AzTrials
AzTrials

Complex Regional Pain SyndromesVRGINCT04849897

Virtual Reality Guided Imagery for Chronic Pain

A study testing Experimental: Virtual Reality Guided Imagery and Active Comparator: Audio Only Guided Imagery in people with Complex Regional Pain Syndromes and Back Pain, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To assess treatment with an at-home Virtual Reality Guided Imagery (VR-GI) intervention, 36 patients with chronic pain (18 with chronic back pain, CBP, and 18 with complex regional pain syndrome, CRPS) will complete a 2-week intervention with at-home daily practice of VR-GI (n = 24) or audio-only GI (n = 12). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Back Pain
What is being tested?
Experimental: Virtual Reality Guided Imagery and Active Comparator: Audio Only Guided Imagery
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
22 Mar 2021to 30 Apr 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must be a patient at the University of Southern California Pain Center
  • - English Fluency
  • Diagnosis of chronic back pain or complex regional pain syndrome
  • Average pain intensity of 5 on a 0 to 10 scale for more than 3 month
  • Access to a device with video and audio capability and sufficient WiFI to participate in on-line sessions

Who cannot join

  • History of significant motion sickness
  • Active nausea/vomiting
  • Epilepsy
  • Significant movement problems
  • Significant vision or hearing impairment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • USC Pain Center, Keck School of Medicine

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

Other trials in United States

About this study

To assess treatment with an at-home Virtual Reality Guided Imagery (VR-GI) intervention, 36 patients with chronic pain (18 with chronic back pain, CBP, and 18 with complex regional pain syndrome, CRPS) will complete a 2-week intervention with at-home daily practice of VR-GI (n = 24) or audio-only GI (n = 12). Pre-post treatment measures of pain intensity, opioid use, functional outcomes, and mood will be collected. Intervention feasibility and patient satisfaction will be evaluated post-treatment via questionnaire and qualitative interview.

Read the detailed description

○ Chronic pain affects over 100 million adults in the US, resulting in disability, loss of work productivity, and overall reductions in health, making chronic pain a major public health problem with an economic burden estimated at $560-635 billion annually. Opioids, the most frequently prescribed class of drugs to control pain, lack evidence supporting their long-term efficacy and carry a 15-26% risk of misuse and abuse among pain patients, highlighting a critical need to develop effective non-pharmacological interventions for pain. Guided imagery (GI), a cognitive-behavioral technique for guiding patients to create multisensory, imagined scenes to increase well-being, is an effective non-pharmacological intervention for reducing pain. However, its effectiveness is limited by patients' imaging abilities. The long-term objective of this project is to reduce chronic pain and opioid use by developing an at-home virtual reality (VR)-GI intervention to improve chronic pain management using the Limbix VR Kit. Given the enhanced immersiveness and interactivity of VR, VR-GI is expected to reduce pain and reliance on opioids, as well as improve functional outcomes and mood, compared to traditional audio-only GI and usual care. The specific aims are to evaluate feasibility and usability of an at-home VRGI intervention in a 2-week clinical trial. Two 15-min VR-GI experiences that guide patients through psychoeducation, relaxation exercises, and interactive virtual worlds that allow them to control their experience of pain will be evaluated. To assess feasibility of an at-home VR-GI intervention, 36 patients with chronic pain (18 with chronic back pain, CBP, and 18 with complex regional pain syndrome, CRPS) will complete a 2-week intervention with at-home daily practice of VR-GI (n = 24) or audio-only GI (n = 12). Pre-post treatment measures of pain intensity, opioid use, functional outcomes, and mood will be collected. Intervention feasibility and patient satisfaction will be evaluated post-treatment via questionnaire and qualitative interview. This research directly addresses the need to improve pain treatment to prevent opioid use disorder.

