AzTrials
AzTrials

Food InsecurityNCT04831216

Delivering Health: Addressing Diabetes and Food Insecurity

A study testing Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education in people with Food Insecurity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Arkansas at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to use home-delivery of Type 2 diabetes (T2D)-appropriate food boxes with plain language adapted education materials to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Food Insecurity, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
101 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
24 Aug 2021to 13 Jul 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Food insecure (confirmed with adapted 10-item screener)
  • HbA1c levels of ≥7%

Who cannot join

  • Conditions making it unlikely the participant will be able to follow the protocol, such as terminal illness, non-ambulatory, severe mental illness, severely impaired vision or hearing, eating disorder, or plans to move out of the geographic region
  • Pregnant
  • Only one adult per household will be enrolled

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest

    Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Delivering Health: An Integrated Approach to Address Diabetes in the Context of Food Insecurity

The goal of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to use home-delivery of Type 2 diabetes (T2D)-appropriate food boxes with plain language adapted education materials to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure people with T2D in northwest Arkansas.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale

Decades of increasing incidence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) present a multifaceted challenge to the health of a growing number of Americans, affecting their diets and how they live life. Approximately 30 million (~9%) of all people in the US have T2D, and this number is expected to continue to rise. At the same time, 15 million (11.8%) US households experience food insecurity, which is associated with risk for T2D and other chronic diseases. Both T2D and food insecurity are even more prevalent in Arkansas, with rates of T2D and food insecurity at 12.2% and 17.3%, respectively.

Approximately 46 million Americans per year turn to food pantries and related programs to help meet household nutritional needs. However, food pantries are not a long-term solution to improve health for food insecure people with T2D. Most food pantries do not provide food of sufficient dietary quality to support a healthy lifestyle.

Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is an approach with documented efficacy in helping people manage T2D. DSME supports informed decision-making, encourages goal setting and problem solving, and improves self-care behaviors. Recent studies have shown promise for DSME among food pantry clients with T2D. However, studies have suffered from problems with attendance and retention.

We designed a study to develop and evaluate the efficacy of a plain-language DSME curriculum to improve the nutritional health, physical activity, and health outcomes of low-income food insecure people with T2D. We home-delivered this curriculum along with T2D-appropriate healthy food boxes to mitigate difficulties associated with access to healthy food and attendance at DSME sessions outside of the home. We hypothesized that this approach will lead to improvements in participants' glycemic control, diet quality, and other outcomes.

Study Population Up to 110 study participants will be recruited from food pantries located in Benton and Washington Counties in northwest Arkansas.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Food insecure (confirmed with adapted 10-item screener)
  • HbA1c levels of ≥7%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conditions making it unlikely the participant will be able to follow the protocol, such as terminal illness, non-ambulatory, severe mental illness, severely impaired vision or hearing, eating disorder, or plans to move out of the geographic region
  • Pregnant
  • Only one adult per household will be enrolled

Study Design and Procedures For each participant, participation took place over 22 weeks (Weeks 1-4: Pre-intervention data collection; Weeks 5-16: Intervention; Weeks 17-22: Post-intervention data collection). Data collection took place at pre-intervention and post-intervention for each participant. At enrollment (i.e., pre-intervention) and one week after the 12th food box delivery (i.e. post-intervention), participants provided data on glycemic control (measured by HbA1c), physical activity, body mass index (BMI), T2D self-management behaviors, T2D knowledge, T2D self-efficacy, and food security. To enhance the study's significance in characterizing the diet patterns and fruit and vegetable consumption of low-income food insecure people with T2D, we collected extensive diet quality data measures pre-intervention and post-intervention.

Data Analysis To examine the intervention's effect on the primary outcomes of glycemic control as measured by HbA1c and diet quality as measured by Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) scores, we used mixed effects regression models for repeated measures. These analyses focused on testing for a statistically significant difference between pre-intervention versus post-intervention measures. Analyses included relevant covariates such as sex or age.

Being tested
Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education
Keywords
Food insecurity, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Nutrition, Food delivery
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes EducationBehavioural

    All participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm. The intervention includes weekly delivery of type 2 diabetes-appropriate food boxes that include diabetes self-management education materials.

Study groups in NCT04831216
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes EducationExperimentalAll participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm. The intervention includes weekly delivery of type 2 diabetes-appropriate food boxes that include diabetes self-management education materials.
Receives: Behavioral: Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), %

    A Siemens analyzer was utilized to measure HbA1c (%) via finger stick blood collection.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (19)
  1. Diet Quality

    Total skin carotenoid level was measured using a Veggie Meter optical skin scanner using Raman Spectroscopy. The Veggie Meter produces a score from 0 to 800, with higher scores indicating greater skin carotenoid levels, which suggest a greater intake of fruits and vegetables.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  2. Diet Quality (2)

    24 hour dietary recalls was collected using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR). NDSR was used to calculate Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI) scores. HEI is a metric used to assess the quality of a person's diet by comparing their food intake to the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, with a higher score indicating a diet that more closely aligns with recommended nutritional guidelines. HEI scores range from 0 to 100, where a higher score is better.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  3. Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Weight and height was used to compute a continuous measure of BMI (kilograms per square meter).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  4. Chronic Diseases

