Nociceptive PainNCT04864340
Clinical Trial Using Pupillometry to Measure Nociception in Healthy Volunteers.
A study testing CE marked medical device, Algometer and Comparator in people with Nociceptive Pain and Pupillary Light Reflex Lost, run by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
Pupillometry has been used in healthy volunteers to investigate the usefulness of the pupil light reflex as an indicator of pain intensity on pressure as a nociceptive stimulus. In this sense, it is necessary to check if the pupillometry is sensitive to different types or sources of pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Nociceptive Pain, Pupillary Light Reflex Lost, Healthy
- What is being tested?
- CE marked medical device, Algometer and Comparator
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 30 Apr 2021to May 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects of both sexes (balanced)
- Caucasian race
- Ages between 25 and 65 years old (balanced, 50% from 25-45 and 50% from 45-65)
- Body weight within the normal range (Quetelet index: 19-30)
- Clinical history, physical examination and vital signs within normality
- Free acceptance to participate, with written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Previous history of alcoholism or drug dependence (year prior to the screening visit or daily alcohol consumption> 40 gr / day for men or> 24 gr / day for women)
- Significant consumption of stimulating drinks (> 5 coffees, teas, chocolate or cola drinks / day).
- Taking any medication in the 15 days prior to the study and / or medicinal plants that may have an effect on the pupil (beta-blockers, droperidol, metoclopramide, clonidine ...). Oral contraceptives and paracetamol will be allowed.
- Pregnancy (β-hCG test).
- Menstruation and / or dysmenorrhea on the day of the study
- Family or personal history or clinical evidence of psychiatric, neurological or ophthalmological problems: anxiety, depression, Parkinson's, glaucoma, dry eyes, retinal diseases, eye surgery and pupil abnormalities, presenting migraine pathology and diabetes
Show all 9Show fewer
- Pupillary diameter ≥ 5mm
- Smokers or ex-smokers <6 months.
- Have participated in a clinical trial in the 3 months prior to the start of this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, 08041
Maria Rosa Ballester, PhD, mballesterv@santpau.cat
+34935537855
About this study
Official title: Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Pupillometry as an Objective Measurement of Nociception in Healthy Volunteers.
Pupillometry has been used in healthy volunteers to investigate the usefulness of the pupil light reflex as an indicator of pain intensity on pressure as a nociceptive stimulus. In this sense, it is necessary to check if the pupillometry is sensitive to different types or sources of pain. One of these devices is the Algiscan® portable pupillometer (IdMed, Marseille, France), which we propose to use in the present study. This pupillometer has previously been used in healthy volunteers, and in patients admitted to the intensive care unit, subjected to mechanical ventilation and sedation / analgesia.
This study in healthy volunteers aims to evaluate whether the PDR can be a reliable and discriminatory measure of the intensity of nociception, applying various types of nociceptive stimuli. If so, this study could lead to the use of pupillometry as an objective measure of nociception in settings where patients cannot communicate, such as intensive care areas or perioperative settings.
- Conditions
- Nociceptive Pain, Pupillary Light Reflex Lost, Healthy, Pain, Procedural, Gender, Anxiety
- Being tested
- CE marked medical device, Algometer, Comparator
- Medical subject headings
- Nociceptive Pain, Pain, Procedural, Coitus, Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CE marked medical deviceDevice
Tetanic stimulation
AlgometerDevice
Pressure stimulation
ComparatorProcedure or surgery
Non-nociceptive procedure (fine touch)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| threshold stimulation (tetanic) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: CE marked medical device |
| upper threshold stimulation (tetanic) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: CE marked medical device |
| threshold stimulation (pressure) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Algometer |
| upper threshold stimulation (pressure) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: Algometer |
| non nociceptive procedure (fine touch) | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Comparator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan®
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +10 minutes (with non-nociceptive procedure (fine touch))
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 20 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 30 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 40 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 50 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after pressure estimulation (by algometer Somedic®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to + 60 minutes after pressure estimulation
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after pressure estimulation (by algometer Somedic®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +70 minutes after pressure estimulation
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after pressure estimulation (by algometer Somedic®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +80 minutes after pressure estimulation
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after pressure estimulation (by algometer Somedic®)
Measured: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +90 minutes after pressure estimulation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Apr 2021
- Study start30 Apr 2021
- Primary completionMay 2021 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Nociceptive PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04864340
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IIBSP-PUP-2019-01
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 19 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Pupillometry as an Objective Measurement of Nociception in Healthy Volunteers.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04864340
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IIBSP-PUP-2019-01
- Conditions
- Nociceptive Pain, Pupillary Light Reflex Lost, Healthy, Pain, Procedural, Gender, Anxiety
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant PauUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 28 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pupillometry has been used in healthy volunteers to investigate the usefulness of the pupil light reflex as an indicator of pain intensity on pressure as a nociceptive stimulus. In this sense, it is necessary to check if the pupillometry is sensitive to different types or sources of pain. One of these devices is the Algiscan® portable pupillometer (IdMed, Marseille, France), which we propose to use in the present study. This pupillometer has previously been used in healthy volunteers, and in patients admitted to the intensive care unit, subjected to mechanical ventilation and sedation / analgesia.