Being tested
Experimental: Virtual Reality Guided Imagery, Active Comparator: Audio Only Guided Imagery
Medical subject headings
Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental: Virtual Reality Guided ImageryDevice

    Platform and VR Goggles

  • Active Comparator: Audio Only Guided ImageryOther

    Audio Recordings of Guided Imagery via an iPAD

Study groups in NCT04849897
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active Comparator: Audio Only Guided Imagery Audio Recordings of Guided Imagery via tabletActive comparatorListen to narrative scripts based on traditional GI audio recordings. The narrative scripts will include psychoeducation content that explains how the mind and brain can influence physical pain and how they can be trained to effect changes in experienced chronic pain. Narration will guide users in breathing and relaxation exercises and explain how patients can continue to exert control over their pain outside of the GI experience.
Receives: Other: Active Comparator: Audio Only Guided Imagery
Experimental: Virtual Reality Guided Imagery Platform and VR HeadsetExperimentalVR headset for guided imagery with audiovisual computer-generated VR content to accompany the GI narration. The narrative scripts will include psychoeducation content that explains how the mind and brain can influence physical pain and how they can be trained to effect changes in experienced chronic pain. Narration will guide users in breathing and relaxation exercises and explain how patients can continue to exert control over their pain outside of the VR-GI experience.
Receives: Device: Experimental: Virtual Reality Guided Imagery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants Who Are Recruited But Not Enrolled as Documented in Participant Log

    Participant log tracks number of recruited participants who are ineligible to participate and/or decline to enroll

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Number of Enrolled Participants Who do Not Complete the Study as Documented in Log

    Participant log tracks the number of enrolled participants who discontinue intervention, are lost to follow-up and/or experience adverse events.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  3. Number of Practice Sessions Completed by Participants as Documented in Spread Sheet

    Spread sheet documenting proportion of at-home daily GI practice completed over 2-week intervention

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  4. Pain Assessed by Pain Numeric Rating Scale

    Numeric Rating Scale of self-reported highest, lowest, and average pain scores (0-10) over the last 7 days. Higher scores indicate worse pain outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  5. Opioid Medication Usage Assessed by Frequency of Use Log

    Log with list of medications taken, dosages and frequency of use. Lower frequency indicates better outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  6. Non-opioid Pain Medication Usage Assessed by Frequency of Use Log

    Log with list of non-opioid pain mediction taken, dosages and frequency of use. Lower frequency of use indicates better outcomes

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Anxiety Assessed by Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment: GAD-2 (GAD-7)

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment is calculated by assigning scores of 1,2,3 and 4, to the response categories of Not at all sure, Several Days,Over half the days, Nearly every day , respectively. Total score for the two ranges from 0-6 with higher number indicating worse anxiety outcome.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  2. Depression Assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-2

    Patient Health Questionnaire is calculated by assigning scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, to the response categories of not at all, several days more than half the days, and-nearly every day, respectively. Total score for the two ranges from 0 to 6 with higher number worse depression outcome.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  3. Short Form Health Survey (SF12v12)

    Health-related quality of life assessment Short Form Health Survey 12 has two composite scores (Physical composite score and Mental composite score). Each score has a range of 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health outcomes.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  4. Back Pain Disability Assessed by the Back Pain Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    Pain Management assessments for patients with back pain. Oswestry Disability Index For each section the total possible score is 5: if the first statement is marked the section score = 0; if the last statement is marked, it = 5 with 50 as a highest score; higher scores indicating a worse disability outcome from back pain. Scale is 0-50.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  5. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Symptoms Assessed by the CSS 17 Patientobservation Portion

    Pain management assessments for patients with CRPS. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) Severity Score (CSS-17) 0 absence of symptoms, 1 presence of symptoms, 0-8, higher score indicate worse symptom outcome.

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

  6. Daily Pain Numerical Rating Scale

    Rating of current pain intensity from 0-10 with higher number indicated worse pain outcomes

    Measured: Baseline to 2 week follow up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Apr 2021
  2. Study start22 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2022
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04849897
Sponsor's protocol ID
HS 1900549
Acronym
VRGI
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
9 Apr 2021
Last updated
21 Aug 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Experimental: Virtual Reality Guided Imagery and Active Comparator: Audio Only Guided Imagery in people with Complex Regional Pain Syndromes and Back Pain, run by University of Southern California at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants Who Are Recruited But Not Enrolled as Documented in Participant Log (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in