Pneumonia, ViralPhase 3NCT04878055
Study on Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia.
A Phase 3 study testing Reparixin in people with Pneumonia, Viral, run by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A at 17 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The study objective is to assess Efficacy and safety of Reparixin treatment as compared to placebo (both on top of standard treatment) in adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pneumonia, Viral
- What is being tested?
- Reparixin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 287 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 14 Feb 2021to 31 Oct 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 to 90, male and female subject of any race
- Reverse transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (rt-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 infection based on a nasal / oropharyngeal swab within 10 days before randomization
- At least one of the following: 1) Respiratory distress with tachypnea (RR ≥ 24 breaths/min without oxygen); 2) Partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) / Fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2), P/F >100 and <300 mmHg (1mmHg = 0.133kPa), 3) SpO2 ≤ 94% while breathing ambient air.
- Calculation through validated Sat/FiO2 scales is allowed. P/F value of reference if the last available before the signature of consent.
- Need of supplemental oxygen (i.e. new use of supplemental oxygen, or increased oxygen requirement if on chronic oxygen) requiring low- or high-flow oxygen or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (7-point WHO-OS category 4 or 5).
- Radiological chest imaging (X-rays, CT scan) confirms lung involvement and inflammation.
Who cannot join
- Cannot obtain informed consent.
- Hepatic dysfunction with Child Pugh score B or C, or ALT or AST> 5 times the upper limit.
- Renal dysfunction with estimated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD) < 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 or patient receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis.
- Bacterial sepsis (besides COVID-19 sepsis).
- Known congenital or acquired immune deficiency.
- Positive or missing pregnancy test before first drug intake or day 1; pregnant or lactating women; women of childbearing potential and fertile men who do not agree to use at least one primary form of contraception for the duration of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 2 countries.
17 sites in 2 countries
Italy15 sites
Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi UO di Pneumologia e Terapia Int. Respiratoria
Bologna, 40138
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Malattie infettive e tropicali
Genova, 16132
Ospedale regionale San Salvatore U.O.C. Anestesia e Rianimazione
L’Aquila, 67100
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Centro di Ricerca Anestesia e Rianimazione
Milan, 20132
ASST SANTI PAOLO E CARLO Ospedale San Paolo Struttura Complessa Malattie Infettive
Milan, 20142
IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas U.O. Medicina D'Urgenza
Milan, 20089
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Dipartimento Malattie Infettive
Milan, 20162
ASST-Monza Ospedale San Gerardo Malattie Infettive
Monza, 20900
A.O.U. Federico II Malattie Infettive del Policlinico Federico II
Naples, 80131
Università della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" Dipartimento di Malattie Infettive
Naples, 80133
Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico UOC Anestesia e Rianimazione
Roma, 00128
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, UOC Malattie Infettive
Roma, 00161
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore - Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" - Istituto di Clinica delle Malattie Infettive
Roma, 00168
ASST dei Sette Laghi Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi Struttura Complessa Malattie infettive e tropicali
Varese, 21100
A.O.U. Integrata di Verona U.O. Medicina Respiratoria, sezione di Medicina Interna
Verona, 37124
United States2 sites
Franciscan Alliance, 421 N Emerson Ave,
Greenwood, Indiana, 46143
The George Washington University Medical Faculty Associates, 2150 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia
The study objective is to assess Efficacy and safety of Reparixin treatment as compared to placebo (both on top of standard treatment) in adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Read the detailed description
This is a phase 3 clinical trial designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Reparixin in hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Patients will be screened for the participation in the study and eventually randomized based on an unbalanced randomization scheme (2:1) to Reparixin oral tablets (2 x 600 mg TID) for up to 21 days or to placebo.
An unequal randomization is justified by the need to gain experience and more safety data with the investigated treatment and by an expected better acceptability of the trial by patients.
The placebo control arm is justified by the unavailability of a well-defined standard of care for subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia who are candidates for this study.
