Genetic TestingNCT04856696
Clinical Application of Non-invasive PGT-A
A study testing PGT-A and non-invasive PGT-A in people with Genetic Testing, run by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
The study aims to investigate the difference of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 44 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Genetic Testing
- What is being tested?
- PGT-A and non-invasive PGT-A
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 24 Mar 2021to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 44 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Infertile women who undergo IVF with PGT
- BMI:18~30 kg/m2
Who cannot join
- Primary ovarian insufficiency
- Congenital uterine anomaly
- Severe male infertility (azoospermia)
- One of the couples with chromosome abnormality
- Malignancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Clinical Application of Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies
The study aims to investigate the difference of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A.
Read the detailed description
Background Chromosome abnormality is a leading cause of implantation failure and miscarriage. Chromosome abnormality increases with age, resulting in reduced pregnancy rate. Nowadays, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) could be used for detection of aneuploidy. However, PGT-A needs embryo biopsy which is invasive and may cause embryo damage. It was found that cell free DNA could be isolated from culture media. The cell free DNA from culture media also could be used to detect embryo ploidy, called non-invasive PGT-A.
Objective The study aims to investigate the difference of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A. Another aim of this study is to check the concordance rate between non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A.
Methods The prospective cohort study will be performed at the reproductive medical center of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Participants who plan to receive an IVF cycle and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies will be enrolled in this study. The investigators will divide the participants into 3 groups: (1) combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A; (2) PGT-A; (3) non-invasive PGT-A. Basal characteristics, infertility history, ovarian reserve and embryo development of the three groups will be recorded. The samples will be detected ploidy by using next generation sequencing (NGS). Then, the investigators will choose embryo to transfer according to the embryo ploidy and follow the pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer.
Outcome
- Concordance rate between non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A
- The relationship between morphological grade and ploidy of non-invasive PGT-A
- IVF outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A
- Conditions
- Genetic Testing
- Being tested
- PGT-A, non-invasive PGT-A
- Keywords
- PGT, PGT-A, non-invasive PGT-A, embryo biopsy, spent media, cell free DNA
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PGT-ADiagnostic test
trophectoderm biopsy in blastocyst stage for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
non-invasive PGT-ADiagnostic test
cell-free DNA collected from spent culture media for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| combined non-invasive PGT-A & PGT-A | Experimental | Infertility women who underwent both non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A Receives: Diagnostic Test: PGT-A; Diagnostic Test: non-invasive PGT-A |
| non-invasive PGT-A | Experimental | Infertility women who underwent non-invasive PGT-A only Receives: Diagnostic Test: non-invasive PGT-A |
| PGT-A | Active comparator | Infertility women who underwent PGT-A only Receives: Diagnostic Test: PGT-A |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Ongoing pregnancy rate
continuous presence of a fetal heartbeat over 12 weeks of a pregnancy
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Clinical pregnancy rate
the presence of a fetal heartbeat at 6-7 weeks of a pregnancy
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Miscarriage rate
pregnancy loss before 24 weeks of gestation
Measured: through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2021
- Study start24 Mar 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023
- Study completion31 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Genetic TestingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sofiva Genomics Co., Ltd.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Li-Te Lin, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
- Investigators
- Kuan-Hao Tsui, Study director, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04856696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KSVGH20-CT12-16
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 2 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fesahat F, Montazeri F, Hoseini SM. Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction technology. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 May;49(5):101723. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101723. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
PubMed 32113002Sciorio R, Dattilo M. PGT-A preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and embryo selection in routine ART cycles: Time to step back? Clin Genet. 2020 Aug;98(2):107-115. doi: 10.1111/cge.13732. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
PubMed 32141057Homer HA. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): The biology, the technology and the clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):317-324. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12960. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
PubMed 30811595Fragouli E, Munne S, Wells D. The cytogenetic constitution of human blastocysts: insights from comprehensive chromosome screening strategies. Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):15-33. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy036.
PubMed 30395265Sullivan-Pyke C, Dokras A. Preimplantation Genetic Screening and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;45(1):113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.10.009.
PubMed 29428279Rubio C, Navarro-Sanchez L, Garcia-Pascual CM, Ocali O, Cimadomo D, Venier W, Barroso G, Kopcow L, Bahceci M, Kulmann MIR, Lopez L, De la Fuente E, Navarro R, Valbuena D, Sakkas D, Rienzi L, Simon C. Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryonic cell-free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1301 human blastocysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):751.e1-751.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.035. Epub 2020 May 26.
