Down SyndromeNCT04854122
Blood Flow Regulation in Individuals With Down Syndrome - Training Study
A study testing Combined exercise intervention in people with Down Syndrome, run by University of Nevada, Las Vegas at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Work capacity is an important predictor of declining health or physical function, and of mortality, and is commonly measured as peak oxygen consumption. Peak oxygen consumption is very low in individuals with Down syndrome, the most prevalent genetic cause of intellectual disability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Down Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Combined exercise intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2021to 31 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- generally healthy
- sedentary (defined as being involved in less than 30 minutes of moderately-intense physical activity per day)
- additionally for the participants with Down syndrome:
- diagnosis of Down syndrome trisomy 21 and
- normal thyroid function or stable thyroid function (and medications) for at least 6 mo.
Who cannot join
- congenital heart disease;
- atherosclerotic or other vascular disease;
- asthma or other pulmonary disease;
- hypertension (defined BP >140/90 mmHg);
- blood pressure below 90/60 mmHg;
- history of pre-syncope or syncope;
Show all 12Show fewer
- diabetes (defined as Hba1c of >7.5% or use of glucose lowering medication);
- severe obesity (defined as BMI >40);
- medications affecting heart rate, blood pressure or arterial function;
- anti-inflammatory medication including NSAIDS;
- current smoking and
- pregnancy.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89154
About this study
Official title: The Effects of Exercise Training on Central and Peripheral Blood Flow Regulation in Individuals With Down Syndrome
Work capacity is an important predictor of declining health or physical function, and of mortality, and is commonly measured as peak oxygen consumption. Peak oxygen consumption is very low in individuals with Down syndrome, the most prevalent genetic cause of intellectual disability. Previous research suggests individuals with Down syndrome may experience a double disadvantage when they are exercising: they may not be able to increase cardiac output sufficiently and they may not be able to allocate adequate blood flow to the working muscles. The aim of this research proposal is therefore to investigate the responses in central and peripheral blood flow regulation and cardiac autonomic function to exercise training in individuals with DS. Additionally the effects of exercise on gait, balance and attitude towards exercise in individuals with DS are investigated.
Read the detailed description
Down syndrome (DS) is the most prevalent genetic cause of intellectual disability and occurs in approximately 1 in every 700 births in the US. Individuals with DS are at increased risk for a number of health issues. Work capacity is an important predictor of declining health or physical function, and of mortality, and is commonly measured as peak oxygen consumption. Peak oxygen consumption is very low in individuals with DS, and cannot be explained by physical inactivity, lack of motivation, or lack of understanding of the test. To date, the nature of the limitations in work capacity in DS is unknown, and the proposed research aims to address this knowledge gap.
Work capacity is determined by central and peripheral regulation of blood flow (i.e. cardiac output and maintaining arterial blood pressure vs. supplying exercising muscles with oxygen and nutrients). These factors are governed by the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system. Central regulation of blood flow is impaired in individuals with DS due to cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction, whereby parasympathetic activity is high and sympathetic control is reduced. This results in lower heart rate, less adequate blood pressure control and attenuated catecholamine levels during exercise. It is unknown to what extent this impaired central control impacts cardiac output, and subsequently work capacity, during exercise in individuals with DS.
Peripheral blood flow regulation is even less studied in individuals with DS. Peripheral regulation involves sympathetically regulated vasoconstriction in non-active muscles and tissues, and local mechanisms regulating vasodilation in working muscles, which facilitates blood flow to working muscle in order to meet metabolic demand. Individuals with DS may partly experience reduced work capacity due to this inability to shunt blood to the working tissue effectively. Our pilot data supports this hypothesis in that individuals with DS are unable to vasoconstrict in response to lower body negative pressure, a known sympathoexcitatory maneuver that produces vasoconstriction in controls without disabilities. Importantly, the impact of their lack of sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction on exercise has not been studied, and neither have the local mechanisms regulating appropriate vasodilation in working muscles.
The aim of this research proposal is therefore to determine the impact of limitations in central and peripheral regulation of blood flow on work capacity in individuals with DS. The aim is to examine the responses to exercise training to better understand the underlying mechanisms and the potential to improve health by using this knowledge in exercise interventions.
Overall Aim: To investigate the responses in central and peripheral blood flow regulation and cardiac autonomic function to exercise training in individuals with DS Aim 1: To determine if exercise training improves peripheral or central regulation of blood flow in individuals with DS. The investigators hypothesize that improvements in work capacity in response to chronic exercise training are primarily due to improvements in peripheral blood flow regulation.
