AzTrials
AzTrials

AllergyPhase 3TreeTopNCT04878354

A Study in Children and Adolescents With Birch Pollen-induced Rhinoconjunctivitis

A Phase 3 study testing Tree SLIT-tablet in people with Allergy, run by ALK-Abelló A/S at 80 sites in 11 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a clinical study in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with allergy to pollen from birch (or related trees). It compares the tree SLIT-tablet with placebo in relieving rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms during the birch/tree pollen season based on the average allergic rhinoconjunctivitis daily total combined… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Allergy
What is being tested?
Tree SLIT-tablet
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
952 participants
Where
80 sitesin 11 countries
Study dates
7 Apr 2021to 31 Jul 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female of any race/ethnicity aged ≥4 to <18 years on the day informed consent is obtained from the parent/caregiver; the subject must be ≥5 to <18 years old at the randomisation visit
  • A documented , physician diagnosed, clinically relevant history of moderate to severe AR/C induced by birch pollen (with or without asthma) despite having received treatment with symptom-relieving medication during at least 1 previous tree pollen season for ages 4 through 6 years at screening or at least 2 previous tree pollen seasons for ages 7 through 17 years at screening
  • Positive skin prick test (SPT) to Betula verrucosa at screening
  • Positive specific IgE to Bet v at screening
  • Presence of 1 or more of the following Allergic Rhinitis Impact on Asthma (ARIA) quality of life items due to AR/C during the previous BPS:
  • Sleep disturbance
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Impairment of daily activities, leisure and/or sport
  • Impairment of school or work
  • Troublesome symptoms

Who cannot join

  • A clinically relevant history of symptomatic seasonal AR/C caused by an allergen source, other than tree pollen from the birch homologous group, with a season overlapping the TPS
  • A clinically relevant history of symptomatic perennial AR/C caused by an allergen source such as animal hair and dander to which the subject is exposed during the TPS
  • Any clinical deterioration of asthma (i.e. asthma exacerbation) that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation or treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 3 months prior to randomisation
  • Reduced lung function at randomisation defined as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) <70% of predicted value. For subjects with asthma, this is assessed on subject's usual asthma medication following at least a 6-hour wash-out of SABA. This criterion does not need to be fulfilled if the subject is <7 years old, cannot perform reproducible FEV1 manoeuvres despite coaching and is not considered as having a diagnosis of asthma
  • Ongoing treatment with any allergy immunotherapy product
  • Severe chronic oral inflammation
Show all 9Show fewer
  • A diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis
  • A relevant history of systemic allergic reaction e.g. anaphylaxis with cardiorespiratory symptoms, generalised urticaria or severe facial angioedema that in the opinion of the investigator may constitute an increased safety concern
  • Immunosuppressive treatment (ATC code L04 or L01) within 3 months prior to the screening visit

Trial locations and contacts

80 sites in 11 countries.

80 sites in 11 countries

Poland24 sites
  • NZOZ E-Vita

    Bialystok, Podlaskie Voivodeship, 15-879

  • Centrum Medyczne PRATIA Bydgoszcz

    Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 85-796

  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia Czestochowa

    Częstochowa, 42-200

  • Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska lek. med. Elzbieta Matusz

    Gryfice, 72-300

  • Specjalist. Praktyka Lek. dr n.med. Joanna Orlicz-Widawska

    Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-338

  • ETG Kielce

    Kielce, 25-355

  • Centrum Medyczne ALL-MED

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 30-033

  • Centrum Medyczne PROMED

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-411

  • Malopolskie Centrum Alergologii

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-411

  • Centrum Medyczne Plejady

    Krakow, 30-363

  • SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. N.Barlickiego

    Lodz, 90-141

  • WWCOiT im. M. Kopernika w Lodzi, Osrodek Pediatryczny im. dr J.Korczaka

    Lodz, 90-329

  • Centrum Alergologii Prof. K. Buczyłko Spółka z o.o.

    Lodz, 90-553

  • Centrum Alergologii Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Alergologiczna

    Lublin, Lublin Voivodeship, 20-552

  • Alergotest s.c. Specjalistyczne Centrum Medyczne

    Lublin, 20-095

  • NSZOZ Puls - Med Anna Bogusz, Agnieszka Musielak Sp.J.

    Skarżysko-Kamienna, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, 26-110

  • ETG Skierniewice

    Skierniewice, Łódź Voivodeship, 96-100

  • Gabinet Lekarski Pediatryczno-Alergologiczny Zenon Bukowczan

    Sucha Beskidzka, 34-200

  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej "ALERGOLOGIA", Poradnia Alergologiczna

    Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, 70-382

  • ALERGO-MED Spolka z o.o.

