Surgical Site InfectionPhase 4NCT04834310
Postoperative Antibiotics Following Primary and Secondary Breast Augmentation
A Phase 4 study testing Cefazolin and Cephalexin in people with Surgical Site Infection and Capsular Contracture Associated With Breast Implant, run by University of California, Los Angeles.
Trial summary
Postoperative antibiotics are routinely used for implant-based breast augmentation at the investigators' institution. From 2017-2019, the investigators' institution has conducted approximately 270 primary and secondary breast augmentation procedures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Site Infection, Capsular Contracture Associated With Breast Implant, Antibiotic Resistant Infection
- What is being tested?
- Cefazolin and Cephalexin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2021to 30 Jul 2024
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 year or older
- Participants undergoing primary breast augmentation with subglandular or submuscular implants
- Participants undergoing breast augmentation-mastopexy with subglandular or submuscular implants
- Participants undergoing secondary breast augmentation with subglandular or submuscular implants (i.e. patients undergoing implant exchange secondary to capsular contracture and implant rupture)
Who cannot join
- Refusal or inability to obtain consent from participants
- Participants with biopsy-proven breast cancer
- Participants undergoing expander-based breast reconstruction
- Participants undergoing autologous flap breast reconstruction
- Participants with history of chest radiation
- Participants with active infection at the time of surgery
Show all 9Show fewer
- Participants who fail to take the placebos or antibiotics provided in the study for any reason
- Participants who miss postoperative visits
- Participants who withdraw consent at any stage of the study
About this study
Official title: Postoperative Antibiotics Following Primary and Secondary Breast Augmentation: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial
Postoperative antibiotics are routinely used for implant-based breast augmentation at the investigators' institution. From 2017-2019, the investigators' institution has conducted approximately 270 primary and secondary breast augmentation procedures. Current plastic surgery literature does not provide recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis following implant-based breast procedures. Despite controversy surrounding their utility during the postoperative course, postoperative antibiotics have become commonplace for many plastic surgeons. To date, strong scientific evidence supporting this practice is minimal and based largely on anecdotal evidence and limited studies, including poorly controlled retrospective and non-blinded prospective series. The goal of this study is to conduct a prospective randomized trial to assess whether extended antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary to prevent infection and long-term complications (e.g. capsular contracture) in patients undergoing augmentation mammoplasty with implants. The investigators' anticipate that extended antibiotic prophylaxis is not required. The rationale for discontinuing postoperative antibiotics is based on the following: (1) a single dose of preoperative intravenous antibiotics has been demonstrated to be sufficient prophylaxis for most breast surgeries and (2) there are patient safety concerns associated with prolonged antimicrobial use such as the development of resistant bacterial strains and clostridium-related infections. Concrete evidence that extended antibiotic prophylaxis is not required would encourage plastic surgeons to practice better antibiotic stewardship and help stymie the rise of drug-resistant organisms.
Read the detailed description
The investigators will perform a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial at University of California Los Angeles Ronald Reagan Medical Center for patients undergoing primary and secondary breast augmentation between 2021-2025. The study will be added to a research registry before patient enrollment begins (i.e. www.clinicaltrials.gov) with study methods and results presented in the manner recommended by the CONSORT statement (available at www.consort-statement.org). The study will be designed as a non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups: the experimental group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively (Cephalexin 500 mg four times per day or Clindamycin 300 mg four times per day, if Penicillin allergic) while the control group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics (Cefazolin 1 g or 2 g, or Clindamycin 600 mg or 900 mg, if Penicillin allergic, higher doses provided if BMI > 30 kg/m2) followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively. Inclusion criteria will include: females and transgender females 18 years or older, patients undergoing primary breast augmentation, breast augmentation-mastopexy, and secondary breast augmentation with subglandular or submuscular implants. Secondary breast augmentation will include patients undergoing implant exchange secondary to capsular contracture and implant rupture. Exclusion criteria will include refusal or inability to consent, patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer, patients undergoing expander-based and autologous flap breast reconstruction following mastectomies, history of chest radiation, and the presence of active infection at the time of surgery. Patients who fail to take the placebos or antibiotics provided in the study for any reason, miss postoperative visits, and/or withdraw consent at any stage of the study will also be excluded.