All patient will receive the standard supportive care based on the patient's clinical need. Follow-up information on the patient's clinical condition will be collected until day 90.
- Conditions
- Pneumonia, Viral
- Being tested
- Reparixin, Placebo
- Keywords
- Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, Pneumonia, Severe pneumonia
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Viral, COVID-19, Pneumonia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ReparixinDrug
Also called DF 1681Y
2 tablets of Reparixin (600 mg each), for the total of three daily administrations (6 tablets daily).
PlaceboOther
Matched placebo, i.e. 2 tablets for the total of three daily administrations (6 tablets daily).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin | Experimental | Reparixin oral tablets, 1200 mg three times daily (TID) (2 tablets 600 mg each, TID) for up to 21 days or until decision of discharge from the hospital, on top of standard supportive care Receives: Drug: Reparixin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | placebo, 2 tablets TID (identical to Reparixin tablets) for up to 21 days or until decision of discharge from the hospital, on top of standard supportive care. Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Day 28
The event variable is defined as "the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28". This means no need of invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or admission to intensive care unit (ICU) linked to worsening of respiratory parameters compared to baseline.
Measured: At day 28
Secondary outcomes (26)
Proportion of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Day 60
This key secondary efficacy endpoint of the study is defined as "the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 60", i.e. with no need of invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or admission to intensive care unit (ICU) linked to worsening of respiratory parameters compared to baseline.
Measured: At day 60
Mortality Rates up to Day 28
This key secondary efficacy endpoint describes number and proportion along with the 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson's formula) of patients who died up to Day 28.
Measured: Up to Day 28
Incidence of ICU Admission Until Day 28
This is a key secondary efficacy endpoint. Admissions to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) had to be considered only in presence of significant worsening of respiratory status. This condition was objectively identified by means of a decrease of PaO2/FiO2 ratio of at least 40% from the baseline value or by a worsening of Investigator's Interpretation.
Measured: Until day 28
Time to Recovery (Category 1 - 2 - 3 of the 7-point WHO Ordinal Scale of Clinical Improvement (WHO-OS)) Until Day 28
This is a key secondary efficacy endpoint. The event "recovery" was considered as such, if the patient has scored category 1, 2 or 3 from the 7-point WHO Ordinal Scale of clinical improvement (WHO-OS), otherwise it will be considered free of event.
Category 1: not hospitalized, with resumption of normal activities; 2: not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities; 3: hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; [4: hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5: hospitalized, requiring high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 6: hospitalized, requiring ECMO, invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 7: death]. The lower the category, the better the outcome.
Measured: Until Day 28
Proportion of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Fixed Timepoints
The event variable is defined as the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at fixed timepoints. This means no need of invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or admission to intensive care unit (ICU) linked to worsening of respiratory parameters compared to baseline.
Admissions to ICU had to be considered only in presence of significant worsening of respiratory status.
This condition was objectively identified by means of a decrease of PaO2/FiO2 ratio of at least 40% from the baseline value or by a worsening of Investigator's Interpretation.
Measured: At Days 3, 7(±1),14(±2), 21(±2) and 90(±2) after randomization (randomization = day 1)
Mean Changes From Baseline in Clinical Severity Score Based on the 7-point WHO-OS at Fixed Timepoints
Changes from baseline in clinical severity score are analyzed based on the 7-point WHO-OS. The 7-point WHO Ordinal Scale of clinical improvement (WHO-OS), comprises the following categories: 1: not hospitalized, with resumption of normal activities; 2: not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities; 3: hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4: hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5: hospitalized, requiring high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 6: hospitalized, requiring ECMO, invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 7: death.
