Post-COVID19NCT04849598
Automatic Oxygen Titration in Patients After SARS-CoV-2 Infection
A study testing Oxygen therapy in people with Post-COVID19, run by Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
With the progression of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there's an increasing number of patients recovering from COVID19. Some of these patients still experience hypoxemia and therefore are still in need of a long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), usually provided as a constant-flow. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-COVID19
- What is being tested?
- Oxygen therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 13 Apr 2021to 27 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- validated COVID19 disease in case history
- hypoxemia (PO2 < 55 mmHg) under room air conditions (rest or during exercise) or SpO2 <88% during exercise
- already established Long-term oxygen therapy or given indication for a Long-term oxygen therapy
Who cannot join
- acute infection
- cardiovascular diseases that limit physical fitness
- orthopedic diseases preventing the patient from undergoing the walking tests
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Klinikum Berchtesgadener Land, Schön Kliniken
Schönau am Königssee, Bavaria, 83471
About this study
Official title: Effects of an Automatic Oxygen Titration vs. Constant Oxygen Flow Rates During Daily Activities in Patients After SARS-CoV-2 Infection
With the progression of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there's an increasing number of patients recovering from COVID19. Some of these patients still experience hypoxemia and therefore are still in need of a long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), usually provided as a constant-flow. However, during a patient's daily activities, oxygenation levels may vary and the same constant flow may not be suitable for all tasks. Studies in COPD patients suggest that an automatic oxygen titration, which adjusts the oxygen flow automatically according to a patient's blood oxygen levels to prevent desaturations, could be beneficial compared to a constant oxygen titration during exercise.
So far there are no studies available that directly compare the automatic oxygen titration with the patient's prescribed constant oxygen flow in patients with hypoxemia after SARS-CoV-2 infection during activities of daily life. Therefore, the primary outcome of this study is to investigate the effects of an automatic oxygen titration (O2matic, Denmark) in comparison to constant oxygen flow rates as prescribed according to guidelines.
Read the detailed description
Rationale
After an infection with SARS-CoV-2, some patients still experience hypoxemia even after being discharged from the hospital. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is then used to increase the patients blood oxygen level and prolong the time spent within the SpO2 target range, decreasing the probability of severe hypoxemia or at least lowering the time spent in this severe hypoxemia and all in all enhance the patient's endurance. A prescription for LTOT is usually given for constant flow rates which might vary during day- and night use.
This study is a randomized, controlled cross-over trial. Its aim is to investigate the effects of an automatic oxygen titration in patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection on the blood oxygen saturation level during activities of daily life (walking). Secondary, the effects of using an automatic titration on endurance, pCO2 blood level as well as heart rate and breathing frequency are compared to using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy.
Design:
Each patient undergoes a series of shuttle walk tests. After an initial incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) to determine the patient's maximum walking speed, the patient undergoes 2 endurance shuttle walk tests (ESWTs) at 85% of the maximum walking speed. One of these ESWTs is performed with the prescribed constant oxygen flow, the other with the O2matic automatic oxygen titration in a random order.
In addition to the shuttle walk tests, patient will perform two stair walking tests, again one with the prescribed constant oxygen flow, the other with the O2matic automatic oxygen titration in a random order.
Furthermore, patients will be asked to rate their experienced comfort after each ESWT and to name their preferred oxygen titration system.
- Conditions
- Post-COVID19
- Being tested
- Oxygen therapy
- Keywords
- post SARS-CoV-2 infection, long-term oxygen therapy, automatic oxygen-titration, hypoxemia
- Medical subject headings
- Hypoxia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Oxygen therapyOther
Oxygen therapy during ESWTs and Stair Walking Test: one test using the prescribed constant oxygen flow and one using an automatic oxygen titration system. SpO2 target range: 90 - 94%
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ESWT Order A and B | Experimental | First Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2, the second Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy. Receives: Other: Oxygen therapy |
| ESWT Order B and A | Experimental | First Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy, the second Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2. Receives: Other: Oxygen therapy |
| Stairs Order A and B | Experimental | First Stair Walking Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2, the second Stair Walking Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy. Receives: Other: Oxygen therapy |
| Stairs Order B and A | Experimental | First Stair Walking Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy, the second Stair Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2. Receives: Other: Oxygen therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of oxygen saturation during the endurance shuttle walk Tests
SpO2 measured by continuous transcutaneous recording via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland)
Measured: Day 2, 3
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change of transcutaneous pCO2 during ESWTs
tc pCO2 measured by continuous transcutaneous recording via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland)
Measured: Day 2, 3
Change of heart rate during ESWTs and stair walking tests
Heart rate measured by continuous transcutaneous recording via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland)
Measured: Day 2, 3, 4
Change of respiratory rate during ESWTs
Respiratory rate measured by ApneaLink Air™
Measured: Day 2, 3
Change of time to desaturation (SpO2 ≤ 90%) and to severe desaturation (SpO2 ≤ 85%) during ESWTs and Stair Walking Tests
SpO2 measured by continuous transcutaneous recording via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland) and O2matic Device.
