AzTrials
AzTrials

Postoperative ComplicationsALBUTEPNCT04839432

Crystalloids vs Albumin Prime Solution and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications

An observational study of Postoperative Complications, run by Erasme University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In 2019, the investigators initiated a new priming fluid therapy strategy in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) machine for patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy surgery. It consisted in a transition from a "pure" primarly balanced crystalloid priming fluid strategy to a 4% human albumin priming fluid-strategy in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Postoperative Complications
What is being tested?
implementation of albumin solution in the priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2018to 31 Mar 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy surgery from 2018 to 2019 ( a two years study period)

Who may be able to join

  • All consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patients with important missing data
  • Patients undergoing combined surgery
  • Patients undergoing an emergency pulmonary endarterectomy surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Marie lannelongue

    Le Plessis-Robinson, Paris, 92350

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Effect of 4% Albumin Prime Solution for Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications In Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Endarterectomy: A Propensity-adjusted Analysis

In 2019, the investigators initiated a new priming fluid therapy strategy in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) machine for patients undergoing pulmonary endarterectomy surgery. It consisted in a transition from a "pure" primarly balanced crystalloid priming fluid strategy to a 4% human albumin priming fluid-strategy in addition to a low volume of balanced crystalloid solution. The rationale was the theoritical assumption that albumin leads to better intravascular volume expansion compared to crystalloid and therefore could reduce overall volume requirement during surgery and consequently potentially decrease the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. The objective of this propensity-matched study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention

Read the detailed description

Intravenous fluid is usually needed (and sometime in important amount) to increase intravascular volume during cardiac surgery and to prime the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. In this context, albumin has been frequently used as the ideal fluid choice. Although albumin has the disadvantage to be much more expensive than crystalloids and not to be free from immunological reactions, this solution provides a more sustained volume effect that a similar volume of crystalloid which may result in smaller volumes of resuscitation fluid being administered. It also better preserves the on-bypass oncotic pressure and reduce extravascular lung water. These considerations are important especially during pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery (PTE), a high-risk procedure which aims to resect thromboembolic material. Reperfusion lung injury (RLI) and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), are the most encountered postoperative pulmonary complications and are significant risks factors of morbi-mortality. As data suggest that RLI and ARDS are high-permeability phenomenon, cautious is required to avoid fluid accumulation/overload during this complex procedure. In addition, this surgical procedure has a relatively high CPB duration which can induce a systemic inflammatory response syndrome, damage the endothelial glycocalyx and vascular barrier where crystalloids may extravagates and accumulates in the lungs. On the contrary, albumin solution used during the priming of CPB can favorably preserve oncotic pressure, have a protective effect on endothelial glycocalyx and better maintain vascular barrier competence, preventing interstitial edema and potential pulmonary complications.

In March 2019, the investigators initiated a new priming fluid policy strategy aiming at replacing our traditional pure crystalloid fluid administration for an albumin one in order to decrease the relatively high-rate of pulmonary complications observed in the investigators patients.

The objective of this propensity-matched study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention

Being tested
implementation of albumin solution in the priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine
Medical subject headings
Postoperative Complications

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • implementation of albumin solution in the priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass machineBehavioural

    In March 2019, the investigators initiated a new priming fluid policy strategy aiming at replacing our traditional pure crystalloid fluid administration for an albumin one in order to decrease the relatively high-rate of observed pulmonary complications

Study groups in NCT04839432
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Crystalloids groupPatients had only a balanced crystalloid solution in the priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass (pre interventional group)
albumin groupPatients had only a 4% albumin solution in addtion to a very low volume of a balanced crystalloid solution in the priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass (post interventional group)
Receives: Behavioral: implementation of albumin solution in the priming of the cardiopulmonary bypass machine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. pulmonary complications

    a composite of two pulmonary complications ( reperfusion lung syndrome and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome)

    Measured: postoperative day 7

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2021
  2. Study start1 Jan 2018
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04839432
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB 00012157
Acronym
ALBUTEP
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
7 Apr 2021
Last updated
27 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Postoperative Complications, run by Erasme University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

pulmonary complications (time frame: postoperative day 7). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in