Retinopathy of PrematurityPhase 4NCT04838665
Changes in Vital Signs and Pupil Diameter Related to Pharmacologic Mydriasis in Premature Infants: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study
A Phase 4 study testing 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine and 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by University of the Philippines.
Trial summary
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the common anatomic causes of blindness among Filipinos, accounting for 47.7% of the cases. With this retinopathy being preventable and treatable, ROP screening has been proven to be effective in preventing blindness, which is achieved with the usage of mydriatics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 week to 32 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- What is being tested?
- 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine and 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 Sep 2011to 30 Sep 2011
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 week to 32 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- birth weight of less than 1500 g
- gestational age of 32 weeks or less
- an unstable clinical course who are believed to be at high risk for Retinopathy of Prematurity, as assessed by their individual attendings
Who cannot join
- infants with cardiac abnormalities directly affecting the heart rate and oxygen saturation
- infants with inotropic medications
- infants with ventilatory support
About this study
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the common anatomic causes of blindness among Filipinos, accounting for 47.7% of the cases. With this retinopathy being preventable and treatable, ROP screening has been proven to be effective in preventing blindness, which is achieved with the usage of mydriatics. Even if the regimen of multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine is the one recommended by international guidelines for ROP screening, the mydriatic regimen used by many of the country's institutions is the single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine applied via a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW). There have been no studies yet on the safety and efficacy in premature infants of this mydriatic preparation and method, although it is hypothesized that the usage of a cotton wick promotes the possible systemic effects of the mydriatic combination used.
This study then aims to determine the safety and efficacy of different mydriatic regimens in premature infants referred for screening of ROP using (1) multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% cyclopentolate hydrochloride and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI), (2) single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI), and (3) single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW) in a tertiary Philippine hospital.
This study was designed as a randomized, double blind, clinical study which enrolled sixty preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from January to July 2011. With instillations via MAI, SI, and SIW, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and oxygen saturation were monitored from ten minutes prior to instillation up to forty-five minutes after instillation. Pupil dilations were also measured at the forty-fifth minute.
Read the detailed description
- Introduction Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the common anatomic causes of blindness among Filipinos, accounting for 47.7% of the cases. With this retinopathy being preventable and treatable, ROP screening has been proven to be effective in preventing blindness, which is achieved with the usage of mydriatics. Even if the regimen of multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine is the one recommended by international guidelines for ROP screening, the mydriatic regimen usually used by many of the country's institutions is the regimen of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine applied via a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix. There have been no studies yet on the safety and efficacy in premature infants of this mydriatic preparation and method, although it is hypothesized that the usage of a cotton wick promotes the possible systemic effects of the mydriatic combination used.
II. Significance It is the aim of this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the mydriatic regimens we use in our institution and compare it to the recommendation by the UK ROP Guidelines. In doing so, this study aims to (1) document vital sign changes in the infant during dilation, (2) identify adverse systemic changes due to the mydriatic regimen and (3) provide appropriate interventions and recommendations to address these adverse effects. These will greatly improve the ROP screening process in our institution.
III. Objectives The general objective is to determine vital sign changes related to Pupil Dilation among preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Wards and Eye Instrumentation Center of the Philippine General Hospital (PGH). Specifically, its objective is to compare the vital sign changes and mydriasis in (1) multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride + 2.5% Phenylephrine (MAI) (2) single instillation of 0.5%/0.5% Phenylephrine + Tropicamide (SI) and (3) single instillation of 0.5%/0.5% Phenylephrine + Tropicamide with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW).
IV. Methodology This study was designed as a randomized, double blind, clinical study which enrolled sixty preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from January to July 2011. Each subject was randomly distributed into the standard, instillation, and packing group. To avoid observer bias, two investigators were involved per monitoring during dilation. The first investigator was assigned only to place the monitoring devices and to administer the mydriatics contained in unmarked 1 mL syringe which content was unknown to him.
The vital signs monitored during dilation were blood pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP)), heart rates and oxygen saturations using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors. A digital camera and a millimeter rule were used to approximate size of pupil dilatation. Measurement of all the vital signs and pupil dilation from a subject was derived from a single dilation session only.
Prior to data collection up to the end of monitoring, other factors that may affect the vital signs of the preterm infants were addressed. This included hunger, cold temperature, and soiled diapers.
Baseline vital signs determination was then performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is a significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior to the initial drop.
For the MAI, multiple alternate drops of 0.5% cyclopentolate then 2.5% phenylephrine every 5 minutes in two doses were instilled (total of 0.2 milliliter of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 0.2 millimeter of 2.5% Phenylephrine). Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor was placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference.
