Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With ExacerbationNCT04828837
Bubble PEP Training Among Patient With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Pulmonary Function Effects
A study testing bubble PEP in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Exacerbation and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The morbidity rate of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is increasing year by year. It is predicted to be the third leading cause of death worldwide in 2030. People with COPD have a high risk of needing a ventilator due to the decline of lung function, the increase of secretions, the dysfunction of airway… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Exacerbation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation, Chronic Pulmonary Disease
- What is being tested?
- bubble PEP
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 2 Feb 2021to 31 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hospitalized patients diagnosed with COPD
- Over 40 years old
- Awareness and ability to read articles
- Agree to participate in this research and sign the research consent form
Who cannot join
- Use non-invasive positive pressure breathing apparatus
- Have received positive pressure breathing therapy before or during hospitalization
- People with mental illness
- Coughing up blood, pneumothorax
- Suffer from legally infectious respiratory diseases
- Pregnant women
- Reject the subject
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
National Taipei University of Nursing and Heath Sciences
Taipei, Beitou District, 112303
About this study
Official title: National Taipei University of Nursing and Heath Sciences
The morbidity rate of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is increasing year by year. It is predicted to be the third leading cause of death worldwide in 2030. People with COPD have a high risk of needing a ventilator due to the decline of lung function, the increase of secretions, the dysfunction of airway clearance, and the obstruction and loss of alveolar elasticity.
Read the detailed description
This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of cough and sputum assessment and respiratory physiological indicators after training with the Bubble positive expiratory pressure (Bubble PEP) inpatients with COPD. This is a randomization control trial design survey using convenient sampling and will be to select 94 inpatients with COPD in the division of chest ward of two teaching hospital in New Taipei City. The subjects who meet the conditions for admission are explained, and they need to sign a consent form confirming that they understand the risks. More, they are randomly divided into the experimental group (experimental group n=47) and the control group (control group n=47). The experimental group receives the Bubble PEP training; the control group receives the division of chest ward routine care. The study employs a structured questionnaire including a basic demography, COPD domain, COPD assessment test (CAT), cough and sputum assessment test, and check the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) using it for data collection. The study needs to be approve by the Institutional Review Board. The two groups agreed to participate in the study, after completing the subject consent form before the intervention, they also received the pre-test as a benchmark for the intervention effect. After completing the 7-day and 30-day intervention, the post-test was performed immediately to understand the intervention immediate effect.
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Exacerbation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation, Chronic Pulmonary Disease
- Being tested
- bubble PEP
- Keywords
- COPD, Bubble PEP, pulmonary function
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bubble PEPDevice
Using the bubble positive expiratory pressure (Bubble PEP) for breathing training of inpatients with COPD. The training course for one day of three times. Every time needs about 20 mins. Huff and cough after the breathing training the end.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bubble positive expiratory pressure training | Experimental | The experimental group receives the Bubble PEP training. Receives: Device: bubble PEP |
| general care | No intervention | The control group receives the division of chest ward routine care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Chinese Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test(CAT)
In the CAT, a total of eight items were used to assess the degree of dyspnea of the patients. Each item had a score ranging from 0 to 5 points, with the lowest total score being 0 points and the highest total score being 40 points. The higher the score, the higher the degree of dyspnea.
Measured: The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.
The Cough With Sputum Symptoms Assessment Questionnaire(CSSAQ)
CSSAQ is used to assess patients' cough and sputum symptoms. The questionnaire content is based on published literature. It consists of 25 questions, including issues related to cough, sputum, and psychological symptoms and impacts. The scoring uses a four-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The total scale score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. The content validity index is 1, and the Cronbach's α is 0.97.
Measured: The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate(PEFR)
The TruZone peak flow meter is used to monitor the patient's Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1). For each data collection session, three maximum expiratory flow tests are conducted, and the best value is taken as the result for that session. The measurement unit is ml/sec.
Measured: The study lasted 30 days with a total of three measurements. The first measurement baseline was 48 hours after hospitalization, the second on day 7 of the study, and the third on day 30 of the study.
Secondary outcomes (1)
Re-hospitalization Event
The number of patients who were readmitted due to COPD acute exacerbation (COPDAE) within 14 days after discharge during the study.
Measured: Within 14 days after discharge.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2021
- Study start2 Feb 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2021
- Study completion31 Aug 2021
Why it stopped: Due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Taiwan in 2021/05, and then recruitment was stopped under the government epidemic prevention policy.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With ExacerbationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, SZU-YI WANG, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences
- Investigators
- Szu Yi Wang, Principal investigator, none, specify Unaffiliated
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04828837
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SYWANG
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 25 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 11 Dec 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Dec 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Heath Sciences
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04828837
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SYWANG
- Conditions
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Exacerbation, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation, Chronic Pulmonary Disease
- Keywords
- COPD, Bubble PEP, pulmonary function
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Taiwan in 2021/05, and then recruitment was stopped under the government epidemic prevention policy.