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement 1 up to Day 28 (Decline of 1 Category in the 7-point WHO-OS)
Clinical improvement 1 is defined as the decline of 1 category in the 7-point WHO-OS up to Date 28. The clinical improvement 1 up to Day 28 was analyzed as described for time to recovery: an event was considered as such, if patient declined of at least 1 category in the 7-point WHO-OS respect to the baseline, otherwise it was be considered free of event.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline), Days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement 1 up to Day 28
Clinical improvement 1 up to Date 28 for this outcome is expressed as cumulative incidence function (CIF in %). CIF allows for estimation of the occurrence of an event while taking into account the following competing risks: death, reasons for discontinuation for Adverse events and patient transferred to another institution. Estimates are calculated using a nonparametric method. The null hypothesis is that the cumulative incidence functions are identical across treatment groups.
Measured: At day 28
Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement 2 up to Day 28 (Decline of 2 Categories in the 7-point WHO-OS)
Clinical improvement 2 is defined as the decline of 2 categories in the 7-point WHO-OS) up to Date 28. Clinical improvement 2 up to Date 28 was analyzed as described for time to recovery. An event was considered as such, if patient declined of at least 2 categories in the 7-point WHO-OS respect to the baseline, otherwise it was considered free of event.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline), Days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement 2 up to Day 28
Clinical improvement 2 up to Day 28 is defined as cumulative incidence function (CIF, in %). CIF allows for estimation of the occurrence of an event while taking into account the following competing risks: death, reasons for discontinuation for Adverse events and patient transferred to another institution. Estimates are calculated using a nonparametric method. The null hypothesis is that the cumulative incidence functions are identical across treatment groups.
Measured: At Day 28
Time to Discharge From Hospital up to Day 28
Time to discharge from hospital up to Day 28 is analyzed as described for time to recovery.
Measured: Day 1 (baseline), Days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28
Clinical Status Either in Hospital or at Home (7-point WHO-OS) at Fixed Time Points
Clinical status is analyzed based on the 7-point WHO-OS. The 7-point WHO Ordinal Scale of clinical improvement (WHO-OS), comprises the following categories: 1: not hospitalized, with resumption of normal activities; 2: not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities; 3: hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4: hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5: hospitalized, requiring high-flow oxygen therapy, non-invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 6: hospitalized, requiring ECMO, invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 7: death. The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
The Number of Patients With Different Dyspnea Severity Scores Using the Likert Scale at Fixed Timepoints
The number of patients with Dyspnea severity Likert scale by score and treatment group is calculated for each time point.
Likert scale: grading the current experience of breathing discomfort compared to baseline (randomization) status (from -3 to 3) where:
"-1 = minimally worse; -2 = moderately worse; -3 = markedly worse; 0 = no change; 1 = minimally better; 2 = moderately better; 3 = markedly better" More negative the score, the worse the outcome.
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline to Fixed Timepoints in Pulse Oximetry by Measurement of Peripheral Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SpO2).
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) monitoring by pulse oximetry is used to estimate the oxygen saturation of arterial blood (SaO2) and provides vital information about a patient's cardiorespiratory function.
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline in Dyspnea Severity (VAS Scale) at Fixed Timepoints
The pain VAS is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity, used to record patients' pain progression, or compare pain severity between paints with similar conditions.The VAS scale is from 0 to 100. The number 0 means the worst breathing the patient has ever felt, and the number 100 means the best the patient has ever felt.
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Duration of Supplemental Oxygen Treatment up to Day 28
This endpoint is expressed as:
- The number and proportion along with the 95% CI (Clopper-Pearson's formula) of patients using supplemental oxygen treatment by treatment group;
- The Cumulative duration of supplemental oxygen treatment in days analyzed by means of descriptive statistics by treatment. This latter is reported in the system.
Measured: From baseline up to day 28
Number of Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Use, or ECMO up to Day 28 and up to Day 60
Invasive mechanical ventilation is defined as the delivery of positive pressure to the lungs via an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube. During mechanical ventilation, a predetermined mixture of air (ie, oxygen and other gases) is forced into the central airways and then flows into the alveoli.