Aim 2: To determine if exercise training improves the cardiovascular autonomic profile in individuals with DS The investigators hypothesize that exercise training will improve the response to clinical cardiovascular autonomic tests in individuals with DS.
Aim 3: To determine if exercise training improves gait, balance and attitude towards exercise in individuals with Down syndrome compared to individuals with Down syndrome in a control group and to individuals without DS.
Individuals with DS may experience a double disadvantage when they are exercising: they may not be able to increase cardiac output sufficiently and they may not be able to allocate adequate blood flow to the working muscles. By revealing the impact of autonomic regulation of blood flow in individuals with DS, the results of this project will identify critical aspects needed to improve clinical practice and design of exercise interventions that optimally improve health and functioning.
General study design Intervention. The exercise intervention will last 12 weeks and will consist of a supervised combined aerobic and resistance training program with a frequency of 3 days/week. Aerobic exercise will be part of all three sessions, with resistance exercise during two out of three sessions. Training sessions will be supervised by two instructors to ensure the safe use of the equipment and the correct form when performing each exercise. The first 3 weeks of the intervention will be familiarization with the exercises and the program. After a warm-up, the participant will perform 30 min of aerobic exercise at a heart rate of 65% of the participant's maximum heart rate [43], which increases to 65-85% during weeks 4-12 of the intervention. The resistance exercise part will include all major muscle groups, both upper and lower body, using multi- and single-joint exercises. The exercise load will be selected to ensure fatigue is reached at 12 repetitions (12-RM). Additionally, if the participants are able to complete 14 repetitions for 2 consecutive sessions using proper technique, the load will be increased by 10% of their 12-RM. The control condition consists of usual care with creative activities that do not involve exercise. Familiarization with the intervention will take place in the first three weeks of the intervention, in which the instructors will support the participants to become familiar with the exercises.
Baseline measures Participants will be tested in a postprandial state (>3 h) on 2 separate days and will refrain from exercise 24 h before each test day. Participants will be also asked to refrain from drinking or eating caffeine and drinking alcohol on testing days. Participants who do not follow the requirements on study days will be asked to come back another day. During the first visit, height, weight and circumferences will be measured. Body composition will be determined with a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, to determine forearm composition and mass. Two-dimensional echocardiography (Hitachi Aloka Alpha 7 system, Tokyo, Japan) will be used to measure aortic root diameter, cardiac output, and stroke volume and end systolic volume at rest. In addition, clinical autonomic function tests (heart rate variability at rest and recovery after exercise, deep breathing, Valsalva maneuver, isometric exercise, active and passive orthostasis) will be evaluated during the first study visit.
Familiarization sessions. Parents/care givers are involved in order to provide a supportive environment for participants and to enhance the parent/caregiver understanding of the research. Prior to study initiation, photographs and video clips of the laboratory and study equipment will be provided to help the participants become comfortable with the laboratory environment and equipment, and the informed consent information is sent to the participants and their parents/care-givers for their review. Familiarization for the participants with Down syndrome will be divided in two parts: they will practice and become accustomed with the treadmill and the equipment for the graded maximal exercise test (first visit), and they will practice and become accustomed with the procedures for the hand grip exercise protocol and the lower body negative pressure chamber (LBNP) (second visit).
Descriptions data collection visits (for both pre and post intervention):
During the first data collections visit, after discussing the study and potential questions, participants (and/or parents/caregivers for the group with Down syndrome) will complete a health history questionnaire and physical activity questionnaire to confirm eligibility. For women of childbearing age, the first visit will include a urine pregnancy test using a test stick. Females will be studied during the first 3-5 days of menses or during the placebo phase if taking oral contraceptives, in order to control for hormonal variation. Eligible participants with Down syndrome and their parent/care-giver will then provide written informed consent, or give verbal assent (for individuals with Down syndrome), and the eligible control participants will provide informed consent themselves. For participants with Down syndrome, the first visit continues with baseline measures and familiarization with the graded maximal exercise test protocol. If necessary, additional familiarization sessions will be scheduled for people with Down syndrome. The second visit, the participant performs the graded maximal exercise test and familiarize the participant with the procedures for the third visit: the hand grip exercise protocol and the LBNP. Gait, balance and foot posture will also be measured. The third visit peripheral blood flow will be assessed during the hand grip exercise protocol without and with the LBNP. For control subjects, the first and second visit are combined. Their second visit is the same as the third visit for individuals with Down syndrome.
