AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Organ ProlapseProSacNCT04878146

Sacrocolpopexy Versus Sacro-spinous Fixation for Prolapse Treatment

A study testing Sacro-spinous fixation, Subtotal hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prolapse is a condition that causes up to 13% of women to have surgery in their lifetime. There are many surgical techniques for the treatment of prolapse, each with its advantages and disadvantages. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
What is being tested?
Sacro-spinous fixation, Subtotal hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
132 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2021to 30 Jun 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who:
  • Have symptomatic prolapse, degree ≥ 2
  • Want surgical management
  • Accept subtotal hysterectomy
  • Accept the idea of being in the arm of the study, which involves the placement of prosthetic material
  • After explaining and reading the information sheet, have understood and signed the consent form

Who cannot join

  • Refuse hysterectomy
  • Refuse the idea of having prosthetic material implanted
  • Prefer conservative management
  • Have insufficient understanding of French
  • Still wish a pregnancy
  • Are not in a condition to withstand surgery of this type

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Chahin Achtari, MD contact

+41213143237

chahin.achtari@chuv.ch

About this study

Official title: Comparaison Entre la Sacrocervicopexie (SCP) et la Fixation Sacro-spinale (FSS) du Col utérin Dans le Traitement du Prolapsus génital: Etude Prospective randomisée: Etude "ProSac "

Prolapse is a condition that causes up to 13% of women to have surgery in their lifetime. There are many surgical techniques for the treatment of prolapse, each with its advantages and disadvantages. The techniques by vaginal approach aim to put back in tension the supporting tissue, the endopelvic fascia, damaged and released. This technique has the advantage of not causing an abdominal scar, a quick recovery and often little pain. In contrast, the use of already damaged native tissue results in a recurrence rate of up to 15% to 30%.

The other technique is the abdominal route either by laparotomy or by a minimally invasive approach such as laparoscopy, assisted or not by robotics. With this technique, we use prosthetic material introduced around the vaginal wall without opening the latter, therefore without contamination and without dissection of the vaginal wall.

Read more

During upper surgery, a subtotal hysterectomy is performed, that is to say that the uterine cervix is preserved and serves as an anchoring point for the synthetic nets which are attached to the cervix and then sutured to the promontory of the sacrum. (sacrocervicopexy).

In the vaginal route, a total hysterectomy is traditionally performed and the vaginal dome is sutured to the sacro-spinal ligament (Richter's operation). The stitches are then passed through the thickness of the often thin vaginal wall constituting a possible release point of the assembly. There are currently no studies that compare prosthetic sacrocervicopexy with fixation of the remaining cervix to the sacro-spinal ligament without prosthesis, and repair of the endopelvic fascia with native tissue. The study consists of performing a subtotal hysterectomy by minimally invasive approach in both cases and then randomize for either a prosthetic sacrocervicopexy or fixation of the remaining cervix to the sacro-spinal ligament via the abdominal or vaginal route.

Read the detailed description

Genital prolapse is caused by the collapse of the supporting structures of the pelvic organs. This results in the organs sliding down through the pelvic hiatus. The pelvic organs involved are the bladder, which rests on the anterior vaginal wall like a hammock made of supportive connective tissue called the anterior endopelvic fascia. When too much stress is placed on this support tissue, microtrauma or tears gradually weaken this tissue, which relaxes and causes the bladder to gradually lower. In the same way, the rectum is separated from the posterior vaginal wall by this same endopelvic fascia which can suffer the same kind of lesion with the same consequences. The middle compartment, i.e. the top of the vagina is made up of the cervix which is supported by a condensation of this endopelvic tissue in the form of ligaments that suspend this cervix in the center of the pelvic cavity. If these ligaments weaken, the uterus, or the "vaginal cuff" in the event of a previous hysterectomy, will also gradually lower, or even externalize. The middle compartment is considered the keystone of pelvic organ support. All interventions to correct severe prolapse should include suspension of the middle compartment. Traditionally, the sacro-spinal ligament is used during the intervention via the low approach and the sacral promontory via the high approach.

There is a classification (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification or POP-Q) in stages of descent of the pelvic organs. At the first stage, the organs are not exteriorized and in most cases asymptomatic. In the second stage, the vaginal walls reach the vaginal introitus and begin to cause symptoms such as pelvic discomfort or heaviness, whether or not associated with functional disorders of the organs involved. In the following stages, the patients are generally symptomatic.

Prolapse is a condition that causes up to 13% of women to have to have surgery in their lifetime. It causes both an impairment of the quality of life by the discomfort caused by the externalization of the organs and by the functional disorders that it causes, such as urinary or fecal incontinence, bladder emptying disorder, sexual disorders, etc. all of these disorders can be measured by dedicated questionnaires and validated in this population.