    Tarnów, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 33-100

  • "All-Med" Specjalistyczna Opieka Medyczna

    Wroclaw, 53-201

  • Michal Bogacki DOBROSTAN

    Wroclaw, 53-201

  • Michal Bogacki DOBROSTAN

    Wroclaw, 53-301

  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Centrum Uslug Medycznych "PROXIMUM" Sp. z o.o.

    Wroclaw, 53-428

Other trials in Poland

Germany17 sites
  • Praxis Dr. Yury Yarin

    Dresden, Saxony, 01139

  • HNO Praxis Dr. Uta Thieme

    Duisburg, 40225

  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf - Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin

    Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40217

  • ENT Research GmbH

    Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 15355

  • Hautarztpraxis Dr. med. Daniela Kasche

    Hamburg, 22549

  • Kinder- u. Jugendmedizin

    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, 69126

  • HNO-Praxis am Neckar

    Heidelberg, 69120

  • Praxis Dr. med. Karsten Jünger

    Herxheim, Rhineland-Palatinate, 76863

  • Kinder- und Jugendärzte

    Hürth, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50354

  • Universitätsmedizin der JGU

    Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131

  • Gemeinschaftspraxis für Kinder und Jugendmedizin

    Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68161

  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH - Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Sektion Rhinologie und Allergologie

    Marburg, Hesse, 35043

  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM

    Munich, Bavaria, 80802

  • Universitätsklinikum Münster

    Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149

  • Praxis Dr.J. Funck

    Neuss, North Rhine-Westphalia, 41469

  • KliFOs - Klinische Forschung Osnabrück

    Osnabrück, Lower Saxony, 49074

  • Kinderarztpraxis Dr. med. Siegfried Simmet und Simon Traub

    Schweigen-Rechtenbach, Rhineland-Palatinate, 76889

Other trials in Germany

Lithuania9 sites
  • JSC Ausros Medicinos Centras

    Kaunas, Kaunas County, 49387

  • "CD8 Klinika" JSC

    Kaunas, Kaunas County, LT-44269

  • Hospital of University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos

    Kaunas, LT-50161

  • "Medicum centrum" JSC

    Tauragė, Tauragė County, LT-72250

  • "Seimos gydytojas" JSC

    Vilnius, Vilnius County, LT-01118

  • "Inlita" JSC Santara CTC

    Vilnius, Vilnius County, LT-08406

  • Allergy clinic "Perspektyvos" JSC

    Vilnius, Vilnius County, LT-08465

  • Alerginiu susirgimu diagnostikos ir gydymo centras

    Vilnius, 8109

  • "Center of Innovative Allergology" JSC

    Vilnius, LT-06256

Other trials in Lithuania

Slovakia8 sites
  • ALERGO H2B s.r.o.

    Komárno, Nitra Region, 945 01

  • DANIMED, spol. s.r.o.

    Levice, 935-31

  • Univerzitna Nemocnica Martin

    Martin, 03601

  • MedKol, s.r.o.

    Nové Zámky, 940 01

  • EMED s.r.o.

    Prešov, 080 01

  • Zoll-Med s.r.o., Ambulancia klinickej imunologie a alergologie

    Rimavská Sobota, 979 01

  • Ambulancia klinickej imunologie a alergologie

    Šurany, 942 01

  • SIMIDA s.r.o.

    Vráble, 952 01

Other trials in Slovakia

Hungary5 sites
  • Svábhegy Plusz Kft

    Budapest, 1037

  • Semmelweis Egyetem

    Budapest, 1083

  • Heim Pál Gyermekkórház

    Budapest, 1089

  • Kispesti Egeszsegugyi Intezet

    Budapest, 1195

  • Aranyklinika Kft

    Szeged, Csongrád megye, 6720

Other trials in Hungary

Russia5 sites
  • LLC "Olla-Med"

    Moscow, Moscow, 105554

  • NRPC Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Immunology n.a. Dmitriya Rogacheva - Multispecialty

    Moscow, Moscow, 117198

  • FGBU "Scientific center of children health" of RAMS

    Moscow, Moscow, 119333

  • Public Enterprise State Scient

    Moscow, 115478

  • FGBUN" Federal Research Center for Nutrition and Biotechnology "

    Moskva, 115446

Other trials in Russia

Belgium3 sites
  • Practice Dr Jean-Benoit Martinot

    Erpent, Namur, 5101

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, Oost-Vlandeeren, 9000

  • UZ Leuven

    Leuven, Vlaams Brabant, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

Denmark3 sites
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital, Astma, Allergi- og Lungeklinikken for Born

