Early AmbulationSTRIDENCT04868656
Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0
A study testing Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support and Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support in people with Early Ambulation, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 aims to compare implementation strategies for large-scale spread of STRIDE, a supervised walking program for hospitalized older Veterans. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Early Ambulation
- What is being tested?
- Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support and Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2021to 26 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Hospital inclusion criteria includes submission of a signed participation agreement.
- All enrolled hospitals will all be exposed to Foundational Support.
- Hospitals randomized to Enhanced Support that do not meeting STRIDE initial program benchmarks will receive higher-intensity implementation support (Enhanced Support).
- The clinical outcomes assessment will include all patients >=60 that have an admission on a general medicine ward that offers STRIDE program at enrolled site.
Who cannot join
- The eight STRIDE hospitals that have previously participated in Function QUERI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03300336) will be excluded from enrollment in this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, 27705-3875
About this study
Official title: Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 (QUE 20-023)
Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 aims to compare implementation strategies for large-scale spread of STRIDE, a supervised walking program for hospitalized older Veterans. The overall goal is to implement, evaluate, and sustain STRIDE in 32 additional VA hospitals using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework.
Read the detailed description
Background/Purpose. Hospitalization is a major risk factor for development of disability. More than one-third of adults over the age of 70 are discharged from the hospital with a major new disability that was not present before the onset of acute illness. A key contributor to hospital-associated disability is immobility during hospitalization. Although fewer than 5% of patients have physician orders for bed rest, hospitalized older adults spend only about 3% of their time standing or walking. The hazards of bedrest have been recognized for more than 2 decades, but there remains a persistent 'epidemic of immobility' in American hospitals.
STRIDE is a supervised inpatient walking program developed by an interdisciplinary team of investigators, clinicians and administrators at the Durham VA and funded by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care. STRIDE is designed for patients aged >= 60 years and consists of a one-time gait and balance assessment, followed by daily walks supervised by a mobility assistant for the duration of the hospital stay. Clinical demonstration of STRIDE conducted at the Durham VA resulted in a greater likelihood of discharge to home than to skilled nursing or rehabilitation among STRIDE participants compared to clinically similar patients receiving usual care. Based on this experience, the cumulative evidence of the positive impact of early mobility interventions, and successful spread to other hospitals, STRIDE has the potential to become a system-wide approach to address hospital-associated disability in VA.
As part of Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE), the investigators plan to implement the STRIDE clinical program at an additional 32 VA hospitals using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework with hospitals enrolled and randomized to receive low-touch implementation support (foundational support) or a higher-intensity implementation support (enhanced support including additional facilitation, self-organization, and team building support) for hospitals that do not meet program benchmarks at 6 and 8 months.
Objectives. The investigators plan to develop scalable approaches to implement and sustain STRIDE as well as evaluate implementation with foundational support versus the enhanced-implementation strategy (enhanced support).
Key questions: How should the STRIDE clinical program be adapted to optimize sustainability? Are there differences in implementation outcomes (penetration, fidelity) at 10 months (primary), 13, 16 months between arms? How do hospitals experience implementation strategies in each arm? What baseline organizational characteristics are associated with hospitals that do not meet implementation benchmarks? The investigators also plan to conduct an explanatory sequential mixed method design that includes qualitative data collection and analysis that will not be reported here. Additionally, adoption will be examined at 10 months.
Methodology. To evaluate implementation, the investigators will randomize hospitals (n=32) 1:1 to either foundational support or enhanced support. The investigators will use generalized linear models to examine the effect of foundational vs. enhanced on implementation outcomes at 10-months.
- Conditions
- Early Ambulation
- Being tested
- Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support, Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support
- Keywords
- Walking, Veterans, Inpatients, Quality of Life, Implementation Science, Functional Independence, Early Ambulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Implementation Strategy: Foundational SupportOther
Also called Foundational REP
The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for STRIDE hospitals that have not met implementation program benchmarks, specifically Foundational Support vs. Enhanced Support. We propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting STRIDE for context and provides tools for ongoing STRIDE evaluation (defined as foundational support), will be sufficient for some but not all hospitals to successfully incorporate STRIDE into routine practice.
