AzTrials
AzTrials

Covid19NCT04846907

Mental Health of Professionals Working in Pediatric Intensive Care Units During the COVID-19 Pandemic

An observational study of Covid19 and Burnout, Professional, run by D'Or Institute for Research and Education at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Health professionals are extremely exposed to psychosocial risks, as they experience, in general, high levels of stress, anxiety, fatigue and suffering, due to the nature and location of their work. As a result, the health and well being of these professionals can be significantly compromised. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Web-based survey
How many people
1,148 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
1 Jul 2020to Dec 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Physicians, registered nurses, nurse technicians, physical therapists and other professionals; on duty, routine staff or fellow/residents working in participants PICU

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible participants that signed informed consent form

Who cannot join

  • Refused to sign informed consent form

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • D'Or Institute for Research and Education

    Rio de Janeiro, 22281-100

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Mental Health and Emotional Aspects of Professionals Working in Pediatric Intensive Care Units During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Health professionals are extremely exposed to psychosocial risks, as they experience, in general, high levels of stress, anxiety, fatigue and suffering, due to the nature and location of their work. As a result, the health and well being of these professionals can be significantly compromised. In outbreaks of serious infectious diseases and pandemics, these risks become amplified and the health team is at greater risk of falling ill, presenting changes in mental health and psychological trauma, while caring for infected patients and becoming potential contaminants in their family and community.

The objective is to study the mental health of professionals who work in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in Brazil, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome will be the prevalence of burnout in the team involved with the care of critically ill children. Secondary outcomes such as anxiety, depression, quality of professional life, compassionate fatigue and post-traumatic stress disorder will be measured. Possible associations between demographic, work and coping variables (social support and resilience) with mental and emotional health outcomes will be investigated, in an exploratory character.

It is a multicenter, observational, longitudinal study, with a descriptive and exploratory analytical component. Data collection will be carried out through an electronic survey during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read the detailed description

Health professionals are extremely exposed to psychosocial risks, as they experience, in general, high levels of stress, anxiety, fatigue and suffering, due to the nature and location of their work. As a result, the health and well being of these professionals can be significantly compromised. In outbreaks of serious infectious diseases and pandemics, these risks become amplified and the health team is at greater risk of falling ill, presenting changes in mental health and psychological trauma, while caring for infected patients and becoming potential contaminants in their family and community.

The objective is to study the mental health of professionals who work in Pediatric Intensive Care Units (PICUs) in Brazil, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome will be the incidence of burnout in the team involved with the care of critically ill children. Secondary outcomes such as anxiety, depression, quality of professional life, compassionate fatigue and post-traumatic stress disorder will be measured. Possible associations between demographic, work and coping variables (social support and resilience) with mental and emotional health outcomes will be investigated, in an exploratory character.

It is a multicenter, observational, longitudinal study, with a descriptive and exploratory analytical component. Data collection will be carried out through an electronic survey during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Being tested
Web-based survey
Keywords
Covid19, Burnout, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Anxiety, Depression, Compassion Fatigue
Medical subject headings
COVID-19, Burnout, Professional, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Compassion Fatigue, Burnout, Psychological

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Web-based surveyOther

    Eligible participants received emails or text messages with links to a REDCap-created and managed web-based questionnaire

Study groups in NCT04846907
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Healthcare personnel working in pediatric intensive care units during COVID-19 pandemicPhysicians, registered nurses, nurse technicians, physical therapists and other professionals; on duty, routine staff or fellow/residents working in participants PICU
Receives: Other: Web-based survey

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of burnout as measured by Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)

    Proportion of participants positive for Burnout as measured by MBI (Maslach et al), a self-report standardized 22-item questionnaire covering 3 domains: emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP) and personal accomplishment (PA). Each subscale includes Likert-scaled questions ranging from 0 (never) to 6 (every day). Higher EE and DP scores and lower PA scores, more severe Burnout. Further analysis will be done to evaluate associations between Burnout presence and severity and demographic and laboral characteristics.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Prevalence of anxiety as measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Proportion of participants positive for anxiety as measured by HADS (Zigmond and Snaith), a self-report standardized 14-item questionnaire covering 1 anxiety 7-question subscale and 1 depression 7-question subscale. Each subscale includes Likert-scaled questions ranging from 0 to 3. Presence of anxiety symptoms when 9 or more points on anxiety subscale. Further analysis will be done to evaluate associations between anxiety presence and severity and demographic and laboral characteristics.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Prevalence of depression as measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Proportion of participants positive for depression as measured by HADS (Zigmond and Snaith), a self-report standardized 14-item questionnaire covering 1 anxiety 7-question subscale and 1 depression 7-question subscale. Each subscale includes Likert-scaled questions ranging from 0 to 3. Presence of depression symptoms when 9 or more points on depression subscale. Further analysis will be done to evaluate associations between depression presence and severity and demographic and laboral characteristics.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Prevalence of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as measured by PTSD Checklist DSM-5 (PCL-5)

