P. Falciparum MalariaPhase 4UNAL MALARIANCT04877626
Assessment of the Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability of the Artesunate/Amodiaquina Combination and Artemether/Lumefantrine Combination, Treatment of Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria in the Department of Chocó (Colombia)
A Phase 4 study testing Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquina in people with P. Falciparum Malaria, run by Universidad Nacional de Colombia at 1 site in Colombia.
Trial summary
Background: Malaria by P falciparum is a public health problem in more than 100 municipalities of Colombia. The country is using the artemether+lumefantrine (AM+L) fixed combination for uncomplicated P falciparum malaria but it is ideal to have different types of formulations with similar efficacy that may be used in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- P. Falciparum Malaria
- What is being tested?
- Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquina
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- 1 siteColombia
- Study dates
- Sep 2008to Dec 2009
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- fever (axillary temperature >37.5º C) or history of fever during the prior 48 hours in absence of another obvious cause (such as pneumonia, otitis media)
- a non-mixed P. falciparum infection with 250 and 100,000 asexual parasites/µl to be determined by a thick film or thick film and blood smear microscopic test
Who cannot join
- Not being able to drink
- vomiting (more than twice within the prior 24 hours)
- recent history of seizures (1 or more in the previous 24 hours)
- alteration of the consciousness level
- not being able to seat or stand up, signs of serious malaria (World Health Organization criteria)
- other chronic or severe diseases (i.e., cardiac, renal and hepatic diseases, HIV/AIDS, severe malnutrition)
- history of hypersensibility to any of the study drugs or drugs used as alternative treatment (i.e. mefloquine, artesunate, quinine or tetracycline/clindamycin)
- suspicion of pregnancy or pregnancy (based on a urine pregnancy test).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Colombia1 site
San Rafael Hospital in Quibdó Chocó
Quibdó, Departamento del Chocó, 57
About this study
Official title: Assessment of the Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability of the Artesunate/Amodiaquina Combination and Artemether/Lumefantrine Combination, the Standard Treatment Recommended by the Ministry of the Social Protection in Colombia for the Treatment of Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria in the Department of Chocó (Colombia)
Background: Malaria by P falciparum is a public health problem in more than 100 municipalities of Colombia. The country is using the artemether+lumefantrine (AM+L) fixed combination for uncomplicated P falciparum malaria but it is ideal to have different types of formulations with similar efficacy that may be used in diverse circumstances. One alternative of treatment is using preparations containing artesunate and amodiaquine (AS+AQ) in fixed combination, which can be given in a simpler dosing regimen. In order to assess the efficacy of that combination in an area with suspected risk of resistance to amodiaquine an open controlled clinical trial was carried out in Colombia. Methods: The study was done in Choco, a high endemic area for malaria by P falciparum, from August 2008 and September 2009. Patients diagnosed with uncomplicated malaria (n=210) malaria were randomized in two arms, one receiving AS+AQ and the other AM+L. The main clinical results was parasitological cure, i.e. a negative blood smears, that was assessed, for both groups, at days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after the onset of treatment. Results: There were no losses at follow up. The mean age of the enrolled study subjects was of 37.5 years without differences between study arms. Both therapies were very well tolerated in general. The efficacy for AS+AQ was 100%, and 99% for AM+L (p>0.1). In average, patients in the AS+AQ arm became negative for P falciparum parasites and gametocytes earlier than those at the AM+L arm. Blood smears became negative after one day of treatment with AS+AQ and after two days of treatment with AM+L. Gametocytes disappeared after 2 days of treatment in the AS+AQ arm compared to 4 days in the AM+L arm. Conclusions: In this study, the efficacy of the AS+AQ combination was similar to that of the AM+L. This finding do not support the hypothesis that there is a level of resistance to amodiaquine that prevents its use combined with artemisinin derived.
Read the detailed description
Design: An open-labeled, randomized and controlled clinical trial with follow-up in days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, 21 and 28 was carried out in adult patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. This type of study has been validated by PAHO and has been used by the Amazon Network for the Surveillance of Antimalarial Drug (RAVREDA) to evaluate the efficacy of antimalarial treatment in the Americas region. This study is a simplified version with monthly follow-up by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) of the status of therapeutic failures to assure that the study progress does not result unethical.