There are many surgical techniques for the treatment of prolapse, each with its advantages and disadvantages. The techniques by vaginal approach aim to put back in tension of the native supporting tissue damaged and released. This technique has the advantage of not causing an abdominal scar, a quick recovery and often little pain. On the other hand, the use of already damaged tissue results in a recurrence rate of up to 15-30%. In an attempt to reduce this rate of recurrence, by taking the example of abdominal hernia surgery, prosthetic reinforcements have started to be used in order to make the repair more solid and durable. The prostheses were introduced through a vaginal incision (naturally contaminated medium) and directly under the mucosa. It turned out that a reduction in recurrence was achieved, especially in the anterior compartment, but at the cost of complications directly linked to the use of prostheses such as erosions of the vaginal mucosa, infections and, when using implantation kits supplied by industry, pain that is often difficult to treat.

The other technique is the abdominal route either by laparotomy or by a minimally invasive approach such as laparoscopy, assisted or not by robotics. With this technique, prosthetic material is also used but it is introduced around the vaginal wall without opening it, therefore without contamination and without dissection of the vaginal wall, with a much lower rate of erosion or other complication.

Many studies have compared these different techniques without reaching a definitive conclusion on the best approach. The use of synthetic material introduced vaginally using kits has recently been the subject of warnings from the FDA due to the sometimes severe complications followed by a gradual withdrawal of these products or even a ban in most Anglo-Saxon countries. On the other hand, the use by the abdominal route not causing the same complications has not been questioned by the FDA

. In our department, the management of symptomatic prolapse involves two techniques, vaginal without prosthesis or minimally invasive abdominal with prosthesis, according to various criteria such as age, surgical history or severity of the prolapse. During upper surgery, a subtotal hysterectomy is performed, i.e. the uterine cervix is preserved and serves as an anchoring point for the synthetic nets which are attached to the cervix and then sutured to the promontory of the sacrum. (sacro-cervicopexy). In the vaginal route, a total hysterectomy is traditionally performed and the vaginal dome is sutured to the sacro-spinal ligament (Richter's operation). The stitches are then passed through the thickness of the often thin vaginal wall constituting a possible release point of the assembly. There are currently no studies that compare prosthetic sacro-cervicopexy with fixation of the remaining cervix to the sacro-spinal ligament without prosthesis and repair of the endopelvic fascia with native tissue. The study consists of performing a subtotal hysterectomy by minimally invasive first in both cases and then randomise for the mode of suspension of the uterine cervix, either a prosthetic sacro-cervicopexy or to fix the remaining cervix to the sacro-sinous ligament by abdominal or vaginal route. We would thus obtain more solid anchoring points at the level of the middle compartment with less risk of dropping and a more lasting result.

The main objective is to demonstrate that this new intervention gives similar results to the reference intervention by the upper route. For this we use a composite definition of the success of the intervention which takes into account the anamnestic aspect, the absence of a sensation of prolapse, the clinical examination, the absence of measurable prolapse, and the absence of secondary surgery. The secondary objectives are to ensure a similar improvement in the quality of life in the two groups by relying on specific questionnaires validated for this indication.

Being tested
Sacro-spinous fixation, Subtotal hysterectomy, Sacrocolpopexy
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Organ Prolapse

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sacro-spinous fixationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Richter operation

    Uterine cervix will be attached to the sacro-spinous ligament

  • Subtotal hysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    Done on both arms

  • SacrocolpopexyProcedure or surgery

    Uterine cervix is attached to sacral promontory with two synthetic meshes

Study groups in NCT04878146
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SacrocolpopexyActive comparatorUsed as the standard intervention for prolapse
Receives: Procedure: Subtotal hysterectomy; Procedure: Sacrocolpopexy
Sacro-spinous fixationExperimentalTo be demonstrated as non inferior
Receives: Procedure: Sacro-spinous fixation; Procedure: Subtotal hysterectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Non inferiority of sacro-spinous fixation compared to sacrocolpopexy after 1 year

    Anatomical and symptomatic definition of success measured by validated questionnaires

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Operative time

    Measure of operative time

    Measured: Immediately after operation

  2. Complications

    Measured with Clavien Dindo classification

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Jul 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
132 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04878146
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHUV
Acronym
ProSac
Status last verified
May 2021
First submitted
4 May 2021
Last updated
7 May 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sacro-spinous fixation, Subtotal hysterectomy and Sacrocolpopexy in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Chahin Achtari, MD (+41213143237, chahin.achtari@chuv.ch), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Non inferiority of sacro-spinous fixation compared to sacrocolpopexy after 1 year (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in