    Proportion of participants positive for PTSD as measured by PCL-5 (Weathers et al), a self-report standardized 20-item questionnaire covering 4 dimensions of symptoms: intrusions, avoidance, negative alterations in cognitions and mood and alterations in arousal and reactivity. Each subscale includes Likert-scaled questions ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). Presence of PTSD symptoms when 33 or more total points or positivity in each dimension. Further analysis will be done to evaluate associations between PTSD presence and severity and demographic and laboral characteristics.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Prevalence of Compassion Fatigue as measured by Professional Quality of Life 5 (ProQOL 5) scale

    Proportion of participants positive for compassion fatigue and satisfaction as measured by ProQOL 5 scale (Stamm), a self-report standardized 30-item questionnaire covering 3 domains: compassion satisfaction (CS), Burnout (BO), secondary traumatic stress (ST). Each subscale includes Likert-scaled questions ranging from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). Scores are scaled between low (22 or less points), moderate (23 to 41) and high (42 or more) levels in each domain. Further analysis will be done to evaluate associations between CS, BO and ST presence and severity and demographic and laboral characteristics.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2021
  2. Study start1 Jul 2020
  3. Primary completionJul 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
1,148 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04846907
Sponsor's protocol ID
COVID-EMOTION
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
13 Apr 2021
Last updated
13 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Oh N, Hong N, Ryu DH, Bae SG, Kam S, Kim KY. Exploring Nursing Intention, Stress, and Professionalism in Response to Infectious Disease Emergencies: The Experience of Local Public Hospital Nurses During the 2015 MERS Outbreak in South Korea. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2017 Sep;11(3):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.anr.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 21.

    PubMed 28991605
  • Almutairi AF, Adlan AA, Balkhy HH, Abbas OA, Clark AM. "It feels like I'm the dirtiest person in the world.": Exploring the experiences of healthcare providers who survived MERS-CoV in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2017.06.011. Epub 2017 Jul 1.

    PubMed 28676285
  • Roy D, Tripathy S, Kar SK, Sharma N, Verma SK, Kaushal V. Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102083. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102083. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

    PubMed 32283510
  • Chan AO, Huak CY. Psychological impact of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome outbreak on health care workers in a medium size regional general hospital in Singapore. Occup Med (Lond). 2004 May;54(3):190-6. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqh027.

    PubMed 15133143
  • Greenberg N, Docherty M, Gnanapragasam S, Wessely S. Managing mental health challenges faced by healthcare workers during covid-19 pandemic. BMJ. 2020 Mar 26;368:m1211. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1211. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32217624
  • Chen Q, Liang M, Li Y, Guo J, Fei D, Wang L, He L, Sheng C, Cai Y, Li X, Wang J, Zhang Z. Mental health care for medical staff in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e15-e16. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30078-X. Epub 2020 Feb 19. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32085839
  • Buckley L, Berta W, Cleverley K, Medeiros C, Widger K. What is known about paediatric nurse burnout: a scoping review. Hum Resour Health. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-0451-8.

    PubMed 32046721
  • Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, Wu J, Du H, Chen T, Li R, Tan H, Kang L, Yao L, Huang M, Wang H, Wang G, Liu Z, Hu S. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976.

    PubMed 32202646
  • Wu PE, Styra R, Gold WL. Mitigating the psychological effects of COVID-19 on health care workers. CMAJ. 2020 Apr 27;192(17):E459-E460. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200519. Epub 2020 Apr 15. No abstract available.

    PubMed 32295761

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Covid19 and Burnout, Professional, run by D'Or Institute for Research and Education at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of burnout as measured by Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04846907, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in