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 11 Dec 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The morbidity rate of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is increasing year by year. It is predicted to be the third leading cause of death worldwide in 2030. People with COPD have a high risk of needing a ventilator due to the decline of lung function, the increase of secretions, the dysfunction of airway clearance, and the obstruction and loss of alveolar elasticity.
Detailed description
This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of cough and sputum assessment and respiratory physiological indicators after training with the Bubble positive expiratory pressure (Bubble PEP) inpatients with COPD. This is a randomization control trial design survey using convenient sampling and will be to select 94 inpatients with COPD in the division of chest ward of two teaching hospital in New Taipei City. The subjects who meet the conditions for admission are explained, and they need to sign a consent form confirming that they understand the risks. More, they are randomly divided into the experimental group (experimental group n=47) and the control group (control group n=47). The experimental group receives the Bubble PEP training; the control group receives the division of chest ward routine care. The study employs a structured questionnaire including a basic demography, COPD domain, COPD assessment test (CAT), cough and sputum assessment test, and check the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) using it for data collection. The study needs to be approve by the Institutional Review Board. The two groups agreed to participate in the study, after completing the subject consent form before the intervention, they also received the pre-test as a benchmark for the intervention effect. After completing the 7-day and 30-day intervention, the post-test was performed immediately to understand the intervention immediate effect.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bubble positive expiratory pressure training | Experimental | Device: bubble PEPThe experimental group receives the Bubble PEP training. |
| general care | No intervention | –The control group receives the division of chest ward routine care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Hospitalized patients diagnosed with COPD
- Over 40 years old
- Awareness and ability to read articles
- Agree to participate in this research and sign the research consent form
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Use non-invasive positive pressure breathing apparatus
- Have received positive pressure breathing therapy before or during hospitalization
- People with mental illness
- Coughing up blood, pneumothorax
- Suffer from legally infectious respiratory diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bubble PEPUsing the bubble positive expiratory pressure (Bubble PEP) for breathing training of inpatients with COPD. The training course for one day of three times. Every time needs about 20 mins. Huff and cough after the breathing training the end. | Device | Bubble positive expiratory pressure training |
Primary outcome
The Chinese Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test(CAT)
Time frame: The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.
In the CAT, a total of eight items were used to assess the degree of dyspnea of the patients. Each item had a score ranging from 0 to 5 points, with the lowest total score being 0 points and the highest total score being 40 points. The higher the score, the higher the degree of dyspnea.
The Cough With Sputum Symptoms Assessment Questionnaire(CSSAQ)
Time frame: The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.
CSSAQ is used to assess patients' cough and sputum symptoms. The questionnaire content is based on published literature. It consists of 25 questions, including issues related to cough, sputum, and psychological symptoms and impacts. The scoring uses a four-point Likert scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The total scale score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. The content validity index is 1, and the Cronbach's α is 0.97.
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate(PEFR)
Time frame: The study lasted 30 days with a total of three measurements. The first measurement baseline was 48 hours after hospitalization, the second on day 7 of the study, and the third on day 30 of the study.
The TruZone peak flow meter is used to monitor the patient's Forced Expiratory Volume in the first second (FEV1). For each data collection session, three maximum expiratory flow tests are conducted, and the best value is taken as the result for that session. The measurement unit is ml/sec.
1 secondary outcome
Re-hospitalization Event
Time frame: Within 14 days after discharge.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Dec 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Exacerbation
RecruitingPhase 2
Rademikibart IV for Acute Asthma and COPD Exacerbation
Asthma Acute, COPD Exacerbation Acute
RecruitingObservational study
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to ICU for a Severe Acute Exacerbation of COPD.
COPD Exacerbation, ICU
RecruitingPhase 4
This After Market Study is Seeing if Dupilumab Plus Usual Standard of Care (SOC) is Better Than Usual Care Alone for Adult Participants After a Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Flare-Up Requiring Hospitalization
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
RecruitingObservational study
The Study of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Participants Treated With Dupilumab (STRIDE) Registry
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
RecruitingObservational study
Study of Hospitalised Patients With Acute Respiratory Conditions
Acute Respiratory Disease, COPD Exacerbation Acute
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Szu Yi Wang principal investigator
none, specify Unaffiliated
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing bubble PEP in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Exacerbation and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation, run by National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Dec 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Chinese Version of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test(CAT) (time frame: The pre-tests within 48 hours of hospitalization, which served as the baseline of the intervention (T0). Assessed at 1(T1) and 4(T2) weeks, week 4 was reported.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2024.