For the SI, only a drop of 0.5%/0.5% tropicamide + phenylephrine was properly instilled at time 0 (total of 0.1 milliliter). Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor was placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference.
For the SIW, a cotton wisp soaked with a drop of 0.5%/0.5% tropicamide + phenylephrine was placed on the lower fornix in each eye of the infant (total of 0.1 milliliter). The weight of the cotton wisp was standardized at 0.02 milligram using a digital weighing scale. Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor is placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference. Pictures were uploaded into the computer monitor for the actual measurement.
Vital sign changes were monitored using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors. In the presence of significant vital sign changes, immediate intervention will be done.
In the presence of a significant increase in BP or heart rate, the infant will be observed. Both changes are expected from undergoing a stressful procedure such as placing a lid retractor in measuring the pupil dilation. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work up should tachycardia persist even after the examination. The blood pressure, heart rate and sensorium will be continuously monitored so as to avoid any ensuing bradycardia.
In the presence of a significant drop in BP, the infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work up to determine the possible source. Fluid challenge will be done to check if the cause of hypotension is just attributable to hypovolemia. The investigator will determine body temperature to check for hypothermia. If hypothermic, slow rewarming will be done by placing back the infant inside a close incubator or beside a radiant warmer. Blood glucose will be checked for hypoglycemia. Should hyperglycemia be detected, the infant can be started on 2cc/kg D5water. Infant will be worked up for infection as well.
During events of hypoxia or oxygen desaturation of less than 85%, the infant will be given supportive ventilation as required. Oxygen saturation will be monitored using the pulse oximeter. In the event of an apnea happening, supportive ventilation will be provided immediately, together with significant stimulation. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for possible intubation.
In the event of bradycardia, significant stimulation will be started on the infant. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work-up to determine the cause. The investigator is also to determine body temperature to check for hypothermia. If hypothermic, slow rewarming will be done by placing back the infant inside a close incubator or beside a radiant warmer. Blood glucose will be determined to check for hypoglycemia. Should hyperglycemia be detected, the infant can be started on 2cc/kg D5water. Infant can be worked up for infection as well.
In the event that a subject suffers from any of the abovementioned adverse effects, the appropriate interventions cited will be administered free of charge. Should the adverse effects believed by the investigators to be secondary to the ROP screening only and additional expenses are needed to procure medicines or equipment, the investigators will shoulder the expenses. If the medicine or equipment is immediately needed, the relative may spend first for them and have the expenses reimbursed with the investigators later. Should the amount to procure the said medicine or equipment cannot be produced by the relative, the investigators can be immediately contacted to assist the relatives immediately. All other expenses will be shouldered by the investigators through reimbursements. Expenses amounting to P500 for the medicine and P1000 for the equipment will be shouldered by the investigators. Should it exceed these limits, the infant will be referred to any charitable institution for further assistance.
The blood pressure (systole, diastole and MAP), HR and oxygen saturation obtained during dilatation were analyzed. They were graphed to determine patterns from baseline up to 45 minutes. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess statistical significance for oxygen saturation, being a non-parametric variable. Poor dilatation among ROP patients with the advanced disease will be noted. A subgroup analysis was also done to determine the any relationship between the amounts of mydriatic used to the weight of the infant.
An interim analysis was done within the study to assess if the two mydriatic regimens were particularly beneficial or harmful compared to the concurrent standard group. Either the Pocock or the Flemming method will be used to decide if this study needed to terminate earlier than planned. Unblinding can be done should it be made necessary during the interim analysis or during course of the study. This protocol was submitted to the PGH ERB for ethics review and approval. It was conducted only upon approval from the ERB. All patient information were anonymized and are confidential. There is no funding received by the investigators for the conduct of this research.