PubMed 32470458Rubio C, Rienzi L, Navarro-Sanchez L, Cimadomo D, Garcia-Pascual CM, Albricci L, Soscia D, Valbuena D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi F, Simon C. Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertil Steril. 2019 Sep;112(3):510-519. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
PubMed 31200971Leaver M, Wells D. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics? Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):16-42. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz033.
PubMed 31774124Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Abramov R, Antes R, Ibarrientos Z, Motamedi G, Zaman A, Kuznyetsova I, Librach CL. Minimally Invasive Cell-Free Human Embryo Aneuploidy Testing (miPGT-A) Utilizing Combined Spent Embryo Culture Medium and Blastocoel Fluid -Towards Development of a Clinical Assay. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 29;10(1):7244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64335-3.
PubMed 32350403Liang B, Gao Y, Xu J, Song Y, Xuan L, Shi T, Wang N, Hou Z, Zhao YL, Huang WE, Chen ZJ. Raman profiling of embryo culture medium to identify aneuploid and euploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):753-762.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.036. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
PubMed 30683589Jiao J, Shi B, Sagnelli M, Yang D, Yao Y, Li W, Shao L, Lu S, Li D, Wang X. Minimally invasive preimplantation genetic testing using blastocyst culture medium. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1369-1379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez075.
PubMed 31251795Huang L, Bogale B, Tang Y, Lu S, Xie XS, Racowsky C. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):14105-14112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907472116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
PubMed 31235575Fang R, Yang W, Zhao X, Xiong F, Guo C, Xiao J, Chen L, Song X, Wang H, Chen J, Xiao X, Yao B, Cai LY. Chromosome screening using culture medium of embryos fertilised in vitro: a pilot clinical study. J Transl Med. 2019 Mar 8;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1827-1.
PubMed 30849973Vera-Rodriguez M, Diez-Juan A, Jimenez-Almazan J, Martinez S, Navarro R, Peinado V, Mercader A, Meseguer M, Blesa D, Moreno I, Valbuena D, Rubio C, Simon C. Origin and composition of cell-free DNA in spent medium from human embryo culture during preimplantation development. Hum Reprod. 2018 Apr 1;33(4):745-756. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey028.
PubMed 29471395Belandres D, Shamonki M, Arrach N. Current status of spent embryo media research for preimplantation genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 May;36(5):819-826. doi: 10.1007/s10815-019-01437-6. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
PubMed 30895497
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Application of Non-invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04856696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KSVGH20-CT12-16
- Conditions
- Genetic Testing
- Keywords
- PGT, PGT-A, non-invasive PGT-A, embryo biopsy, spent media, cell free DNA
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sofiva Genomics Co., Ltd.
- Study start
- 24 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study aims to investigate the difference of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A.
Detailed description
Background Chromosome abnormality is a leading cause of implantation failure and miscarriage. Chromosome abnormality increases with age, resulting in reduced pregnancy rate. Nowadays, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) could be used for detection of aneuploidy. However, PGT-A needs embryo biopsy which is invasive and may cause embryo damage. It was found that cell free DNA could be isolated from culture media. The cell free DNA from culture media also could be used to detect embryo ploidy, called non-invasive PGT-A.
Objective The study aims to investigate the difference of in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A. Another aim of this study is to check the concordance rate between non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A.
Methods The prospective cohort study will be performed at the reproductive medical center of Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, in Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Participants who plan to receive an IVF cycle and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies will be enrolled in this study. The investigators will divide the participants into 3 groups: (1) combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A; (2) PGT-A; (3) non-invasive PGT-A. Basal characteristics, infertility history, ovarian reserve and embryo development of the three groups will be recorded. The samples will be detected ploidy by using next generation sequencing (NGS). Then, the investigators will choose embryo to transfer according to the embryo ploidy and follow the pregnancy outcomes after embryo transfer.
