AzTrials
AzTrials

Early AmbulationSTRIDENCT04868656

Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0

A study testing Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support and Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support in people with Early Ambulation, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 aims to compare implementation strategies for large-scale spread of STRIDE, a supervised walking program for hospitalized older Veterans. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Early Ambulation
What is being tested?
Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support and Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Jun 2021to 26 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Hospital inclusion criteria includes submission of a signed participation agreement.
  • All enrolled hospitals will all be exposed to Foundational Support.
  • Hospitals randomized to Enhanced Support that do not meeting STRIDE initial program benchmarks will receive higher-intensity implementation support (Enhanced Support).
  • The clinical outcomes assessment will include all patients >=60 that have an admission on a general medicine ward that offers STRIDE program at enrolled site.

Who cannot join

  • The eight STRIDE hospitals that have previously participated in Function QUERI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03300336) will be excluded from enrollment in this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705-3875

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 (QUE 20-023)

Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 aims to compare implementation strategies for large-scale spread of STRIDE, a supervised walking program for hospitalized older Veterans. The overall goal is to implement, evaluate, and sustain STRIDE in 32 additional VA hospitals using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework.

Read the detailed description

Background/Purpose. Hospitalization is a major risk factor for development of disability. More than one-third of adults over the age of 70 are discharged from the hospital with a major new disability that was not present before the onset of acute illness. A key contributor to hospital-associated disability is immobility during hospitalization. Although fewer than 5% of patients have physician orders for bed rest, hospitalized older adults spend only about 3% of their time standing or walking. The hazards of bedrest have been recognized for more than 2 decades, but there remains a persistent 'epidemic of immobility' in American hospitals.

STRIDE is a supervised inpatient walking program developed by an interdisciplinary team of investigators, clinicians and administrators at the Durham VA and funded by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care. STRIDE is designed for patients aged >= 60 years and consists of a one-time gait and balance assessment, followed by daily walks supervised by a mobility assistant for the duration of the hospital stay. Clinical demonstration of STRIDE conducted at the Durham VA resulted in a greater likelihood of discharge to home than to skilled nursing or rehabilitation among STRIDE participants compared to clinically similar patients receiving usual care. Based on this experience, the cumulative evidence of the positive impact of early mobility interventions, and successful spread to other hospitals, STRIDE has the potential to become a system-wide approach to address hospital-associated disability in VA.

As part of Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE), the investigators plan to implement the STRIDE clinical program at an additional 32 VA hospitals using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework with hospitals enrolled and randomized to receive low-touch implementation support (foundational support) or a higher-intensity implementation support (enhanced support including additional facilitation, self-organization, and team building support) for hospitals that do not meet program benchmarks at 6 and 8 months.

Objectives. The investigators plan to develop scalable approaches to implement and sustain STRIDE as well as evaluate implementation with foundational support versus the enhanced-implementation strategy (enhanced support).

Key questions: How should the STRIDE clinical program be adapted to optimize sustainability? Are there differences in implementation outcomes (penetration, fidelity) at 10 months (primary), 13, 16 months between arms? How do hospitals experience implementation strategies in each arm? What baseline organizational characteristics are associated with hospitals that do not meet implementation benchmarks? The investigators also plan to conduct an explanatory sequential mixed method design that includes qualitative data collection and analysis that will not be reported here. Additionally, adoption will be examined at 10 months.

Methodology. To evaluate implementation, the investigators will randomize hospitals (n=32) 1:1 to either foundational support or enhanced support. The investigators will use generalized linear models to examine the effect of foundational vs. enhanced on implementation outcomes at 10-months.

Being tested
Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support, Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support
Keywords
Walking, Veterans, Inpatients, Quality of Life, Implementation Science, Functional Independence, Early Ambulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Implementation Strategy: Foundational SupportOther

    Also called Foundational REP

    The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for STRIDE hospitals that have not met implementation program benchmarks, specifically Foundational Support vs. Enhanced Support. We propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting STRIDE for context and provides tools for ongoing STRIDE evaluation (defined as foundational support), will be sufficient for some but not all hospitals to successfully incorporate STRIDE into routine practice.