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- Being tested
- 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine, 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick
- Medical subject headings
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrineDrug
Also called Multiple Alternate Instillation of Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Dilate® Micro Labs Limited Bangalore and Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Mydfrin™ 25mg/mL (2.5%) Alcon Fort Worth Texas
Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI) dropped every 5 minutes for two doses
0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrineDrug
Also called Single instillation of Tropicamide + Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Sanmyd-P 0.5%/0.5% Santen Osaka Japan
Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine
0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wickDrug
Also called Single instillation of Tropicamide + Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Sanmyd-P 0.5%/0.5% Santen Osaka Japan with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix weighing 0.02 milligrams
Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick weighing 0.02 milligrams placed in the inferior fornix for the entire 45 minutes
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI) | Active comparator | 20 infants were enrolled in Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI) Receives: Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine; Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine; Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick |
| Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI) | Experimental | Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI) Receives: Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine; Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine; Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick |
| 1 instillation of 0.5% tropicamide +0.5% phenylephrine w/a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix | Experimental | Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW) Receives: Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine; Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine; Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Systolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure changes
Measured in mmHg using a well-fitted neonatal cuff placed in the arm connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Measured: A baseline systolic blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 minute prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the v/s between 10 and 5 minutes
Diastolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure changes
Measured in mmHg using a well-fitted neonatal cuff placed in the arm connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Measured: A baseline diastolic blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5
Mean arterial blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure changes
Measured in mmHg using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Measured: A baseline mean arterial blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 mins. prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 an
Heart rate
Measured in beats per minute using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Measured: A baseline heart rate determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior
Oxygen saturation
Measured in percent saturation using a pulse oximeter connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Measured: A baseline heart rate determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior
Pupil diameter
Measuring using a digital camera and a millimeter ruler
Measured: Measured at the 45th minute post-instillation of the specified intervention
Secondary outcomes (1)
Successful retinopathy of prematurity screening
Whether or not a successful ROP screening was carried out
Measured: After the 45th minute measurement of pupil diameter
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Apr 2021
- Study start30 Sep 2011
- Primary completion30 Sep 2011
- Study completion30 Sep 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Retinopathy of PrematurityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of the Philippines
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Roland Joseph D Tan, MD, Principal investigator, University of the Philippines Manila
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04838665
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- OVS 2010-08-10-109
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 18 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Changes in Vital Signs and Pupil Diameter Related to Pharmacologic Mydriasis in Premature Infants: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04838665
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OVS 2010-08-10-109
- Conditions
- Retinopathy of Prematurity
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of the PhilippinesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Sep 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the common anatomic causes of blindness among Filipinos, accounting for 47.7% of the cases. With this retinopathy being preventable and treatable, ROP screening has been proven to be effective in preventing blindness, which is achieved with the usage of mydriatics. Even if the regimen of multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine is the one recommended by international guidelines for ROP screening, the mydriatic regimen used by many of the country's institutions is the single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine applied via a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW). There have been no studies yet on the safety and efficacy in premature infants of this mydriatic preparation and method, although it is hypothesized that the usage of a cotton wick promotes the possible systemic effects of the mydriatic combination used.
This study then aims to determine the safety and efficacy of different mydriatic regimens in premature infants referred for screening of ROP using (1) multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% cyclopentolate hydrochloride and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI), (2) single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI), and (3) single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW) in a tertiary Philippine hospital.
This study was designed as a randomized, double blind, clinical study which enrolled sixty preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from January to July 2011. With instillations via MAI, SI, and SIW, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, and oxygen saturation were monitored from ten minutes prior to instillation up to forty-five minutes after instillation. Pupil dilations were also measured at the forty-fifth minute.
Detailed description
- Introduction Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is one of the common anatomic causes of blindness among Filipinos, accounting for 47.7% of the cases. With this retinopathy being preventable and treatable, ROP screening has been proven to be effective in preventing blindness, which is achieved with the usage of mydriatics. Even if the regimen of multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine is the one recommended by international guidelines for ROP screening, the mydriatic regimen usually used by many of the country's institutions is the regimen of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine applied via a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix. There have been no studies yet on the safety and efficacy in premature infants of this mydriatic preparation and method, although it is hypothesized that the usage of a cotton wick promotes the possible systemic effects of the mydriatic combination used.
II. Significance It is the aim of this study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the mydriatic regimens we use in our institution and compare it to the recommendation by the UK ROP Guidelines. In doing so, this study aims to (1) document vital sign changes in the infant during dilation, (2) identify adverse systemic changes due to the mydriatic regimen and (3) provide appropriate interventions and recommendations to address these adverse effects. These will greatly improve the ROP screening process in our institution.
III. Objectives The general objective is to determine vital sign changes related to Pupil Dilation among preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Wards and Eye Instrumentation Center of the Philippine General Hospital (PGH). Specifically, its objective is to compare the vital sign changes and mydriasis in (1) multiple alternate instillations of 0.5% Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride + 2.5% Phenylephrine (MAI) (2) single instillation of 0.5%/0.5% Phenylephrine + Tropicamide (SI) and (3) single instillation of 0.5%/0.5% Phenylephrine + Tropicamide with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW).
