AzTrials
AzTrials

Steatohepatitis, NonalcoholicNCT04861012

Screening for Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) at Al-Rajhy Hospital Nutrition Clinic. Assiut, Egypt

A study testing Ultrasound in people with Steatohepatitis, Nonalcoholic, run by Assiut University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Primary outcome Screen for MAFLD among patients attending to the Nutrition clinic in Al Rajhi hospital. Secondary outcome Determining the degrees of fibrosis and steatosis in patients with MAFLD Determining the rate of obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia in patients with MAFLD. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Steatohepatitis, Nonalcoholic
What is being tested?
Ultrasound
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
360 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Sep 2021to Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: 18-80 years

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant females.
  • Patients who will refuse to participate in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Yusuf Amry, Resident contact

00201068160066

yusufamry@rocketmail.com

Magda Hassan, Professor contact

00201066900939

Magda_sh@yahoo.com

About this study

Official title: Screening for Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD) at Al-Rajhy Hospital Nutrition Clinic

Primary outcome Screen for MAFLD among patients attending to the Nutrition clinic in Al Rajhi hospital.

Secondary outcome

  • Determining the degrees of fibrosis and steatosis in patients with MAFLD
  • Determining the rate of obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia in patients with MAFLD.
  • Determining the rate of patients with other associated chronic liver disease (CLD).
Read the detailed description

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) formly called non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was defined as the presence of macrovesicular steatosis in ≥5% of hepatocytes in individuals who consume little or no alcohol. NAFLD was divided into two major subtypes: nonalcoholic fatty liver, and Non alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH).

It is now believed that MAFLD is due to state of systemic metabolic dysfunction and is perceived as standalone disease that warrants positive diagnosis rather than simply a disease of exclusion. MAFLD affects about quarter of the world's population and it is now considered a public health issue.

Real time ultrasound (US) scanning is accepted as the first line imaging investigation in patients with suspected liver disorders. In spite insufficient sensitivity to detect liver inflammation and fibrosis, it demonstrates a good correlation with histological finding of fatty infiltration.

Another tool used for detection of fatty liver is fatty liver index (FLI) which is an algorithm based on waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), triglyceride, and gamma-glutamyl-transferase (GGT). A FLI < 30 (negative likelihood ratio = 0.2) rules out and a FLI ≥ 60 (positive likelihood ratio = 4.3) rules in fatty liver. FLI had an accuracy of 0.84 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.87) in detecting fatty liver.

Haung X, et al, 2015 found that FLI achieves a high sensitivity of 79.89% and a specificity of 71.51% for diagnosis of NAFLD.

TE (transient elastography) is a non-invasive ultrasound-based method that uses shear wave velocity to assess tissue (e.g., liver) stiffness. It has been applied in medical practice under the name FibroScan®.

Based on the physical characteristics (velocity and intensity attenuation) of the shear wave, the acquired data in the examination are processed and displayed on the screen as the liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and controlled attenuation parameter (CAP).

LSM values range from 1.5 to 75 kPa; lower values indicate a more elastic liver. CAP values range from 100 to 400 dB/m, and higher numbers indicate more pronounced steatosis.

A meta-analysis in 2014 has indicated that TE is excellent in diagnosing F ≥ 3 (85% sensitivity, 82% specificity) and F4 (92% sensitivity, 92% specificity), and it has a moderate accuracy for F ≥ 2 in NAFLD patients.

According to various studies, compared to liver biopsy, CAP is useful in the detection of S ≥ 1, S ≥ 2, and S3 (where S0 indicates no steatosis, to S3, which indicates the highest level of steatosis steatosis) because of its good sensitivity and specificity; however, the exact cut-off values remain to be defined.

Sample size estimation:

To assess the prevalence of MAFLD in, a prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Based on previous studies (24), the expected frequency of MAFLD in Egypt is 37%. For a two-sided 95% confidence interval for a single proportion using the large sample normal approximation that will extend 5 % from the expected proportion, a sample size of 360 participant will be recruited. The sample will be equally represented from urban and rural areas. Sample size estimation was performed by Epi Info statistical package (Dean A, 1990).

Dean A (1990). Epi Info, Version 5.01. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control; 1990.

Statistical methods Data management and analysis will be performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) vs. 25. Numerical data were summarized using means and standard deviations or medians, interquartile ranges and/or ranges, as appropriate. Categorical data were summarized as numbers and percentages. Estimates of the frequency of different grade of severity of NAFLD in the entire sample and will be done using the numbers and percentages. Numerical data were explored for normality using Kolmogrov-Smirnov test and Shapiro-Wilk test. The severity of fatty liver will be related to different serological risk factors of metabolic syndrome and diseases progression.

Chi square or Fisher's tests will be used to compare between the groups with respect to categorical data, as appropriate. Comparisons between two groups for normally distributed numeric variables will be done using the Student's t-test while for non-normally distributed numeric variables, comparisons will be done by Mann-Whitney test. Comparisons between more than 2 groups will be performed by the one analysis of variance (ANOVA) for normally distributed variables and Kruskal-Wallis for non-normally distributed variables, then followed by post hoc if needed. To measure the strength of association between the normally distributed numerical measurements, Pearson's correlation coefficients will be computed. Spearman's correlation coefficients will be calculated for non-normally distributed variables. All tests are two-sided. P-values < 0.05 is considered significant.