This study in healthy volunteers aims to evaluate whether the PDR can be a reliable and discriminatory measure of the intensity of nociception, applying various types of nociceptive stimuli. If so, this study could lead to the use of pupillometry as an objective measure of nociception in settings where patients cannot communicate, such as intensive care areas or perioperative settings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| threshold stimulation (tetanic) | Experimental | Device: CE marked medical device |
| upper threshold stimulation (tetanic) | Experimental | Device: CE marked medical device |
| threshold stimulation (pressure) | Experimental | Device: Algometer |
| upper threshold stimulation (pressure) | Experimental | Device: Algometer |
| non nociceptive procedure (fine touch) | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Comparator |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects of both sexes (balanced)
- Caucasian race
- Ages between 25 and 65 years old (balanced, 50% from 25-45 and 50% from 45-65)
- Body weight within the normal range (Quetelet index: 19-30)
- Clinical history, physical examination and vital signs within normality
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Previous history of alcoholism or drug dependence (year prior to the screening visit or daily alcohol consumption> 40 gr / day for men or> 24 gr / day for women)
- Significant consumption of stimulating drinks (> 5 coffees, teas, chocolate or cola drinks / day).
- Taking any medication in the 15 days prior to the study and / or medicinal plants that may have an effect on the pupil (beta-blockers, droperidol, metoclopramide, clonidine ...). Oral contraceptives and paracetamol will be allowed.
- Pregnancy (β-hCG test).
- Menstruation and / or dysmenorrhea on the day of the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CE marked medical deviceTetanic stimulation | Device | threshold stimulation (tetanic), upper threshold stimulation (tetanic) |
| AlgometerPressure stimulation | Device | threshold stimulation (pressure), upper threshold stimulation (pressure) |
| ComparatorNon-nociceptive procedure (fine touch) | Procedure or surgery | non nociceptive procedure (fine touch) |
Primary outcome
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +10 minutes (with non-nociceptive procedure (fine touch))
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan®
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 20 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 30 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 40 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to 50 minutes after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
Measure of Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) in % obtained by AlgiScan® after tetanic stimulation (by Algiscan®)
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to + 60 minutes after pressure estimulation
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +70 minutes after pressure estimulation
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +80 minutes after pressure estimulation
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR)
Time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +90 minutes after pressure estimulation
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2021.
Related trials for Nociceptive Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Music During Walking on Pain and Muscle Activation in People With Chronic Pain Due to Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Consciousness Depth (qCON) and Analgesia Depth (qNOX) Indices in General Anesthesia
Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585), Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
Overlapping Pain Trajectory Study
Migraine, Musculoskeletal Pain
Not yet recruiting
TAP vs. ESP Blocks for Post-Cesarean Analgesia
Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CE marked medical device, Algometer and Comparator in people with Nociceptive Pain and Pupillary Light Reflex Lost, run by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) (time frame: Change in Pupillary Dilatation Reflex (PDR) from baseline to +10 minutes (with non-nociceptive procedure (fine touch))). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2021.