AzTrials
AzTrials

Obstetrical Perineal Injury and Anal IncontinencePAPOASINCT04862299

Pelvic-perineal Disorders in Women With Sphincter Tears

An observational study of Obstetrical Perineal Injury and Anal Incontinence, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

According to INSEE, in 2016, in France, there were 785,000 births. According to the latest national perinatal survey in 2016, 80.4% of women gave birth by vaginal delivery. Of these, 52.1% had perineal tears and 0.8% had 3rd and 4th degree tears. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
How many people
86 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
15 Apr 2021to 26 Apr 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patient whose age is ≥ 18 years, with an obstetric anal sphincter injury diagnosed in the delivery room, referred for a pre-rehabilitation perineal assessment between June 2016 and February 2021

Who may be able to join

  • Patient whose age is ≥ 18 years
  • Patient with an obstetric anal sphincter injury diagnosed in the delivery room
  • Patients referred for a pre-rehabilitation perineal assessment between June 2016 and February 2021
  • French-speaking patient

Who cannot join

  • Patient with occult obstetric anal sphincter injury
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under court protection
  • Patient objecting to the use of her data for this research

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph

    Paris, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, 75014

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Pelvic-perineal Disorders in Women With Sphincter Tears, a Retrospective Study

According to INSEE, in 2016, in France, there were 785,000 births. According to the latest national perinatal survey in 2016, 80.4% of women gave birth by vaginal delivery. Of these, 52.1% had perineal tears and 0.8% had 3rd and 4th degree tears. Of these 3rd and 4th degree tears, 2.2% occurred during instrumental delivery and 0.5% during spontaneous delivery. In recent years, there has been an increase in the prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Mc Pherson et al. found a prevalence of LOSA (Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury) of 2% in 2004 versus 4.6% in 2008. Gurol-Urganci et al. also found an increase in prevalence from 1.8% in 2000 to 5.9% in 2012. This increase is probably due to improved diagnosis by obstetrical teams. Indeed, a large number of LOSAs remained undiagnosed at birth and these occult lesions were subsequently found by endoanal ultrasound. In the Andrews et al. study, when women were reexamined, the prevalence of LOSA increased from 11% to 24.5%. As practitioner training improved, the prevalence of LOSA at birth became increasingly accurate. Obstetric anal sphincter injuries are responsible for significant physical and psychological morbidity. These obstetrical lesions of the anal sphincter can generate functional consequences (including anal incontinence in the first rank), which will have harmful effects on the quality of life of the women, they can involve a social isolation passing by the limitation of displacements and physical and social activities. The daily life of these women can remain impacted by the consequences of LOSA until more than 10 years after delivery. In addition, a loss of self-esteem as well as feelings of guilt, shame and frustration are reported in these women. Thus, some will speak of a LOSA syndrome, which includes emotional, social and psychological consequences, including the ability to assume one's role as a mother. LOSA are perineal tears corresponding to the 3rd and 4th degree, formerly and respectively called complete perineum and complicated complete perineum. The Sultan classification for perineal tears proposed in 1999 was adopted by the Royal College of Obstretricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) and is the most widely used in the scientific literature worldwide. It defines the 3rd degree as a perineal injury involving the anal sphincter complex alone.

Anal continence is a balance between several factors such as rectal sensitivity, stool quality, the smooth and striated muscles of the anal sphincter, the pubo-rectal muscle webbing and the innervation of these structures. Obstetrical trauma of the stretching and compression type affects all these structures. All of these lesions can contribute to the development of anal incontinence. However, these structures are not routinely evaluated in women who have had an obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Read more

Pelvic-perineal pain was studied in 2 studies and involved 24.7% to 35% of women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Compared to women without LOSA, women with LOSA had a later return to sexual intercourse, with more severe anal incontinence during the first week after LOSA. Indeed, at 12 weeks postpartum, the rate of women who resumed sexual intercourse was lower in the group of women with LOSA than in the group without LOSA.

The pelvic-perineal disorders faced by women with LOSA affect their quality of life, their sexuality, and their health. Thus, early identification of all pelvic-perineal disorders appears to be a priority in this population.

Medical subject headings
Encopresis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Clinical pictures of pelvic-perineal disorders in women

    This outcome corresponds to the symptoms presented by the patient (Urinary Symptoms scores: Urinary Symptom Profil Score (USP, It consists of 13 items that assess stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence, and obstructive symptoms.), anal incontinence: St Marks Score, St Mark's Incontinence score for assessment of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), Score 0-4: minimal, score 5-12: moderate, 13-19: severe, >20: major).

    Measured: Year 1

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Prevalence of these lesions

    This outcome corresponds to the number of sphincter injuries found in the delivery room.

    Measured: Year 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Apr 2021
  2. Study start15 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion15 May 2021
  4. Study completion26 Apr 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
86 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04862299
Sponsor's protocol ID
PAPOASI
Acronym
PAPOASI
Status last verified
Apr 2023
First submitted
15 Apr 2021
Last updated
27 Apr 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • McPherson KC, Beggs AD, Sultan AH, Thakar R. Can the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) be predicted using a risk-scoring system? BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jul 24;7:471. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-471.

    PubMed 25056485
  • Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC, Mahmood TA, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Third- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factors. BJOG. 2013 Nov;120(12):1516-25. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12363. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

    PubMed 23834484
  • Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Occult anal sphincter injuries--myth or reality? BJOG. 2006 Feb;113(2):195-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00799.x.

    PubMed 16411998
  • Cornell K, De Souza A, Tacey M, Long DM, Veerasingham M. The effect of implementing a new guideline and operative pro forma on the detection and management of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears. Int J Womens Health. 2016 May 5;8:131-5. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S101188. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27226734

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Obstetrical Perineal Injury and Anal Incontinence, run by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Clinical pictures of pelvic-perineal disorders in women (time frame: Year 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04862299, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in