AzTrials
AzTrials

Malaria, FalciparumProACTNCT04839900

Proactive Community Case Management for Malaria in Zambia

A study testing Proactive iCCM in people with Malaria, Falciparum and Malaria, run by PATH at 1 site in Zambia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To study if a proactive strategy of weekly household visits by community health workers (CHWs) to identify people with malaria symptoms, offer diagnostic testing, and treatment for those with positive tests in Chadiza District, Eastern Province, can decrease malaria incidence and prevalence compared to conventional… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Malaria, Falciparum, Malaria
What is being tested?
Proactive iCCM
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10,890 participants
Where
1 siteZambia
Study dates
15 Apr 2021to 30 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

All residents of all ages in the study area will be eligible to receive the CHW intervention.

All ages with fever

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Zambia1 site
  • Chadiza District Health Office

    Chadiza, Eastern Provice

Other trials in Zambia

About this study

Official title: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Pro-active Community Case Management for Malaria in Chadiza District, Eastern Province, Zambia

To study if a proactive strategy of weekly household visits by community health workers (CHWs) to identify people with malaria symptoms, offer diagnostic testing, and treatment for those with positive tests in Chadiza District, Eastern Province, can decrease malaria incidence and prevalence compared to conventional community case management.

Read the detailed description

This study will be a two arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial to determine whether year round weekly household visits by CHWs to detect and test people of all ages with fever or history of fever with RDTs (and offer diagnosis and referral or treatment of diarrhea and pneumonia for children under 5 years), and offer treatment with an ACT for those who test positive compared to standard passive iCCM by CHWs (which includes malaria case management for all ages in Zambia), is associated with a greater reduction in confirmed malaria cases and parasite prevalence over a 2-year follow-up period.

Randomization will occur at the level of the CHW catchment areas. Thirty-three clusters will be enrolled in each arm for a total of 66 clusters. Primary study outcomes will be evaluated based on household-level cross-sectional surveys conducted at baseline and end-line and confirmed malaria case data collected through the health system throughout the study period.

Primary objectives:

  1. Assess whether year-round weekly proactive iCCM compared to passive iCCM with malaria case management for all ages reduces the prevalence of patent (by rapid diagnostic test (RDT)) and subpatent (by PCR) parasitemia detected at the household level in cross sectional household surveys.
  2. Determine whether the confirmed malaria case incidence (detected by CHWs (either proactively or passively) and at health facilities) decreases over time in communities with weekly proactive iCCM compared to passive iCCM by comparing the difference in slope of confirmed malaria incidence in proactive vs routine arms using an interrupted time series analysis

Secondary objectives:

  1. Assess whether access to care (proportion of the population with fever in the past two weeks who received care from a qualified health provider, including community health worker), promptness of care (within 24 and 48 hours of symptoms), access to diagnostic malaria testing (proportion of the population with fever in the past two weeks who received a diagnostic test for malaria), and treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) if RDT is reported positive, is improved by proactive iCCM compared to passive iCCM
  2. Describe the incidence of febrile disease, by arm, as well as the incidence of symptomatic malaria infection (febrile persons with a positive RDT), detected during proactive iCCM visits
  3. Compare the incidence of malaria, by arm, detected at health facilities
  4. Compare the proportion of malaria cases detected at community vs health facility, by arm
  5. Determine if proactive iCCM reduces severe disease (malaria in all ages, diarrhea and pneumonia among < 5) compared to passive iCCM identified at health facility and community level)
  6. Compare level of parasite exposure in intervention and control arms using multiplex bead based assay for long, medium and short duration antibodies
  7. Determine programmatic cost per additional case detected and treated at the community level with proactive iCCM
  8. Describe the feasibility, challenges, and benefits of proactive iCCM from the perspective of the facility health worker, CHW, and community members
  9. Describe the benefits and challenges associated with incorporating diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia and diarrhea for children under 5 years
Being tested
Proactive iCCM
Keywords
Malaria, integrated community case management, proactive response, Zambia
Medical subject headings
Malaria, Falciparum, Malaria