  • Implementation Strategy: Enhanced SupportOther

    Also called Enhanced REP

    The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for STRIDE hospitals that have not met implementation program benchmarks, specifically Foundational Support vs. Enhanced Support. We posit that monitoring hospitals' progress and adding, for hospitals with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as Enhanced Support) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value.

Study groups in NCT04868656
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Foundational SupportActive comparatorFoundational Support uses the Replicating Effective Program (REP) implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: STRIDE Toolkit; Online shared resources (SharePoint) access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist hospitals with tracking their own data; Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support; and Microsoft TEAMS Channels.
Receives: Other: Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support
Enhanced SupportExperimentalEnhanced Support begins with the same activities as Foundational Support. Hospitals that are randomized to Enhanced Support and do not meet STRIDE initial program benchmarks within 6 months will continue with Foundational support and also receive higher intensity support for a period of 4-6 months. Hospitals that have sustained their implementation will continue low-touch activities while those that have been randomized to the enhanced support arm and met the initial program benchmark at 6-months but have not sustained (did not meet the sustainment benchmark), will begin engaging in high-touch activities. The higher intensity support will consist of facilitation, a process of interactive problem solving and support that occurs in a context of a supportive interpersonal relationship. Facilitation will be provided by Function QUERI team members.
Receives: Other: Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Penetration

    Penetration is defined as the percent of eligible hospitalizations with one or more STRIDE walks at 10 months. It is not possible to assess all eligibility criteria in the Electronic Health Record (e.g. able to walk at baseline); thus, with this more inclusive denominator, 100% penetration is not an appropriate goal. Based on preliminary data, we anticipate penetration to range from 0% (no program activity at 10-month outcome assessment) to 40% (estimated maximum achievable based on data from current STRIDE sites).

    Measured: 10 months (cumulative)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Fidelity

    Fidelity will be the percentage of eligible hospital days with "full dose" of the program, defined as two or more documented walks or one walk for more than five minutes.

    Measured: 10 months (cumulative)

  2. Adoption

    Program adoption is a binary outcome defined for each hospital as equal to or more than 5 patients with a STRIDE walk or not.

    Measured: 10 months (cumulative)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion26 Jan 2024
  4. Study completion26 Jan 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel cluster-randomized trial (parallel-CRT): used in pragmatic evaluations of health program or policy interventions, where half the clusters (in this case, VA hospitals) are randomly assigned to two interventions: Foundational support (active comparator) vs. Enhanced support (experimental).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04868656
Sponsor's protocol ID
QUX 21-001
Acronym
STRIDE
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
27 Apr 2021
Last updated
1 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be available upon request. Prior to distribution, a local privacy officer and study statistician will certify that the dataset contains no protected health information (PHI). Data will be provided to requestor in electronic format. Sufficient data and descriptors will be made available to duplicate statistical analysis and confirm conclusions in publication. No data or statistical code that could lead to re-identification of individuals will be released. Data will be stored \& maintained in an approved, secured location as described in the VA Research Data Inventory Form. The statistician will create de-identified, publication-specific datasets that includes variables from statistical models presented in publication. Data will only be released per appropriate authorizations or agreements. Written agreements will specify that recipients are prohibited from taking steps to re-identify any individual whose data are included in the dataset.

Publications

  • Hastings SN, Stechuchak KM, Kappler CB, Choate A, Meyer C, Webster A, Zullig LL, Drake C, Hughes JM, Sperber NR, Tucker M, Hoenig H, Colon-Emeric C, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Coffman CJ. Comparing Approaches to Support Implementation of a Hospital Walking Program: Evidence from a Cluster Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2026 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-026-10238-4. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 41749000
  • Kappler CB, Coffman CJ, Stechuchak KM, Choate A, Meyer C, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Drake C, Sperber NR, Kaufman BG, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Hastings SN. Evaluation of strategies to support implementation of a hospital walking program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jan 12;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00544-5.

    PubMed 38216967
  • Hughes JM, Zullig LL, Choate AL, Decosimo KP, Wang V, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Nicole Hastings S. Intensification of Implementation Strategies: Developing a Model of Foundational and Enhanced Implementation Approaches to Support National Adoption and Scale-up. Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac130.

    PubMed 36029028

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support and Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support in people with Early Ambulation, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Penetration (time frame: 10 months (cumulative)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04868656, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in