Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationPhase 3MylightNCT04864834
Phase III Study Assessing the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of SOK583A1 Versus Eylea® in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
A Phase 3 study testing SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL) and Eylea EU (40 mg/mL) in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Sandoz at 102 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
Purpose and rationale: To demonstrate similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of SOK583A1 and Eylea EU as per Eylea approved treatment regimen in patients with nAMD. The primary clinical question of interest is: Does SOK583A1 have similar efficacy as Eylea EU in terms of mean change in BCVA score in participants… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL) and Eylea EU (40 mg/mL)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 485 participants
- Where
- 102 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- 12 May 2021to 10 May 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Participants eligible for inclusion in this study must meet all of the following criteria:
- Signed informed consent must be obtained prior to participation in the study
- Participants must be 50 years of age or older at Screening
- Anti-VEGF treatment-naive patients for either eye and systemically
- Study eye diagnosed with active CNV lesions (type 1 and/ or type 2) secondary to AMD and/or Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation lesions (type 3), affecting the central subfield. Active CNV lesion is defined by the presence of leakage as evidenced by fluorescein angiography, and intra- or subretinal fluid as evidenced by optical coherence tomography, both confirmed by the CRC at Screening
- Total area of CNV (including both classic and occult components) must comprise > 50% of the total lesion area in the study eye, confirmed by the CRC at Screening
- BCVA between 73 and 38 letters, both inclusive, in the study eye at Screening and Baseline using ETDRS testing charts
- Willing and able to comply with all study procedures, and be likely to complete the study
- Clear ocular media and adequate pupil dilatation in both eyes to permit good quality photographic imaging.
Participants meeting any of the following criteria are not eligible for inclusion in this study.
Ocular conditions and treatments:
- Previous treatment with any anti-VEGF therapy in either eye or investigational drugs in study eye or fellow eye, at any time prior to Baseline
- Participant has received any approved treatment for nAMD (other than vitamin and dietary supplements) in the study eye and at any time prior to Baseline
- Presence of other causes of CNV, including pathologic myopia (spherical equivalent of -8 diopters or more negative), ocular histoplasmosis syndrome, angioid streaks,choroidal rupture, or multifocal choroiditis in the study eye, assessed by imaging at screening by CRC and appropriately stated in the multi-modal eligibility confirmation report
- Any active or suspected intraocular or periocular infection or suspected active intraocular inflammation (e.g infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, endophthalmitis, infectious blepharitis, uveitis) in either eye at Screening or Baseline
- Subfoveal fibrosis, atrophy, or scarring extending > 50% of total lesion area in the study eye as assessed by the Investigator at Screening and confirmed by the CRC prior to randomization
- Subretinal hemorrhage that is ≥ 50% of the total lesion area in the study eye, or if the subretinal hemorrhage involving the fovea is 1 or more disc areas (≥ 2.54 mm2 ) in size in the study eye, as assessed by Fluorescein Angiography (FA) and confirmed by the CRC
- Retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) rip/tear in the study eye at Screening or Baseline
- Current vitreous hemorrhage or history of vitreous hemorrhage in the study eye within 4 weeks prior to Baseline
- History or evidence of the following, in the study eye:
- Intraocular (including cataract surgery) or refractive surgery within the 90 day period prior to Baseline. The yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) posterior capsulotomy is allowed no later than 4 weeks prior to Baseline
- Previous penetrating keratoplasty or vitrectomy
- Previous panretinal photocoagulation
- Previous photodynamic therapy
- Previous submacular surgery or other surgical intervention for AMD
- Retinal detachment or treatment or surgery for retinal detachment
- Any history of macular hole of stage 2 and above
- Prior trabeculectomy or other filtration surgery
- Ocular trauma within the 6-months period prior to Baseline
- History of hypersensitivity to any of the study treatments or its excipients, or clinically relevant sensitivity to fluorescein dye, as assessed by the Investigators
- Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) > 25 mmHg on medication or according to Investigator's judgment at Screening or Baseline
- Aphakia and/or absence of the posterior capsule in the study eye at Screening or Baseline, unless it occurred as a result of a YAG posterior capsulotomy in association with prior posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation
- Intra or periocular use of corticosteroids in the study eye within a 6 month period prior to Baseline
- Use of topical ocular corticosteroids in the study eye for 30 or more consecutive days within the 90 days period prior to Baseline
- Previous therapeutic radiation near the region of the study eye
- Concomitant conditions or ocular disorders in the study eye, including media opacities, cataract and diabetic macular edema, at Screening or Baseline which could, in the opinion of the Investigator, prevent response to study treatment or may confound interpretation of study results (efficacy and safety), compromise visual acuity or require medical or surgical intervention during the course of the study
- Presence of amblyopia, amaurosis or ocular disorders with BCVA <38 letters (ETDRS testing charts) in the fellow eye at Screening (except when due to conditions whose surgery may improve VA, e.g. cataract)
- Presence of Scleromalacia in either eye
- Participants requiring anti-VEGF treatment of the fellow eye at Baseline will not be eligible for the PK substudy Systemic conditions and treatments:
- Previous systemic treatment with any anti-VEGF therapy
- Use of systemic corticosteroids for 30 or more consecutive days within the 90 days prior to Baseline, with the exception of low stable doses of corticosteroids (defined as ≤ 10 mg prednisolone or equivalent dose used for 90 days or more).
- Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as a systolic value ≥ 160 mmHg or diastolic value ≥ 100 mmHg at Screening
- Stroke or myocardial infarction during the 6-month period prior to Baseline
- Participation in an investigational systemic drug, biologic, or device study within 30 days or duration of 5 half-lives of the investigational product (whichever is longer) prior to Baseline. Note: observational clinical studies solely involving over-the-counter vitamins, supplements, or diets are not exclusionary
- Presence of infection at screening or active infection within 2 weeks before screening
- Underlying advanced, severe and uncontrolled concomitant condition (including, but not limited to metabolic, hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurologic, endocrine, cardiac, inflammatory, infectious or gastrointestinal), physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding which in the opinion of the Investigator place the participant at unacceptable risk from participation in the study
- History of a medical condition (including, but not limited to chronic disease immunosuppression, metabolic dysfunction, prior exposure to other drugs that may pose risk of infection or allergic reactions) that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude scheduled study visits, completion of the study, or a safe administration of investigational product, or that might affect participant safety or interpretation of the study results.
- Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women and women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, unless they are using highly effective methods of contraception while taking study treatment and for 3 months after stopping the medication. Highly effective contraception methods include:
- Total abstinence (when this is in line with the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant. Periodic abstinence (e.g. calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, post-ovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.
- Female sterilization (have had surgical bilateral oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy), total hysterectomy or tubal ligation at least six weeks before taking investigational drug. In case of oophorectomy alone, only when the reproductive status of the woman has been confirmed by follow up hormone level assessment.
- Male sterilization (at least 6 months prior to screening). For female participants on the study, the vasectomized male partner should be the sole partner for that participant.
- Use of oral (estrogen and progesterone), injected or implanted hormonal methods of contraception or other forms of hormonal contraception that have comparable efficacy (failure rate <1%), for example hormone vaginal ring or transdermal hormone contraception or placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) or intrauterine system (IUS).
Trial locations and contacts
102 sites in 16 countries.
