EmergenciesNCT04829032
GOODBYE HARTMANN TRIAL: 100 YEARS OF HARTMANN'S PROCEDURE
An observational study of Emergencies and Colon Disease, run by Parma University Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Hartmann's procedure was described for the first time in 1921 as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of upper rectal tumours. Although Hartmann's procedure fell out of favour for rectal cancer after the introduction of restorative procedures, it remained the most common procedure in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Emergencies, Colon Disease, Colo-rectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Hartmann's procedure
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 31 May 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All consecutive adult patients with left-sided colonic disease who have been operated in urgent-emergency setting between March -May 2021 will be prospectively analyzed and evaluated time of surgery, patient's characteristic, hospital's characteristics. All patients who have been operated in urgent-emergency setting for left-sided colonic disease are suitable for inclusion.
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 years or older;
- Patients admitted in Emergency setting for left-sided colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; large bowel perforation-obstruction; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma).
- Patients who underwent urgent or emergency surgery for left-sided colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; large bowel perforationobstruction; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma).
Who cannot join
- Aged 17 or younger.
- Elective surgery.
- Non-surgical treatment.
- Patients with personal history of colorectal cancer treated surgically.
- Patients with stoma.
- Unstable patients who benefited of damage control procedures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mario Giuffrida
Parma, Italia, 43125
mario giuffrida, 3931555684, goodbyehartmann@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: GOODBYE HARTMANN. AFTER 100 YEARS HARTMANN'S PROCEDURE IS GOING TO BE ABANDONED?
Hartmann's procedure was described for the first time in 1921 as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of upper rectal tumours.
Although Hartmann's procedure fell out of favour for rectal cancer after the introduction of restorative procedures, it remained the most common procedure in emergency setting for many years. Nowadays Hartmann's procedure is a useful procedure in selected cases e.g. severely ill patients with a high risk of anastomotic failure. However, restoring intestinal continuity for Hartmann patients is often associated with high morbidity, and about 70% will live with a permanent colostomy. Hartmann procedure' is a rapid and simple surgical technique intended to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. This technique is often performed by young surgeons Indeed, end colostomy may be necessary in situations where restoration of continuity is risky, either because of unfavorable local conditions or because a more definitive resection must be aborted due to hemodynamic instability. In the last decade the Hartmann's procedure has been revalued in many studies. In diverticular disease the results of DIVA arm of the LADIES trial showed that more patients in the primary anastomosis group were stoma free compared with patients in the Hartmann's procedure group. Other studies have observed no differences in major postoperative complications or postoperative mortality between patients undergoing primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure.
Read more
Hartmann's procedure reversals were associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications than were stoma reversals after primary anastomosis with ileostomy.
Despite the growing evidence in favour of primary anastomosis and its inclusion as a valid treatment option for perforated diverticulitis or perforated sigmoid colon in recent clinical practice guidelines, some surgeons have been hesitant to undertake anastomosis in the setting of purulent or faecal contamination and continue to choose Hartmann's procedure to eliminate concerns about anastomotic leakage.
Read the detailed description
Left-sided surgical acute colonic diseases (perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis, colon perforation, large bowel obstruction, colon cancer perforation or obstruction, ischemic colitis, abdominal trauma) are still a life-threatening condition requiring urgent surgical intervention.
Despite several published randomized trials, showing that primary anastomosis with or without protective ileostomy is feasible and randomized trials for laparoscopic lavage with conflicting results, the Hartmann's procedure, described for the first time in 1921 as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of upper rectal tumours, is still performed in many hospitals worldwide. It remained the most common procedure for acute diverticulitis and colonic perforation in emergency setting for many years. Hartmann's procedure is safe for severely ill patients; however, restoring intestinal continuity for such patients is often associated with high morbidity leaving a great percentage of patients with (up to 50%) with a permanent stoma.
Hartmann procedure' is a rapid and simple surgical technique intended to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. This technique is often performed by young surgeons Indeed, end- colostomy may be necessary in situations where restoration of continuity is risky, either because of unfavourable local conditions (Hinchey IV peritonitis) or because a more definitive resection must be aborted due to hemodynamic instability. Although anastomosis at the time of surgery is an alternative approach to Hartmann's procedure, there have been concerns about the safety of this approach.