IV. Methodology This study was designed as a randomized, double blind, clinical study which enrolled sixty preterm infants referred for ROP Screening from January to July 2011. Each subject was randomly distributed into the standard, instillation, and packing group. To avoid observer bias, two investigators were involved per monitoring during dilation. The first investigator was assigned only to place the monitoring devices and to administer the mydriatics contained in unmarked 1 mL syringe which content was unknown to him.
The vital signs monitored during dilation were blood pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressure (MAP)), heart rates and oxygen saturations using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors. A digital camera and a millimeter rule were used to approximate size of pupil dilatation. Measurement of all the vital signs and pupil dilation from a subject was derived from a single dilation session only.
Prior to data collection up to the end of monitoring, other factors that may affect the vital signs of the preterm infants were addressed. This included hunger, cold temperature, and soiled diapers.
Baseline vital signs determination was then performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is a significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior to the initial drop.
For the MAI, multiple alternate drops of 0.5% cyclopentolate then 2.5% phenylephrine every 5 minutes in two doses were instilled (total of 0.2 milliliter of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 0.2 millimeter of 2.5% Phenylephrine). Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor was placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference.
For the SI, only a drop of 0.5%/0.5% tropicamide + phenylephrine was properly instilled at time 0 (total of 0.1 milliliter). Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor was placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference.
For the SIW, a cotton wisp soaked with a drop of 0.5%/0.5% tropicamide + phenylephrine was placed on the lower fornix in each eye of the infant (total of 0.1 milliliter). The weight of the cotton wisp was standardized at 0.02 milligram using a digital weighing scale. Vital signs were continuously recorded at time 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 45. At the 45th minute, a lid retractor is placed in the eyes of the subject after a drop of topical anesthesia. Pictures of the eyes were taken with a millimeter rule to serve as measurement reference. Pictures were uploaded into the computer monitor for the actual measurement.
Vital sign changes were monitored using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors. In the presence of significant vital sign changes, immediate intervention will be done.
In the presence of a significant increase in BP or heart rate, the infant will be observed. Both changes are expected from undergoing a stressful procedure such as placing a lid retractor in measuring the pupil dilation. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work up should tachycardia persist even after the examination. The blood pressure, heart rate and sensorium will be continuously monitored so as to avoid any ensuing bradycardia.
In the presence of a significant drop in BP, the infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work up to determine the possible source. Fluid challenge will be done to check if the cause of hypotension is just attributable to hypovolemia. The investigator will determine body temperature to check for hypothermia. If hypothermic, slow rewarming will be done by placing back the infant inside a close incubator or beside a radiant warmer. Blood glucose will be checked for hypoglycemia. Should hyperglycemia be detected, the infant can be started on 2cc/kg D5water. Infant will be worked up for infection as well.
During events of hypoxia or oxygen desaturation of less than 85%, the infant will be given supportive ventilation as required. Oxygen saturation will be monitored using the pulse oximeter. In the event of an apnea happening, supportive ventilation will be provided immediately, together with significant stimulation. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for possible intubation.
In the event of bradycardia, significant stimulation will be started on the infant. The infant will be referred to the NICU ROD for further work-up to determine the cause. The investigator is also to determine body temperature to check for hypothermia. If hypothermic, slow rewarming will be done by placing back the infant inside a close incubator or beside a radiant warmer. Blood glucose will be determined to check for hypoglycemia. Should hyperglycemia be detected, the infant can be started on 2cc/kg D5water. Infant can be worked up for infection as well.
In the event that a subject suffers from any of the abovementioned adverse effects, the appropriate interventions cited will be administered free of charge. Should the adverse effects believed by the investigators to be secondary to the ROP screening only and additional expenses are needed to procure medicines or equipment, the investigators will shoulder the expenses. If the medicine or equipment is immediately needed, the relative may spend first for them and have the expenses reimbursed with the investigators later. Should the amount to procure the said medicine or equipment cannot be produced by the relative, the investigators can be immediately contacted to assist the relatives immediately. All other expenses will be shouldered by the investigators through reimbursements. Expenses amounting to P500 for the medicine and P1000 for the equipment will be shouldered by the investigators. Should it exceed these limits, the infant will be referred to any charitable institution for further assistance.
The blood pressure (systole, diastole and MAP), HR and oxygen saturation obtained during dilatation were analyzed. They were graphed to determine patterns from baseline up to 45 minutes. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess statistical significance for oxygen saturation, being a non-parametric variable. Poor dilatation among ROP patients with the advanced disease will be noted. A subgroup analysis was also done to determine the any relationship between the amounts of mydriatic used to the weight of the infant.
