Type 1 DiabetesNCT04838561
Assessing the Impact of Control-IQ Technology
An observational study of Type 1 Diabetes, run by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This is a single-centre, mixed-methods, prospective study in pediatric patients with T1D initiating Control-IQ technology on the Tandem t-slim X2 insulin pump. Primary Objective: To determine pediatric T1D patients' and their parents' perceptions of the impact of Control-IQ on their psychosocial functioning and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Mar 2021to 26 Oct 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Children and youth with T1D followed at CHEO will be invited to participate in the study.
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of T1D
- Age 6-18 years
- Currently using the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Dexcom G6 CGM, who are initiating Control-IQ
Who cannot join
- Patients under the age of 6 years of age
- Patients who are not English or French speaking
- Patients unwilling to provide consent (assent where applicable).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Assessing the Impact of Control-IQ Technology on Quality of Life and Glycemic Control in Children and Youth With Type 1 Diabetes in a Canadian Context
This is a single-centre, mixed-methods, prospective study in pediatric patients with T1D initiating Control-IQ technology on the Tandem t-slim X2 insulin pump.
Primary Objective:
To determine pediatric T1D patients' and their parents' perceptions of the impact of Control-IQ on their psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
Read the detailed description
Background Information \& Rationale
The management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is rapidly evolving to offer technology that aims to improve metabolic control and decrease the burden of diabetes management. Hybrid-closed loop systems are at the forefront of this technology. They are comprised of an insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system that interface in order to automatically adjust the delivery of basal insulin through the pump, based on CGM data. Insulin boluses for meals and snacks must still be entered manually by the user.
Studies of hybrid closed loop systems have primarily focused on clinical trials that show improved glycemic outcomes.1-3 Few studies have assessed real-world glycemic outcomes or patient-reported outcomes, and none have focused on a pediatric population.
A recent study published by Pinsker et al.4 showed improvement in psychosocial outcomes and persistent achievement of glycemic targets in a real-world setting in adults with T1D using the Tandem t:slim X2 pump with Control-IQ technology.
The Tandem t:slim X2 pump with Control-IQ is a hybrid closed loop system (using Dexcom G6 CGM) that has recently been approved for use by Health Canada, but has been used in the U.S. for the last year. This new technology will launch in Canada in March 2021, at which time existing Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump users (with concurrent CGM use) will be able to upgrade their insulin pump software to access this technology (following review of an online module).
The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), is located in Ottawa, ON Canada. CHEO follows approximately 800 children with diabetes, approximately 85 of whom are managed on the Tandem t:slim X2 pump with concurrent Dexcom G6 CGM use.
The upcoming launch of Control-IQ presents a unique opportunity to gain a better understanding of the real-world impact of this technology on our Canadian pediatric population. The benefits of conducting this study in our population are two-fold:
- The Canadian context offers the study a diverse patient population given our universal healthcare system and provincially-funded insulin pump program. Because pumps and supplies are funded by the government, they are available to all of our patients, regardless of socio-economic status and whether or not they have private health insurance.
- Studying a pediatric population offers the unique perspective of children and youth (and their parents) whose management practices and goals differ from those of adults. While adult patients and parents of children with T1D are motivated by attaining glycemic targets for long term health outcomes, children and youth live in moment with emphasis on how they feel now. As such, patient reported outcomes, while important to all ages, are often the most important motivator for children and youth when choosing a treatment regimen.
Study Design This is a single-centre, mixed-methods, prospective study in pediatric patients with T1D initiating Control-IQ technology on the Tandem t-slim X2 insulin pump.
Participants will enroll in the study prior to initiating use of Control-IQ on their Tandem insulin pump.
Recruitment will occur over an eight-week period starting mid-March 2021. Participation in this study will last 16 weeks.
Study Objectives
Primary Objective: To determine pediatric T1D patients' and their parents' perceptions of the impact of Control-IQ on their psychosocial functioning and quality of life (as measured by the INSPIRE Questionnaire, post assessment).
Secondary Objectives:
- To assess the effect of Control-IQ technology on other patient and parent reported outcomes (PROs) including:
- Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) scale,
- Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (child and parent version),
- WHO-5 (emotional well-being)
- To determine the impact of Control-IQ technology on glycemic control in pediatric T1D patients who are experienced sensor-augmented pump users.
