Food InsecurityNCT04831216
Delivering Health: Addressing Diabetes and Food Insecurity
A study testing Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education in people with Food Insecurity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Arkansas at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to use home-delivery of Type 2 diabetes (T2D)-appropriate food boxes with plain language adapted education materials to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Food Insecurity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 101 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Aug 2021to 13 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- Food insecure (confirmed with adapted 10-item screener)
- HbA1c levels of ≥7%
Who cannot join
- Conditions making it unlikely the participant will be able to follow the protocol, such as terminal illness, non-ambulatory, severe mental illness, severely impaired vision or hearing, eating disorder, or plans to move out of the geographic region
- Pregnant
- Only one adult per household will be enrolled
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
About this study
Official title: Delivering Health: An Integrated Approach to Address Diabetes in the Context of Food Insecurity
The goal of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to use home-delivery of Type 2 diabetes (T2D)-appropriate food boxes with plain language adapted education materials to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure people with T2D in northwest Arkansas.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale
Decades of increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) present a multifaceted challenge to the health of a growing number of Americans, affecting their diets and how they live life. Approximately 30 million (~9%) of all people in the US have T2D, and this number is expected to continue to rise. At the same time, 15 million (11.8%) US households experience food insecurity, which is associated with risk for T2D and other chronic diseases. Both T2D and food insecurity are even more prevalent in Arkansas, with rates of T2D and food insecurity at 12.2% and 17.3%, respectively.
Approximately 46 million Americans per year turn to food pantries and related programs to help meet household nutritional needs. However, food pantries are not a long-term solution to improve health for food insecure people with T2D. Most food pantries do not provide food of sufficient dietary quality to support a healthy lifestyle.
Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an approach with documented efficacy in helping people manage T2D. DSME supports informed decision-making, encourages goal setting and problem solving, and improves self-care behaviors. Recent studies have shown promise for DSME among food pantry clients with T2D. However, studies have suffered from problems with attendance and retention.
We designed a study to develop and evaluate the efficacy of a plain-language DSME curriculum to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure people with T2D. We home-delivered this curriculum along with T2D-appropriate healthy food boxes to mitigate difficulties associated with access to healthy food and attendance at DSME sessions outside of the home. We hypothesized that this approach will lead to improvements in participants' glycemic control, diet quality, and other outcomes.
Study Population Up to 110 study participants will be recruited from food pantries located in Benton and Washington Counties in northwest Arkansas.
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Food insecure (confirmed with adapted 10-item screener)
- HbA1c levels of ≥7%
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conditions making it unlikely the participant will be able to follow the protocol, such as terminal illness, non-ambulatory, severe mental illness, severely impaired vision or hearing, eating disorder, or plans to move out of the geographic region
- Pregnant
- Only one adult per household will be enrolled
Study Design and Procedures For each participant, participation took place over 22 weeks (Weeks 1-4: Pre-intervention data collection; Weeks 5-16: Intervention; Weeks 17-22: Post-intervention data collection). Data collection took place at pre-intervention and post-intervention for each participant. At enrollment (i.e., pre-intervention) and one week after the 12th food box delivery (i.e. post-intervention), participants provided data on glycemic control (measured by HbA1c), physical activity, body mass index (BMI), T2D self-management behaviors, T2D knowledge, T2D self-efficacy, and food security. To enhance the study's significance in characterizing the diet patterns and fruit and vegetable consumption of low-income food insecure people with T2D, we collected extensive diet quality data measures pre-intervention and post-intervention.
Data Analysis To examine the intervention's effect on the primary outcomes of glycemic control as measured by HbA1c and diet quality as measured by Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) scores, we used mixed effects regression models for repeated measures. These analyses focused on testing for a statistically significant difference between pre-intervention versus post-intervention measures. Analyses included relevant covariates such as sex or age.