In the last decade the Hartmann's procedure has been revalued and the results of different studies [DIVA arm of the LADIES trial; DIVERTI study; Halim et Al] showed that more patients in the primary anastomosis group were stoma free compared with patients in the Hartmann's procedure group.
Several studies have observed no differences in major postoperative complications or postoperative mortality between patients undergoing primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure. Hartmann's procedure reversals were associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications than were stoma reversals after protected primary anastomosis. The management of colorectal cancer emergencies is challenging. WSES guidelines recommend in case of perforation resection with anastomosis, with or without ileostomy. Hartmann's procedure should be preferred to simple colostomy, since colostomy appears to be associated with longer overall hospital stay and need for multiple operations, without a reduction in perioperative morbidity in patients with colorectal cancer obstruction. Resection with primary anastomosis should be preferred for uncomplicated malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction in absence of other risk factors. Patients with high surgical risk are better managed with Hartmann's procedure Despite the growing evidence in favour of primary anastomosis and its inclusion as a valid treatment option for perforated diverticulitis or perforated sigmoid colon cancer in recent clinical practice guidelines, surgeons have been reluctant to perform anastomosis. Moreover, the postoperative course of the septic patient is unpredictable and it very hard to estimate it intraoperatively.
In the setting of purulent or fecal contamination most surgeons choose Hartmann's procedure to eliminate also legal concerns about anastomotic leakage. It's important to note that most of these procedures are performed off normal working hours when maybe best colorectal expertise is lacking for decision making regarding anastomosis.
Primary study objective:
- To evaluate the role of Hartmann's procedure in emergency setting for left-sided colonic acute surgical disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-occlusion; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma) and the type of surgery commonly performed in different level of care hospitals.
- To investigate which factors contribute in the choice of Hartmann's procedure instead of colon resection with primary anastomosis (Hospital characteristics, surgeon experience, time of surgery, age of patients, comorbidities, etc ) Study design: International multicenter prospective cohort study. Study population: Adult patients with left-sided colonic acute surgical disease who need surgery in an emergency setting (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-occlusion; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma).
- Conditions
- Emergencies, Colon Disease, Colo-rectal Cancer, Volvulus Colon, Intussusception, Diverticulitis
- Being tested
- Hartmann's procedure
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies, Colonic Diseases, Colonic Neoplasms, Intussusception, Diverticulitis, Foreign Bodies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hartmann's procedureProcedure or surgery
Hartmann's procedure
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Hartmann's procedure | Evaluate the role of Hartmann's procedure in emergency setting for left-sided acute surgical colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma). Receives: Procedure: Hartmann's procedure | |
| Colonic resection with primary anastomosis | Evaluate the role of colonic resection with primary anastomosis in emergency setting for left-sided acute surgical colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Hartmann's procedure vs colic resection with primary anastomosis performed in 3-months in urgent or emergency setting for left-sided acute colonic diseases.
- Etiology: perforated diverticulitis; perforated colonic cancer; large bowel perforation- obstruction; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; colon ischemia; abdominal trauma.
- Treatment: Hartmann's procedure, colonic resection with primary anastomosis with or without diverting stoma, stoma without colic resection.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Risk factors that contribute in the choice of Hartmann's procedure instead of colon resection with primary anastomosis
- Hospital Characteristics: hospital type (academic, non-academic teaching, categorical, secondary hospital, tertiary hospital, level 4- trauma center); annual volume of emergency surgical procedures; annual volume of left-sided colonic disease; types of diagnostic and treatment modalities that are available in the hospital.
- Surgeon experience (surgeon in training: less than 50 colorectal resections performed; less than 5 resections per year in the last 5 years; Trained surgeon: more than 50 colorectal resections performed; more than 10 resections per year in the last 5 years)
- Time of surgery: weekdays, weekend, public holidays, night shift (day: 8am- 8pm; night: 8pm-8am)
Measured: 3 months
The number of patients treated with Hartmann's procedure with a permanent stoma after one year.