102 sites in 16 countries
United States28 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Abilene, Texas, 79606
Sandoz Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87102
Sandoz Investigational Site
Arcadia, California, 91006
Sandoz Investigational Site
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Sandoz Investigational Site
Campbell, California, 95008
Sandoz Investigational Site
Encino, California, 91436
Sandoz Investigational Site
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
Sandoz Investigational Site
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912-7125
Sandoz Investigational Site
Fullerton, California, 92835
Sandoz Investigational Site
Glendale, California, 91203
Sandoz Investigational Site
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Sandoz Investigational Site
Hagerstown, Maryland, 21740
Sandoz Investigational Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
Sandoz Investigational Site
Liverpool, New York, 13088
Sandoz Investigational Site
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24502
Sandoz Investigational Site
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Sandoz Investigational Site
Oak Forest, Illinois, 60452
Sandoz Investigational Site
Pasadena, California, 91107
Sandoz Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85021
Sandoz Investigational Site
Pinellas Park, Florida, 33782
Sandoz Investigational Site
Plantation, Florida, 33324
Sandoz Investigational Site
Poway, California, 92064
Sandoz Investigational Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701
Sandoz Investigational Site
Redlands, California, 92374
Sandoz Investigational Site
Rochester, New York, 14620
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95841
Sandoz Investigational Site
Stuart, Florida, 34994
Sandoz Investigational Site
Willow Park, Texas, 76087
Japan13 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Amagasaki, Hyōgo, 660 8550
Sandoz Investigational Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582
Sandoz Investigational Site
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-8558
Sandoz Investigational Site
Inashiki-gun, Ibaraki, 300-0395
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 890 8520
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0017
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kure, Hiroshima, 737-0029
Sandoz Investigational Site
Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8902
Sandoz Investigational Site
Nagakute, Aichi-ken, 480-1195
Sandoz Investigational Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 457 8510
Sandoz Investigational Site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 466 8560
Sandoz Investigational Site
Taito-ku, Tokyo, 111-0051
Sandoz Investigational Site
Ube, Yamaguchi, 755-8505
Hungary8 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Budapest, HUN, 1204
Sandoz Investigational Site
Budapest, Pest County, 1134
Sandoz Investigational Site
Budapest, H-1085
Sandoz Investigational Site
Budapest, H-1136
Sandoz Investigational Site
Debrecen, 4032
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sopron, H-9400
Sandoz Investigational Site
Szeged, H-6720
Sandoz Investigational Site
Székesfehérvár, H-8000
Germany7 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Düsseldorf, 40212
Sandoz Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, 60596
Sandoz Investigational Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Sandoz Investigational Site
Hanover, 30625
Sandoz Investigational Site
Leipzig, 04103
Sandoz Investigational Site
Mainz, 55131
Sandoz Investigational Site
Marburg, 35043
Israel7 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Haifa, 3434104
Sandoz Investigational Site
Jerusalem, 9112001
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kfar Saba, 44281
Sandoz Investigational Site
Lod, 6093000
Sandoz Investigational Site
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Sandoz Investigational Site
Rehovot, 7610001
Sandoz Investigational Site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Spain7 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Barcelona, 08021
Sandoz Investigational Site
Barcelona, 8022
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bilbao, Basque Country, 48006
Sandoz Investigational Site
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33012
Sandoz Investigational Site
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sant Cugat del Vallès, Catalonia, 08190
Sandoz Investigational Site
Zaragoza, 50009
Australia6 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Sandoz Investigational Site
Albury, New South Wales, 2640
Sandoz Investigational Site
Liverpool, New South Wales, 2170
Sandoz Investigational Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Sandoz Investigational Site
Parramatta, New South Wales, 2150
Sandoz Investigational Site
Sydney, New South Wales, 2000
Poland5 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bydgoszcz, 85-631
Sandoz Investigational Site
Krakow, Malopolska, 30-394
Sandoz Investigational Site
Lodz, 91-134
Sandoz Investigational Site
Lublin, 20-079
Sandoz Investigational Site
Wroclaw, 53-334
Slovakia4 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bratislava, 821 01
Sandoz Investigational Site
Bratislava, 83301
Sandoz Investigational Site
Trenčín, 91171
Sandoz Investigational Site
Žilina, Slovak Republic, 010 01
Austria3 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Graz, A-8036
Sandoz Investigational Site
Linz, Upper Austria, 4021
Sandoz Investigational Site
Linz, Upper Austria, A 4020
Czechia3 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Pardubice, 530 02
Sandoz Investigational Site
Prague, 12808
Sandoz Investigational Site
Prague, 150 00
France3 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Marseille, Bouches-Du-Rhone, 13008
Sandoz Investigational Site
Paris, 75015
Sandoz Investigational Site
Saint-Cyr-sur-Loire, Indre Et Loire, 37540
Portugal3 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Coimbra, 3000-548
Sandoz Investigational Site
Coimbra, 3030-363
Sandoz Investigational Site
Porto, 4200 319
Latvia2 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Riga, 1002
Sandoz Investigational Site
Riga, LV-1007
Lithuania2 sites
Sandoz Investigational Site
Kaunas, Kaunas County, 50161
Sandoz Investigational Site
Vilnius, LT-08661
About this study
Official title: A 52-week Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, 2-arm Parallel Study to Compare Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of SOK583A1 to Eylea®, Administered Intravitreally, in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Purpose and rationale: To demonstrate similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of SOK583A1 and Eylea EU as per Eylea approved treatment regimen in patients with nAMD.