    Aarhus, 8200

  • Astma, Allergi- og Lungeklinik

    Copenhagen, 1364

  • Gentofte Hospital Allergy Clinic

    Hellerup, 2900

Other trials in Denmark

Austria2 sites
  • Allergy Center Vienna West

    Vienna, 1150

  • Medical University of Vienna

    Vienna, A-1090

Other trials in Austria

Canada2 sites
  • CHU Sainte-Justine

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1C5

  • Clinique specialisee en allergie de la capitale

    Québec, G1V 4W2

Other trials in Canada

Netherlands2 sites
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente

    Enschede, Overijssel, 7500KA

  • Erasmus MC - Sophia Childrens Hospital

    Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015 CN

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of the SQ Tree Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet in Children and Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Allergic Rhinitis and/or Conjunctivitis Induced by Pollen From Birch and Trees Belonging to the Birch Homologous Group

This is a clinical study in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with allergy to pollen from birch (or related trees). It compares the tree SLIT-tablet with placebo in relieving rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms during the birch/tree pollen season based on the average allergic rhinoconjunctivitis daily total combined score.

The study will also collect health-related quality of life information in the groups treated with the tree SLIT-tablet or with placebo during the pollen season.

The trial medication used is already approved to treat allergic rhinitis caused by birch/tree pollen in adults in several countries?.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase III, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate efficacy and safety of the tree SLIT-tablet in children and adolescents (5-17 years) who have rhinoconjunctivitis (with or without asthma) induced by pollen from birch trees or by trees belonging to the birch homologous group. Approximately 1000 children and adolescents will be enrolled in the trial and will receive either the tree SLIT-tablet or placebo.

The trial consists of 3 periods: a screening period, a treatment period, which includes pre-seasonal and co seasonal treatment, and a follow-up period. The duration is up to 13 months for each participant.

The trial is conducted in several European countries and in Canada.

Conditions
Allergy
Being tested
Tree SLIT-tablet, Placebo SLIT-tablet
Keywords
Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, Children, Adolescents, Birch
Medical subject headings
Hypersensitivity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tree SLIT-tabletDrug

    Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablets

  • Placebo SLIT-tabletDrug

    Placebo

Study groups in NCT04878354
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorGelatine (fish source), mannitol and sodium hydroxide
Receives: Drug: Placebo SLIT-tablet
Intervention/treatmentExperimentalSublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, for daily administration SQ tree SLIT-tablet
Receives: Drug: Tree SLIT-tablet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    The primary endpoint of the trial was the average allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis TCS during the BPS. The average TCS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    Average TCS measured in the TPS. TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. The average TCS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  2. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the BPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  3. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the TPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks).

  4. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the BPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  5. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the TPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  6. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

    Average TCS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)

  7. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)

  8. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)

  9. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

    Average TCS measured in the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)

  10. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)

  11. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)

  12. Number of Severe Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    The disease burden for participants was analyzed in terms of proportion of severe days.

    A severe day was a day with a daily symptom score (DSS) ≥6 and ≥2 moderate symptoms or 1 severe symptom. The DSS ranged from 0 to 18 and was the sum of the 6 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores, each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms).

    The proportion of severe days was the number of severe days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  13. Number of Severe Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    The disease burden for participants was analyzed in terms of proportion of severe days.

    A severe day was a day with a daily symptom score (DSS) ≥6 and ≥2 moderate symptoms or 1 severe symptom. The DSS ranged from 0 to 18 and was the sum of the 6 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores, each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms).

    The proportion of severe days was the number of severe days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  14. Number of Well Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    A well day was defined as a day with no use of allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis (AR/C) rescue medication (daily medication score =0) and daily symptom score ≤2.

    The proportion of well days was the number of well days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  15. Number of Well Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    A well day was defined as a day with no use of allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis (AR/C) rescue medication (daily medication score =0) and daily symptom score ≤2.

    The proportion of well days was the number of well days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  16. Number of Symptom-free Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    A a symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication (Total Combined Score = 0). The proportion of symptom-free days was the number of symptom-free divided by the number of days in the season.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  17. Number of Symptom-free Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    A a symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication (Total Combined Score = 0).

