communication in primary care through methods to proactively engage family in ongoing interactions with primary care and stimulate and support Advance Care Planning (ACP) for all older adults and attention to ADRD in primary care throughout the ADRD disease trajectory. The investigators' premise is that individuals and families appreciate primary care involvement in ACP and information and referrals for ADRD needs, but that individual, family, and system factors including time, knowledge, and resources often inhibit these conversations from occurring.
SHARING Choices integrates communication strategies that have been individually found to be effective but have thus far been deployed in isolation of one another. The investigators focus on all older primary care patients because of the importance of addressing ACP early, the under-diagnosis of ADRD and the greater implementation potential of a protocol with broad applicability.
Components of SHARING Choices include:
- A letter from the clinic introducing an initiative to prepare persons and families for Advance Care Planning (ACP);
- Access to a facilitator trained to lead ACP discussions;
- Patient-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of family and stimulate discussion about ACP;
- Facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and family) as desired;
- Education \& resources about ADRD for clinic staff.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SHARING Choices | Experimental | Behavioral: SHARING ChoicesComponents of SHARING Choices include: A letter from the clinic introducing an initiative to prepare persons and families for Advance Care Planning (ACP); Access to a facilitator trained to lead ACP discussions; Patient-family agenda-setting to align perspectives about the role of family and stimulate discussion about ACP; Facilitated registration to the patient portal (for patient and family) as desired; Education \& resources about Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) for clinic staff. |
| Usual care | No intervention | –Usual care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Affiliated with Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) or MedStar Health;
- A primary care practice, defined as adult internal medicine, family medicine, or geriatric medicine;
- Have 2 or more practicing clinicians; and
- Have more than 500 patients aged 65 and over currently receiving care.
- Age 65 and older, and
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Primary care practices affiliated with Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) or MedStar Health that are:
- Not a primary care practice, defined as adult internal medicine, family medicine, or geriatric medicine;
- Have fewer than 2 practicing clinicians; and
- Have fewer than 500 patients aged 65 and over currently receiving care.
- Patients under the care of primary care practices affiliated with Johns Hopkins Community Physicians (JHCP) or MedStar Health that are:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SHARING ChoicesSHARING Choices is a multicomponent communication intervention to proactively engage family members or friends and to support advance care planning in primary care | Behavioural | SHARING Choices |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients 65 and Older With New Documentation of Any Advance Directive in the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Time frame: 1 year
Advance directive will be defined as a durable power of attorney, living will, Maryland Medical Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST), or District of Columbia Medical Order for Sustaining Treatment (MOST) based on information that is recorded in each care delivery system's electronic medical record 12 months after study entry. The initial visit date for each candidate patient after the inception of the trial serves as the beginning of the 12-month observation period and will be used to construct comparable observation periods for candidate patients at both intervention and control groups.
Occurrence of Potentially Burdensome Procedures Reported Within 6 Months
Time frame: 6 months preceding patient death
Potentially burdensome care will be measured as any (yes/no) procedures within the 6 months that precede death using dates and validated International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes for hospital services that will be extracted from CRISP, the regional health information exchange, which includes a repository of all hospital encounters in Maryland, Delaware, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia. Specific procedures and codes that will be used to reflect burdensome care include intubation and mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, gastrostomy feeding tube placement, hemodialysis, enteral and parenteral nutrition, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Analysis limited to patients with diagnosis codes indicative of serious illness, for whom these procedures would be considered potentially burdensome, drawing from a list of ICD-10 codes.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 31486723Walling AM, Sudore RL, Bell D, Tseng CH, Ritchie C, Hays RD, Gibbs L, Rahimi M, Sanz J, Wenger NS. Population-Based Pragmatic Trial of Advance Care Planning in Primary Care in the University of California Health System. J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):72-81. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0142.
- Background: PubMed 31925998Wasp GT, Alam SS, Brooks GA, Khayal IS, Kapadia NS, Carmichael DQ, Austin AM, Barnato AE. End-of-life quality metrics among medicare decedents at minority-serving cancer centers: A retrospective study. Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(5):1911-1921. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2752. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
- Background: PubMed 19820614Barnato AE, Farrell MH, Chang CC, Lave JR, Roberts MS, Angus DC. Development and validation of hospital "end-of-life" treatment intensity measures. Med Care. 2009 Oct;47(10):1098-105. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181993191.