The primary clinical question of interest is: Does SOK583A1 have similar efficacy as Eylea EU in terms of mean change in BCVA score in participants with nAMD who are anti-VEGF naive, without important protocol deviations and adherent to the treatment and completed the treatment to Week 8?
Read the detailed description
BCVA: Best-Corrected Visual Acuity Eylea EU: Europe-authorized Eylea® nAMD: Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration VEGF: Vascular Endothelium Growth Factor
- Being tested
- SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL), Eylea EU (40 mg/mL)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL)Biological
IVT administration of 2 mg of SOK583A1 in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48.
Eylea EU (40 mg/mL)Biological
IVT administration of 2 mg of Eylea EU in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL) | Experimental | Intravitreal (IVT) administration of 2 mg of SOK583A1 in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48. Receives: Biological: SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL) |
| Eylea EU (40 mg/mL) | Active comparator | IVT administration of 2 mg of Eylea EU in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48.
EU: European Receives: Biological: Eylea EU (40 mg/mL) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Will be Assessed Using the ETDRS Testing Charts at an Initial Distance of 4 Meters. The Change From Baseline in BCVA in Letters is Defined as Difference Between BCVA Score Between Week 8 and Baseline.
The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate equivalence of change in BCVA score from Baseline at Week 8 between participants with nAMD treated with SOK583A1 and participants treated with Eylea EU. The primary analysis will be performed on the Per-Protocol Set (PPS), which is the most appropriate analysis set to use when testing for equivalence.
ETDRS: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study EU: European
Measured: Change from baseline in mean BCVA score at Week 8
Secondary outcomes (6)
Similarity in the Anatomical Outcome Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU
Mean change in CSFT using SD-OCT from Baseline to Week 1, 4, 8, 24 and 52
CSFT: Central Subfield Thickness SD-OCT: Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography
Measured: Week 1, 4, 8, 24 and 52
Similarity in the Anatomical Outcome Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU
Mean change of CNV lesion size using FA from Screening to Week 8 and 52
CNV: Choroidal neovascularization FA: Fundus Angiography
Measured: Week 8 and 52
Similarity of Efficacy Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Terms of BCVA
Mean change from Baseline in BCVA score using EDTRS testing charts at Week 24 and 52
Measured: Week 24 and 52
Similarity Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Terms of Safety
Number and proportion of subjects with ocular and non-ocular Adverse Events (AEs) over 52 weeks including serious AEs, regardless of relationship to study treatment
Measured: 52 weeks
Similarity Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Terms of Immunogenicity
Development of binding and neutralizing Anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) up to Week 52
Measured: Week 52
Systemic Exposure to SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Participants of the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment
Aflibercept concentration assessments at Baseline (pre-dose) and 24 hours after the first and third injections
Measured: Baseline (pre-dose) and 24 hours after the first injection (day 2) and third injection (day 58)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2021
- Study start12 May 2021
- Primary completion7 Jul 2022
- Study completion10 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Neovascular Age-related Macular DegenerationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 485 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sandoz
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04864834
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CSOK583A12301
- Acronym
- Mylight
- Status last verified
- Jul 2023
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 52-week Multicenter, Randomized, Double-masked, 2-arm Parallel Study to Compare Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of SOK583A1 to Eylea®, Administered Intravitreally, in Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04864834
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Mylight / CSOK583A12301
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 485 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SandozIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 26 Mar 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose and rationale: To demonstrate similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of SOK583A1 and Eylea EU as per Eylea approved treatment regimen in patients with nAMD.