Outcome
- Concordance rate between non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A
- The relationship between morphological grade and ploidy of non-invasive PGT-A
- IVF outcomes among non-invasive PGT-A, PGT-A and combined non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| combined non-invasive PGT-A & PGT-A | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: PGT-A, Diagnostic Test: non-invasive PGT-AInfertility women who underwent both non-invasive PGT-A and PGT-A |
| non-invasive PGT-A | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: non-invasive PGT-AInfertility women who underwent non-invasive PGT-A only |
| PGT-A | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: PGT-AInfertility women who underwent PGT-A only |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 44 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Infertile women who undergo IVF with PGT
- BMI:18~30 kg/m2
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Primary ovarian insufficiency
- Congenital uterine anomaly
- Severe male infertility (azoospermia)
- One of the couples with chromosome abnormality
- Malignancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PGT-Atrophectoderm biopsy in blastocyst stage for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform | Diagnostic test | PGT-A, combined non-invasive PGT-A & PGT-A |
| non-invasive PGT-Acell-free DNA collected from spent culture media for euploidy testing using next generation sequencing platform | Diagnostic test | combined non-invasive PGT-A & PGT-A, non-invasive PGT-A |
Primary outcome
Ongoing pregnancy rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
continuous presence of a fetal heartbeat over 12 weeks of a pregnancy
2 secondary outcomes
Clinical pregnancy rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Miscarriage rate
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1.5 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 32113002Fesahat F, Montazeri F, Hoseini SM. Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction technology. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2020 May;49(5):101723. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101723. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
- Background: PubMed 32141057Sciorio R, Dattilo M. PGT-A preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and embryo selection in routine ART cycles: Time to step back? Clin Genet. 2020 Aug;98(2):107-115. doi: 10.1111/cge.13732. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
- Background: PubMed 30811595Homer HA. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): The biology, the technology and the clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):317-324. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12960. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
- Background: PubMed 30395265Fragouli E, Munne S, Wells D. The cytogenetic constitution of human blastocysts: insights from comprehensive chromosome screening strategies. Hum Reprod Update. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):15-33. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy036.
- Background: PubMed 29428279Sullivan-Pyke C, Dokras A. Preimplantation Genetic Screening and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;45(1):113-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.10.009.
- Background: PubMed 32470458Rubio C, Navarro-Sanchez L, Garcia-Pascual CM, Ocali O, Cimadomo D, Venier W, Barroso G, Kopcow L, Bahceci M, Kulmann MIR, Lopez L, De la Fuente E, Navarro R, Valbuena D, Sakkas D, Rienzi L, Simon C. Multicenter prospective study of concordance between embryonic cell-free DNA and trophectoderm biopsies from 1301 human blastocysts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Nov;223(5):751.e1-751.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.035. Epub 2020 May 26.
- Background: PubMed 31200971Rubio C, Rienzi L, Navarro-Sanchez L, Cimadomo D, Garcia-Pascual CM, Albricci L, Soscia D, Valbuena D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi F, Simon C. Embryonic cell-free DNA versus trophectoderm biopsy for aneuploidy testing: concordance rate and clinical implications. Fertil Steril. 2019 Sep;112(3):510-519. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.04.038. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
- Background: PubMed 31774124Leaver M, Wells D. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics? Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Jan 1;26(1):16-42. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz033.
- Background: PubMed 32350403Kuznyetsov V, Madjunkova S, Abramov R, Antes R, Ibarrientos Z, Motamedi G, Zaman A, Kuznyetsova I, Librach CL. Minimally Invasive Cell-Free Human Embryo Aneuploidy Testing (miPGT-A) Utilizing Combined Spent Embryo Culture Medium and Blastocoel Fluid -Towards Development of a Clinical Assay. Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 29;10(1):7244. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64335-3.
- Background: PubMed 30683589Liang B, Gao Y, Xu J, Song Y, Xuan L, Shi T, Wang N, Hou Z, Zhao YL, Huang WE, Chen ZJ. Raman profiling of embryo culture medium to identify aneuploid and euploid embryos. Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):753-762.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.11.036. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
- Background: PubMed 31251795Jiao J, Shi B, Sagnelli M, Yang D, Yao Y, Li W, Shao L, Lu S, Li D, Wang X. Minimally invasive preimplantation genetic testing using blastocyst culture medium. Hum Reprod. 2019 Jul 8;34(7):1369-1379. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez075.
- Background: PubMed 31235575Huang L, Bogale B, Tang Y, Lu S, Xie XS, Racowsky C. Noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in spent medium may be more reliable than trophectoderm biopsy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):14105-14112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907472116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Genetic Testing
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
RecruitingObservational study
Genetic Analysis of Uncommon Disease Presentations in Non-US Populations
Undiagnosed Diseases, Rare Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing GDC-0032 (Taselisib) as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With PIK3CA Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol I)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Active, not recruiting
Efficacy of Stabilometric Platform to Improve Standing Balance in Patients With Friedreich's Ataxia
Friedreich Ataxia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing MLN0128 (TAK-228) as Potentially Targeted Treatment in Cancers With TSC1 or TSC2 Genetic Changes (MATCH - Subprotocol M)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kuan-Hao Tsui study director
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PGT-A and non-invasive PGT-A in people with Genetic Testing, run by Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Ongoing pregnancy rate (time frame: through study completion, an average of 1.5 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04856696, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2024.