Exploratory Objectives:
- To explore the effect of Control-IQ technology on patient and parents' sleep, school, activities/ sports, mood and family dynamics.
- To explore whether or not youth and parents' expectations of Control-IQ align with their experience of using this this automated insulin delivery system.
Participant Characteristics:
The following data will be collected from each chart at baseline:
- Date of birth
- Gender
- Date of T1D diagnosis
- Date of initiation of insulin pump therapy
- Date of first insulin pump start
- Date of Tandem t:slim X2 pump start
- Current use of CGM (yes/ no)
- Last measured HbA1c ( if available within the last 3 months
- Number of hospitalizations due to diabetes complications within the past year
Sociodemographic measures will be collected by questionnaire at baseline, including:
- Family structure
- Parental education - highest level achieved
- Household income
- Private health insurance
- Ethnicity (self-reported)
Statistical Plan The patient population will be described using descriptive statistics. The study team will compare patient reported outcomes, measures of glycemic control, and measures of insulin pump management pre and 16 weeks post-initiation of Control-IQ technology, using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on the distributional characteristics of the outcomes. Analysis of open-ended questions will be done by a qualitative research specialist.
Sample Size Determination CHEO currently has 85 patients on the Tandem t:slim X2 pump with CGM, with an estimated 10-15 patients more estimated to start before March 2021. Historically, the patient population at CHEO has been highly engaged with research with an anticipated participation rate of 90-95%. The Investigator expects that recruitment rates would be similar for this study, allowing for a sample size of 70 participants.
This sample size is sufficient to provide > 80% power for detecting a "medium size" effect (Cohen's d = 0.5), which corresponds to a mean score of 70 from the post assessment INSPIRE Questionnaire, 10 units larger than a mean score of 60 (the null hypothesis). Cohen's d is expressed by the ratio of the mean difference over the standard deviation. Here, we use sd = 20 as an estimate of the standard deviation of the score, which is conservative considering previously presented estimates (e.g. sd = 16.44 described in Weissberg-Benchell et al [5]).
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
INsulin delivery Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations Questionnaire Post Intervention (Youth and Parent Versions)
Measures perceptions of the impact of automated insulin delivery systems on users' psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
Score 0-100- mean score is significantly larger than 60 (out of 100). A score of greater than 60 indicates a perceived benefit of Control-IQ on psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
Measured: 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change in Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction scale
Evaluates users' experience interacting with their insulin delivery device, and the impact of diabetes on their life on a 10-point Likert Scale. Scoring: Device Satisfaction average of items 1-7 (#5, #7 are reverse scored), Diabetes Impact: Average of items 8-11. Higher Score Indicates increased device satisfaction.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (child and parent version)
Assess change in fear of hypoglycemia among children with type 1 diabetes and parents of children with type 1 diabetes.
Mean score will be compared pre and post study Behaviour (score 0-40) - lower score better (less behaviours associated with fear of hypo) Worry (score 0-60) - lower score better (less worry re: hypoglycemia)
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
The World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index
Assessing change in subjective psychological well-being in research and clinical settings.
The WHO-5 consists of five statements, which respondents rate according to the scale below (in relation to the past two weeks).
- All of the time = 5
- Most of the time = 4
- More than half of the time = 3
- Less than half of the time = 2
- Some of the time = 1
- At no time = 0.
The total raw score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to give the final score, with 0 representing the worst imaginable well-being and 100 representing the best imaginable well-being.
Measured: Baseline and 16 weeks
% time in target range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (overall, day,and night)
Measure of glycemic control will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform will be compared at each time frame.
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time below target range <3.0mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Measure of glycemic control will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform will be compared at each time frame.
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time below target range <3.9mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Measure of glycemic control will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform will be compared at each time frame.
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time above target range >10mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Measure of glycemic control will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform will be compared at each time frame..
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time above target range >13.9mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Measure of glycemic control will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform will be compared at each time frame.
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Average glucose and standard deviation (mmol/L)
Measure of glycemic control will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform will be compared at each time frame.
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Coefficient of variation (%)
Measure of glycemic control will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform.