Study area: The study area was in Department of Chocó, which is located west in the Pacific region of the country, has an approximate extension of 47,000 Km2, equivalent to 4% of the country's total extension. Chocó has 31 Municipalities for a total of 454,030 inhabitants, according to the 2005 Survey. From this population, 90% is black, 6% mulatto or white, and the remaining 4% natives. The great part of the population has its settling in the river and sea zones, which constitutes an important aspect to consider in communications, culture and socioeconomic development of the region. The temperature ranges between 26º and 30ºC. Patients were recruited from two municipalities, Quibdo and Tado.
Inclusion Criteria. Age > 18 years, fever (axillary temperature >37.5º C) or history of fever during the prior 48 hours in absence of another obvious cause (such as pneumonia, otitis media), a non-mixed P. falciparum infection with 250 and 100,000 asexual parasites/µl to be determined by a thick film or thick film and blood smear microscopic test.
Exclusion Criteria. Not being able to drink, vomiting (more than twice within the prior 24 hours), recent history of seizures (1 or more in the previous 24 hours), alteration of the consciousness level, not being able to seat or stand up, signs of serious malaria (World Health Organization criteria), other chronic or severe diseases (i.e., cardiac, renal and hepatic diseases, HIV/AIDS, severe malnutrition), history of hypersensibility to any of the study drugs or drugs used as alternative treatment (i.e. mefloquine, artesunate, quinine or tetracycline/clindamycin), and suspicion of pregnancy or pregnancy (based on a urine pregnancy test).
Study arms and treatments. Two study arms were considered: Group 1 received the combination AQ+AS (COARSUCAM®) which was administered orally at an initial dose of 2 tablets (200 mg AQ/540 mg AS) followed by 2 additional doses of 2 tablets at 24 and 48 hours (6 tablets in 48 hours).
Group 2 received the combination Artemeter+lumefantrina (COARTEM®) administered orally at an initial dose of 4 tablets (80 mg artemeter/480 mg lumefantrina) followed by 5 additional doses of 4 tablets at 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours (24 tablets in 60 hours)
Sample size. The sample size was estimated based on the expected proportion of failures for each one of the treatments in this population. Assuming a similar efficacy for both treatments (7) and considering a proportion of failures to treatment of 5% (range 1-11%) in a population of infinite size, a 5% significance level and a maximum tolerable error of +4%, a total of 100 study subjects are required to be included in each group. If 5% of the study subjects are lost in a 28 days study, a total of 105 will be needed in each group. All included subjects signed the Informed Consent.
Randomization. The assignment of treatments was made through a negative coordinated type sampling scheme (7) which consists in generating a list of randomized numbers from a normal distribution [0,1] and order the study subjects regarding this new list. These ordered study subjects were systematically chosen (in this case applying a ½ sampling fraction, i.e., 1 of every two for each treatment arm, since there were two arms) with an initial number randomly generated through a Bernoulli distribution. This process ensures a balanced allocation to the study arms.
Main outcomes. failure to take the drug on any of the first three days, parasitemia on day 2 greater than that on day 0, presence of parasitemia on day 7, diagnosis of severe malaria at any point after day 0, recurrent parasitemia after day 7 up to day 28 (8-11).
Analysis. Data were double-entered, and validated using Epi info© 2000 and the analysis was done using Stata™ 10.0. Per protocol analysis included patients who were properly randomised, had received the study drugs according to the protocol, and for whom data were available on the primary end point. All statistical tests were two-sided and an α-level <0.05 was considered a statistically significant result. For comparisons of continuous variables between groups, the t-test was used and for comparisons between more than two groups, one-way analysis of variance was used after assuring normality and homogeneity of variances assumptions were satisfied. For comparison of categorical variables, the chi-square test was used with the exact extension invoked when there were small numbers in the cells. The end points were any of the following: failure to take the drug on any of the first three days, parasitaemia on day 2 greater than that on day 0, presence of parasitaemia on day 7, diagnosis of severe malaria at any point after day 0, recurrent parasitaemia after day 7 up to day 28.