Being tested
Ultrasound
Keywords
MAFLD
Medical subject headings
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • UltrasoundDevice

    Also called Fibroscan

    All subjects initially will be subjected to abdominal ultrasound, and if fatty liver is detected fibroscan will be done

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Screen for MAFLD among patients attending to the Nutrition clinic in Al Rajhi hospital

    Screening will be done according to new criteria set by Eslam M, et al, 2020, Patients with detected fatty liver by ultrasound will undergo an evaluation for the BMI and fasting and post prandial blood glucose levels. Patients with with BMI >25 kg/m2 or type two diabetes mellitus (DM) will be diagnosed to have MAFLD. Patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 and normal sugar curve will be subjected to tests to detect metabolic abnormalities with the presence of at least two metabolic risk abnormalities, the subject will be diagnosed as MAFLD.

    Eventually the percentage of patients diagnosed as MAFLD will be calculated among this random sample

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. determining the number of patients diagnosed as MAFLD and degree of fibrosis and steatosis in each one.

    Fibro scan with CAP to all patients meeting criteria of MAFLD

    Measured: baseline

  2. Determining the rate of patients with other associated chronic liver disease(CLD)

    Hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody, hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface antigen will be done for all participants and history of any CLD

    Measured: baseline

  3. Determining the rate of obesity, DM, HTN, hyperlipidemia in patients with MAFLD

    .Through history, clinical examination and lab tests.

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2021
  2. Study startSep 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
360 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04861012
Sponsor's protocol ID
MAFLD Assiut
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
20 Apr 2021
Last updated
27 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, Feldstein A, Angulo P. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005 Jul;129(1):113-21. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.014.

    PubMed 16012941
  • Matteoni CA, Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Boparai N, Liu YC, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a spectrum of clinical and pathological severity. Gastroenterology. 1999 Jun;116(6):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(99)70506-8.

    PubMed 10348825
  • Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, Anstee QM, Targher G, Romero-Gomez M, Zelber-Sagi S, Wai-Sun Wong V, Dufour JF, Schattenberg JM, Kawaguchi T, Arrese M, Valenti L, Shiha G, Tiribelli C, Yki-Jarvinen H, Fan JG, Gronbaek H, Yilmaz Y, Cortez-Pinto H, Oliveira CP, Bedossa P, Adams LA, Zheng MH, Fouad Y, Chan WK, Mendez-Sanchez N, Ahn SH, Castera L, Bugianesi E, Ratziu V, George J. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: An international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020 Jul;73(1):202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.03.039. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

    PubMed 32278004
  • Younossi Z, Anstee QM, Marietti M, Hardy T, Henry L, Eslam M, George J, Bugianesi E. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan;15(1):11-20. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109. Epub 2017 Sep 20.

    PubMed 28930295
  • Sarin SK, Kumar M, Eslam M, George J, Al Mahtab M, Akbar SMF, Jia J, Tian Q, Aggarwal R, Muljono DH, Omata M, Ooka Y, Han KH, Lee HW, Jafri W, Butt AS, Chong CH, Lim SG, Pwu RF, Chen DS. Liver diseases in the Asia-Pacific region: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;5(2):167-228. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30342-5. Epub 2019 Dec 15.

    PubMed 31852635
  • Hegazy M, Abo-Elfadl S, Mostafa A, Ibrahim M, Rashed L, Salman A. Serum Resistin Level and Its Receptor Gene Expression in Liver Biopsy as Predictors for the Severity of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol. 2014 Jul-Dec;4(2):59-62. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1102i. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

    PubMed 29699348
  • Bedogni G, Bellentani S, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Passalacqua M, Castiglione A, Tiribelli C. The Fatty Liver Index: a simple and accurate predictor of hepatic steatosis in the general population. BMC Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov 2;6:33. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-6-33.

    PubMed 17081293
  • Huang X, Xu M, Chen Y, Peng K, Huang Y, Wang P, Ding L, Lin L, Xu Y, Chen Y, Lu J, Wang W, Bi Y, Ning G. Validation of the Fatty Liver Index for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Middle-Aged and Elderly Chinese. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(40):e1682. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001682.

    PubMed 26448014
  • Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, Christidis C, Ziol M, Poulet B, Kazemi F, Beaugrand M, Palau R. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Dec;29(12):1705-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.07.001.

    PubMed 14698338
  • Castera L, Forns X, Alberti A. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography. J Hepatol. 2008 May;48(5):835-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 26.

    PubMed 18334275
  • Afdhal NH. Fibroscan (transient elastography) for the measurement of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2012 Sep;8(9):605-7. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23483859
  • Sandrin L, Tanter M, Gennisson JL, Catheline S, Fink M. Shear elasticity probe for soft tissues with 1-D transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002 Apr;49(4):436-46. doi: 10.1109/58.996561.

    PubMed 11989699
  • Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, Fink M, Tanter M. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013 May;94(5):487-95. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2013.01.022. Epub 2013 Apr 22.

    PubMed 23619292
  • Sasso M, Miette V, Sandrin L, Beaugrand M. The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a novel tool for the non-invasive evaluation of steatosis using Fibroscan. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012 Feb;36(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 15.

    PubMed 21920839
  • Kwok R, Tse YK, Wong GL, Ha Y, Lee AU, Ngu MC, Chan HL, Wong VW. Systematic review with meta-analysis: non-invasive assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease--the role of transient elastography and plasma cytokeratin-18 fragments. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Feb;39(3):254-69. doi: 10.1111/apt.12569. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

    PubMed 24308774

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound in people with Steatohepatitis, Nonalcoholic, run by Assiut University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yusuf Amry, Resident (00201068160066, yusufamry@rocketmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Screen for MAFLD among patients attending to the Nutrition clinic in Al Rajhi hospital (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04861012, which also lists 23 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in