Measured: day 28 and Day 60
Duration of Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation up to Day 60
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is the delivery of oxygen (ventilation support) via a face mask and therefore eliminating the need of an endotracheal airway. NIV achieves comparative physiological benefits to conventional mechanical ventilation by reducing the work of breathing and improving gas exchange.
Measured: From baseline up to day 60
Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, or ECMO up to Day 60
Invasive mechanical ventilation is defined as the delivery of positive pressure to the lungs via an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube. During mechanical ventilation, a predetermined mixture of air (ie, oxygen and other gases) is forced into the central airways and then flows into the alveoli.
Measured: Up to day 60
Duration of ICU Admission up to Day 60
Admission to intensive care unit or ICU is linked to worsening of respiratory parameters compared to baseline.
Measured: Up to day 60
Change From Baseline to Fixed Timepoints of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
PaO2-the oxygen pressure in arterial blood. The PaO2 reflects how well oxygen is able to move from the lungs to the blood. It is often altered by severe illnesses, with the PaO2 test results used to guide treatment.
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline to Fixed Timepoints in PaO2/FiO2 Ratio.
The PaO2/FiO2 ratio is used to determine the severity of lung injury in mechanically ventilated patients.
A normal P/F Ratio is ≥ 400 and equivalent to a PaO2 ≥ 80 mmHg on room air. Low values of the PaO2/FIO2 ratio may be due to pathological conditions, primarily those of a respiratory nature (atelectasis, ARDS, acute pulmonary edema, pneumonia, etc.), as well as to alterations in hemodynamic status (cardiogenic shock, septic shock, etc.), or even both.
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline to Fixed Endpoints in High-Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
The high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) test is more sensitive than the standard CRP test measuring slight increases in CRP levels even when within the normal range. Because of this greater sensitivity, the hs-CRP test can help determine your risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD).
Measured: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Mortality Rates up to Days 60 and 90
Mortality rate, or death rate, is a measure of the number of deaths (in general, or due to a specific cause) in a particular population, scaled to the size of that population, per unit of time. The death event variable is defined as the proportion of patients died up to Day 90.
Measured: up to Days 60 and 90
Freedom From (Time to) Death or Respiratory Failure up to Day 90
Freedom from (time to) death or respiratory failure (need of invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO or admission to ICU linked to worsening of respiratory parameters compared to baseline) at baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28, day 60, day 90 was performed using the same Kaplan-Meier analysis and the one-sided log-rank test that were used to test for differences between groups.
Measured: at baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28, day 60, day 90
Number of Subjects Who Exhibited at Least 1 TEAE, at Least 1 Severe TEAE, at Least 1 Serious TEAE, at Least 1 Non-serious TEAE, at Least 1 ADR, at Least 1 Serious ADR, at Least 1 TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of IMP, Etc.
AE= An adverse event is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a human. subject, including any abnormal sign (for example, abnormal physical exam or. laboratory finding), symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the subject's.
serious AE=a SAE iA serious adverse event (SAE) in human drug trials is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death Is life-threatening Requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity May have caused a congenital anomaly/birth defect Requires intervention to prevent permanent impairment or damage. The term "life-threatening" in the definition of "serious" refers to an event in which the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe.
Do note that starting from this point the safety endpoint is analysed.
