BacteremiaNCT04821661
T2 and SeptiCyte RAPID Duration Project
An observational study of Bacteremia, run by The University of Queensland at 3 sites in Australia.
Trial summary
Infection with bacteria and other germs in the blood can be deadly. How long germs stay in the blood is important for two reasons. The first is that if they stay in the blood for many days it is a sign that antibiotics may need to be changed. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Bacteremia
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesAustralia
- Study dates
- 11 Jan 2022to 30 Apr 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Caboolture Hospital and Redcliffe Hospital who have bacteria or yeast in the blood identified by the MALDI-TOF MS and Gram stain respectively
Who may be able to join
- Patients who have proven bloodstream infection with any T2-on panel pathogen (Enterococcus faecium, S. aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Candida spp.)
Who cannot join
- Palliative care approach
- Failure to give written informed consent (by patient or their legal representative)
- Polymicrobial index blood culture
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
Australia3 sites
Caboolture Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland
Redcliffe Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland
About this study
Official title: Duration of Bloodstream Infection as Measured by Conventional Cultures Compared With Novel Culture Independent Systems and Persistence of Biomarkers Associated With Severe Infection
Infection with bacteria and other germs in the blood can be deadly. How long germs stay in the blood is important for two reasons. The first is that if they stay in the blood for many days it is a sign that antibiotics may need to be changed. The second is that if they stay in the blood for only a short time it may give doctors confidence to switch to tablets and consider early discharge from hospital. This study is evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic performance of two novel technologies when used to measure the duration of the bloodstream infection.
Read the detailed description
Bloodstream infection is highly significant and is associated with mortality rates of between 10 and 25%.
For some infection types (for example, Staphylococcus aureus) a longer duration of bacteria being present in the blood is linked to higher mortality. With traditional microbiologic techniques, bloodstream infection with gram-negative bacteria is usually quite brief. However, new culture independent bacteraemia detection systems (such as T2 magnetic resonance assay) are more sensitive than traditional blood culture systems and may show that gram-negative bacteraemia is more prolonged in some patients than has previously been thought. This observational study will investigate the correlation between the duration of bloodstream infection by mean of traditional blood culture techniques with:
- Duration of the bloodstream infection by mean of the T2 magnetic resonance assay, a new culture independent bacteraemia detection system.
- Persistence of inflammation as measured by the SeptiCyte RAPID test, a host response assay able to differentiate infectious from sterile inflammation.
The study will also correlate each measure of the duration of bacteraemia with microbiological and clinical outcomes.
- Conditions
- Bacteremia
- Keywords
- Bacteraemia, Gram-negative Bacteremia, Bacterial Infections, T2 magnetic resonance assay, SeptiCyte RAPID
- Medical subject headings
- Bacteremia, Toxemia, Bacterial Infections
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Duration of bloodstream infection measured by conventional blood cultures and the T2 magnetic resonance assay
The T2 system is a new diagnostic detection method utilizing miniaturized magnetic resonance technology. The T2 system has been shown to quickly and accurately identify molecular targets within patient samples without the need for purification or extraction of target molecules from the sample. It does not require bacterial culture and can detect organisms as low as 1 CFU/mL in whole blood. The study will compare the duration of detectable pathogens in the bloodstream as measured by the T2 with the duration of bloodstream infection according to conventional cultures
Measured: Days 1-4
Persistent infection defined as metastatic infection and lack of source control
The study will explore the correlation between the duration of detectable pathogens in the bloodstream as measured by the T2 (duration of T2emia) and the presence of persistent infection
Measured: Days 1-4
Secondary outcomes (3)
Short-term clinical outcome (SOFA success)
The study will explore the correlation between the duration of detectable pathogens in the bloodstream as measured by the T2 (duration of T2emia) and short-term clinical outcome. A "successful short-term outcome" or "SOFA success" is defined as survival for the first 7 days from BSI onset with a stable or decreased Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (for ICU patients) or modified SOFA score (for non-ICU patients), defined as follows: if the baseline SOFA/mSOFA >=3, a decrease of at least 30% in that score, if the baseline SOFA/mSOFA <3, a stable or decreased SOFA/mSOFA score. Patients discharged before day 7 will be assumed to have improved SOFA scores. The lack of "SOFA success" will be defined "SOFA failure".
Measured: Days 1-7
Long-term clinical outcome
The study will explore the correlation between the duration of detectable pathogens in the bloodstream as measured by the T2 (duration of T2emia) and long-term clinical outcomes. A "successful long-term outcome" is defined as survival for the first 6 months from the BSI onset and maintenance of the baseline functional performance status defined by the functional bloodstream infection score (FBIS) score 7 days prior to the BSI onset.
