AzTrials
AzTrials

Adolescent DevelopmentNCT04875507

PPI to Promote the Psychological Well-being of Children Living in Poverty

A study testing Positive Psychology in people with Adolescent Development, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Positive psychology interventions use positive psychology techniques to identify meaning and value in life events to raise positive feelings and emotions. Application of PPIs has steadily increased in clinical and non-clinical samples. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Adolescent Development
What is being tested?
Positive Psychology
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Dec 2021to 30 Aug 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age from 13-17
  • Can read Chinese and speak Cantonese

Who cannot join

  • with identified cognitive and/or behavioral problem(s)
  • with identified mental problem(s)
  • participating in any mental health service/programme and/or receiving any psychiatric medication.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Katherine Lam, PhD contact

27666420

kwkatlam@polyu.edu.hk

Hong Kong1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Ka Yan Ho

    Hong Kong, Hong Kong,China, 000

    Ka Yan Ho, PhD, 27666417, kyeva.ho@polyu.edu.hk

    Recruiting

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: The Use of a Positive Psychology Intervention (PPI) to Promote the Psychological Well-being of Children Living in Poverty: a Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Positive psychology interventions use positive psychology techniques to identify meaning and value in life events to raise positive feelings and emotions. Application of PPIs has steadily increased in clinical and non-clinical samples. However, that meta-analysis did not include any study in a Chinese population, and it remains unclear whether PPIs are applicable in the Hong Kong Chinese context.

Read the detailed description

A randomized controlled trial will be conducted. A convenience sample of 120 patients age 13 to 17 years with no cognitive and/or behavioral problem(s) will be recruited in secondary school around Kwai Chung Estate Participants will be randomized into experimental and control group. The experimental group, who will receive a 1.5-hour workshop covering positive psychology techniques delivered by a qualified research assistant, in groups of less than 5 people, and a booster intervention at 1 week. The control group will received no intervention. Data collection will be conducted at baseline, 1 week, 1month, 3months and 6 months for both groups.

Being tested
Positive Psychology
Keywords
Poverty, Positive Psychology, Depressive symptoms, Self-esteem, Quality of life
Medical subject headings
Depression

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Positive PsychologyBehavioural

    This intervention aim to examine the effectiveness of PPI in reducing depressive symptoms, enhancing self-esteem, and promoting quality of life among Chinese children who are living in poverty. Participants in the experimental group will receive a 1.5 hour workshop on 4 positive psychology techniques, including (1) gratitude visit/letters, (2) 3 good things, (3) you at your best, and (4) using signature strengths. A booster intervention will be given at 1-week follow-up.

Study groups in NCT04875507
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Positive psychologyActive comparatorThe experimental group(n=60), who will receive a 1.5-hour workshop covering positive psychology techniques delivered by a qualified research assistant, in groups of less than 5 people.
Receives: Behavioral: Positive Psychology
ControlNo interventionThe control group will receive no intervention.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Screening rate

    The number of children screened by the RA divided by the number of children available for screening during the recruitment period.

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Eligibility rate

    The number of eligible children divided by the number of screened children

    Measured: At baseline

  3. Consent rate

    The number of eligible children who consent to participate divided by the number of eligible children

    Measured: At baseline

  4. Randomization rate

    The number of children randomized to the experimental and control groups divided by the number of consenting children

    Measured: At baseline

  5. Intervention attendance rate

    The number of participants in the experimental group who complete the intervention divided by the number of participants randomized into the group

    Measured: Immediately after the training workshop

  6. Intervention attendance rate at 1-week follow-up

    The number of participants in the experimental group who complete the intervention divided by the number of participants randomized into the group

    Measured: At 1-week follow-up

  7. Adherence to the intervention protocol at 1-week follow-up

    The number of participants in the experimental group who practice the skills gained divided by the number of participants randomized into the group

    Measured: At 1-week follow-up

  8. Retention rate at 6-month follow-up

    The number of participants who remain in this study divided by the number of randomized participants, calculated by group at each follow-up

    Measured: At 6-month follow-up

  9. Completion rate at 6-month follow-up

    The number of participants who return the questionnaires divided by the number of questionnaires distributed

    Measured: At 6-month follow-up

  10. Missing data at baseline

    The percentage of missing in the dataset

    Measured: At baseline

  11. Missing data at 1-week follow-up

    The percentage of missing in the dataset

    Measured: At 1-week follow-up

  12. Missing data at 1-month follow-up

    The percentage of missing in the dataset

    Measured: At 1-month follow-up

  13. Missing data at 3-month follow-up

    The percentage of missing in the dataset

    Measured: At 3-month follow-up

  14. Missing data at 6-month follow-up

    The percentage of missing in the dataset

    Measured: At 6-month follow-up

  15. Adverse events at baseline

    unfavorable and unintended events

    Measured: At baseline

  16. Adverse events at 1-week follow-up

    unfavorable and unintended events

    Measured: At 1-week follow-up

  17. Adverse events at 1-month follow-up

    unfavorable and unintended events

    Measured: At 1-month follow-up

  18. Adverse events at 3-month follow-up

    unfavorable and unintended events

    Measured: At 3-month follow-up

  19. Adverse events at 6-month follow-up

    unfavorable and unintended events

    Measured: At 6-month follow-up

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Chinese version of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale at 6-month follow-up

    Assess participants' self-esteem

    Measured: At 6-month follow-up

  2. Chinese version of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory at 6-month follow-up

    Assess participants' quality of life

    Measured: At 6-month follow-up

  3. Chinese version of The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children at 6-month follow-up

    Assess participants' depressive symptoms

    Measured: At 6-month follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Dec 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Aug 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Aug 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04875507
Sponsor's protocol ID
PPI_poverty
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
20 Apr 2021
Last updated
19 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ho KY, Lam KKW, Bressington DT, Lin J, Mak YW, Wu C, Li WHC. Use of a positive psychology intervention (PPI) to promote the psychological well-being of children living in poverty: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 17;12(8):e055506. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055506.

    PubMed 35977772

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Positive Psychology in people with Adolescent Development, run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Eva Ho, PhD (27666417, kyeva.ho@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Screening rate (time frame: At baseline). The study lists 19 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04875507, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in