An interim analysis was done within the study to assess if the two mydriatic regimens were particularly beneficial or harmful compared to the concurrent standard group. Either the Pocock or the Flemming method will be used to decide if this study needed to terminate earlier than planned. Unblinding can be done should it be made necessary during the interim analysis or during course of the study. This protocol was submitted to the PGH ERB for ethics review and approval. It was conducted only upon approval from the ERB. All patient information were anonymized and are confidential. There is no funding received by the investigators for the conduct of this research.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI) | Active comparator | Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine, Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick20 infants were enrolled in Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI) |
| Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI) | Experimental | Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine, Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wickSingle instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI) |
| 1 instillation of 0.5% tropicamide +0.5% phenylephrine w/a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix | Experimental | Drug: 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine, Drug: 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wickSingle instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix (SIW) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 week to 32 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- birth weight of less than 1500 g
- gestational age of 32 weeks or less
- an unstable clinical course who are believed to be at high risk for Retinopathy of Prematurity, as assessed by their individual attendings
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- infants with cardiac abnormalities directly affecting the heart rate and oxygen saturation
- infants with inotropic medications
- infants with ventilatory support
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrineAlso: Multiple Alternate Instillation of Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Dilate® Micro Labs Limited Bangalore and Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Mydfrin™ 25mg/mL (2.5%) Alcon Fort Worth TexasMultiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI) dropped every 5 minutes for two doses | Drug | 1 instillation of 0.5% tropicamide +0.5% phenylephrine w/a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix, Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI), Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI) |
| 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrineAlso: Single instillation of Tropicamide + Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Sanmyd-P 0.5%/0.5% Santen Osaka JapanSingle instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine | Drug | 1 instillation of 0.5% tropicamide +0.5% phenylephrine w/a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix, Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI), Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI) |
| 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wickAlso: Single instillation of Tropicamide + Phenylephrine Hydrochloride Sanmyd-P 0.5%/0.5% Santen Osaka Japan with a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix weighing 0.02 milligramsSingle instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick weighing 0.02 milligrams placed in the inferior fornix for the entire 45 minutes | Drug | 1 instillation of 0.5% tropicamide +0.5% phenylephrine w/a cotton wick placed in the inferior fornix, Multiple Alternate Instillation of 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine (MAI), Single instillation of 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine (SI) |
Primary outcome
Systolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure changes
Time frame: A baseline systolic blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 minute prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the v/s between 10 and 5 minutes
Measured in mmHg using a well-fitted neonatal cuff placed in the arm connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Diastolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure changes
Time frame: A baseline diastolic blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5
Measured in mmHg using a well-fitted neonatal cuff placed in the arm connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Mean arterial blood pressure and mean arterial blood pressure changes
Time frame: A baseline mean arterial blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 mins. prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 an
Measured in mmHg using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Heart rate
Time frame: A baseline heart rate determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior
Measured in beats per minute using the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Oxygen saturation
Time frame: A baseline heart rate determination was performed 10 and 5 minutes prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the vital signs between 10 and 5 minutes prior
Measured in percent saturation using a pulse oximeter connected to the newly calibrated Phillips Digital IntelliVue MP20 junior Cardiac monitors
Pupil diameter
Time frame: Measured at the 45th minute post-instillation of the specified intervention
Measuring using a digital camera and a millimeter ruler
1 secondary outcome
Successful retinopathy of prematurity screening
Time frame: After the 45th minute measurement of pupil diameter
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingObservational study
The Correlation Between Red Cell Transfusion and Complications of Prematurity
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
RecruitingObservational study
An Observational Study to Collect Data on How Aflibercept (Eylea) Given Using a Paediatric Dosing Device is Used in Preterm Babies With Retinopathy of Prematurity in the United Kingdom (UK)
Retinopathy of Prematurity, Preterm Infants
RecruitingObservational study
Imaging Retinal Vasculature in Infant Eyes
Retinopathy of Prematurity
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, PK and PD of FLQ-101 in Premature Neonates
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Recruiting
Analyzing Retinal Microanatomy in Retinopathy of Prematurity to Improve Care
Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roland Joseph D Tan, MD principal investigator
University of the Philippines Manila
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing 0.5% cyclopentolate and 2.5% phenylephrine, 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine and 0.5% tropicamide + 0.5% phenylephrine with a cotton wick in people with Retinopathy of Prematurity, run by University of the Philippines.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Systolic blood pressure and systolic blood pressure changes (time frame: A baseline systolic blood pressure determination was performed 10 and 5 minute prior to the first drop of mydriatic or proparacaine prior to packing. Additional reading will be done if there is significant difference in the v/s between 10 and 5 minutes). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.