ArrhythmiaNCT04868058
Serratus Anterior or Erector Spinae Block for Hybrid Arrhythmia Ablation Surgery
A study testing Ropivacaine injection in people with Arrhythmia, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences between single-shot EQUAL ropivacaine doses of the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) or erector spinae plane block (ESPB) injection, when used as adjuvant to treat postoperative pain, after one-stage unilateral hybrid arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, ventricular… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Arrhythmia
- What is being tested?
- Ropivacaine injection
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2020to 1 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-80 years.
- Provision of signed informed consent prior to any study-specific procedure
- Selected for Hybrid Rhythm ablation surgery (ISNT, VT, AF)
- American Society of Anesthesiologist physical Status I to III
- Dutch, French or English speaking
- Ability to follow the study protocol
- BMI > 35 kg/m2 . BMI or Body mass index will be obtained from body weight in kg divided by the square of the length in meter and is expressed in kg/m2
- -
Who cannot join
- a. History of chronic pain or drug treatment abuse
- b. Depression, psychiatric morbidity or mal-adaptive coping behaviour
- c. Neuropathy
- d. Severe anxiety or other mental ailment, taking drugs affecting their capacity to assess pain (gabapentin, pregabalin, opiod use)
- e. Chronic or acute skin infection of the back or the lateral thorax
- f. Hypersensitivity to ropivacaine
- g. Severe hepatic, renal , pulmonary or cardiac (EF < 30%) disease or refuse to participate to the study..
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Serratus Anterior Plane Block or Erector Spinae Plane Block Used as an Adjuvant for Hybrid Arrhythmia Ablation Surgery
The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences between single-shot EQUAL ropivacaine doses of the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) or erector spinae plane block (ESPB) injection, when used as adjuvant to treat postoperative pain, after one-stage unilateral hybrid arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, inappropriate sinus node tachycardia) ablation surgery. The primary outcomes are to evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting (total time to block placement in seconds, time to visualization of location of injection in seconds, adequacy of ropivacaine spread) by picturing and worst numerical scale pain at rest or moving, using a visual analog pain scale from 0= no pain to 10= maximal pain, in the first 12 hours after admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes aim to evaluate to investigate pain location, additional analgesic consumption and requests, ease of breathing, breathing quality, sleeping quality and quantity, duration of hospitalisation, and general level of satisfaction.
Read the detailed description
This clinical investigation is an interventional uni-center, prospective, open, randomized, double arm, blinded to the pain physician and the patient, clinical evaluation.
To ensure the same number of patients in each group, a stratified block randomization will be performed. A randomization list is generated for each type of arrhythmia. Patients will be block randomized into two groups: the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) arm or the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) arm. As such the nerve block performing physician will be informed on the nerve block choice just before surgery.
132 consecutive patients. (22 in each group) Single Center study: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - department of Anesthesiology 3 years Subject will be followed till 3 days post-procedure
Primary outcome measurement details:
The total time to block placement is obtained by starting a timer after local antiseptic application, just before puncturing the skin, to full injection of the local anaesthetic ropivacaine where the timer will be stopped.
In practice: a physician places the nerve block, a nurse anaesthetist manages the patient and a second nurse assistant records the timing and takes a picture just before drug injection and after block injection The time to visualization of the optimal location before nerve block injection is defined as the time needed to find the best place before local anaesthetic injection.
A picture of the location will be taken just before and after injection (by the second nurse assistant with an I-phone or similar device and kept with the patient's file Pain assessment will start 1 h after ICU admission by a different team (ICU nurse- intensive care physician or pain nurse). The first 24h assessments are blinded to the block performing physician.
Visual- analog- pain scores (0 no pain-10= maximal pain) will be analysed at rest or moving every 4 h or more depending on the patient's needs/requests for the first 24 h. After this period pain will be analysed twice daily (morning and afternoon) up to 72 h after start of surgery or less when dismissed earlier.
Secondary outcome measurements will be recorded after the initial 24h twice/da (morning and afternoon) by a pain nurse. Written data will be transmitted for storage to REDCAP.