For the analysis, the investigators plan to obtain hospital records with intraoperative procedural and postoperative clinic notes. Demographic information including gender, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking use, and prior breast surgeries will be collected and used for analysis. Power analysis for statistical equivalency using 8% infection rate yields a required sample size of 164 total patients, with planned 82 patients per group (i.e. experimental and control). This would provide 80 percent power at a significance level of 5 percent. The experimental group will consist of patients who receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively. The control group includes patients who receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively. All medications and placebos will be formulated, compounded and dispensed by the University of California Los Angeles Investigational Research Pharmacy. An appointed Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor data and safety as recommended by the Investigational Review Board (IRB).
Antibiotics of choice include intravenous Cefazolin and oral Cephalexin. Intravenous and oral Clindamycin will be made available for subjects who are allergic to Penicillin. Subject allocation will be based on a 1:1 ratio for each group. Surgeons, nursing, and administrative staff will be responsible for recruitment. Prior to surgery, patients will be given a consent form to explain their involvement in the randomized trial. The consent process will inform the participant about details of the study and indicate participation is voluntary. They will also be given the risks, benefits, alternatives, and confidentiality of their information with proceeding with the study. Risks discussed with participants will include those associated with antibiotic use, including gastrointestinal symptoms, yeast infections, allergic reactions, development of resistant bacterial strains, and clostridium-related infections. Potential risks associated with no antibiotic use (i.e. placebo group), include infection. The interventions to protect those affected by these risks include hospital admission as detailed in the informed consent under the section "Office of the Human Research Protection Program (OHRPP)," and the option to opt out of the study. There are no medical benefits with participating in the study. However, participants will be informed that the results may contribute to the body of knowledge around postoperative antibiotics, and improve surgical protocols and postoperative care.
Randomization will be performed prior to surgery, and an assigned study coordinator will generate group assignments. Patients and surgeons will be blinded to the study before randomization takes place. However, surgeons will have access to information following medication dispensation in case any complications arise so that the provider can carry out appropriate interventions. Review of the rate of subject accrual and compliance will occur monthly during the recruitment phase. An interim analysis will be performed on the primary endpoint when 50% of patients have been randomized and have complete their 6-month follow up period. An independent statistician blinded to treatment allocation will perform the analyses. The statistician will report to DSMB who will have unmasked access to all data. Interim analysis will be used to inform stopping guidelines and trial adaptations (e.g. sample size re-estimation, alteration to the proportion of participants allocated to each study group, and changes to eligibility criteria). The Principal Investigator (PI) will be responsible for ensuring participants' safety on a daily basis. The DSMB will act in an advisory capacity to monitor participant safety, evaluate the progress of the study, and review procedures for maintaining the confidentiality, quality, management, and analysis of the data.
An adverse event will be any untoward medical occurrence in a subject without regard to the possibility of a causal relationship. Adverse events will be collected after the subject has provided consent and enrolled in the study. All adverse events occurring after entry into the study and up to their first postoperative visit will be recorded. A serious adverse event for this study is any untoward medical occurrence that is believed by the investigators to be causally related to study-drug and results in any of the following: life-threatening condition (i.e. immediate risk of death); severe or permanent disability, prolonged hospitalization, or a significant hazard as determined by the DSMB. Investigators will determine relatedness of an event to study based on a temporal relationship, as well as whether the event is unexpected or unexplained given the subject's clinical course, previous medical conditions, and concomitant medications. All adverse and severe events related to antibiotic use, including anaphylaxis requiring hospital admission and/or resulting in death, will be monitored through patient examination and chart review. Furthermore, events that meet criteria for an adverse and serious adverse will be reported to the IRB.
Six plastic surgeons will be involved in the study and will utilize a standardized surgical protocol. Initial follow up visits will be arranged within 1-2 weeks following surgery. Data on adherence to the treatment protocol will be collected monthly by research staff and reviewed quarterly by the Principal Investigator and the study statistician. Adherence of participants will be evaluated by inquiring about completion of antibiotics or placebos at each postoperative visit. During follow-up visits, inquiry will be made to assure patients receive their antibiotics or placebos. This information along with any post-operative complications will be transferred onto the patient's electronic medical record accordingly. Primary outcomes including surgical site infection, secondary outcomes (e.g. hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, implant loss, and capsular contracture), and antibiotic-related complications (e.g. antibiotic resistance, diarrhea, clostridium infection, yeast infections, rash, urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal upset) will be documented. Surgical site infections will be determined by the surgeon however will be defined by the presence of the following signs and symptoms: fevers, purulent drainage, pain, tenderness, localized edema, heat, erythema, positive wound cultures, and leukocytosis. Study endpoints will include diagnosis of surgical site infection, development of secondary outcomes, and subject death or loss to follow-up. Follow-up will be continued until all patients have reached one of the study endpoints. Statistical tests will be performed by a statistician using statistical software and determined after enough data has been generated to perform preliminary analysis. Threats to study validity include under recruitment of subjects, subjects lost to follow-up, subject non-compliance, and subject crossovers. This study will be stopped prior to its completion if: the intervention is associated with adverse effects that call into question the safety of the intervention; difficulty in study recruitment or retention will significantly impact the ability to evaluate the study endpoints; any new information becomes available during the trial that necessitates stopping the trial; or other situations occur that might warrant stopping the trial.