Measured: 6-months from the index BSI
Persistent infection
SeptiCyte is a host-response assay able to differentiate infectious from sterile inflammation by providing a score (SeptiScore) from 1-15. It is approved for the diagnosis of sepsis in ICU patients. Whether SeptiScore may have a role in diagnosing the persistence of the infection in patients with proven BSI is unknown. The study will explore the performance of SeptiScore in diagnosing persistent infection including persistent BSI and metastatic infection
Measured: Day 1-4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Mar 2021
- Study start11 Jan 2022
- Primary completion31 Mar 2023
- Study completion30 Apr 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for BacteremiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Queensland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Pathology Queensland
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Professor David L. Paterson, The University of Queensland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04821661
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HREC/2021/QRBW/70126
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 1 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Duration of Bloodstream Infection as Measured by Conventional Cultures Compared With Novel Culture Independent Systems and Persistence of Biomarkers Associated With Severe Infection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04821661
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HREC/2021/QRBW/70126
- Conditions
- Bacteremia
- Keywords
- Bacteraemia, Gram-negative Bacteremia, Bacterial Infections, T2 magnetic resonance assay, SeptiCyte RAPID
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of QueenslandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Pathology Queensland
- Study start
- 11 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Apr 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Infection with bacteria and other germs in the blood can be deadly. How long germs stay in the blood is important for two reasons. The first is that if they stay in the blood for many days it is a sign that antibiotics may need to be changed. The second is that if they stay in the blood for only a short time it may give doctors confidence to switch to tablets and consider early discharge from hospital. This study is evaluating the diagnostic and prognostic performance of two novel technologies when used to measure the duration of the bloodstream infection.
Detailed description
Bloodstream infection is highly significant and is associated with mortality rates of between 10 and 25%.
For some infection types (for example, Staphylococcus aureus) a longer duration of bacteria being present in the blood is linked to higher mortality. With traditional microbiologic techniques, bloodstream infection with gram-negative bacteria is usually quite brief. However, new culture independent bacteraemia detection systems (such as T2 magnetic resonance assay) are more sensitive than traditional blood culture systems and may show that gram-negative bacteraemia is more prolonged in some patients than has previously been thought. This observational study will investigate the correlation between the duration of bloodstream infection by mean of traditional blood culture techniques with:
- Duration of the bloodstream infection by mean of the T2 magnetic resonance assay, a new culture independent bacteraemia detection system.
- Persistence of inflammation as measured by the SeptiCyte RAPID test, a host response assay able to differentiate infectious from sterile inflammation.
The study will also correlate each measure of the duration of bacteraemia with microbiological and clinical outcomes.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients at the Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Caboolture Hospital and Redcliffe Hospital who have bacteria or yeast in the blood identified by the MALDI-TOF MS and Gram stain respectively
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who have proven bloodstream infection with any T2-on panel pathogen (Enterococcus faecium, S. aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli and Candida spp.)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Palliative care approach
- Failure to give written informed consent (by patient or their legal representative)
- Polymicrobial index blood culture
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Duration of bloodstream infection measured by conventional blood cultures and the T2 magnetic resonance assay
Time frame: Days 1-4
The T2 system is a new diagnostic detection method utilizing miniaturized magnetic resonance technology. The T2 system has been shown to quickly and accurately identify molecular targets within patient samples without the need for purification or extraction of target molecules from the sample. It does not require bacterial culture and can detect organisms as low as 1 CFU/mL in whole blood. The study will compare the duration of detectable pathogens in the bloodstream as measured by the T2 with the duration of bloodstream infection according to conventional cultures
Persistent infection defined as metastatic infection and lack of source control
Time frame: Days 1-4
The study will explore the correlation between the duration of detectable pathogens in the bloodstream as measured by the T2 (duration of T2emia) and the presence of persistent infection
3 secondary outcomes
Short-term clinical outcome (SOFA success)
Time frame: Days 1-7
Long-term clinical outcome
Time frame: 6-months from the index BSI
Persistent infection
Time frame: Day 1-4
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2026.
Related trials for Bacteremia
RecruitingObservational study
Middle East Study of Infections in Patients With Hematological Malignancies
Hematological Malignancy, Hematopoetic Stem Cell Transplantation
RecruitingPhase 4
Oral Switch in Pediatric Bloodstream Infections
Bloodstream Infection, Bacteremia Sepsis
Recruiting
From Commensalism to Pathogenicity: Exploring the Pathophysiology of Bacteremia to Better Understand Enterococcus Faecalis Infective Endocarditis
Infective Endocarditis (IE)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
THiamine for Recovery In Vulnerable Early-life Infections
Meningitis, Bacteremia
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Blood Cultures Drawn From Arterial Lines on the Incidence of Contamination, Detection of Bacteremia, and Blood Culture Volume
Bacteremia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bacteremia, run by The University of Queensland at 3 sites in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Duration of bloodstream infection measured by conventional blood cultures and the T2 magnetic resonance assay (time frame: Days 1-4). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2026.