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Estimated HbA1c (%)
Will be collected from the Dexcom Clarity Platform.
Measured: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Apr 2021
- Study start15 Mar 2021
- Primary completion26 Oct 2021
- Study completion26 Oct 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Caroline Zuijdwijk, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
- Investigators
- Caroline Zuijdwijk, MD, FRCPC, Principal investigator, Children's Hopsital of Eastern Ontario
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04838561
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21/26X
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
O'Malley G, Messer LH, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Kudva YC, Ekhlaspour L, Raghinaru D, Lum J, Brown SA; iDCL Trial Research Group. Clinical Management and Pump Parameter Adjustment of the Control-IQ Closed-Loop Control System: Results from a 6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Apr;23(4):245-252. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0472.
PubMed 33155824Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, Lum JW, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Wadwa RP, Dassau E, Doyle FJ 3rd, Anderson SM, Church MM, Dadlani V, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Lam DW, Kollman C, Beck RW; iDCL Trial Research Group. Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1707-1717. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907863. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
PubMed 31618560Dadlani V, Pinsker JE, Dassau E, Kudva YC. Advances in Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Aug 29;18(10):88. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1051-z.
PubMed 30159816Pinsker JE, Muller L, Constantin A, Leas S, Manning M, McElwee Malloy M, Singh H, Habif S. Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes and Glycemic Results with Initiation of Control-IQ Technology. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Feb;23(2):120-127. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0388. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
PubMed 32846114Weissberg-Benchell J, Shapiro JB, Hood K, Laffel LM, Naranjo D, Miller K, Barnard K. Assessing patient-reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures. Diabet Med. 2019 May;36(5):644-652. doi: 10.1111/dme.13930. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
PubMed 30761592Cox DJ, Irvine A, Gonder-Frederick L, Nowacek G, Butterfield J. Fear of hypoglycemia: quantification, validation, and utilization. Diabetes Care. 1987 Sep-Oct;10(5):617-21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.10.5.617.
PubMed 3677982Zuijdwijk C, Courtney J, Mitsakakis N, Hayawi L, Sutherland S, Newhook D, Ahmet A, Goldbloom EB, Khatchadourian K, Lawrence S. Control-IQ Technology Positively Impacts Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Glycemic Control in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes in a Real-World Setting. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Apr 12;2023:5106107. doi: 10.1155/2023/5106107. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 40303267
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing the Impact of Control-IQ Technology on Quality of Life and Glycemic Control in Children and Youth With Type 1 Diabetes in a Canadian Context
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04838561
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 21/26X
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc.
- Study start
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a single-centre, mixed-methods, prospective study in pediatric patients with T1D initiating Control-IQ technology on the Tandem t-slim X2 insulin pump.
Primary Objective:
To determine pediatric T1D patients' and their parents' perceptions of the impact of Control-IQ on their psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
Detailed description
Background Information \& Rationale
The management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) is rapidly evolving to offer technology that aims to improve metabolic control and decrease the burden of diabetes management. Hybrid-closed loop systems are at the forefront of this technology. They are comprised of an insulin pump and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system that interface in order to automatically adjust the delivery of basal insulin through the pump, based on CGM data. Insulin boluses for meals and snacks must still be entered manually by the user.
Studies of hybrid closed loop systems have primarily focused on clinical trials that show improved glycemic outcomes.1-3 Few studies have assessed real-world glycemic outcomes or patient-reported outcomes, and none have focused on a pediatric population.
A recent study published by Pinsker et al.4 showed improvement in psychosocial outcomes and persistent achievement of glycemic targets in a real-world setting in adults with T1D using the Tandem t:slim X2 pump with Control-IQ technology.
The Tandem t:slim X2 pump with Control-IQ is a hybrid closed loop system (using Dexcom G6 CGM) that has recently been approved for use by Health Canada, but has been used in the U.S. for the last year. This new technology will launch in Canada in March 2021, at which time existing Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump users (with concurrent CGM use) will be able to upgrade their insulin pump software to access this technology (following review of an online module).
The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), is located in Ottawa, ON Canada. CHEO follows approximately 800 children with diabetes, approximately 85 of whom are managed on the Tandem t:slim X2 pump with concurrent Dexcom G6 CGM use.