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection, Capsular Contracture Associated With Breast Implant, Antibiotic Resistant Infection, Antibiotic Side Effect
- Being tested
- Cefazolin, Cephalexin, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CefazolinDrug
Also called Ancef, Clindamycin, Cleocin
All patients will receive an intraoperative dose of IV Cefazolin 2 g (re-dose after 4 hours) or IV Clindamycin 600mg (re-dose after 6 hours) for penicillin allergic patients.
CephalexinDrug
Also called Keflex, Clindamycin, Cleocin
The experimental group will receive a postoperative 5-day course of Cephalexin 500 mg QID or Clindamycin 300 mg QID for penicillin allergic patients. All capsules will be encapsulated with size 00 dark-colored capsules compounded by the UCLA Investigational Pharmacy.
PlaceboOther
The placebo group will receive a postoperative 5-day course of placebos (sugar capsules). All capsules will be encapsulated with size 00 dark-colored capsules compounded by the UCLA Investigational Pharmacy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative and Postoperative Antibiotics | Experimental | The experimental group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics, which is standard protocol at our institution, followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively. Receives: Drug: Cefazolin; Drug: Cephalexin |
| Intraoperative Antibiotics and Placebo | Placebo comparator | The control group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics, which is standard protocol at our institution, followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively Receives: Drug: Cefazolin; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with surgical site infection
Surgical site infections will be determined by the surgeon however will be defined by the presence of the following signs and symptoms: fevers, purulent drainage, pain, tenderness, localized edema, heat, erythema, positive wound cultures, and leukocytosis.
Measured: 365 days following surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
Number of participants with hematoma
Fluid collection consisting of blood secondary to procedure identified by clinical exam and/or ultrasound.
Measured: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with seroma
Fluid collection consisting of serous fluid secondary to procedure identified by clinical exam and/or ultrasound.
Measured: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with wound dehiscence
Any re-opening of surgical incision following procedure which was closed primarily.
Measured: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with implant loss
Extrusion of implant or condition resulting in implant removal secondary to procedure.
Measured: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with antibiotic-related complications
Diarrhea, clostridium infection, yeast infections, rash, urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal upset
Measured: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with antibiotic resistance
Local wound infections and fluid collections will be cultured and sent for identification and susceptibility. Resistant strains will be documented and treated with alternative antibiotics.
Measured: 365 days following surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2021
- Study start1 Apr 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 May 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2024 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Do not have adequate funding to proceed with project.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Surgical Site InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The study will be designed as a non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups: the experimental group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively (Cephalexin 500 mg QID or Clindamycin 300 mg QID, if Penicillin allergic) while the control group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics (Cefazolin 1 g or 2 g, or Clindamycin 600 mg or 900 mg, if Penicillin allergic, higher doses provided if BMI \> 30 kg/m2) followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Karie Villanueva, MD, University of California, Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Karie Villanueva, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, Los AngelesJaco Festekjian, MD, Study chair, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04834310
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UCLA PRS
- Status last verified
- Sep 2022
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Chopra K, Gowda AU, McNichols CHL, Brown EN, Slezak S, Rasko Y. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practice Patterns in Breast Augmentation: A National Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6):629-632. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000942.
PubMed 27922894Hardwicke JT, Bechar J, Skillman JM. Are systemic antibiotics indicated in aesthetic breast surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun;131(6):1395-1403. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd752.
PubMed 23416440Keramidas E, Lymperopoulos NS, Rodopoulou S. Is antibiotic prophylaxis in breast augmentation necessary? A prospective study. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2016 Fall;24(3):195-198. doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000976. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
PubMed 28439510LeRoy J, Given KS. Wound infection in breast augmentation: the role of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991 Fall;15(4):303-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02273877.
PubMed 1950803Mirzabeigi MN, Mericli AF, Ortlip T, Tuma GA, Copit SE, Fox JW 4th, Moore JH Jr. Evaluating the role of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in primary and secondary breast augmentation: a retrospective review. Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Jan;32(1):61-8. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11430830.
