AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 2SCRATCH-ADNCT04839380

The Purpose of the Study is to Evaluate the Effect of Ruxolitinib Cream on Itch in Participants With Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2 study testing ruxolitinib cream in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Incyte Corporation at 2 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of ruxolitinib cream on itch in participants with Atopic Dermatitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
ruxolitinib cream
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
12 Oct 2021to 18 Nov 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participant has clinically confirmed diagnosis of active AD for at least a 6-months.
  • Participant has chronic pruritus related to AD for at least 3 months .
  • Participant has an overall BSA (excluding palms, soles, scalp, genitals, and folds) affected by AD of 1%-20% on Day 1.
  • Participant has an IGA score of at least 2 on Day 1.
  • Participant has a single PP-NRS score ≥ 4 in the 24-hour period prior to the screening visit.
  • Willingness to avoid pregnancy or fathering children.
  • Participant must be willing to comply with all study procedures and restrictions including discontinuation of all current therapies for AD and pruritus (unless otherwise specified), and must be available for the duration of the study.

Who cannot join

  • Female participnat who is breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Participant had significant flares or unstable course in AD.
  • Participant has clinically infected AD or has used antibiotics (systemic or topical) for their infected AD within 2 weeks prior to the run-in period.
  • Participant has a history of skin disease or presence of skin condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study assessments.
  • Participant has any clinically significant medical condition or physical/laboratory/vital sign abnormality that would, in the opinion of the investigator, put the participant at undue risk or interfere with interpretation of study results.
  • Participant has received treatment with JAK inhibitors (systemic or topical) within 4 weeks prior to the run-in period.
  • Participant is unlikely, in the opinion of the investigator, to be compliant with study procedures and requirements.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Canada2 sites
  • Innovaderm Research Inc.

    Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4L5

  • Innovoderm Research

    Montreal, Quebec, H2K 4LS

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ruxolitinib 1.5% Cream on Itch in Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the effect of ruxolitinib cream on itch in participants with Atopic Dermatitis.

Being tested
ruxolitinib cream
Keywords
ruxolitinib, Itch, Chronic Pruritus
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Pruritus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ruxolitinib creamDrug

    Also called INCB018424

    ruxolitinib cream 1.5% will be applied twice daily as a thin film

Study groups in NCT04839380
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Treatment Group : RuxolitinibExperimentalruxolitinib cream 1.5% will be applied twice daily as a thin film.
Receives: Drug: ruxolitinib cream

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the Peak-Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) Score at Day 2 (24-hour Recall Period After First Application)

    The intensity of pruritus (itch) was recorded daily using the PP-NRS (24-hour recall period). Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing their itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no itch and 10 being the worst itch imaginable. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the average of all non-missing PP-NRS scores reported during the 7-day run-in period.

    Measured: Baseline; Day 2

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Modified Peak-Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (mPP-NRS) Score (Current Itch Intensity) at 15 and 30 Minutes Postdose and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 Hours Postdose on Day 1

    On Day 1, participants were asked to evaluate the current intensity of their itch at the time of assessment (i.e., prior to the morning study drug application, and 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after the morning study drug application; the 12-hour evaluation occurred prior to the second daily study drug application) on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst imaginable itch. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment before or on Day 1 and prior to the first application of study drug (including unscheduled assessments).

    Measured: Baseline; Day 1 (15 and 30 minutes postdose; 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours postdose)

  2. Change From Baseline in the PP-NRS Score From Day 3 Through Day 29 (24-hour Recall Period After First Application)

    The intensity of pruritus (itch) was recorded daily using the PP-NRS (24-hour recall period). Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing their itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no itch and 10 being the worst itch imaginable. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as the average of all non-missing PP-NRS scores reported during the 7-day run-in period.

    Measured: Baseline; Day 3 through Day 29

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 1-grade Decrease From Baseline in the mPP-NRS Score at 15 and 30 Minutes Postdose and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 Hours Postdose on Day 1

    On Day 1, participants were asked to evaluate the current intensity of their itch at the time of assessment (i.e., prior to the morning study drug application, and 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after the morning study drug application; the 12-hour evaluation occurred prior to the second daily study drug application) on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst imaginable itch. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment before or on Day 1 and prior to the first application of study drug (including unscheduled assessments). Confidence intervals were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method.

    Measured: Baseline; Day 1 (15 and 30 minutes postdose; 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours postdose)

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 1-grade Decrease From Baseline in the PP-NRS Score From Day 2 Through Day 29

    The intensity of pruritus (itch) was recorded daily using the PP-NRS (24-hour recall period). Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing their itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no itch and 10 being the worst itch imaginable. Baseline was defined as the average of all non-missing PP-NRS scores reported during the 7-day run-in period.