Measured: Day 2, 3, 4
Change of Endurance time (s)
Change of Walking Duration during the ESWT and Stair Walking Tests
Measured: Day 2, 3, 4
Change of capillary partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) during endurance shuttle walk tests
pCO2 measured by capillary blood gases taken before and after the ESWT
Measured: Day 2, 3
Change of capillary partial pressure of O2 (pO2) during endurance shuttle walk tests
pO2 measured by capillary blood gases taken before and after the ESWT
Measured: Day 2,3
Patients preference due to oxygen delivery system
Patients will be asked to rate their experienced comfort after each ESWT
Measured: Day 3
Change of number of stairs
Change of the number of stairs the patient was able to climb during Stair Walking Tests
Measured: Day 4
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Apr 2021
- Study start13 Apr 2021
- Primary completion27 Aug 2021
- Study completion27 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post-COVID19Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Dr. Andreas Rembert Koczulla, Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land
- Investigators
- Andreas R Koczulla, Prof. Dr. med., Principal investigator, Philipps University Marburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04849598
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- O2matic_COVID
- Status last verified
- Nov 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2021
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Lellouche F, L'Her E, Bouchard PA, Brouillard C, Maltais F. Automatic Oxygen Titration During Walking in Subjects With COPD: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Study. Respir Care. 2016 Nov;61(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04406. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
PubMed 27794080Singh SJ, Puhan MA, Andrianopoulos V, Hernandes NA, Mitchell KE, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Camillo CA, Troosters T, Spruit MA, Carlin BW, Wanger J, Pepin V, Saey D, Pitta F, Kaminsky DA, McCormack MC, MacIntyre N, Culver BH, Sciurba FC, Revill SM, Delafosse V, Holland AE. An official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1447-78. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00150414. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
PubMed 25359356Prieur G, Combret Y, Medrinal C, Arnol N, Bonnevie T, Gravier FE, Quieffin J, Lamia B, Reychler G, Borel JC. Energy conservation technique improves dyspnoea when patients with severe COPD climb stairs: a randomised crossover study. Thorax. 2020 Jun;75(6):510-512. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214295. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
PubMed 32217783
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of an Automatic Oxygen Titration vs. Constant Oxygen Flow Rates During Daily Activities in Patients After SARS-CoV-2 Infection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04849598
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- O2matic_COVID
- Conditions
- Post-COVID19
- Keywords
- post SARS-CoV-2 infection, long-term oxygen therapy, automatic oxygen-titration, hypoxemia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener LandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With the progression of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic there's an increasing number of patients recovering from COVID19. Some of these patients still experience hypoxemia and therefore are still in need of a long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT), usually provided as a constant-flow. However, during a patient's daily activities, oxygenation levels may vary and the same constant flow may not be suitable for all tasks. Studies in COPD patients suggest that an automatic oxygen titration, which adjusts the oxygen flow automatically according to a patient's blood oxygen levels to prevent desaturations, could be beneficial compared to a constant oxygen titration during exercise.
So far there are no studies available that directly compare the automatic oxygen titration with the patient's prescribed constant oxygen flow in patients with hypoxemia after SARS-CoV-2 infection during activities of daily life. Therefore, the primary outcome of this study is to investigate the effects of an automatic oxygen titration (O2matic, Denmark) in comparison to constant oxygen flow rates as prescribed according to guidelines.
Detailed description
Rationale
After an infection with SARS-CoV-2, some patients still experience hypoxemia even after being discharged from the hospital. Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is then used to increase the patients blood oxygen level and prolong the time spent within the SpO2 target range, decreasing the probability of severe hypoxemia or at least lowering the time spent in this severe hypoxemia and all in all enhance the patient's endurance. A prescription for LTOT is usually given for constant flow rates which might vary during day- and night use.
This study is a randomized, controlled cross-over trial. Its aim is to investigate the effects of an automatic oxygen titration in patients after SARS-CoV-2 infection on the blood oxygen saturation level during activities of daily life (walking). Secondary, the effects of using an automatic titration on endurance, pCO2 blood level as well as heart rate and breathing frequency are compared to using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy.
Design:
Each patient undergoes a series of shuttle walk tests. After an initial incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) to determine the patient's maximum walking speed, the patient undergoes 2 endurance shuttle walk tests (ESWTs) at 85% of the maximum walking speed. One of these ESWTs is performed with the prescribed constant oxygen flow, the other with the O2matic automatic oxygen titration in a random order.