The upcoming launch of Control-IQ presents a unique opportunity to gain a better understanding of the real-world impact of this technology on our Canadian pediatric population. The benefits of conducting this study in our population are two-fold:
- The Canadian context offers the study a diverse patient population given our universal healthcare system and provincially-funded insulin pump program. Because pumps and supplies are funded by the government, they are available to all of our patients, regardless of socio-economic status and whether or not they have private health insurance.
- Studying a pediatric population offers the unique perspective of children and youth (and their parents) whose management practices and goals differ from those of adults. While adult patients and parents of children with T1D are motivated by attaining glycemic targets for long term health outcomes, children and youth live in moment with emphasis on how they feel now. As such, patient reported outcomes, while important to all ages, are often the most important motivator for children and youth when choosing a treatment regimen.
Study Design This is a single-centre, mixed-methods, prospective study in pediatric patients with T1D initiating Control-IQ technology on the Tandem t-slim X2 insulin pump.
Participants will enroll in the study prior to initiating use of Control-IQ on their Tandem insulin pump.
Recruitment will occur over an eight-week period starting mid-March 2021. Participation in this study will last 16 weeks.
Study Objectives
Primary Objective: To determine pediatric T1D patients' and their parents' perceptions of the impact of Control-IQ on their psychosocial functioning and quality of life (as measured by the INSPIRE Questionnaire, post assessment).
Secondary Objectives:
- To assess the effect of Control-IQ technology on other patient and parent reported outcomes (PROs) including:
- Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction (DIDS) scale,
- Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (child and parent version),
- WHO-5 (emotional well-being)
- To determine the impact of Control-IQ technology on glycemic control in pediatric T1D patients who are experienced sensor-augmented pump users.
Exploratory Objectives:
- To explore the effect of Control-IQ technology on patient and parents' sleep, school, activities/ sports, mood and family dynamics.
- To explore whether or not youth and parents' expectations of Control-IQ align with their experience of using this this automated insulin delivery system.
Participant Characteristics:
The following data will be collected from each chart at baseline:
- Date of birth
- Gender
- Date of T1D diagnosis
- Date of initiation of insulin pump therapy
- Date of first insulin pump start
- Date of Tandem t:slim X2 pump start
- Current use of CGM (yes/ no)
- Last measured HbA1c ( if available within the last 3 months
- Number of hospitalizations due to diabetes complications within the past year
Sociodemographic measures will be collected by questionnaire at baseline, including:
- Family structure
- Parental education - highest level achieved
- Household income
- Private health insurance
- Ethnicity (self-reported)
Statistical Plan The patient population will be described using descriptive statistics. The study team will compare patient reported outcomes, measures of glycemic control, and measures of insulin pump management pre and 16 weeks post-initiation of Control-IQ technology, using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test, depending on the distributional characteristics of the outcomes. Analysis of open-ended questions will be done by a qualitative research specialist.
Sample Size Determination CHEO currently has 85 patients on the Tandem t:slim X2 pump with CGM, with an estimated 10-15 patients more estimated to start before March 2021. Historically, the patient population at CHEO has been highly engaged with research with an anticipated participation rate of 90-95%. The Investigator expects that recruitment rates would be similar for this study, allowing for a sample size of 70 participants.
This sample size is sufficient to provide > 80% power for detecting a "medium size" effect (Cohen's d = 0.5), which corresponds to a mean score of 70 from the post assessment INSPIRE Questionnaire, 10 units larger than a mean score of 60 (the null hypothesis). Cohen's d is expressed by the ratio of the mean difference over the standard deviation. Here, we use sd = 20 as an estimate of the standard deviation of the score, which is conservative considering previously presented estimates (e.g. sd = 16.44 described in Weissberg-Benchell et al [5]).
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Children and youth with T1D followed at CHEO will be invited to participate in the study.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosis of T1D
- Age 6-18 years
- Currently using the Tandem t:slim X2 insulin pump with Dexcom G6 CGM, who are initiating Control-IQ
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients under the age of 6 years of age
- Patients who are not English or French speaking
- Patients unwilling to provide consent (assent where applicable).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
INsulin delivery Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations Questionnaire Post Intervention (Youth and Parent Versions)
Time frame: 16 weeks
Measures perceptions of the impact of automated insulin delivery systems on users' psychosocial functioning and quality of life. Score 0-100- mean score is significantly larger than 60 (out of 100). A score of greater than 60 indicates a perceived benefit of Control-IQ on psychosocial functioning and quality of life.