- Conditions
- Down Syndrome
- Being tested
- Combined exercise intervention, Usual care / Sham intervention
- Keywords
- exercise, blood flow regulation, blood pressure, heart rate
- Medical subject headings
- Down Syndrome, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Combined exercise interventionBehavioural
The exercise intervention will last 12 weeks and will consist of a supervised combined aerobic and resistance training program with a frequency of 3 days/week. Aerobic exercise will be part of all three sessions, with resistance exercise during two out of three sessions. Training sessions will be supervised by personal trainers to ensure the safe use of the equipment and the correct form when performing each exercise. The first 3 weeks of the intervention will be familiarization with the exercises and the program. After a warm-up, the participant will perform 30 min of aerobic exercise at a heart rate of 65% of the participant's maximum heart rate [43], which increases to 65-85% during weeks 4-12 of the intervention. The resistance exercise part will include all major muscle groups, both upper and lower body.
Usual care / Sham interventionBehavioural
The control condition consists of usual activities.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Combined exercise intervention Down syndrome | Experimental | The exercise intervention will last 12 weeks and will consist of a supervised combined aerobic and resistance training program with a frequency of 3 days/week.In the exercise sessions, the participant will work with the trainer on their strength, balance and aerobic endurance. Each session consists of 10 min of strength exercises (Foundational Exercise), 10 min of Hip Strengthening, 10 min of Vestibular and Balance Exercise, and 20 min of Aerobic Exercise, and starts with a warming up and ends with stretching/cooling down. Each new exercise will be introduced in easy steps and practiced until the participant is comfortable executing it. Receives: Behavioral: Combined exercise intervention |
| Usual care Down Syndrome | Sham comparator | The control condition consists of usual activities. Receives: Behavioral: Usual care / Sham intervention |
| Reference group without Down syndrome | No intervention | This reference group of age- and sex-matched inactive individuals without Down syndrome will undergo the same baseline testing as the other groups but without intervention or post-intervention measures. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline Work Capacity at 13 Weeks
Change in work capacity from baseline to 13 weeks, as measured by peak oxygen uptake in ml/kg/min with a graded exercise test on a treadmill.
Measured: 13 weeks
Secondary outcomes (13)
Change From Baseline Brachial Blood Flow at 13 Weeks
Forearm blood flow and vascular conductance was measured in both the exercising and non-exercising arm using high definition ultrasound (Alpha 7, Aloka-Hitachi). The brachial artery was imaged in dual mode allowing for simultaneous determination of artery diameter (B-mode) and flow velocity (Doppler mode). Blood flow was determined from the following formula: Forearm Blood flow = (Mean blood velocity) x (Brachial Cross Sectional Area) x (60) and expressed as ml/min. Change from baseline to 13 weeks was presented.
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Muscle Oxygenation at 13 Weeks
Muscle oxygenation was measured with near-infrared spectrography (NIRS), which is a simple, noninvasive method for measuring the presence of oxygen in muscle. It monitored changes in muscle oxygenation and blood flow during submaximal and maximal exercise. During exercise, the extent to which skeletal muscles deoxygenate varies according to the type of muscle, type of exercise and blood flow response. We analyzed the change from baseline to 13 weeks in percentage of oxygenated blood during hand grip exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (HGE 30%MVC).
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Cardiac Output (Aortic Blood Flow) at 13 Weeks
Change from baseline to 13 weeks in cardiac output will be measured during a graded maximal test protocol. The ascending aortic blood flow will be measured using continuous Doppler echocardiography using a pedoff probe in the suprasternal notch.
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Autonomic Cardiac Function at Rest at 13 Weeks
Change from baseline to 13 weeks in clinical autonomic function test: heart rate variability during rest measured in root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) in ms.
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Autonomic Cardiac Function During Orthostasis at 13 Weeks
Change from baseline to 13 weeks in clinical autonomic function test: heart rate variability during orthostasis in root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) in ms
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline IL-6 at 13 Weeks
Change from baseline to 13 weeks for interleukin-6 IL-6 (venous blood sample)
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline HDL at 13 Weeks
Change from Baseline in High-Density Lipoprotein in venous blood sample
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Superoxide Dismutase at 13 Weeks
Change from Baseline to 13 weeks in super oxide dismutase (venous blood sample)
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Comfortable Walking Speed at 13 Weeks
Change from Baseline to 13 weeks in Comfortable walking speed in cm/sec
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Fast Walking Speed at 13 Weeks
Change from Baseline to 13 weeks in Fast Walking Speed in cm/sec
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Functional Reach at 13 Weeks
Change from baseline to 13 week in Functional Reach, which is a balance test to investigate how far the participant can reach measured in cm.
