AzTrials
AzTrials

Inflammatory ResponseNCT04864600

CANDLE - A Study of Acute Health Effects of Exposure to Particles Generated by Candles

A study testing Candle C and Candle 1 in people with Inflammatory Response and Symptoms and Signs, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

INTRODUCTION: Particle contamination is suggested to have substantial negative effects on health, with candles emitting huge amount of particles, thus being one of the largest contributors to indoor air pollution. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years
Conditions the study is for
Inflammatory Response, Symptoms and Signs
What is being tested?
Candle C and Candle 1
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-25
  • Medically treated / physician diagnosed mild seasonal asthma GINA guidelines step 1 or 2 (https://ginasthma.org/)
  • Never smoker or ex-smoker ≥ 6 months
  • Allergy > 1 common allergy

Who cannot join

  • Any other disease that could influence the study parameters
  • Conditions that prevent safe access to the climate chambers (such as claustrophobia)
  • Perennial asthma
  • Need for continuous medical treatment for asthma
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Climate Chambers, Dept. Public Health, Aarhus University

    Aarhus, Central Region Denmark, 8000

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

INTRODUCTION: Particle contamination is suggested to have substantial negative effects on health, with candles emitting huge amount of particles, thus being one of the largest contributors to indoor air pollution. Chronic low levels of exposure to indoor particles over time is an important risk factor for the health of the population as a whole and it becomes particularly important for vulnerable groups like people suffering from respiratory diseases such as asthma.

AIM: In a randomized controlled cross-over trial the difference in health effects between two candles I) a standard candle and II) a low emission candle modified from the standard candle is studied.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION; Particle contamination is suggested to have substantial negative effects on health, with candles emitting the huge amount of particles, thus being one of the largest contributors to indoor air pollution. Chronic low levels of exposure to indoor particles over time is an important risk factor for the health of the population as a whole and it becomes particularly important for vulnerable groups like children and the elderly or people already suffering from allergies and respiratory diseases such as asthma.

AIM: To study the difference in health effects between two candles I) a standard candle and II) a low emission candle modified from the standard candle. The following hypothesis will be examined: Short-term exposure to particles generated by the standard candle is associated with more objectively measurable effects in metabolomics inflammation compared to exposure to modified low-emission candle particles.

METHODS: Separated by two weeks 20 young asthmatics will be exposed in a randomized cross-over double-blind study under controlled conditions in a climate chamber to three different exposures; A) a standard (Scandinavian) stearin candle, B) a modified low emitting version of the same candle, and C) clean air from the adjacent chamber. The experiment will be carried out in groups of 3-6 participants.

MEASUREMENTS: TSI P-TRAK Ultrafine Particle Counter and SMPS will be used for particle counts. Health effects, including spirometry and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) will be evaluated in relation to local and systemic effects prior to, right after and 24 h. after exposure.

ANALYSIS: Mixed methods approach taking both time and exposure into account.

Being tested
Candle C, Candle 1
Keywords
Stearin candle, Health effects, Inflammation, Asthmatics, Particle contamination, Indoor air, Pollutant
Medical subject headings
Signs and Symptoms, Inflammation, Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Candle COther

    Burning candles will produce particulate air pollution being passed on an exposure chamber where the participants will be sitting for 5 hours.

  • Candle 1Other

    Burning candles will produce particulate air pollution being passed on an exposure chamber where the participants will be sitting for 5 hours.

Study groups in NCT04864600
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard Stearin CandleActive comparatorSeveral candles will be lit. We will be using realistic burning cycles i.e. burning candles which extinguish and new ones being lit.
Receives: Other: Candle 1
Modified low emission candleExperimentalSeveral candles will be lit. We will be using realistic burning cycles i.e. burning candles which extinguish and new ones being lit.
Receives: Other: Candle C
Clean AirNo interventionNo candles in the chamber.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Particles in Exhaled Air (Surfactant Protein A & Albumin)

    PExA: Subjects performed repeated breath maneuvers allowing for airway closure and re-opening, and exhaled particles were optically counted and collected on a membrane using the PExA® instrument set-up

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Change in Lung Function (FEV1 & FVC)

    Spirometry

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  2. Change in Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO)

    NIOX VERO system; Aerocrine AB, Sweden

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  3. Change in white blood cells in Blood

    White blood cells

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  4. Change in Endothelial Progenitor Cells (EPCs) in Blood

    Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) further divided into early and late EPCs

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  5. Change in inflammatory markers in Blood

    Interleukin 8, interleukin 1

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  6. Change in biomarkers in Blood

    Metabolomics

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  7. Change in nasal volume (using Acoustic rhinometry)

    Acoustic rhinometry is used to assess the nasal cross sectional area and volume. The left and right nasal cavity were studied alternatively until three reproducible measurements were obtained. The minimum cross sectional cavity area is calculated from the means of the measurements. By integration of the area-distance curve, the sum of the volume 2 to 4 (vol2-4) from the nostril is determined on both sides.

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  8. Change in biomarkers in Saliva Sample

    An oral svap from Salivette was placed in the mouth of the participant to collect saliva by gently chewing the swab for one minute. Afterwards the saturated swab was removed to the suspended insert and closed firmly with a lid. Then the sample was transferred to a freezer and stored for -80 C until further analysis. The sample will be analyzed for biomarkers (amylase, cortisol, substance P, lysozyme and secretory IgA. (same unit measure))

    Measured: after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  9. ReCIVA

    Sampling of VOCs and particles in exhaled air. Breathing through a mask for 10-15 minutes makes it possible to collect VOCs and particles into tenax air sampling tubes.

    Measured: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)

  10. Change in Subjective Symptoms

    n the exposure chamber participants are asked to fill out a symptom questionnaire every 30 minute regarding their well-being and experienced symptoms in eyes, nose and throat. The participants are asked to score their evaluation / rate the strength of symptoms on a Linear Numeric Scale from 0-10, with 10 being worst. Health effects are evaluated in relation to rated changes in symptoms

    Measured: Every 30 minute during 5 hours of exposure

  11. Heart rate using a Fitbit

    Using a Fitbit watch participants' heart rate is measured.

    Measured: From exposure start until the morning after exposure (in total 24 hours)

  12. Sleep quality using a Fitbit

    Using a Fitbit watch participants' sleep quality is measured.

    Measured: during 48 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2021
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
A randomized cross-over double-blind study under controlled conditions in a climate chamber having three different exposures; A) a standard (Scandinavian) stearin candle, B) a modified low emitting version of the same candle, and C) clean air
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04864600
Sponsor's protocol ID
201100
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
4 Nov 2020
Last updated
29 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Candle C and Candle 1 in people with Inflammatory Response and Symptoms and Signs, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Particles in Exhaled Air (Surfactant Protein A & Albumin) (time frame: At baseline (0 hour), after exposure (5 hours), and the day after exposure (24 hours)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in