- Conditions
- Food Insecurity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education
- Keywords
- Food insecurity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Nutrition, Food delivery
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes EducationBehavioural
All participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm. The intervention includes weekly delivery of type 2 diabetes-appropriate food boxes that include diabetes self-management education materials.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education | Experimental | All participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm. The intervention includes weekly delivery of type 2 diabetes-appropriate food boxes that include diabetes self-management education materials. Receives: Behavioral: Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), %
A Siemens analyzer was utilized to measure HbA1c (%) via finger stick blood collection.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (19)
Diet Quality
Total skin carotenoid level was measured using a Veggie Meter optical skin scanner using Raman Spectroscopy. The Veggie Meter produces a score from 0 to 800, with higher scores indicating greater skin carotenoid levels, which suggest a greater intake of fruits and vegetables.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Diet Quality (2)
24 hour dietary recalls was collected using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR). NDSR was used to calculate Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) scores. HEI is a metric used to assess the quality of a person's diet by comparing their food intake to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, with a higher score indicating a diet that more closely aligns with recommended nutritional guidelines. HEI scores range from 0 to 100, where a higher score is better.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Weight and height was used to compute a continuous measure of BMI (kilograms per square meter).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Chronic Diseases
Self-report items from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey assessed lifetime prevalence of chronic diseases.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy for self-management of type 2 diabetes was assessed using the eight item Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES). The DSES assesses confidence in a person's perceived capability to perform necessary type 2 diabetes self-care activities including, maintaining healthy diet, engaging in exercise, and performing blood sugar monitoring (0, Not at all confident to 10, Totally confident). The score for the scale is the mean of the eight items, producing a range of scores of 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher levels of confidence to perform diabetes self-management activities.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Oral Health
Oral health was assessed by a single self-report item from the BRFSS, asking length of time since a dental cleaning ("Within the past year=1; Within the past 2 years=2; Within the past 5 years=3; 5 or more years ago=4; Never=5"). A lower score indicates a better outcome (more recent dental cleaning).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes-related Distress
Psychological distress related to type 2 diabetes was assessed using the Problem Areas in Diabetes 5-item scale (PAID-5) scale. The PAID-5 is used to assess the emotional distress related to living with type 2 diabetes, consisting of five questions that focus on feelings like fear, depression, worry about future complications, feeling overwhelmed by diabetes management, and coping with diabetes complications; essentially measuring the psychological impact of managing diabetes on a person's daily life (0, Not a problem to 4, Serious problem). The sum of the items produces a total score that ranges from 0-20, with lower scores indicating less distress.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Food Security
Food security was assessed using the Hunger Vital Sign two-question screening tool. Food security was not assessed at post-intervention, therefore no data can be reported for this measure.
Measured: Baseline
Food Pantry Utilization
Food pantry utilization was assessed through a single survey item adapted from Feeding America's Hunger in America survey. The item asked how many times the participant got food from a food pantry in the past 30 days.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Medication Adherence
Type 2 diabetes medication adherence was collected using responses to six items (0, No; 1, Yes) from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The survey items assess how well individuals with diabetes adhered to their prescribed medication regimen, specifically by measuring whether they are taking medications correctly and refilling prescriptions as directed versus using non-adherence strategies to lower the cost of their medications (e.g., skipping doses, taking less medicine than prescribed, delaying filling prescriptions). Scores ranged from 0-6, with lower scores on the scale indicating a better outcome (e.g., better adherence to medication regimens).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Cooking Skills and Knowledge (1)
Cooking skills and knowledge were assessed using two items. The first item asks "How confident do you feel being able to cook from raw or basic ingredients?" Response options include "Not confident at all; Somewhat confident; and Completely confident". Cooking skills and knowledge were not assessed at post-intervention, therefore no data can be reported for this measure.
Measured: Baseline
Cooking Skills and Knowledge (2)
Cooking skills and knowledge were assessed using two items. The second item asks "How confident do you feel about following a simple recipe?" Response options include "Not confident at all; Somewhat confident; and Completely confident". Cooking skills and knowledge were not assessed at post-intervention, therefore no data can be reported for this measure.
Measured: Baseline
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - General Diet
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.
The General Diet subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants adhered to a diet plan (0-7 days per week).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Specific Diet
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.
The Specific Diet subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants ate certain types of foods (0-7 days per week).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Exercise
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.
The Exercise subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants engaged in exercise (0-7 days per week).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Blood Glucose Testing
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.
The Blood Glucose Testing subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants tested their blood sugar (0-7 days per week).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Foot Care
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.
The Foot Care subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants performed a foot check and inspected the inside of their shoes (0-7 days per week).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Smoking
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days. Smoking was assessed using a single yes/no item.
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Medication Adherence
The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.
The Medication Adherence subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants adhered to taking recommended diabetes medications (0-7 days per week).
Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2021
- Study start24 Aug 2021
- Primary completion15 Jun 2023
- Study completion13 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Food InsecurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ArkansasThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Arkansas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Krista N Langston, MBA, Principal investigator, University of Arkansas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04831216
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 260304
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Short E, Li J, Selig JP, Bounds K, Rowland B, Faitak B, Lane J, Solis-Garcia R, Felix HC, Langston K, McElfish PA, Mejia-Otera J, Haggard-Duff L, Long CR. Medically Tailored Grocery Delivery for Food Pantry Clients with Diabetes. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025 Dec;57(12):1181-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2025.08.006. Epub 2025 Oct 29.
PubMed 41159998
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Delivering Health: An Integrated Approach to Address Diabetes in the Context of Food Insecurity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04831216
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 260304
- Conditions
- Food Insecurity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Keywords
- Food insecurity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Nutrition, Food delivery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 101 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ArkansasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 17 Apr 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to use home-delivery of Type 2 diabetes (T2D)-appropriate food boxes with plain language adapted education materials to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure people with T2D in northwest Arkansas.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale
Decades of increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) present a multifaceted challenge to the health of a growing number of Americans, affecting their diets and how they live life. Approximately 30 million (~9%) of all people in the US have T2D, and this number is expected to continue to rise. At the same time, 15 million (11.8%) US households experience food insecurity, which is associated with risk for T2D and other chronic diseases. Both T2D and food insecurity are even more prevalent in Arkansas, with rates of T2D and food insecurity at 12.2% and 17.3%, respectively.