Measured: Throughout the study, till Day 90 (= end of the follow-up period).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 May 2021
- Study start14 Feb 2021
- Primary completion30 Sep 2021
- Study completion31 Oct 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pneumonia, ViralStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- subjects will be randomized with a 2:1 randomization ratio
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 287 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Giovanni Landoni, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Ospedale San Raffaele
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04878055
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REP0220
- Other IDs
- 2020-005919-51
- Status last verified
- May 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Piemonti L, Landoni G, Voza A, Puoti M, Gentile I, Coppola N, Nava S, Mattei A, Marinangeli F, Marchetti G, Bonfanti P, Mastroianni CM, Bassetti M, Crisafulli E, Grossi PA, Zangrillo A, Desai A, Merli M, Foggia M, Carpano M, Schiavoni L, D'Arminio Monforte A, Bisi L, Russo G, Busti F, Rovelli C, Perrotta E, Goisis G, Gavioli EM, Toya S, De Pizzol M, Mantelli F, Allegretti M, Minnella EM. Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Oct;12(10):2437-2456. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00871-5. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
PubMed 37798468
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jun 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients With Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04878055
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REP0220
- Conditions
- Pneumonia, Viral
- Keywords
- Covid-19, SARS-CoV-2, Pneumonia, Severe pneumonia
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 287 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.AIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 14 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 13 Jun 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study objective is to assess Efficacy and safety of Reparixin treatment as compared to placebo (both on top of standard treatment) in adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Detailed description
This is a phase 3 clinical trial designed as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Reparixin in hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia.
Patients will be screened for the participation in the study and eventually randomized based on an unbalanced randomization scheme (2:1) to Reparixin oral tablets (2 x 600 mg TID) for up to 21 days or to placebo.
An unequal randomization is justified by the need to gain experience and more safety data with the investigated treatment and by an expected better acceptability of the trial by patients.
The placebo control arm is justified by the unavailability of a well-defined standard of care for subjects with COVID-19 pneumonia who are candidates for this study.
All patient will receive the standard supportive care based on the patient's clinical need. Follow-up information on the patient's clinical condition will be collected until day 90.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- subjects will be randomized with a 2:1 randomization ratio
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Reparixin | Experimental | Drug: ReparixinReparixin oral tablets, 1200 mg three times daily (TID) (2 tablets 600 mg each, TID) for up to 21 days or until decision of discharge from the hospital, on top of standard supportive care |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placeboplacebo, 2 tablets TID (identical to Reparixin tablets) for up to 21 days or until decision of discharge from the hospital, on top of standard supportive care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age 18 to 90, male and female subject of any race
- Reverse transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction (rt-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 infection based on a nasal / oropharyngeal swab within 10 days before randomization
- At least one of the following: 1) Respiratory distress with tachypnea (RR ≥ 24 breaths/min without oxygen); 2) Partial arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) / Fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2), P/F >100 and <300 mmHg (1mmHg = 0.133kPa), 3) SpO2 ≤ 94% while breathing ambient air.
- Calculation through validated Sat/FiO2 scales is allowed. P/F value of reference if the last available before the signature of consent.
- Need of supplemental oxygen (i.e. new use of supplemental oxygen, or increased oxygen requirement if on chronic oxygen) requiring low- or high-flow oxygen or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (7-point WHO-OS category 4 or 5).
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Cannot obtain informed consent.
- Hepatic dysfunction with Child Pugh score B or C, or ALT or AST> 5 times the upper limit.
- Renal dysfunction with estimated glomerular filtration rate (MDRD) < 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 or patient receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, hemodialysis, or peritoneal dialysis.
- Bacterial sepsis (besides COVID-19 sepsis).
- Known congenital or acquired immune deficiency.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ReparixinAlso: DF 1681Y2 tablets of Reparixin (600 mg each), for the total of three daily administrations (6 tablets daily). | Drug | Reparixin |
| PlaceboMatched placebo, i.e. 2 tablets for the total of three daily administrations (6 tablets daily). | Other | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Day 28
Time frame: At day 28
The event variable is defined as "the proportion of patients alive and free of respiratory failure at Day 28". This means no need of invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or admission to intensive care unit (ICU) linked to worsening of respiratory parameters compared to baseline.