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Proactive iCCMOther

    CHWs in the proactive iCCM intervention arm will conduct weekly visits of all households in their communities to detect children < 5 years with diarrhea or cough, and people of all ages complaining of fever or history of fever. People with fever or history of fever in the past 48 hours, or any person with symptoms suggestive of malaria (chills, headache, muscle ache, fatigue, etc), will receive an RDT; those with positive results will be defined as confirmed malaria cases, and will receive the first line antimalarial. Any child under 5 years with diarrhea will be treated with oral rehydration solution (ORS) and zinc, and any child meeting diagnostic criteria for pneumonia will receive the first line antibiotic recommended per national iCCM policy. If the CHW does not have the indicated therapy on hand, the patient will be referred for treatment.

Study groups in NCT04839900
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Proactive iCCMActive comparatorCommunity health workers (CHWs) will conduct weekly visits of all households in their communities to detect children < 5 years with diarrhea or cough, and people of all ages complaining of fever or history of fever. Weekly household visits will be conducted year round. CHWs will be available for consultation throughout the week for sick visit consultations as per national iCCM policy (with malaria case management for all ages).
Receives: Other: Proactive iCCM
Standard Passive iCCMNo interventionCommunity health workers (CHWs) will provide case management per national iCCM policy to all who are brought for consultation, but will not conduct household visits to provide active case detection. CHWs will be available for consultation throughout the week for sick visit consultations as per national iCCM policy (with malaria case management for all ages).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Parasite Prevalence

    1. Difference in parasite prevalence in intervention vs control clusters over time measured by RDT and PCR among all age groups (stratified by < 15 and 15+ years), detected through baseline and endline cross-sectional surveys conducted at the end of the transmission season.

    Measured: 24 months

  2. Confirmed malaria case incidence

    1. Difference in slope of trend lines of total numbers of febrile patients detected and malaria cases diagnosed monthly (CHWs + HF) in intervention vs control clusters (CHWs + HF)

    Measured: 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Apr 2021
  2. Study start15 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2023
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A two arm, cluster-randomized controlled trial (CRCT) will be conducted to determine whether proactive iCCM (arm 1)-- year-round weekly household visits by CHWs to test people of all ages with fever or history of fever with RDTs and offer treatment with an ACT for those who test positive (and treatment or referral of diarrhea and pneumonia for children under 5 years) -- compared to standard passive iCCM (arm 2)- malaria case management for all ages, and treatment or referral of diarrhea and pneumonia for children under 5 years, conducted by CHWs -- is associated with a greater reduction in confirmed malaria cases and parasite prevalence over a 2-year follow-up period. \] Clusters defined by CHW location will be randomly allocated to receive either proactive iCCM or standard passive iCCM.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10,890 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04839900
Sponsor's protocol ID
1704068
Acronym
ProACT
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
7 Apr 2021
Last updated
25 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Future analyses might be required and an approval will be sought and granted by the local governing research ethics, Eres Converge, before such analyses can be performed. Any request for potential future secondary use will need review and approval by an IRB committee with full disclosure of the previous study protocol and Eres Converge committee reviews. Any transfer of samples and data to a collaborator or other agent/institute will be governed by the local rules and regulations, including those set forth by the Zambia National Health Research Authority for Material Transfer Agreements and the Ministry of Health in accordance with the Eres Converge.

Publications

  • Rutagwera MI, Ferriss EL, Kabamba BM, Porter T, Kangale CC, Gallalee S, Simataa M, Miller JM, Phiri-Chibawe C, Musunse M, Nyendwa P, Kapenda V, Psychas P, Gutman JR, Hawela M, Banda I, Chitambala-Otiono S, Bennett A, Hamainza B, Thwing JI. Impact of proactive malaria community case management (proCCM) on parasite prevalence and incidence from 2021 to 2023: a randomised controlled trial in Chadiza District, Eastern Province, Zambia. BMJ Glob Health. 2025 May 24;10(5):e017697. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017697.

    PubMed 40412814

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Proactive iCCM in people with Malaria, Falciparum and Malaria, run by PATH at 1 site in Zambia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Zambia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Parasite Prevalence (time frame: 24 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04839900, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in