Implementation Strategy: Enhanced SupportOther
Also called Enhanced REP
The goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for STRIDE hospitals that have not met implementation program benchmarks, specifically Foundational Support vs. Enhanced Support. We posit that monitoring hospitals' progress and adding, for hospitals with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as Enhanced Support) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Foundational Support | Active comparator | Foundational Support uses the Replicating Effective Program (REP) implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: STRIDE Toolkit; Online shared resources (SharePoint) access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist hospitals with tracking their own data; Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support; and Microsoft TEAMS Channels. Receives: Other: Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support |
| Enhanced Support | Experimental | Enhanced Support begins with the same activities as Foundational Support. Hospitals that are randomized to Enhanced Support and do not meet STRIDE initial program benchmarks within 6 months will continue with Foundational support and also receive higher intensity support for a period of 4-6 months. Hospitals that have sustained their implementation will continue low-touch activities while those that have been randomized to the enhanced support arm and met the initial program benchmark at 6-months but have not sustained (did not meet the sustainment benchmark), will begin engaging in high-touch activities. The higher intensity support will consist of facilitation, a process of interactive problem solving and support that occurs in a context of a supportive interpersonal relationship. Facilitation will be provided by Function QUERI team members. Receives: Other: Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Penetration
Penetration is defined as the percent of eligible hospitalizations with one or more STRIDE walks at 10 months. It is not possible to assess all eligibility criteria in the Electronic Health Record (e.g. able to walk at baseline); thus, with this more inclusive denominator, 100% penetration is not an appropriate goal. Based on preliminary data, we anticipate penetration to range from 0% (no program activity at 10-month outcome assessment) to 40% (estimated maximum achievable based on data from current STRIDE sites).
Measured: 10 months (cumulative)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Fidelity
Fidelity will be the percentage of eligible hospital days with "full dose" of the program, defined as two or more documented walks or one walk for more than five minutes.
Measured: 10 months (cumulative)
Adoption
Program adoption is a binary outcome defined for each hospital as equal to or more than 5 patients with a STRIDE walk or not.
Measured: 10 months (cumulative)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 May 2021
- Study start1 Jun 2021
- Primary completion26 Jan 2024
- Study completion26 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Early AmbulationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel cluster-randomized trial (parallel-CRT): used in pragmatic evaluations of health program or policy interventions, where half the clusters (in this case, VA hospitals) are randomly assigned to two interventions: Foundational support (active comparator) vs. Enhanced support (experimental).
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Susan N. Hastings, MD MHSc, Principal investigator, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NCCourtney H Van Houtven, PhD, Principal investigator, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NCKelli Dominick Allen, PhD, Principal investigator, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04868656
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QUX 21-001
- Acronym
- STRIDE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 1 May 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be available upon request. Prior to distribution, a local privacy officer and study statistician will certify that the dataset contains no protected health information (PHI). Data will be provided to requestor in electronic format. Sufficient data and descriptors will be made available to duplicate statistical analysis and confirm conclusions in publication. No data or statistical code that could lead to re-identification of individuals will be released. Data will be stored \& maintained in an approved, secured location as described in the VA Research Data Inventory Form. The statistician will create de-identified, publication-specific datasets that includes variables from statistical models presented in publication. Data will only be released per appropriate authorizations or agreements. Written agreements will specify that recipients are prohibited from taking steps to re-identify any individual whose data are included in the dataset.
Publications
Hastings SN, Stechuchak KM, Kappler CB, Choate A, Meyer C, Webster A, Zullig LL, Drake C, Hughes JM, Sperber NR, Tucker M, Hoenig H, Colon-Emeric C, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Coffman CJ. Comparing Approaches to Support Implementation of a Hospital Walking Program: Evidence from a Cluster Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2026 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-026-10238-4. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 41749000Kappler CB, Coffman CJ, Stechuchak KM, Choate A, Meyer C, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Drake C, Sperber NR, Kaufman BG, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Hastings SN. Evaluation of strategies to support implementation of a hospital walking program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jan 12;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00544-5.
PubMed 38216967Hughes JM, Zullig LL, Choate AL, Decosimo KP, Wang V, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Nicole Hastings S. Intensification of Implementation Strategies: Developing a Model of Foundational and Enhanced Implementation Approaches to Support National Adoption and Scale-up. Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac130.
PubMed 36029028
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 (QUE 20-023)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04868656
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STRIDE / QUX 21-001
- Conditions
- Early Ambulation
- Keywords
- Walking, Veterans, Inpatients, Quality of Life, Implementation Science, Functional Independence, Early Ambulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 1 May 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE): Function QUERI 2.0 aims to compare implementation strategies for large-scale spread of STRIDE, a supervised walking program for hospitalized older Veterans. The overall goal is to implement, evaluate, and sustain STRIDE in 32 additional VA hospitals using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework.