- Conditions
- P. Falciparum Malaria
- Being tested
- Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquina
- Keywords
- uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, Colombia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquinaDrug
Group 1 received the combination AQ+AS (COARSUCAM®) which was administered orally at an initial dose of 2 tablets (200 mg AQ/540 mg AS) followed by 2 additional doses of 2 tablets at 24 and 48 hours (6 tablets in 48 hours).
Group 2 received the combination Artemeter+lumefantrina (COARTEM®) administered orally at an initial dose of 4 tablets (80 mg artemeter/480 mg lumefantrina) followed by 5 additional doses of 4 tablets at 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours (24 tablets in 60 hours)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AQ+AS | Active comparator | Group 1 received the combination AQ+AS (COARSUCAM®) which was administered orally at an initial dose of 2 tablets (200 mg AQ/540 mg AS) followed by 2 additional doses of 2 tablets at 24 and 48 hours (6 tablets in 48 hours). Receives: Drug: Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquina |
| AM+L | Active comparator | Group 2 received the combination Artemeter+lumefantrina (COARTEM®) administered orally at an initial dose of 4 tablets (80 mg artemeter/480 mg lumefantrina) followed by 5 additional doses of 4 tablets at 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours (24 tablets in 60 hours) Receives: Drug: Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquina |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR)
Absence of parasitemia on day 28, irrespective of axillary temperature, in patients who did not previously meet any of the criteria of early treatment failure, late clinical failure or late parasitological failure
Measured: 28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2021
- Study startSep 2008
- Primary completionOct 2009
- Study completionDec 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for P. Falciparum MalariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Nacional de Colombia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Alejandro AR Rico, Epidemiologist, Study chair, Universidad Nacional de ColombiaFernando FH De la Hoz, PhD, Principal investigator, Universidad Nacional de ColombiaAlexandra AP Porras, Epidemiologist, Study director, Universidad Nacional de ColombiaFreddy FC Cordoba, Epidemiologist, Study chair, Chocó
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04877626
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Treatment malaria in Colombia
- Acronym
- UNAL MALARIA
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2010
- Last updated
- 7 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of the Therapeutic Efficacy and Tolerability of the Artesunate/Amodiaquina Combination and Artemether/Lumefantrine Combination, the Standard Treatment Recommended by the Ministry of the Social Protection in Colombia for the Treatment of Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria in the Department of Chocó (Colombia)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04877626
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UNAL MALARIA / Treatment malaria in Colombia
- Conditions
- P. Falciparum Malaria
- Keywords
- uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria, Colombia
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universidad Nacional de ColombiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company
- Study start
- Sep 2008
- Primary completion
- Oct 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background: Malaria by P falciparum is a public health problem in more than 100 municipalities of Colombia. The country is using the artemether+lumefantrine (AM+L) fixed combination for uncomplicated P falciparum malaria but it is ideal to have different types of formulations with similar efficacy that may be used in diverse circumstances. One alternative of treatment is using preparations containing artesunate and amodiaquine (AS+AQ) in fixed combination, which can be given in a simpler dosing regimen. In order to assess the efficacy of that combination in an area with suspected risk of resistance to amodiaquine an open controlled clinical trial was carried out in Colombia. Methods: The study was done in Choco, a high endemic area for malaria by P falciparum, from August 2008 and September 2009. Patients diagnosed with uncomplicated malaria (n=210) malaria were randomized in two arms, one receiving AS+AQ and the other AM+L. The main clinical results was parasitological cure, i.e. a negative blood smears, that was assessed, for both groups, at days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 after the onset of treatment. Results: There were no losses at follow up. The mean age of the enrolled study subjects was of 37.5 years without differences between study arms. Both therapies were very well tolerated in general. The efficacy for AS+AQ was 100%, and 99% for AM+L (p>0.1). In average, patients in the AS+AQ arm became negative for P falciparum parasites and gametocytes earlier than those at the AM+L arm. Blood smears became negative after one day of treatment with AS+AQ and after two days of treatment with AM+L. Gametocytes disappeared after 2 days of treatment in the AS+AQ arm compared to 4 days in the AM+L arm. Conclusions: In this study, the efficacy of the AS+AQ combination was similar to that of the AM+L. This finding do not support the hypothesis that there is a level of resistance to amodiaquine that prevents its use combined with artemisinin derived.