11 secondary outcomes
Change in Diabetes Impact and Device Satisfaction scale
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (child and parent version)
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
The World Health Organisation- Five Well-Being Index
Time frame: Baseline and 16 weeks
% time in target range 3.9-10.0 mmol/L (overall, day,and night)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time below target range <3.0mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time below target range <3.9mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time above target range >10mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
% time above target range >13.9mmol/L (overall, day, and night)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Average glucose and standard deviation (mmol/L)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Coefficient of variation (%)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Estimated HbA1c (%)
Time frame: 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jan 2022.
- Background: PubMed 33155824O'Malley G, Messer LH, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Kudva YC, Ekhlaspour L, Raghinaru D, Lum J, Brown SA; iDCL Trial Research Group. Clinical Management and Pump Parameter Adjustment of the Control-IQ Closed-Loop Control System: Results from a 6-Month, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Apr;23(4):245-252. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0472.
- Background: PubMed 31618560Brown SA, Kovatchev BP, Raghinaru D, Lum JW, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy CJ, Pinsker JE, Wadwa RP, Dassau E, Doyle FJ 3rd, Anderson SM, Church MM, Dadlani V, Ekhlaspour L, Forlenza GP, Isganaitis E, Lam DW, Kollman C, Beck RW; iDCL Trial Research Group. Six-Month Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Type 1 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 31;381(18):1707-1717. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907863. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
- Background: PubMed 30159816Dadlani V, Pinsker JE, Dassau E, Kudva YC. Advances in Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Aug 29;18(10):88. doi: 10.1007/s11892-018-1051-z.
- Background: PubMed 32846114Pinsker JE, Muller L, Constantin A, Leas S, Manning M, McElwee Malloy M, Singh H, Habif S. Real-World Patient-Reported Outcomes and Glycemic Results with Initiation of Control-IQ Technology. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Feb;23(2):120-127. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0388. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
- Background: PubMed 30761592Weissberg-Benchell J, Shapiro JB, Hood K, Laffel LM, Naranjo D, Miller K, Barnard K. Assessing patient-reported outcomes for automated insulin delivery systems: the psychometric properties of the INSPIRE measures. Diabet Med. 2019 May;36(5):644-652. doi: 10.1111/dme.13930. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
- Background: PubMed 3677982Cox DJ, Irvine A, Gonder-Frederick L, Nowacek G, Butterfield J. Fear of hypoglycemia: quantification, validation, and utilization. Diabetes Care. 1987 Sep-Oct;10(5):617-21. doi: 10.2337/diacare.10.5.617.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40303267Zuijdwijk C, Courtney J, Mitsakakis N, Hayawi L, Sutherland S, Newhook D, Ahmet A, Goldbloom EB, Khatchadourian K, Lawrence S. Control-IQ Technology Positively Impacts Patient Reported Outcome Measures and Glycemic Control in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes in a Real-World Setting. Pediatr Diabetes. 2023 Apr 12;2023:5106107. doi: 10.1155/2023/5106107. eCollection 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Cadisegliatin as Adjunctive Therapy to Insulin in Participants With Type 1 Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Recruiting
Continuous Monitoring of Plantar Temperature Variations Using Connected Insoles and a Mobile Application for Diabetic Foot.
Diabetic Foot Disease, Diabetic Foot Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of the Fully Closed Loop iLet Bionic Pancreas in Adults With Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes (Insulin-requiring, Type 1 or Type 2)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Probiotics in Newly Diagnosed T1D
Type 1 Diabetes, Type1diabetes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Frexalimab in Preservation of Endogenous Insulin Secretion Compared to Placebo in Adults and Adolescents on Top of Insulin Therapy (FABULINUS)
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Caroline Zuijdwijk, MD, FRCPC principal investigator
Children's Hopsital of Eastern Ontario
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Type 1 Diabetes, run by Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
INsulin delivery Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations Questionnaire Post Intervention (Youth and Parent Versions) (time frame: 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04838561, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2022.