Detailed description
Background/Purpose. Hospitalization is a major risk factor for development of disability. More than one-third of adults over the age of 70 are discharged from the hospital with a major new disability that was not present before the onset of acute illness. A key contributor to hospital-associated disability is immobility during hospitalization. Although fewer than 5% of patients have physician orders for bed rest, hospitalized older adults spend only about 3% of their time standing or walking. The hazards of bedrest have been recognized for more than 2 decades, but there remains a persistent 'epidemic of immobility' in American hospitals.
STRIDE is a supervised inpatient walking program developed by an interdisciplinary team of investigators, clinicians and administrators at the Durham VA and funded by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Geriatrics and Extended Care. STRIDE is designed for patients aged >= 60 years and consists of a one-time gait and balance assessment, followed by daily walks supervised by a mobility assistant for the duration of the hospital stay. Clinical demonstration of STRIDE conducted at the Durham VA resulted in a greater likelihood of discharge to home than to skilled nursing or rehabilitation among STRIDE participants compared to clinically similar patients receiving usual care. Based on this experience, the cumulative evidence of the positive impact of early mobility interventions, and successful spread to other hospitals, STRIDE has the potential to become a system-wide approach to address hospital-associated disability in VA.
As part of Implementing a Hospital-Based Walking Program (STRIDE), the investigators plan to implement the STRIDE clinical program at an additional 32 VA hospitals using a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid design framework with hospitals enrolled and randomized to receive low-touch implementation support (foundational support) or a higher-intensity implementation support (enhanced support including additional facilitation, self-organization, and team building support) for hospitals that do not meet program benchmarks at 6 and 8 months.
Objectives. The investigators plan to develop scalable approaches to implement and sustain STRIDE as well as evaluate implementation with foundational support versus the enhanced-implementation strategy (enhanced support).
Key questions: How should the STRIDE clinical program be adapted to optimize sustainability? Are there differences in implementation outcomes (penetration, fidelity) at 10 months (primary), 13, 16 months between arms? How do hospitals experience implementation strategies in each arm? What baseline organizational characteristics are associated with hospitals that do not meet implementation benchmarks? The investigators also plan to conduct an explanatory sequential mixed method design that includes qualitative data collection and analysis that will not be reported here. Additionally, adoption will be examined at 10 months.
Methodology. To evaluate implementation, the investigators will randomize hospitals (n=32) 1:1 to either foundational support or enhanced support. The investigators will use generalized linear models to examine the effect of foundational vs. enhanced on implementation outcomes at 10-months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel cluster-randomized trial (parallel-CRT): used in pragmatic evaluations of health program or policy interventions, where half the clusters (in this case, VA hospitals) are randomly assigned to two interventions: Foundational support (active comparator) vs. Enhanced support (experimental).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Foundational Support | Active comparator | Other: Implementation Strategy: Foundational SupportFoundational Support uses the Replicating Effective Program (REP) implementation strategy and includes 5 elements that were developed and tested in our prior Function QUERI work: STRIDE Toolkit; Online shared resources (SharePoint) access for clinical program training materials; Data dashboard to assist hospitals with tracking their own data; Diffusion Networks to promote peer-to-peer sharing and implementation support; and Microsoft TEAMS Channels. |
| Enhanced Support | Experimental | Other: Implementation Strategy: Enhanced SupportEnhanced Support begins with the same activities as Foundational Support. Hospitals that are randomized to Enhanced Support and do not meet STRIDE initial program benchmarks within 6 months will continue with Foundational support and also receive higher intensity support for a period of 4-6 months. Hospitals that have sustained their implementation will continue low-touch activities while those that have been randomized to the enhanced support arm and met the initial program benchmark at 6-months but have not sustained (did not meet the sustainment benchmark), will begin engaging in high-touch activities. The higher intensity support will consist of facilitation, a process of interactive problem solving and support that occurs in a context of a supportive interpersonal relationship. Facilitation will be provided by Function QUERI team members. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Hospital inclusion criteria includes submission of a signed participation agreement.