    The proportion of symptom-free days was the number of symptom-free divided by the number of days in the season.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  18. Percentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication, i.e. total combined score (TCS) =0. Thus, the endpoint was categorized as a binary variable with a subject being a responder if he/she had no symptoms and had not used rescue medication during the season

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  19. Percentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication, i.e. total combined score (TCS) = 0. Thus, the endpoint was categorized as a binary variable with a subject being a responder if he/she had no symptoms and had not used rescue medication during the tree pollen season.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  20. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    The TCS European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) scoring was calculated using the medication score proposed by EAACI and was the sum of the DSS/6 and the daily EAACI medication score (DMSEAACI) (values 0,1,2), and thus ranged 0-5 with higher scores indicating more combined allergy symptoms and medication use. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  21. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    The TCS European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) scoring was calculated using the medication score proposed by EAACI and was the sum of the DSS/6 and the daily EAACI medication score (DMSEAACI) (values 0,1,2), and thus ranged 0-5 with higher scores indicating more combined allergy symptoms and medication use. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks).

  22. Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (12-17 Years Only)

    The RQLQ measured the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The RQLQ (for participants 12-17 years only) comprised 28 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 item scores.

    The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  23. Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS) (12-17 Years Only)

    The RQLQ measured the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The RQLQ (for participants 12-17 years only) comprised 28 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 item scores.

    The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  24. Overall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (5-11 Years Only)

    The PRQLQ measured the paediatric rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The PRQLQ consisted of 23 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall PRQLQ score was the mean of the 23 item scores.

    The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  25. Treatment Satisfaction (TSQM-9)

    Treatment satisfaction was measured using the 9-item treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM-9 questionnaire). After ending treatment, participants completed the TSQM-9 questionnaire which consisted of 9 items covering 3 domains. Each item was scored on a 5 point (ranging 1-5) or 7 point (ranging 1-7) scale. For each domain, item scores were summed and normalised to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better satisfaction.

    Measured: After ending treatment (after approximately 52 weeks of treatment)

  26. Patient-rated Global Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy

    The global evaluation measured patient treatment satisfaction. After ending treatment, participants were asked: 'Compared to your rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis symptoms in the previous birch/tree pollen season, how have you felt overall in this birch/tree pollen season?'. The endpoint was evaluated as a binary endpoint; answer options 'much better' and 'better' were categorised as improved (taking value 1), while answer options 'the same', 'worse', and 'much worse' were categorised as not improved (taking value 0).

    The primary estimand for the endpoint was he trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Measured: End of treatment (after approximately 52 weeks of treatment)

  27. Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE

    Birch specific IgE reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation

    Measured: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  28. Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgG4

    Birch specific IgG4 reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

    Measured: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  29. Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE-Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)

    The IgE-blocking factor assesses the effect of serum components (including IgE-blocking antibodies known to be induced by allergy immunotherapy) competing with IgE for binding to allergen. IgE-blocking factor is calculated as 1-(S/T), where S is the amount of allergen-specific IgE bound to allergen in the (possible) presence of competing components, and where T is the total amount of allergen-specific IgE capable of binding to allergen when all competing antibodies/components have been washed off. IgE-blocking factor values closer to 0 indicate the presence of fewer IgE-blocking components and values closer to 1 indicate that more IgE is blocked from binding to the allergen.

    Measured: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  30. Change From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgE

    Change in alder, hazel and oak specific IgE reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

    Measured: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  31. Change From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgG4

    Change in alder, hazel and oak specific IgG4 reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

    Measured: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  32. Change From Baseline in Alder and Hazel Specific IgE- Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)

    The IgE-blocking factor assesses the effect of serum components (including IgE-blocking antibodies known to be induced by allergy immunotherapy) competing with IgE for binding to allergen. IgE-blocking factor is calculated as 1-(S/T), where S is the amount of allergen-specific IgE bound to allergen in the (possible) presence of competing components, and where T is the total amount of allergen-specific IgE capable of binding to allergen when all competing antibodies/components have been washed off. IgE-blocking factor values closer to 0 indicate the presence of fewer IgE-blocking components and values closer to 1 indicate that more IgE is blocked from binding to the allergen.

    Measured: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks treatment, on average)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2021
  2. Study start7 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
952 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04878354
Sponsor's protocol ID
TT-06
Other IDs
2020-004372-17
Acronym
TreeTop
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
24 Mar 2021
Last updated
22 Jan 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Gagnon R, Dalgaard T, Ortving GS, Gappa M, Nolte H. Efficacy and safety of the tree sublingual immunotherapy tablet in the subpopulation of Canadian children with allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis: phase III trial results. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2026 Jul 11. doi: 10.1186/s13223-026-01054-w. Online ahead of print.

    PubMed 42432760

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Tree SLIT-tablet in people with Allergy, run by ALK-Abelló A/S at 80 sites in 11 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 80 sites in Poland, Germany, Lithuania, Slovakia, Hungary and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Jan 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04878354, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in