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Timed Up and Go at 13 Weeks
Timed Up and Go is a dynamic balance test involving getting up from a chair, walk around a mark and sit back down, the time in sec to complete whole sequence is the outcome. Change was measured from baseline to 13 weeks.
Measured: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Standing Balance at 13 Weeks
The Sensory Organization Test of the Bertec Balance System was used to detect balance problems with standing under different conditions. The purpose of the Sensory Organization Test is to systematically evaluate the components of the balance control system, including the vision, vestibular, and somatosensory systems in order to identify possible abnormalities in these systems. The Sensory Organization Test has 6 separate conditions varying in eyes open/closed, fixed or moving visual environment and fixed or moving support surface. This test provides a quantitative evaluation of the person's sway during the 6 conditions, presented as equilibrium score from 0-100 for each condition, with higher scores representing better equilibrium. The composite score is the average equilibrium score of the six conditions.
Measured: 13 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Apr 2021
- Study start9 Sep 2021
- Primary completion31 Aug 2024
- Study completion31 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Down SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This intervention study will be set up as a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a 12-weeks exercise program to 12-weeks of non-exercise usual care in participants with Down syndrome.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thessa Hilgenkamp, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04854122
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UNLV_BFDS_TrainingStudy
- Other IDs
- 4R00HD092606-03
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: De-identified IPD will be made available to other researchers upon request.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effects of Exercise Training on Central and Peripheral Blood Flow Regulation in Individuals With Down Syndrome
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04854122
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UNLV_BFDS_TrainingStudy
- Conditions
- Down Syndrome
- Keywords
- exercise, blood flow regulation, blood pressure, heart rate
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nevada, Las VegasUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Feb 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Work capacity is an important predictor of declining health or physical function, and of mortality, and is commonly measured as peak oxygen consumption. Peak oxygen consumption is very low in individuals with Down syndrome, the most prevalent genetic cause of intellectual disability. Previous research suggests individuals with Down syndrome may experience a double disadvantage when they are exercising: they may not be able to increase cardiac output sufficiently and they may not be able to allocate adequate blood flow to the working muscles. The aim of this research proposal is therefore to investigate the responses in central and peripheral blood flow regulation and cardiac autonomic function to exercise training in individuals with DS. Additionally the effects of exercise on gait, balance and attitude towards exercise in individuals with DS are investigated.
Detailed description
Down syndrome (DS) is the most prevalent genetic cause of intellectual disability and occurs in approximately 1 in every 700 births in the US. Individuals with DS are at increased risk for a number of health issues. Work capacity is an important predictor of declining health or physical function, and of mortality, and is commonly measured as peak oxygen consumption. Peak oxygen consumption is very low in individuals with DS, and cannot be explained by physical inactivity, lack of motivation, or lack of understanding of the test. To date, the nature of the limitations in work capacity in DS is unknown, and the proposed research aims to address this knowledge gap.
Work capacity is determined by central and peripheral regulation of blood flow (i.e. cardiac output and maintaining arterial blood pressure vs. supplying exercising muscles with oxygen and nutrients). These factors are governed by the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the autonomic nervous system. Central regulation of blood flow is impaired in individuals with DS due to cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction, whereby parasympathetic activity is high and sympathetic control is reduced. This results in lower heart rate, less adequate blood pressure control and attenuated catecholamine levels during exercise. It is unknown to what extent this impaired central control impacts cardiac output, and subsequently work capacity, during exercise in individuals with DS.
Peripheral blood flow regulation is even less studied in individuals with DS. Peripheral regulation involves sympathetically regulated vasoconstriction in non-active muscles and tissues, and local mechanisms regulating vasodilation in working muscles, which facilitates blood flow to working muscle in order to meet metabolic demand. Individuals with DS may partly experience reduced work capacity due to this inability to shunt blood to the working tissue effectively. Our pilot data supports this hypothesis in that individuals with DS are unable to vasoconstrict in response to lower body negative pressure, a known sympathoexcitatory maneuver that produces vasoconstriction in controls without disabilities. Importantly, the impact of their lack of sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction on exercise has not been studied, and neither have the local mechanisms regulating appropriate vasodilation in working muscles.