In addition to the shuttle walk tests, patient will perform two stair walking tests, again one with the prescribed constant oxygen flow, the other with the O2matic automatic oxygen titration in a random order.
Furthermore, patients will be asked to rate their experienced comfort after each ESWT and to name their preferred oxygen titration system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ESWT Order A and B | Experimental | Other: Oxygen therapyFirst Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2, the second Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy. |
| ESWT Order B and A | Experimental | Other: Oxygen therapyFirst Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy, the second Endurance Shuttle Walk Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2. |
| Stairs Order A and B | Experimental | Other: Oxygen therapyFirst Stair Walking Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2, the second Stair Walking Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy. |
| Stairs Order B and A | Experimental | Other: Oxygen therapyFirst Stair Walking Test using the prescribed constant flow oxygen therapy, the second Stair Test using the automatic oxygen titration (O2matic) with the target range being 90 - 94% SpO2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- validated COVID19 disease in case history
- hypoxemia (PO2 < 55 mmHg) under room air conditions (rest or during exercise) or SpO2 <88% during exercise
- already established Long-term oxygen therapy or given indication for a Long-term oxygen therapy
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- acute infection
- cardiovascular diseases that limit physical fitness
- orthopedic diseases preventing the patient from undergoing the walking tests
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Oxygen therapyOxygen therapy during ESWTs and Stair Walking Test: one test using the prescribed constant oxygen flow and one using an automatic oxygen titration system. SpO2 target range: 90 - 94% | Other | ESWT Order A and B, ESWT Order B and A, Stairs Order A and B, Stairs Order B and A |
Primary outcome
Change of oxygen saturation during the endurance shuttle walk Tests
Time frame: Day 2, 3
SpO2 measured by continuous transcutaneous recording via Sentec-Digital Monitor® (Sentec, Therwil, Switzerland)
9 secondary outcomes
Change of transcutaneous pCO2 during ESWTs
Time frame: Day 2, 3
Change of heart rate during ESWTs and stair walking tests
Time frame: Day 2, 3, 4
Change of respiratory rate during ESWTs
Time frame: Day 2, 3
Change of time to desaturation (SpO2 ≤ 90%) and to severe desaturation (SpO2 ≤ 85%) during ESWTs and Stair Walking Tests
Time frame: Day 2, 3, 4
Change of Endurance time (s)
Time frame: Day 2, 3, 4
Change of capillary partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) during endurance shuttle walk tests
Time frame: Day 2, 3
Change of capillary partial pressure of O2 (pO2) during endurance shuttle walk tests
Time frame: Day 2,3
Patients preference due to oxygen delivery system
Time frame: Day 3
Change of number of stairs
Time frame: Day 4
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2021.
- Background: PubMed 27794080Lellouche F, L'Her E, Bouchard PA, Brouillard C, Maltais F. Automatic Oxygen Titration During Walking in Subjects With COPD: A Randomized Crossover Controlled Study. Respir Care. 2016 Nov;61(11):1456-1464. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04406. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
- Background: PubMed 25359356Singh SJ, Puhan MA, Andrianopoulos V, Hernandes NA, Mitchell KE, Hill CJ, Lee AL, Camillo CA, Troosters T, Spruit MA, Carlin BW, Wanger J, Pepin V, Saey D, Pitta F, Kaminsky DA, McCormack MC, MacIntyre N, Culver BH, Sciurba FC, Revill SM, Delafosse V, Holland AE. An official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease. Eur Respir J. 2014 Dec;44(6):1447-78. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00150414. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
- Background: PubMed 32217783Prieur G, Combret Y, Medrinal C, Arnol N, Bonnevie T, Gravier FE, Quieffin J, Lamia B, Reychler G, Borel JC. Energy conservation technique improves dyspnoea when patients with severe COPD climb stairs: a randomised crossover study. Thorax. 2020 Jun;75(6):510-512. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2019-214295. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
Related trials for Post-COVID19
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Recruiting
ME/CFS Brain Fog: Cognitive Rehabilitation Trial
ME/CFS, ME/CFS Following EBV-associated Infectious Mononucleosis
Active, not recruiting
Long COVID Brain Fog: Cognitive Rehabilitation Trial
Long COVID, Brain Fog
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Korean Post Marketing Surveillance for Comirnaty Injection (Bretovameran)
COVID-19 Vaccination
RecruitingPhase 2
SARS-CoV-2 and Herpesvirus Inhibition for Ending Long COVID Dysfunction
Post-acute Sequelae of COVID-19, Long COVID
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andreas R Koczulla, Prof. Dr. med. principal investigator
Philipps University Marburg
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Oxygen therapy in people with Post-COVID19, run by Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of oxygen saturation during the endurance shuttle walk Tests (time frame: Day 2, 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04849598, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2021.