PubMed 22231414Gylbert L, Asplund O, Berggren A, Jurell G, Ransjo U, Ostrup L. Preoperative antibiotics and capsular contracture in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Aug;86(2):260-7; discussion 268-9.
PubMed 2195567
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Postoperative Antibiotics Following Primary and Secondary Breast Augmentation: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04834310
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UCLA PRS
- Conditions
- Surgical Site Infection, Capsular Contracture Associated With Breast Implant, Antibiotic Resistant Infection, Antibiotic Side Effect
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Do not have adequate funding to proceed with project.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Postoperative antibiotics are routinely used for implant-based breast augmentation at the investigators' institution. From 2017-2019, the investigators' institution has conducted approximately 270 primary and secondary breast augmentation procedures. Current plastic surgery literature does not provide recommendations for antibiotic prophylaxis following implant-based breast procedures. Despite controversy surrounding their utility during the postoperative course, postoperative antibiotics have become commonplace for many plastic surgeons. To date, strong scientific evidence supporting this practice is minimal and based largely on anecdotal evidence and limited studies, including poorly controlled retrospective and non-blinded prospective series. The goal of this study is to conduct a prospective randomized trial to assess whether extended antibiotic prophylaxis is necessary to prevent infection and long-term complications (e.g. capsular contracture) in patients undergoing augmentation mammoplasty with implants. The investigators' anticipate that extended antibiotic prophylaxis is not required. The rationale for discontinuing postoperative antibiotics is based on the following: (1) a single dose of preoperative intravenous antibiotics has been demonstrated to be sufficient prophylaxis for most breast surgeries and (2) there are patient safety concerns associated with prolonged antimicrobial use such as the development of resistant bacterial strains and clostridium-related infections. Concrete evidence that extended antibiotic prophylaxis is not required would encourage plastic surgeons to practice better antibiotic stewardship and help stymie the rise of drug-resistant organisms.
Detailed description
The investigators will perform a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial at University of California Los Angeles Ronald Reagan Medical Center for patients undergoing primary and secondary breast augmentation between 2021-2025. The study will be added to a research registry before patient enrollment begins (i.e. www.clinicaltrials.gov) with study methods and results presented in the manner recommended by the CONSORT statement (available at www.consort-statement.org). The study will be designed as a non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups: the experimental group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively (Cephalexin 500 mg four times per day or Clindamycin 300 mg four times per day, if Penicillin allergic) while the control group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics (Cefazolin 1 g or 2 g, or Clindamycin 600 mg or 900 mg, if Penicillin allergic, higher doses provided if BMI > 30 kg/m2) followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively. Inclusion criteria will include: females and transgender females 18 years or older, patients undergoing primary breast augmentation, breast augmentation-mastopexy, and secondary breast augmentation with subglandular or submuscular implants. Secondary breast augmentation will include patients undergoing implant exchange secondary to capsular contracture and implant rupture. Exclusion criteria will include refusal or inability to consent, patients with biopsy-proven breast cancer, patients undergoing expander-based and autologous flap breast reconstruction following mastectomies, history of chest radiation, and the presence of active infection at the time of surgery. Patients who fail to take the placebos or antibiotics provided in the study for any reason, miss postoperative visits, and/or withdraw consent at any stage of the study will also be excluded.
For the analysis, the investigators plan to obtain hospital records with intraoperative procedural and postoperative clinic notes. Demographic information including gender, body mass index, comorbidities, smoking use, and prior breast surgeries will be collected and used for analysis. Power analysis for statistical equivalency using 8% infection rate yields a required sample size of 164 total patients, with planned 82 patients per group (i.e. experimental and control). This would provide 80 percent power at a significance level of 5 percent. The experimental group will consist of patients who receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively. The control group includes patients who receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively. All medications and placebos will be formulated, compounded and dispensed by the University of California Los Angeles Investigational Research Pharmacy. An appointed Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will monitor data and safety as recommended by the Investigational Review Board (IRB).