1 year follow up to evaluate the number of patients treated with Hartmann's procedure have a permanent stoma after one year.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2021
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion31 May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion31 May 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for EmergenciesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Parma University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fausto Catena, Gennaro Perrone
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mario Giuffrida, Parma University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04829032
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1244
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 22 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- GOODBYE HARTMANN. AFTER 100 YEARS HARTMANN'S PROCEDURE IS GOING TO BE ABANDONED?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04829032
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1244
- Conditions
- Emergencies, Colon Disease, Colo-rectal Cancer, Volvulus Colon, Intussusception, Diverticulitis
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Parma University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Fausto Catena, Gennaro Perrone
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hartmann's procedure was described for the first time in 1921 as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of upper rectal tumours.
Although Hartmann's procedure fell out of favour for rectal cancer after the introduction of restorative procedures, it remained the most common procedure in emergency setting for many years. Nowadays Hartmann's procedure is a useful procedure in selected cases e.g. severely ill patients with a high risk of anastomotic failure. However, restoring intestinal continuity for Hartmann patients is often associated with high morbidity, and about 70% will live with a permanent colostomy. Hartmann procedure' is a rapid and simple surgical technique intended to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. This technique is often performed by young surgeons Indeed, end colostomy may be necessary in situations where restoration of continuity is risky, either because of unfavorable local conditions or because a more definitive resection must be aborted due to hemodynamic instability. In the last decade the Hartmann's procedure has been revalued in many studies. In diverticular disease the results of DIVA arm of the LADIES trial showed that more patients in the primary anastomosis group were stoma free compared with patients in the Hartmann's procedure group. Other studies have observed no differences in major postoperative complications or postoperative mortality between patients undergoing primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure.
Hartmann's procedure reversals were associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications than were stoma reversals after primary anastomosis with ileostomy.
Despite the growing evidence in favour of primary anastomosis and its inclusion as a valid treatment option for perforated diverticulitis or perforated sigmoid colon in recent clinical practice guidelines, some surgeons have been hesitant to undertake anastomosis in the setting of purulent or faecal contamination and continue to choose Hartmann's procedure to eliminate concerns about anastomotic leakage.
Detailed description
Left-sided surgical acute colonic diseases (perforated diverticulitis with generalized peritonitis, colon perforation, large bowel obstruction, colon cancer perforation or obstruction, ischemic colitis, abdominal trauma) are still a life-threatening condition requiring urgent surgical intervention.
Despite several published randomized trials, showing that primary anastomosis with or without protective ileostomy is feasible and randomized trials for laparoscopic lavage with conflicting results, the Hartmann's procedure, described for the first time in 1921 as an alternative to abdominoperineal resection for the treatment of upper rectal tumours, is still performed in many hospitals worldwide. It remained the most common procedure for acute diverticulitis and colonic perforation in emergency setting for many years. Hartmann's procedure is safe for severely ill patients; however, restoring intestinal continuity for such patients is often associated with high morbidity leaving a great percentage of patients with (up to 50%) with a permanent stoma.
Hartmann procedure' is a rapid and simple surgical technique intended to decrease perioperative morbidity and mortality. This technique is often performed by young surgeons Indeed, end- colostomy may be necessary in situations where restoration of continuity is risky, either because of unfavourable local conditions (Hinchey IV peritonitis) or because a more definitive resection must be aborted due to hemodynamic instability. Although anastomosis at the time of surgery is an alternative approach to Hartmann's procedure, there have been concerns about the safety of this approach.
In the last decade the Hartmann's procedure has been revalued and the results of different studies [DIVA arm of the LADIES trial; DIVERTI study; Halim et Al] showed that more patients in the primary anastomosis group were stoma free compared with patients in the Hartmann's procedure group.