- Conditions
- Arrhythmia
- Being tested
- Ropivacaine injection
- Keywords
- Arrhythmia, Ablation, Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ropivacaine injectionDrug
Also called Naropin
Ropivacaine : 0.4 ml/kg (ideal body weight!) of 5mg/ml (20 to 30 ml bolus dose (100-150 mg), maximum dose 200 mg ropivacaine
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 AF SAPB | Experimental | Atrial fibrillation. Serratus anterior plane block Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine injection |
| 2 AF ESPB | Experimental | Atrial fibrillation. Erector spinae plane block Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine injection |
| 3 VT SAPB | Experimental | Ventricular Tachycardia.Serratus anterior plane block Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine injection |
| 4 VT ESPB | Experimental | Ventricular Tachycardia. Erector spinae plane block Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine injection |
| 5 ISNT SAPB | Experimental | Inappropriate Sinus node tachycardia. Serratus anterior plane block Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine injection |
| 6 ISNT ESPB | Experimental | Inappropriate Sinus node tachycardia. Erector spinae plane block Receives: Drug: Ropivacaine injection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting specifically time to placement in seconds
Time to placement in seconds
Measured: Time to placement: 1200 seconds
evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting visualization time of location of injection by picturing
visualisation time of location of injection
Measured: Visualisation is done by picturing to confirm adequate block (up 120 seconds)
evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting adequacy of ropivacaine spread by picturing
Block placement efficacy by seeing the ropivacaine spread
Measured: picturing Confirms time of block placement (up to 300 seconds)
Worst numerical scale pain in the first 12 h after admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit.
Maximal pain assesed by visual analog scale ,where 0= no pain 10= maximal pain
Measured: 12 hours
Secondary outcomes (7)
Pain location
Place of pain: sternal; back, thorax, shoulder, throat, neck
Measured: 72 hours
Additional analgesic consumption and requests
Pain drugs used: paracetamol in grams, piritramide in milligrams, diclofenac in milligrams, aspirin in milligrams, colchicine in grams
Measured: 72 hours
Ease of breathing, breathing quality
Breathing evaluation: superficial, tense, normal, deep
Measured: 72 hours
Sleeping quantity
Number of hours slept after surgery
Measured: 72 hours
Duration hospital Stay
Length of hospital stay
Measured: From 2 to 15 days
Body Mass Index
BMI or Body mass index is obtained from body weight in kg divided by the square of the length in meter) and is expressed in kg/m2).Exclusion criteria if above > 35 kg/m2
Measured: Will be assessed on screening day or exported up to 2 weeks before screening day.
Ideal body weight
Ideal body weight will be calculated from body weight in kg, length in cm and gender on https://by globalrph.com/medcalc. It is expressed in kg and used for drug dosing
Measured: Will be assessed on screening day or exported up to 2 weeks before screening day.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Apr 2021
- Study start2 Oct 2020
- Primary completion11 May 2021
- Study completion1 Dec 2024
Why it stopped: not enough patients were recruited
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for ArrhythmiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- This clinical investigation is an interventional uni-center, prospective, open, randomized, double arm, blinded to the pain physician and the patient, clinical evaluation
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04868058
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SAPB-ESPB hybrid AAS study
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Serratus Anterior Plane Block or Erector Spinae Plane Block Used as an Adjuvant for Hybrid Arrhythmia Ablation Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04868058
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SAPB-ESPB hybrid AAS study
- Conditions
- Arrhythmia
- Keywords
- Arrhythmia, Ablation, Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: not enough patients were recruited
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitair Ziekenhuis BrusselUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 May 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate differences between single-shot EQUAL ropivacaine doses of the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) or erector spinae plane block (ESPB) injection, when used as adjuvant to treat postoperative pain, after one-stage unilateral hybrid arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, inappropriate sinus node tachycardia) ablation surgery. The primary outcomes are to evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting (total time to block placement in seconds, time to visualization of location of injection in seconds, adequacy of ropivacaine spread) by picturing and worst numerical scale pain at rest or moving, using a visual analog pain scale from 0= no pain to 10= maximal pain, in the first 12 hours after admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit. Secondary outcomes aim to evaluate to investigate pain location, additional analgesic consumption and requests, ease of breathing, breathing quality, sleeping quality and quantity, duration of hospitalisation, and general level of satisfaction.
Detailed description
This clinical investigation is an interventional uni-center, prospective, open, randomized, double arm, blinded to the pain physician and the patient, clinical evaluation.
To ensure the same number of patients in each group, a stratified block randomization will be performed. A randomization list is generated for each type of arrhythmia. Patients will be block randomized into two groups: the serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) arm or the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) arm. As such the nerve block performing physician will be informed on the nerve block choice just before surgery.