Approximately 46 million Americans per year turn to food pantries and related programs to help meet household nutritional needs. However, food pantries are not a long-term solution to improve health for food insecure people with T2D. Most food pantries do not provide food of sufficient dietary quality to support a healthy lifestyle.
Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an approach with documented efficacy in helping people manage T2D. DSME supports informed decision-making, encourages goal setting and problem solving, and improves self-care behaviors. Recent studies have shown promise for DSME among food pantry clients with T2D. However, studies have suffered from problems with attendance and retention.
We designed a study to develop and evaluate the efficacy of a plain-language DSME curriculum to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure people with T2D. We home-delivered this curriculum along with T2D-appropriate healthy food boxes to mitigate difficulties associated with access to healthy food and attendance at DSME sessions outside of the home. We hypothesized that this approach will lead to improvements in participants' glycemic control, diet quality, and other outcomes.
Study Population Up to 110 study participants will be recruited from food pantries located in Benton and Washington Counties in northwest Arkansas.
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Food insecure (confirmed with adapted 10-item screener)
- HbA1c levels of ≥7%
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conditions making it unlikely the participant will be able to follow the protocol, such as terminal illness, non-ambulatory, severe mental illness, severely impaired vision or hearing, eating disorder, or plans to move out of the geographic region
- Pregnant
- Only one adult per household will be enrolled
Study Design and Procedures For each participant, participation took place over 22 weeks (Weeks 1-4: Pre-intervention data collection; Weeks 5-16: Intervention; Weeks 17-22: Post-intervention data collection). Data collection took place at pre-intervention and post-intervention for each participant. At enrollment (i.e., pre-intervention) and one week after the 12th food box delivery (i.e. post-intervention), participants provided data on glycemic control (measured by HbA1c), physical activity, body mass index (BMI), T2D self-management behaviors, T2D knowledge, T2D self-efficacy, and food security. To enhance the study's significance in characterizing the diet patterns and fruit and vegetable consumption of low-income food insecure people with T2D, we collected extensive diet quality data measures pre-intervention and post-intervention.
Data Analysis To examine the intervention's effect on the primary outcomes of glycemic control as measured by HbA1c and diet quality as measured by Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) scores, we used mixed effects regression models for repeated measures. These analyses focused on testing for a statistically significant difference between pre-intervention versus post-intervention measures. Analyses included relevant covariates such as sex or age.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education | Experimental | Behavioral: Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes EducationAll participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm. The intervention includes weekly delivery of type 2 diabetes-appropriate food boxes that include diabetes self-management education materials. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- Food insecure (confirmed with adapted 10-item screener)
- HbA1c levels of ≥7%
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Conditions making it unlikely the participant will be able to follow the protocol, such as terminal illness, non-ambulatory, severe mental illness, severely impaired vision or hearing, eating disorder, or plans to move out of the geographic region
- Pregnant
- Only one adult per household will be enrolled
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes EducationAll participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm. The intervention includes weekly delivery of type 2 diabetes-appropriate food boxes that include diabetes self-management education materials. | Behavioural | Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education |
Primary outcome
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), %
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
A Siemens analyzer was utilized to measure HbA1c (%) via finger stick blood collection.
19 secondary outcomes
Diet Quality
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Diet Quality (2)
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Chronic Diseases
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Self-Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Oral Health
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes-related Distress
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Food Security
Time frame: Baseline
Food Pantry Utilization
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Medication Adherence
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Cooking Skills and Knowledge (1)
Time frame: Baseline
Cooking Skills and Knowledge (2)
Time frame: Baseline
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - General Diet
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Specific Diet
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Exercise
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Blood Glucose Testing
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Foot Care
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Smoking
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Medication Adherence
Time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jan 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41159998Short E, Li J, Selig JP, Bounds K, Rowland B, Faitak B, Lane J, Solis-Garcia R, Felix HC, Langston K, McElfish PA, Mejia-Otera J, Haggard-Duff L, Long CR. Medically Tailored Grocery Delivery for Food Pantry Clients with Diabetes. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025 Dec;57(12):1181-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2025.08.006. Epub 2025 Oct 29.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Food Insecurity
Recruiting
Developing a Support Application for Food Pantries (SAFPAS) to Improve Client Access to Healthy Foods & Enhance Emergency Preparedness
Improving Healthy Food Access in Food Insecurity Populations in Normal and Emergency Situations
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Not yet recruiting
Community Health Worker Nutrition Self-Management Support for Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Health
Hypertension (HTN), CKD - Chronic Kidney Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Addressing Food Insecurity in Pregnancy
Food Insecurity, Pregnancy
Active, not recruiting
Pilot of Continuous Glucose Monitor-Augmented Food Is Medicine
Nutrition, Type 2 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Krista N Langston, MBA principal investigator
University of Arkansas
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education in people with Food Insecurity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Arkansas at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), % (time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04831216, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2026.