- The clinical outcomes assessment will include all patients >=60 that have an admission on a general medicine ward that offers STRIDE program at enrolled site.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The eight STRIDE hospitals that have previously participated in Function QUERI (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03300336) will be excluded from enrollment in this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation Strategy: Foundational SupportAlso: Foundational REPThe goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for STRIDE hospitals that have not met implementation program benchmarks, specifically Foundational Support vs. Enhanced Support. We propose that low intensity implementation support that promotes adapting STRIDE for context and provides tools for ongoing STRIDE evaluation (defined as foundational support), will be sufficient for some but not all hospitals to successfully incorporate STRIDE into routine practice. | Other | Foundational Support |
| Implementation Strategy: Enhanced SupportAlso: Enhanced REPThe goal is to test implementation intensification approaches for STRIDE hospitals that have not met implementation program benchmarks, specifically Foundational Support vs. Enhanced Support. We posit that monitoring hospitals' progress and adding, for hospitals with low adoption, higher intensity strategies (defined as Enhanced Support) that directly influence teams' capacity and skills to effectively self-organize and problem-solve will lead to higher implementation adoption, penetration, fidelity, and value. | Other | Enhanced Support |
Primary outcome
Penetration
Time frame: 10 months (cumulative)
Penetration is defined as the percent of eligible hospitalizations with one or more STRIDE walks at 10 months. It is not possible to assess all eligibility criteria in the Electronic Health Record (e.g. able to walk at baseline); thus, with this more inclusive denominator, 100% penetration is not an appropriate goal. Based on preliminary data, we anticipate penetration to range from 0% (no program activity at 10-month outcome assessment) to 40% (estimated maximum achievable based on data from current STRIDE sites).
2 secondary outcomes
Fidelity
Time frame: 10 months (cumulative)
Adoption
Time frame: 10 months (cumulative)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 May 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41749000Hastings SN, Stechuchak KM, Kappler CB, Choate A, Meyer C, Webster A, Zullig LL, Drake C, Hughes JM, Sperber NR, Tucker M, Hoenig H, Colon-Emeric C, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Coffman CJ. Comparing Approaches to Support Implementation of a Hospital Walking Program: Evidence from a Cluster Randomized Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2026 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s11606-026-10238-4. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38216967Kappler CB, Coffman CJ, Stechuchak KM, Choate A, Meyer C, Zullig LL, Hughes JM, Drake C, Sperber NR, Kaufman BG, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Hastings SN. Evaluation of strategies to support implementation of a hospital walking program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jan 12;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00544-5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36029028Hughes JM, Zullig LL, Choate AL, Decosimo KP, Wang V, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Nicole Hastings S. Intensification of Implementation Strategies: Developing a Model of Foundational and Enhanced Implementation Approaches to Support National Adoption and Scale-up. Gerontologist. 2023 Mar 21;63(3):604-613. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac130.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. A de-identified, anonymized dataset will be available upon request. Prior to distribution, a local privacy officer and study statistician will certify that the dataset contains no protected health information (PHI). Data will be provided to requestor in electronic format. Sufficient data and descriptors will be made available to duplicate statistical analysis and confirm conclusions in publication. No data or statistical code that could lead to re-identification of individuals will be released. Data will be stored \& maintained in an approved, secured location as described in the VA Research Data Inventory Form. The statistician will create de-identified, publication-specific datasets that includes variables from statistical models presented in publication. Data will only be released per appropriate authorizations or agreements. Written agreements will specify that recipients are prohibited from taking steps to re-identify any individual whose data are included in the dataset.
Related trials for Early Ambulation
Recruiting
Slow-SPEED: Slowing Parkinson's Early Through Exercise Dosage
Parkinson Disease, Prodromal Stage
Active, not recruiting
Early Rehabilitation in Patients Following Major Cardiac Surgery: Changes in Functional Capacity and Energy Efficiency in Walking and ADLs.
Cardiac Surgery, Median Sternotomy
Not yet recruiting
Early Ambulation Safely in Unstable Ankle Fractures (EASY-Ankle)
Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture, Unstable Trimalleolar Ankle Fracture
Not yet recruiting
Postprocedural Bed-Rest Strategies After Transfemoral Venous Interventions
Venous Access, Endovascular Procedures
Recruiting
Slow-SPEED-NL: Slowing Parkinson's Early Through Exercise Dosage-Netherlands
Parkinson Disease, Prodromal Stage
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Susan N. Hastings, MD MHSc principal investigator
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Courtney H Van Houtven, PhD principal investigator
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Kelli Dominick Allen, PhD principal investigator
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Implementation Strategy: Foundational Support and Implementation Strategy: Enhanced Support in people with Early Ambulation, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Penetration (time frame: 10 months (cumulative)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04868656, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 May 2025.