Detailed description
Design: An open-labeled, randomized and controlled clinical trial with follow-up in days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, 21 and 28 was carried out in adult patients with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria. This type of study has been validated by PAHO and has been used by the Amazon Network for the Surveillance of Antimalarial Drug (RAVREDA) to evaluate the efficacy of antimalarial treatment in the Americas region. This study is a simplified version with monthly follow-up by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) of the status of therapeutic failures to assure that the study progress does not result unethical.
Study area: The study area was in Department of Chocó, which is located west in the Pacific region of the country, has an approximate extension of 47,000 Km2, equivalent to 4% of the country's total extension. Chocó has 31 Municipalities for a total of 454,030 inhabitants, according to the 2005 Survey. From this population, 90% is black, 6% mulatto or white, and the remaining 4% natives. The great part of the population has its settling in the river and sea zones, which constitutes an important aspect to consider in communications, culture and socioeconomic development of the region. The temperature ranges between 26º and 30ºC. Patients were recruited from two municipalities, Quibdo and Tado.
Inclusion Criteria. Age > 18 years, fever (axillary temperature >37.5º C) or history of fever during the prior 48 hours in absence of another obvious cause (such as pneumonia, otitis media), a non-mixed P. falciparum infection with 250 and 100,000 asexual parasites/µl to be determined by a thick film or thick film and blood smear microscopic test.
Exclusion Criteria. Not being able to drink, vomiting (more than twice within the prior 24 hours), recent history of seizures (1 or more in the previous 24 hours), alteration of the consciousness level, not being able to seat or stand up, signs of serious malaria (World Health Organization criteria), other chronic or severe diseases (i.e., cardiac, renal and hepatic diseases, HIV/AIDS, severe malnutrition), history of hypersensibility to any of the study drugs or drugs used as alternative treatment (i.e. mefloquine, artesunate, quinine or tetracycline/clindamycin), and suspicion of pregnancy or pregnancy (based on a urine pregnancy test).
Study arms and treatments. Two study arms were considered: Group 1 received the combination AQ+AS (COARSUCAM®) which was administered orally at an initial dose of 2 tablets (200 mg AQ/540 mg AS) followed by 2 additional doses of 2 tablets at 24 and 48 hours (6 tablets in 48 hours).
Group 2 received the combination Artemeter+lumefantrina (COARTEM®) administered orally at an initial dose of 4 tablets (80 mg artemeter/480 mg lumefantrina) followed by 5 additional doses of 4 tablets at 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours (24 tablets in 60 hours)
Sample size. The sample size was estimated based on the expected proportion of failures for each one of the treatments in this population. Assuming a similar efficacy for both treatments (7) and considering a proportion of failures to treatment of 5% (range 1-11%) in a population of infinite size, a 5% significance level and a maximum tolerable error of +4%, a total of 100 study subjects are required to be included in each group. If 5% of the study subjects are lost in a 28 days study, a total of 105 will be needed in each group. All included subjects signed the Informed Consent.
Randomization. The assignment of treatments was made through a negative coordinated type sampling scheme (7) which consists in generating a list of randomized numbers from a normal distribution [0,1] and order the study subjects regarding this new list. These ordered study subjects were systematically chosen (in this case applying a ½ sampling fraction, i.e., 1 of every two for each treatment arm, since there were two arms) with an initial number randomly generated through a Bernoulli distribution. This process ensures a balanced allocation to the study arms.