The primary clinical question of interest is: Does SOK583A1 have similar efficacy as Eylea EU in terms of mean change in BCVA score in participants with nAMD who are anti-VEGF naive, without important protocol deviations and adherent to the treatment and completed the treatment to Week 8?
Detailed description
BCVA: Best-Corrected Visual Acuity Eylea EU: Europe-authorized Eylea® nAMD: Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration VEGF: Vascular Endothelium Growth Factor
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL) | Experimental | Biological: SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL)Intravitreal (IVT) administration of 2 mg of SOK583A1 in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48. |
| Eylea EU (40 mg/mL) | Active comparator | Biological: Eylea EU (40 mg/mL)IVT administration of 2 mg of Eylea EU in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48. EU: European |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL)IVT administration of 2 mg of SOK583A1 in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48. | Biological | SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL) |
| Eylea EU (40 mg/mL)IVT administration of 2 mg of Eylea EU in the study eye, every 4 weeks (q4w) at Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8, and thereafter every 8 weeks (q8w) at week 16, 24, 32, 40 and 48. | Biological | Eylea EU (40 mg/mL) |
Primary outcome
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Will be Assessed Using the ETDRS Testing Charts at an Initial Distance of 4 Meters. The Change From Baseline in BCVA in Letters is Defined as Difference Between BCVA Score Between Week 8 and Baseline.
Time frame: Change from baseline in mean BCVA score at Week 8
The primary aim of the study is to demonstrate equivalence of change in BCVA score from Baseline at Week 8 between participants with nAMD treated with SOK583A1 and participants treated with Eylea EU. The primary analysis will be performed on the Per-Protocol Set (PPS), which is the most appropriate analysis set to use when testing for equivalence. ETDRS: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study EU: European
6 secondary outcomes
Similarity in the Anatomical Outcome Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU
Time frame: Week 1, 4, 8, 24 and 52
Similarity in the Anatomical Outcome Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU
Time frame: Week 8 and 52
Similarity of Efficacy Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Terms of BCVA
Time frame: Week 24 and 52
Similarity Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Terms of Safety
Time frame: 52 weeks
Similarity Between SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Terms of Immunogenicity
Time frame: Week 52
Systemic Exposure to SOK583A1 and Eylea EU in Participants of the Pharmacokinetic (PK) Assessment
Time frame: Baseline (pre-dose) and 24 hours after the first injection (day 2) and third injection (day 58)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Study Assessing Corneal Endothelial Cells in Participants With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD) Treated With the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab (PDS)
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Assess the Injection Burden, Adverse Events, Change in Disease Activity, and Long-Term Preservation of Visual Acuity of Surabgene Lomparvovec in Adult Participants With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of a 36-Week Refill Regimen for the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab in Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (Velodrome)
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration (nAMD)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of ADVM-022 in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration [LUNA]
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
Extension Study for the Port Delivery System With Ranibizumab (Portal)
Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
102 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing SOK583A1 (40 mg/mL) and Eylea EU (40 mg/mL) in people with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration, run by Sandoz at 102 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 102 sites in United States, Japan, Hungary, Germany, Israel and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Will be Assessed Using the ETDRS Testing Charts at an Initial Distance of 4 Meters. The Change From Baseline in BCVA in Letters is Defined as Difference Between BCVA Score Between Week 8 and Baseline. (time frame: Change from baseline in mean BCVA score at Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2024.