The aim of this research proposal is therefore to determine the impact of limitations in central and peripheral regulation of blood flow on work capacity in individuals with DS. The aim is to examine the responses to exercise training to better understand the underlying mechanisms and the potential to improve health by using this knowledge in exercise interventions.
Overall Aim: To investigate the responses in central and peripheral blood flow regulation and cardiac autonomic function to exercise training in individuals with DS Aim 1: To determine if exercise training improves peripheral or central regulation of blood flow in individuals with DS. The investigators hypothesize that improvements in work capacity in response to chronic exercise training are primarily due to improvements in peripheral blood flow regulation.
Aim 2: To determine if exercise training improves the cardiovascular autonomic profile in individuals with DS The investigators hypothesize that exercise training will improve the response to clinical cardiovascular autonomic tests in individuals with DS.
Aim 3: To determine if exercise training improves gait, balance and attitude towards exercise in individuals with Down syndrome compared to individuals with Down syndrome in a control group and to individuals without DS.
Individuals with DS may experience a double disadvantage when they are exercising: they may not be able to increase cardiac output sufficiently and they may not be able to allocate adequate blood flow to the working muscles. By revealing the impact of autonomic regulation of blood flow in individuals with DS, the results of this project will identify critical aspects needed to improve clinical practice and design of exercise interventions that optimally improve health and functioning.
General study design Intervention. The exercise intervention will last 12 weeks and will consist of a supervised combined aerobic and resistance training program with a frequency of 3 days/week. Aerobic exercise will be part of all three sessions, with resistance exercise during two out of three sessions. Training sessions will be supervised by two instructors to ensure the safe use of the equipment and the correct form when performing each exercise. The first 3 weeks of the intervention will be familiarization with the exercises and the program. After a warm-up, the participant will perform 30 min of aerobic exercise at a heart rate of 65% of the participant's maximum heart rate [43], which increases to 65-85% during weeks 4-12 of the intervention. The resistance exercise part will include all major muscle groups, both upper and lower body, using multi- and single-joint exercises. The exercise load will be selected to ensure fatigue is reached at 12 repetitions (12-RM). Additionally, if the participants are able to complete 14 repetitions for 2 consecutive sessions using proper technique, the load will be increased by 10% of their 12-RM. The control condition consists of usual care with creative activities that do not involve exercise. Familiarization with the intervention will take place in the first three weeks of the intervention, in which the instructors will support the participants to become familiar with the exercises.
Baseline measures Participants will be tested in a postprandial state (>3 h) on 2 separate days and will refrain from exercise 24 h before each test day. Participants will be also asked to refrain from drinking or eating caffeine and drinking alcohol on testing days. Participants who do not follow the requirements on study days will be asked to come back another day. During the first visit, height, weight and circumferences will be measured. Body composition will be determined with a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan, to determine forearm composition and mass. Two-dimensional echocardiography (Hitachi Aloka Alpha 7 system, Tokyo, Japan) will be used to measure aortic root diameter, cardiac output, and stroke volume and end systolic volume at rest. In addition, clinical autonomic function tests (heart rate variability at rest and recovery after exercise, deep breathing, Valsalva maneuver, isometric exercise, active and passive orthostasis) will be evaluated during the first study visit.
Familiarization sessions. Parents/care givers are involved in order to provide a supportive environment for participants and to enhance the parent/caregiver understanding of the research. Prior to study initiation, photographs and video clips of the laboratory and study equipment will be provided to help the participants become comfortable with the laboratory environment and equipment, and the informed consent information is sent to the participants and their parents/care-givers for their review. Familiarization for the participants with Down syndrome will be divided in two parts: they will practice and become accustomed with the treadmill and the equipment for the graded maximal exercise test (first visit), and they will practice and become accustomed with the procedures for the hand grip exercise protocol and the lower body negative pressure chamber (LBNP) (second visit).