    Self-report items from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey assessed lifetime prevalence of chronic diseases.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  5. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Self-Efficacy

    Self-efficacy for self-management of type 2 diabetes was assessed using the eight item Diabetes Self-Efficacy Scale (DSES). The DSES assesses confidence in a person's perceived capability to perform necessary type 2 diabetes self-care activities including, maintaining healthy diet, engaging in exercise, and performing blood sugar monitoring (0, Not at all confident to 10, Totally confident). The score for the scale is the mean of the eight items, producing a range of scores of 0-10, with higher scores indicating higher levels of confidence to perform diabetes self-management activities.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  6. Oral Health

    Oral health was assessed by a single self-report item from the BRFSS, asking length of time since a dental cleaning ("Within the past year=1; Within the past 2 years=2; Within the past 5 years=3; 5 or more years ago=4; Never=5"). A lower score indicates a better outcome (more recent dental cleaning).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  7. Type 2 Diabetes-related Distress

    Psychological distress related to type 2 diabetes was assessed using the Problem Areas in Diabetes 5-item scale (PAID-5) scale. The PAID-5 is used to assess the emotional distress related to living with type 2 diabetes, consisting of five questions that focus on feelings like fear, depression, worry about future complications, feeling overwhelmed by diabetes management, and coping with diabetes complications; essentially measuring the psychological impact of managing diabetes on a person's daily life (0, Not a problem to 4, Serious problem). The sum of the items produces a total score that ranges from 0-20, with lower scores indicating less distress.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  8. Food Security

    Food security was assessed using the Hunger Vital Sign two-question screening tool. Food security was not assessed at post-intervention, therefore no data can be reported for this measure.

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Food Pantry Utilization

    Food pantry utilization was assessed through a single survey item adapted from Feeding America's Hunger in America survey. The item asked how many times the participant got food from a food pantry in the past 30 days.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  10. Medication Adherence

    Type 2 diabetes medication adherence was collected using responses to six items (0, No; 1, Yes) from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS). The survey items assess how well individuals with diabetes adhered to their prescribed medication regimen, specifically by measuring whether they are taking medications correctly and refilling prescriptions as directed versus using non-adherence strategies to lower the cost of their medications (e.g., skipping doses, taking less medicine than prescribed, delaying filling prescriptions). Scores ranged from 0-6, with lower scores on the scale indicating a better outcome (e.g., better adherence to medication regimens).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  11. Cooking Skills and Knowledge (1)

    Cooking skills and knowledge were assessed using two items. The first item asks "How confident do you feel being able to cook from raw or basic ingredients?" Response options include "Not confident at all; Somewhat confident; and Completely confident". Cooking skills and knowledge were not assessed at post-intervention, therefore no data can be reported for this measure.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Cooking Skills and Knowledge (2)

    Cooking skills and knowledge were assessed using two items. The second item asks "How confident do you feel about following a simple recipe?" Response options include "Not confident at all; Somewhat confident; and Completely confident". Cooking skills and knowledge were not assessed at post-intervention, therefore no data can be reported for this measure.

    Measured: Baseline

  13. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - General Diet

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.

    The General Diet subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants adhered to a diet plan (0-7 days per week).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  14. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Specific Diet

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.

    The Specific Diet subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants ate certain types of foods (0-7 days per week).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  15. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Exercise

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.

    The Exercise subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants engaged in exercise (0-7 days per week).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  16. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Blood Glucose Testing

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.

    The Blood Glucose Testing subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants tested their blood sugar (0-7 days per week).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  17. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Foot Care

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.

    The Foot Care subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants performed a foot check and inspected the inside of their shoes (0-7 days per week).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  18. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Smoking

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days. Smoking was assessed using a single yes/no item.

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

  19. Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management Behaviors - Medication Adherence

    The Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA) was used to assess self-management behaviors. The SDSCA is used to assess how well individuals with diabetes manage their condition by measuring the frequency (number of days) of their self-care practices like diet, exercise, blood glucose monitoring, and foot care over the past seven days.

    The Medication Adherence subscale is 2 items assessing how many days participants adhered to taking recommended diabetes medications (0-7 days per week).

    Measured: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Apr 2021
  2. Study start24 Aug 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion13 Jul 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
All participants will be assigned to a single intervention arm.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04831216
Sponsor's protocol ID
260304
Status last verified
Mar 2025
First submitted
1 Apr 2021
Last updated
16 Jan 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Short E, Li J, Selig JP, Bounds K, Rowland B, Faitak B, Lane J, Solis-Garcia R, Felix HC, Langston K, McElfish PA, Mejia-Otera J, Haggard-Duff L, Long CR. Medically Tailored Grocery Delivery for Food Pantry Clients with Diabetes. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2025 Dec;57(12):1181-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2025.08.006. Epub 2025 Oct 29.

    PubMed 41159998

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Type 2 Diabetes Appropriate Food Boxes + Diabetes Education in people with Food Insecurity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by University of Arkansas at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Apr 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), % (time frame: Baseline; immediate post-intervention (approx. 20 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04831216, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in