26 secondary outcomes
Proportion of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Day 60
Time frame: At day 60
Mortality Rates up to Day 28
Time frame: Up to Day 28
Incidence of ICU Admission Until Day 28
Time frame: Until day 28
Time to Recovery (Category 1 - 2 - 3 of the 7-point WHO Ordinal Scale of Clinical Improvement (WHO-OS)) Until Day 28
Time frame: Until Day 28
Proportion of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Fixed Timepoints
Time frame: At Days 3, 7(±1),14(±2), 21(±2) and 90(±2) after randomization (randomization = day 1)
Mean Changes From Baseline in Clinical Severity Score Based on the 7-point WHO-OS at Fixed Timepoints
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement 1 up to Day 28 (Decline of 1 Category in the 7-point WHO-OS)
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement 1 up to Day 28
Time frame: At day 28
Number of Patients With Clinical Improvement 2 up to Day 28 (Decline of 2 Categories in the 7-point WHO-OS)
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Improvement 2 up to Day 28
Time frame: At Day 28
Time to Discharge From Hospital up to Day 28
Time frame: Day 1 (baseline), Days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28
Clinical Status Either in Hospital or at Home (7-point WHO-OS) at Fixed Time Points
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
The Number of Patients With Different Dyspnea Severity Scores Using the Likert Scale at Fixed Timepoints
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline to Fixed Timepoints in Pulse Oximetry by Measurement of Peripheral Arterial Oxygen Saturation (SpO2).
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline in Dyspnea Severity (VAS Scale) at Fixed Timepoints
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Duration of Supplemental Oxygen Treatment up to Day 28
Time frame: From baseline up to day 28
Number of Patients Requiring Invasive Mechanical Ventilation Use, or ECMO up to Day 28 and up to Day 60
Time frame: day 28 and Day 60
Duration of Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation up to Day 60
Time frame: From baseline up to day 60
Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, or ECMO up to Day 60
Time frame: Up to day 60
Duration of ICU Admission up to Day 60
Time frame: Up to day 60
Change From Baseline to Fixed Timepoints of Partial Pressure of Oxygen (PaO2)
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline to Fixed Timepoints in PaO2/FiO2 Ratio.
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Change From Baseline to Fixed Endpoints in High-Sensitivity C Reactive Protein (Hs-CRP)
Time frame: At days 3, 7, 14, 21, 28 and End of Treatment (EoT, up to 30 days); days 60 and 90; at hospital discharge (HD, up to 2 months), and at the EoS (up to 3 months)
Mortality Rates up to Days 60 and 90
Time frame: up to Days 60 and 90
Freedom From (Time to) Death or Respiratory Failure up to Day 90
Time frame: at baseline, day 3, day 7, day 14, day 21, day 28, day 60, day 90
Number of Subjects Who Exhibited at Least 1 TEAE, at Least 1 Severe TEAE, at Least 1 Serious TEAE, at Least 1 Non-serious TEAE, at Least 1 ADR, at Least 1 Serious ADR, at Least 1 TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of IMP, Etc.
Time frame: Throughout the study, till Day 90 (= end of the follow-up period).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jun 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37798468Piemonti L, Landoni G, Voza A, Puoti M, Gentile I, Coppola N, Nava S, Mattei A, Marinangeli F, Marchetti G, Bonfanti P, Mastroianni CM, Bassetti M, Crisafulli E, Grossi PA, Zangrillo A, Desai A, Merli M, Foggia M, Carpano M, Schiavoni L, D'Arminio Monforte A, Bisi L, Russo G, Busti F, Rovelli C, Perrotta E, Goisis G, Gavioli EM, Toya S, De Pizzol M, Mantelli F, Allegretti M, Minnella EM. Efficacy and Safety of Reparixin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. Infect Dis Ther. 2023 Oct;12(10):2437-2456. doi: 10.1007/s40121-023-00871-5. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
Related trials for Pneumonia, Viral
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Giovanni Landoni, MD, PhD principal investigator
Ospedale San Raffaele
17 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Reparixin in people with Pneumonia, Viral, run by Dompé Farmaceutici S.p.A at 17 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Italy, United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jun 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Day 28 (time frame: At day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04878055, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2024.