Descriptions data collection visits (for both pre and post intervention):
During the first data collections visit, after discussing the study and potential questions, participants (and/or parents/caregivers for the group with Down syndrome) will complete a health history questionnaire and physical activity questionnaire to confirm eligibility. For women of childbearing age, the first visit will include a urine pregnancy test using a test stick. Females will be studied during the first 3-5 days of menses or during the placebo phase if taking oral contraceptives, in order to control for hormonal variation. Eligible participants with Down syndrome and their parent/care-giver will then provide written informed consent, or give verbal assent (for individuals with Down syndrome), and the eligible control participants will provide informed consent themselves. For participants with Down syndrome, the first visit continues with baseline measures and familiarization with the graded maximal exercise test protocol. If necessary, additional familiarization sessions will be scheduled for people with Down syndrome. The second visit, the participant performs the graded maximal exercise test and familiarize the participant with the procedures for the third visit: the hand grip exercise protocol and the LBNP. Gait, balance and foot posture will also be measured. The third visit peripheral blood flow will be assessed during the hand grip exercise protocol without and with the LBNP. For control subjects, the first and second visit are combined. Their second visit is the same as the third visit for individuals with Down syndrome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This intervention study will be set up as a randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of a 12-weeks exercise program to 12-weeks of non-exercise usual care in participants with Down syndrome.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Combined exercise intervention Down syndrome | Experimental | Behavioral: Combined exercise interventionThe exercise intervention will last 12 weeks and will consist of a supervised combined aerobic and resistance training program with a frequency of 3 days/week.In the exercise sessions, the participant will work with the trainer on their strength, balance and aerobic endurance. Each session consists of 10 min of strength exercises (Foundational Exercise), 10 min of Hip Strengthening, 10 min of Vestibular and Balance Exercise, and 20 min of Aerobic Exercise, and starts with a warming up and ends with stretching/cooling down. Each new exercise will be introduced in easy steps and practiced until the participant is comfortable executing it. |
| Usual care Down Syndrome | Sham comparator | Behavioral: Usual care / Sham interventionThe control condition consists of usual activities. |
| Reference group without Down syndrome | No intervention | –This reference group of age- and sex-matched inactive individuals without Down syndrome will undergo the same baseline testing as the other groups but without intervention or post-intervention measures. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- generally healthy
- sedentary (defined as being involved in less than 30 minutes of moderately-intense physical activity per day)
- additionally for the participants with Down syndrome:
- diagnosis of Down syndrome trisomy 21 and
- normal thyroid function or stable thyroid function (and medications) for at least 6 mo.
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- congenital heart disease;
- atherosclerotic or other vascular disease;
- asthma or other pulmonary disease;
- hypertension (defined BP >140/90 mmHg);
- blood pressure below 90/60 mmHg;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Combined exercise interventionThe exercise intervention will last 12 weeks and will consist of a supervised combined aerobic and resistance training program with a frequency of 3 days/week. Aerobic exercise will be part of all three sessions, with resistance exercise during two out of three sessions. Training sessions will be supervised by personal trainers to ensure the safe use of the equipment and the correct form when performing each exercise. The first 3 weeks of the intervention will be familiarization with the exercises and the program. After a warm-up, the participant will perform 30 min of aerobic exercise at a heart rate of 65% of the participant's maximum heart rate [43], which increases to 65-85% during weeks 4-12 of the intervention. The resistance exercise part will include all major muscle groups, both upper and lower body. | Behavioural | Combined exercise intervention Down syndrome |
| Usual care / Sham interventionThe control condition consists of usual activities. | Behavioural | Usual care Down Syndrome |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline Work Capacity at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change in work capacity from baseline to 13 weeks, as measured by peak oxygen uptake in ml/kg/min with a graded exercise test on a treadmill.
13 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline Brachial Blood Flow at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Muscle Oxygenation at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Cardiac Output (Aortic Blood Flow) at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Autonomic Cardiac Function at Rest at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Autonomic Cardiac Function During Orthostasis at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline IL-6 at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline HDL at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Superoxide Dismutase at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Comfortable Walking Speed at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Fast Walking Speed at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Functional Reach at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Timed Up and Go at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Change From Baseline Standing Balance at 13 Weeks
Time frame: 13 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. De-identified IPD will be made available to other researchers upon request.
Related trials for Down Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Oral Switch in Bloodstream Infections in Immunocompromised Children
Bloodstream Infection, Bloodstream Infection Due to Central Venous Catheter
Not yet recruiting
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) to Slow Biological Aging
Aging, Healthy, Aging and Cognitive Health
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Blinatumomab in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia
B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, B Lymphoblastic Lymphoma
Not yet recruiting
Executive Function Play Opportunities for Children With Down Syndrome
Down Syndrome, Trisomy 21
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Dysregulation and Aging of the Immune System in People With Trisomy 21 With and Without Thymectomy
Down Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thessa Hilgenkamp, PhD principal investigator
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Combined exercise intervention in people with Down Syndrome, run by University of Nevada, Las Vegas at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Feb 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline Work Capacity at 13 Weeks (time frame: 13 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2026.