Antibiotics of choice include intravenous Cefazolin and oral Cephalexin. Intravenous and oral Clindamycin will be made available for subjects who are allergic to Penicillin. Subject allocation will be based on a 1:1 ratio for each group. Surgeons, nursing, and administrative staff will be responsible for recruitment. Prior to surgery, patients will be given a consent form to explain their involvement in the randomized trial. The consent process will inform the participant about details of the study and indicate participation is voluntary. They will also be given the risks, benefits, alternatives, and confidentiality of their information with proceeding with the study. Risks discussed with participants will include those associated with antibiotic use, including gastrointestinal symptoms, yeast infections, allergic reactions, development of resistant bacterial strains, and clostridium-related infections. Potential risks associated with no antibiotic use (i.e. placebo group), include infection. The interventions to protect those affected by these risks include hospital admission as detailed in the informed consent under the section "Office of the Human Research Protection Program (OHRPP)," and the option to opt out of the study. There are no medical benefits with participating in the study. However, participants will be informed that the results may contribute to the body of knowledge around postoperative antibiotics, and improve surgical protocols and postoperative care.
Randomization will be performed prior to surgery, and an assigned study coordinator will generate group assignments. Patients and surgeons will be blinded to the study before randomization takes place. However, surgeons will have access to information following medication dispensation in case any complications arise so that the provider can carry out appropriate interventions. Review of the rate of subject accrual and compliance will occur monthly during the recruitment phase. An interim analysis will be performed on the primary endpoint when 50% of patients have been randomized and have complete their 6-month follow up period. An independent statistician blinded to treatment allocation will perform the analyses. The statistician will report to DSMB who will have unmasked access to all data. Interim analysis will be used to inform stopping guidelines and trial adaptations (e.g. sample size re-estimation, alteration to the proportion of participants allocated to each study group, and changes to eligibility criteria). The Principal Investigator (PI) will be responsible for ensuring participants' safety on a daily basis. The DSMB will act in an advisory capacity to monitor participant safety, evaluate the progress of the study, and review procedures for maintaining the confidentiality, quality, management, and analysis of the data.
An adverse event will be any untoward medical occurrence in a subject without regard to the possibility of a causal relationship. Adverse events will be collected after the subject has provided consent and enrolled in the study. All adverse events occurring after entry into the study and up to their first postoperative visit will be recorded. A serious adverse event for this study is any untoward medical occurrence that is believed by the investigators to be causally related to study-drug and results in any of the following: life-threatening condition (i.e. immediate risk of death); severe or permanent disability, prolonged hospitalization, or a significant hazard as determined by the DSMB. Investigators will determine relatedness of an event to study based on a temporal relationship, as well as whether the event is unexpected or unexplained given the subject's clinical course, previous medical conditions, and concomitant medications. All adverse and severe events related to antibiotic use, including anaphylaxis requiring hospital admission and/or resulting in death, will be monitored through patient examination and chart review. Furthermore, events that meet criteria for an adverse and serious adverse will be reported to the IRB.
Six plastic surgeons will be involved in the study and will utilize a standardized surgical protocol. Initial follow up visits will be arranged within 1-2 weeks following surgery. Data on adherence to the treatment protocol will be collected monthly by research staff and reviewed quarterly by the Principal Investigator and the study statistician. Adherence of participants will be evaluated by inquiring about completion of antibiotics or placebos at each postoperative visit. During follow-up visits, inquiry will be made to assure patients receive their antibiotics or placebos. This information along with any post-operative complications will be transferred onto the patient's electronic medical record accordingly. Primary outcomes including surgical site infection, secondary outcomes (e.g. hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, implant loss, and capsular contracture), and antibiotic-related complications (e.g. antibiotic resistance, diarrhea, clostridium infection, yeast infections, rash, urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal upset) will be documented. Surgical site infections will be determined by the surgeon however will be defined by the presence of the following signs and symptoms: fevers, purulent drainage, pain, tenderness, localized edema, heat, erythema, positive wound cultures, and leukocytosis. Study endpoints will include diagnosis of surgical site infection, development of secondary outcomes, and subject death or loss to follow-up. Follow-up will be continued until all patients have reached one of the study endpoints. Statistical tests will be performed by a statistician using statistical software and determined after enough data has been generated to perform preliminary analysis. Threats to study validity include under recruitment of subjects, subjects lost to follow-up, subject non-compliance, and subject crossovers. This study will be stopped prior to its completion if: the intervention is associated with adverse effects that call into question the safety of the intervention; difficulty in study recruitment or retention will significantly impact the ability to evaluate the study endpoints; any new information becomes available during the trial that necessitates stopping the trial; or other situations occur that might warrant stopping the trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The study will be designed as a non-inferiority trial with two parallel groups: the experimental group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively (Cephalexin 500 mg QID or Clindamycin 300 mg QID, if Penicillin allergic) while the control group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics (Cefazolin 1 g or 2 g, or Clindamycin 600 mg or 900 mg, if Penicillin allergic, higher doses provided if BMI > 30 kg/m2) followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative and Postoperative Antibiotics | Experimental | Drug: Cefazolin, Drug: CephalexinThe experimental group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics, which is standard protocol at our institution, followed by oral antibiotics for 5 days postoperatively. |