- Background: PubMed 30022409Wolff JL, Roter DL, Boyd CM, Roth DL, Echavarria DM, Aufill J, Vick JB, Gitlin LN. Patient-Family Agenda Setting for Primary Care Patients with Cognitive Impairment: the SAME Page Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1478-1486. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4563-y. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
- Background: PubMed 9487236Hammes BJ, Rooney BL. Death and end-of-life planning in one midwestern community. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Feb 23;158(4):383-90. doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.4.383.
- Background: PubMed 24325558Pecanac KE, Repenshek MF, Tennenbaum D, Hammes BJ. Respecting Choices(R) and advance directives in a diverse community. J Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;17(3):282-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2013.0047. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
- Background: PubMed 15011193Briggs LA, Kirchhoff KT, Hammes BJ, Song MK, Colvin ER. Patient-centered advance care planning in special patient populations: a pilot study. J Prof Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.001.
- Background: PubMed 35690262Dy SM, Scerpella DL, Cotter V, Colburn J, Roth DL, McGuire M, Giovannetti ER, Walker KA, Hussain N, Sloan DH, Boyd CM, Cockey K, Sharma N, Saylor MA, Smith KM, Wolff JL; SHARING Choices investigators. SHARING Choices: Design and rationale for a pragmatic trial of an advance care planning intervention for older adults with and without dementia in primary care. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Aug;119:106818. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106818. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 36398937Smith KM, Scerpella D, Guo A, Hussain N, Colburn JL, Cotter VT, Aufill J, Dy SM, Wolff JL. Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319221137251. doi: 10.1177/21501319221137251.
- Background: PubMed 37100306Colburn JL, Scerpella DL, Chapin M, Walker KA, Dy SM, Saylor MA, Sharma N, Rebala S, Anderson RE, McGuire M, Hussain N, Rawlinson C, Cotter V, Cockey K, Roth DL, Nicholson KLC, Giovannetti ER, Sancho MB, Echavarria D, Boyd CM, Wolff JL, Smith KM. SHARING Choices: Lessons Learned from a Primary-Care Focused Advance Care Planning Intervention. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):e255-e264. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.04.014. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 39226471Cotter VT, Sloan DH, Scerpella DL, Smith KM, Abshire Saylor M, Wolff JL. Feasibility of Using Simulation to Evaluate Implementation Fidelity in an Advance Care Planning Pragmatic Trial. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Aug;42(8):785-791. doi: 10.1177/10499091241282087. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 33325729Wolff JL, Scerpella D, Cockey K, Hussain N, Funkhouser T, Echavarria D, Aufill J, Guo A, Sloan DH, Dy SM, Smith KM; SHARING Choices Investigators. SHARING Choices: A Pilot Study to Engage Family in Advance Care Planning of Older Adults With and Without Cognitive Impairment in the Primary Care Context. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Nov;38(11):1314-1321. doi: 10.1177/1049909120978771. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The following materials will be shared with the research community. * Study Protocol * Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) * Analytic Code
Related trials for Advance Care Planning
Active, not recruiting
ACP Video Intervention for Patients With Life-Limiting Illness
Health Care Utilization, End Stage Disease
Recruiting
Patient Navigation and the Planning Advance Care Together Website to Improve Goals of Care Conversations in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivors, IMPACT-HCT Trial
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm
Not yet recruiting
Using a Conversation Game to Engage Native American Washoe Tribe Members in Advance Care Planning: Preparation for a Clinical Trial
Advance Care Planning, American Indian or Alaska Native
Not yet recruiting
Development and Evaluation of a Disease-oriented Scenario Game to Promote ACP Among Older Adults and Family Caregivers
Heart Failure, Older Adults (65 Years and Older)
Active, not recruiting
Longitudinal Early Advance Care Planning Discussions and Documentation (LEADD) Program: An Exploratory Study in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer Wolff, PhD principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
54 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SHARING Choices in people with Advance Care Planning and Dementia, run by Johns Hopkins University at 54 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 54 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Mar 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients 65 and Older With New Documentation of Any Advance Directive in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04819191, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Mar 2025.