    Measured: Baseline; Day 2 through Day 29

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 2-grade Decrease From Baseline in the mPP-NRS Score at 15 and 30 Minutes Postdose and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 Hours Postdose on Day 1

    On Day 1, participants were asked to evaluate the current intensity of their itch at the time of assessment (i.e., prior to the morning study drug application, and 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours after the morning study drug application; the 12-hour evaluation occurred prior to the second daily study drug application) on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating the worst imaginable itch. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment before or on Day 1 and prior to the first application of study drug (including unscheduled assessments).

    Measured: Baseline; Day 1 (15 and 30 minutes postdose; 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 hours postdose)

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 2-grade Decrease From Baseline in the PP-NRS Score From Day 2 Through Day 29

    The intensity of pruritus (itch) was recorded daily using the PP-NRS (24-hour recall period). Participants were asked to assign a numerical score representing their itch at the worst moment during the previous 24 hours on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no itch and 10 being the worst itch imaginable. Baseline was defined as the average of all non-missing PP-NRS scores reported during the 7-day run-in period.

    Measured: Baseline; Day 2 through Day 29

  7. Time to Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for PP-NRS (≥2-grade Reduction in PP-NRS From Baseline )

    The MCID corresponds to an achievement of a ≥2-grade reduction in PP-NRS from Baseline. The time to MCID was defined as the time from the date (time) of the first dose to the date (time) of the first occurrence of MCID. Baseline was defined as the average of all non-missing PP-NRS scores reported during the 7-day run-in period.

    Measured: from Baseline up to Day 29

  8. Time to MCID for mPP-NRS (≥2-grade Reduction in mPP-NRS From Baseline)

    The MCID corresponds to an achievement of a ≥2-grade reduction in mPP-NRS from Baseline. The time to MCID was defined as the time from the date (time) of the first dose to the date (time) of the first occurrence of MCID. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment before or on Day 1 and prior to the first application of study drug (including unscheduled assessments).

    Measured: Baseline; Day 1

  9. Change From Baseline in Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29

    The IGA of the current state of the disease is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity. 0, clear: no erythema or induration/papulation, no oozing/crusting; there may be minor residual discoloration. 1, almost clear: there may be trace faint pink erythema with almost no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting. 2, mild: there may be faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting. 3, moderate: there may be pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation, and there may be some oozing/crusting. 4, severe: there may be deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting.

    Measured: Baseline; Days 8, 15, and 29

  10. Percentage of Participants Achieving Investigator Global Assessment-Treatment Success (IGA-TS) (Score of 0 or 1 in IGA With a ≥2-grade Reduction From Baseline) at Day 8, Day 15, and Day 29

    The IGA-TS is defined as an IGA score of 0 or 1 with a ≥2-grade reduction from Baseline. The IGA of the current state of the disease is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity. 0, clear: no erythema or induration/papulation, no oozing/crusting; there may be minor residual discoloration. 1, almost clear: there may be trace faint pink erythema with almost no induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting. 2, mild: there may be faint pink erythema with mild induration/papulation and no oozing/crusting. 3, moderate: there may be pink-red erythema with moderate induration/papulation, and there may be some oozing/crusting. 4, severe: there may be deep or bright red erythema with severe induration/papulation and with oozing/crusting.

    Measured: Baseline; Days 8, 15, and 29

  11. Number of Participants With Any Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE)

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. An AE could therefore have been any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of study drug. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date during or after the first study treatment dose.

    Measured: up to Day 43

  12. Number of Participants With Any Grade 3 or Higher TEAE

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not it was considered drug related. TEAEs were defined as any AEs with an onset date during or after the first study treatment dose. The severity of AEs were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. Grade 1: mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; treatment not indicated. Grade 2: moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive treatment indicated; limiting age-appropriate activities of daily living. Grade 3: severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4: life-threatening consequences; urgent treatment indicated. Grade 5: fatal.

    Measured: up to Day 43

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2021
  2. Study start12 Oct 2021
  3. Primary completion18 Nov 2022
  4. Study completion18 Nov 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04839380
Sponsor's protocol ID
INCB 18424-901
Acronym
SCRATCH-AD
Status last verified
Oct 2023
First submitted
8 Apr 2021
Last updated
31 Oct 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Incyte shares data with qualified external researchers after a research proposal is submitted. These requests are reviewed and approved by a review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. The trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on https://www.incyte.com/our-company/compliance-and-transparency

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing ruxolitinib cream in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Incyte Corporation at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 Oct 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the Peak-Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) Score at Day 2 (24-hour Recall Period After First Application) (time frame: Baseline; Day 2). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Oct 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in