| Intraoperative Antibiotics and Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Cefazolin, Other: PlaceboThe control group will receive an intraoperative dose of antibiotics, which is standard protocol at our institution, followed by a placebo for 5 days postoperatively |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age 18 year or older
- Participants undergoing primary breast augmentation with subglandular or submuscular implants
- Participants undergoing breast augmentation-mastopexy with subglandular or submuscular implants
- Participants undergoing secondary breast augmentation with subglandular or submuscular implants (i.e. patients undergoing implant exchange secondary to capsular contracture and implant rupture)
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Refusal or inability to obtain consent from participants
- Participants with biopsy-proven breast cancer
- Participants undergoing expander-based breast reconstruction
- Participants undergoing autologous flap breast reconstruction
- Participants with history of chest radiation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CefazolinAlso: Ancef, Clindamycin, CleocinAll patients will receive an intraoperative dose of IV Cefazolin 2 g (re-dose after 4 hours) or IV Clindamycin 600mg (re-dose after 6 hours) for penicillin allergic patients. | Drug | Intraoperative Antibiotics and Placebo, Intraoperative and Postoperative Antibiotics |
| CephalexinAlso: Keflex, Clindamycin, CleocinThe experimental group will receive a postoperative 5-day course of Cephalexin 500 mg QID or Clindamycin 300 mg QID for penicillin allergic patients. All capsules will be encapsulated with size 00 dark-colored capsules compounded by the UCLA Investigational Pharmacy. | Drug | Intraoperative and Postoperative Antibiotics |
| PlaceboThe placebo group will receive a postoperative 5-day course of placebos (sugar capsules). All capsules will be encapsulated with size 00 dark-colored capsules compounded by the UCLA Investigational Pharmacy. | Other | Intraoperative Antibiotics and Placebo |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with surgical site infection
Time frame: 365 days following surgery
Surgical site infections will be determined by the surgeon however will be defined by the presence of the following signs and symptoms: fevers, purulent drainage, pain, tenderness, localized edema, heat, erythema, positive wound cultures, and leukocytosis.
6 secondary outcomes
Number of participants with hematoma
Time frame: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with seroma
Time frame: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with wound dehiscence
Time frame: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with implant loss
Time frame: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with antibiotic-related complications
Time frame: 365 days following surgery
Number of participants with antibiotic resistance
Time frame: 365 days following surgery
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2022.
- Background: PubMed 27922894Chopra K, Gowda AU, McNichols CHL, Brown EN, Slezak S, Rasko Y. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practice Patterns in Breast Augmentation: A National Survey of Current Practice. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6):629-632. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000942.
- Background: PubMed 23416440Hardwicke JT, Bechar J, Skillman JM. Are systemic antibiotics indicated in aesthetic breast surgery? A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jun;131(6):1395-1403. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd752.
- Background: PubMed 28439510Keramidas E, Lymperopoulos NS, Rodopoulou S. Is antibiotic prophylaxis in breast augmentation necessary? A prospective study. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2016 Fall;24(3):195-198. doi: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000976. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
- Background: PubMed 1950803LeRoy J, Given KS. Wound infection in breast augmentation: the role of prophylactic perioperative antibiotics. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1991 Fall;15(4):303-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02273877.
- Background: PubMed 22231414Mirzabeigi MN, Mericli AF, Ortlip T, Tuma GA, Copit SE, Fox JW 4th, Moore JH Jr. Evaluating the role of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in primary and secondary breast augmentation: a retrospective review. Aesthet Surg J. 2012 Jan;32(1):61-8. doi: 10.1177/1090820X11430830.
- Background: PubMed 2195567Gylbert L, Asplund O, Berggren A, Jurell G, Ransjo U, Ostrup L. Preoperative antibiotics and capsular contracture in augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990 Aug;86(2):260-7; discussion 268-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karie Villanueva, MD principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
Jaco Festekjian, MD study chair
University of California, Los Angeles
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Cefazolin and Cephalexin in people with Surgical Site Infection and Capsular Contracture Associated With Breast Implant, run by University of California, Los Angeles.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with surgical site infection (time frame: 365 days following surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04834310, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2022.