Several studies have observed no differences in major postoperative complications or postoperative mortality between patients undergoing primary anastomosis versus Hartmann's procedure. Hartmann's procedure reversals were associated with a higher risk of serious postoperative complications than were stoma reversals after protected primary anastomosis. The management of colorectal cancer emergencies is challenging. WSES guidelines recommend in case of perforation resection with anastomosis, with or without ileostomy. Hartmann's procedure should be preferred to simple colostomy, since colostomy appears to be associated with longer overall hospital stay and need for multiple operations, without a reduction in perioperative morbidity in patients with colorectal cancer obstruction. Resection with primary anastomosis should be preferred for uncomplicated malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction in absence of other risk factors. Patients with high surgical risk are better managed with Hartmann's procedure Despite the growing evidence in favour of primary anastomosis and its inclusion as a valid treatment option for perforated diverticulitis or perforated sigmoid colon cancer in recent clinical practice guidelines, surgeons have been reluctant to perform anastomosis. Moreover, the postoperative course of the septic patient is unpredictable and it very hard to estimate it intraoperatively.
In the setting of purulent or fecal contamination most surgeons choose Hartmann's procedure to eliminate also legal concerns about anastomotic leakage. It's important to note that most of these procedures are performed off normal working hours when maybe best colorectal expertise is lacking for decision making regarding anastomosis.
Primary study objective:
- To evaluate the role of Hartmann's procedure in emergency setting for left-sided colonic acute surgical disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-occlusion; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma) and the type of surgery commonly performed in different level of care hospitals.
- To investigate which factors contribute in the choice of Hartmann's procedure instead of colon resection with primary anastomosis (Hospital characteristics, surgeon experience, time of surgery, age of patients, comorbidities, etc ) Study design: International multicenter prospective cohort study. Study population: Adult patients with left-sided colonic acute surgical disease who need surgery in an emergency setting (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-occlusion; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Hartmann's procedure | – | Procedure: Hartmann's procedureEvaluate the role of Hartmann's procedure in emergency setting for left-sided acute surgical colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma). |
| Colonic resection with primary anastomosis | – | –Evaluate the role of colonic resection with primary anastomosis in emergency setting for left-sided acute surgical colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All consecutive adult patients with left-sided colonic disease who have been operated in urgent-emergency setting between March -May 2021 will be prospectively analyzed and evaluated time of surgery, patient's characteristic, hospital's characteristics. All patients who have been operated in urgent-emergency setting for left-sided colonic disease are suitable for inclusion.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged 18 years or older;
- Patients admitted in Emergency setting for left-sided colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; large bowel perforation-obstruction; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma).
- Patients who underwent urgent or emergency surgery for left-sided colonic disease (perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis; large bowel perforationobstruction; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; ischemic colitis; abdominal trauma).
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Aged 17 or younger.
- Elective surgery.
- Non-surgical treatment.
- Patients with personal history of colorectal cancer treated surgically.
- Patients with stoma.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hartmann's procedureHartmann's procedure | Procedure or surgery | Hartmann's procedure |
Primary outcome
Number of Hartmann's procedure vs colic resection with primary anastomosis performed in 3-months in urgent or emergency setting for left-sided acute colonic diseases.
Time frame: 3 months
* Etiology: perforated diverticulitis; perforated colonic cancer; large bowel perforation- obstruction; colon cancer perforation-obstruction; colon ischemia; abdominal trauma. * Treatment: Hartmann's procedure, colonic resection with primary anastomosis with or without diverting stoma, stoma without colic resection.
2 secondary outcomes
Risk factors that contribute in the choice of Hartmann's procedure instead of colon resection with primary anastomosis
Time frame: 3 months
The number of patients treated with Hartmann's procedure with a permanent stoma after one year.
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Emergencies
Not yet recruiting
A Pre-post Study of a Lethal Means Safety Planning Intervention for Youth at Elevated Suicide Risk in the Emergency Department
Suicidal Ideas, Suicidal Ideation
Not yet recruiting
Miniature In-line Respirator
Brain Death, Respiration, Artificial
Recruiting
Development and Preliminary Validation of Intelligent Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Use
Critically Ill Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation
RecruitingObservational study
AIDE: Decision Support for Anastomosis or Colostomy in Emergency Surgery for Complicated Acute Diverticulitis
Complicated Diverticulitis, Acute Diverticulitis
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Emergencies and Colon Disease, run by Parma University Hospital at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Hartmann's procedure vs colic resection with primary anastomosis performed in 3-months in urgent or emergency setting for left-sided acute colonic diseases. (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2021.