132 consecutive patients. (22 in each group) Single Center study: Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel - department of Anesthesiology 3 years Subject will be followed till 3 days post-procedure
Primary outcome measurement details:
The total time to block placement is obtained by starting a timer after local antiseptic application, just before puncturing the skin, to full injection of the local anaesthetic ropivacaine where the timer will be stopped.
In practice: a physician places the nerve block, a nurse anaesthetist manages the patient and a second nurse assistant records the timing and takes a picture just before drug injection and after block injection The time to visualization of the optimal location before nerve block injection is defined as the time needed to find the best place before local anaesthetic injection.
A picture of the location will be taken just before and after injection (by the second nurse assistant with an I-phone or similar device and kept with the patient's file Pain assessment will start 1 h after ICU admission by a different team (ICU nurse- intensive care physician or pain nurse). The first 24h assessments are blinded to the block performing physician.
Visual- analog- pain scores (0 no pain-10= maximal pain) will be analysed at rest or moving every 4 h or more depending on the patient's needs/requests for the first 24 h. After this period pain will be analysed twice daily (morning and afternoon) up to 72 h after start of surgery or less when dismissed earlier.
Secondary outcome measurements will be recorded after the initial 24h twice/da (morning and afternoon) by a pain nurse. Written data will be transmitted for storage to REDCAP.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- This clinical investigation is an interventional uni-center, prospective, open, randomized, double arm, blinded to the pain physician and the patient, clinical evaluation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 AF SAPB | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine injectionAtrial fibrillation. Serratus anterior plane block |
| 2 AF ESPB | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine injectionAtrial fibrillation. Erector spinae plane block |
| 3 VT SAPB | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine injectionVentricular Tachycardia.Serratus anterior plane block |
| 4 VT ESPB | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine injectionVentricular Tachycardia. Erector spinae plane block |
| 5 ISNT SAPB | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine injectionInappropriate Sinus node tachycardia. Serratus anterior plane block |
| 6 ISNT ESPB | Experimental | Drug: Ropivacaine injectionInappropriate Sinus node tachycardia. Erector spinae plane block |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 18-80 years.
- Provision of signed informed consent prior to any study-specific procedure
- Selected for Hybrid Rhythm ablation surgery (ISNT, VT, AF)
- American Society of Anesthesiologist physical Status I to III
- Dutch, French or English speaking
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ropivacaine injectionAlso: NaropinRopivacaine : 0.4 ml/kg (ideal body weight!) of 5mg/ml (20 to 30 ml bolus dose (100-150 mg), maximum dose 200 mg ropivacaine | Drug | 1 AF SAPB, 2 AF ESPB, 3 VT SAPB, 4 VT ESPB, 5 ISNT SAPB, 6 ISNT ESPB |
Primary outcome
evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting specifically time to placement in seconds
Time frame: Time to placement: 1200 seconds
Time to placement in seconds
evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting visualization time of location of injection by picturing
Time frame: Visualisation is done by picturing to confirm adequate block (up 120 seconds)
visualisation time of location of injection
evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting adequacy of ropivacaine spread by picturing
Time frame: picturing Confirms time of block placement (up to 300 seconds)
Block placement efficacy by seeing the ropivacaine spread
Worst numerical scale pain in the first 12 h after admission to the post-anaesthesia care unit.
Time frame: 12 hours
Maximal pain assesed by visual analog scale ,where 0= no pain 10= maximal pain
7 secondary outcomes
Pain location
Time frame: 72 hours
Additional analgesic consumption and requests
Time frame: 72 hours
Ease of breathing, breathing quality
Time frame: 72 hours
Sleeping quantity
Time frame: 72 hours
Duration hospital Stay
Time frame: From 2 to 15 days
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Will be assessed on screening day or exported up to 2 weeks before screening day.
Ideal body weight
Time frame: Will be assessed on screening day or exported up to 2 weeks before screening day.
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: not enough patients were recruited). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Dec 2025.
Related trials for Arrhythmia
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Active, not recruiting
Horizon 360 Protocol for the Treatment of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With the Sphere-360™ Catheter and Affera™ Mapping and Ablation System (Horizon 360)
Paroxysmal AF
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Enrolling by invitation
EDEN Intracardiac Electrogram Recording and Classifying System
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ropivacaine injection in people with Arrhythmia, run by Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: not enough patients were recruited). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
evaluate block placement efficacy in the hybrid surgery setting specifically time to placement in seconds (time frame: Time to placement: 1200 seconds). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2025.