Main outcomes. failure to take the drug on any of the first three days, parasitemia on day 2 greater than that on day 0, presence of parasitemia on day 7, diagnosis of severe malaria at any point after day 0, recurrent parasitemia after day 7 up to day 28 (8-11).
Analysis. Data were double-entered, and validated using Epi info© 2000 and the analysis was done using Stata™ 10.0. Per protocol analysis included patients who were properly randomised, had received the study drugs according to the protocol, and for whom data were available on the primary end point. All statistical tests were two-sided and an α-level <0.05 was considered a statistically significant result. For comparisons of continuous variables between groups, the t-test was used and for comparisons between more than two groups, one-way analysis of variance was used after assuring normality and homogeneity of variances assumptions were satisfied. For comparison of categorical variables, the chi-square test was used with the exact extension invoked when there were small numbers in the cells. The end points were any of the following: failure to take the drug on any of the first three days, parasitaemia on day 2 greater than that on day 0, presence of parasitaemia on day 7, diagnosis of severe malaria at any point after day 0, recurrent parasitaemia after day 7 up to day 28.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AQ+AS | Active comparator | Drug: Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquinaGroup 1 received the combination AQ+AS (COARSUCAM®) which was administered orally at an initial dose of 2 tablets (200 mg AQ/540 mg AS) followed by 2 additional doses of 2 tablets at 24 and 48 hours (6 tablets in 48 hours). |
| AM+L | Active comparator | Drug: Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquinaGroup 2 received the combination Artemeter+lumefantrina (COARTEM®) administered orally at an initial dose of 4 tablets (80 mg artemeter/480 mg lumefantrina) followed by 5 additional doses of 4 tablets at 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours (24 tablets in 60 hours) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- fever (axillary temperature >37.5º C) or history of fever during the prior 48 hours in absence of another obvious cause (such as pneumonia, otitis media)
- a non-mixed P. falciparum infection with 250 and 100,000 asexual parasites/µl to be determined by a thick film or thick film and blood smear microscopic test
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Not being able to drink
- vomiting (more than twice within the prior 24 hours)
- recent history of seizures (1 or more in the previous 24 hours)
- alteration of the consciousness level
- not being able to seat or stand up, signs of serious malaria (World Health Organization criteria)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquinaGroup 1 received the combination AQ+AS (COARSUCAM®) which was administered orally at an initial dose of 2 tablets (200 mg AQ/540 mg AS) followed by 2 additional doses of 2 tablets at 24 and 48 hours (6 tablets in 48 hours). Group 2 received the combination Artemeter+lumefantrina (COARTEM®) administered orally at an initial dose of 4 tablets (80 mg artemeter/480 mg lumefantrina) followed by 5 additional doses of 4 tablets at 8, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours (24 tablets in 60 hours) | Drug | AM+L, AQ+AS |
Primary outcome
The primary efficacy endpoint was the adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR)
Time frame: 28 days
Absence of parasitemia on day 28, irrespective of axillary temperature, in patients who did not previously meet any of the criteria of early treatment failure, late clinical failure or late parasitological failure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2021.
Related trials for P. Falciparum Malaria
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ethiopian Antimalarial Therapeutic Efficacy Study 2026
Plasmodium Vivax Malaria Without Complication, Plasmodium Falciparum Malaria (Uncomplicated)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Artemisia Annua Infusion for the Treatment of Asymptomatic Plasmodium Falciparum Infection
Asymptomatic P.Falciparum Malaria
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Malaria CVD 36000; Gates INV090205
Malaria (Plasmodium Falciparum)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2A Study of a Novel Antimalarial Pyrrolidinamide in Adult Patients With Uncomplicated P. Falciparum Malaria
Malaria, Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alejandro AR Rico, Epidemiologist study chair
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Fernando FH De la Hoz, PhD principal investigator
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
Alexandra AP Porras, Epidemiologist study director
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Artemeter plus lumefantrina vs artesunato plus amodiquina in people with P. Falciparum Malaria, run by Universidad Nacional de Colombia at 1 site in Colombia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary efficacy endpoint was the adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) (time frame: 28 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2021.