AzTrials
AzTrials

Thyroid NoduleNCT04879355

Spinal Needles in Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspirations From Thyroid Nodules

A study testing Spinal needle (25G) and Conventional fine needle (25G) in people with Thyroid Nodule, run by Preben Homøe at 1 site in Denmark.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a multicentre, two-arm, randomised and controlled trial. Adults with thyroid nodules suspected of malignancy are to be included consecutively. A total of 350 patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to have FNA with a spinal (25G) or a conventional (25G) needle. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Thyroid Nodule
What is being tested?
Spinal needle (25G) and Conventional fine needle (25G)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
1 Nov 2021to 1 Nov 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 years of age.
  • Patients referred for evaluation of a cold nodule on thyroid scintigraphy and with EU-TIRADS score of 3 or higher.
  • Score 3 and > 20 mm in size.
  • Score 4 and >15 mm in size.
  • Score 5 and >10 mm in size.
  • Clinical suspicion of thyroid cancer:
Show all 11Show fewer
  • PET-positive thyroid tumor.
  • Thyroid tumor and palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve.
  • Rapidly growing thyroid tumor.
  • Hard and/or immobile thyroid tumor.
  • Tumor in the thyroid with suspicious lymph nodes.

Who cannot join

  • Previous participation in the study.
  • Language or other barriers not allowing adequate information.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Zealand University Hospital

    Koege, 4600

    Tobias Andersen, MD, 28409266, tvennervald@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: The Use of Spinal Needles for Ultrasound-guided Fine Needle Aspiration From Thyroid Nodules - a Protocol for a Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial

This is a multicentre, two-arm, randomised and controlled trial. Adults with thyroid nodules suspected of malignancy are to be included consecutively. A total of 350 patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to have FNA with a spinal (25G) or a conventional (25G) needle. The primary outcome is the rate of diagnostic cytological samples according to the Bethesda system. Secondary outcomes are diagnostic accuracy, patient's experienced pain and complication rates.

Conditions
Thyroid Nodule
Being tested
Spinal needle (25G), Conventional fine needle (25G)
Medical subject headings
Thyroid Nodule

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Spinal needle (25G)Device

    Fine needle aspiration from thyroid nodules using a 25G spinal needle.

  • Conventional fine needle (25G)Device

    Fine needle aspiration from thyroid nodules using a conventional 25G fine needle

Study groups in NCT04879355
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Spinal needleExperimentalFine needle aspiration from thyroid nodules using af spinal needle.
Receives: Device: Spinal needle (25G)
Conventional fine needleActive comparatorFine needle aspiration from thyroid nodules using af conventional fine needle, which is traditionally used.
Receives: Device: Conventional fine needle (25G)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic rate

    The percentage of samples evaluated as "diagnostic" by the pathologist.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Complication rate

    Complications, such as infections, bleedings or hematomas requiring treatment or admission, recurrent nerve injury and Horner's syndrome, will be recorded during the procedure. All patients are instructed to contact the department responsible for their management if they suspect complications. These will then be documented in the patient's medical record. At the end of the study period, the patient's medical records will be reviewed for admissions or contacts concerning complications.

    Measured: Till 1 month after last inclusion. Corresponding to about 1 year

  2. Pain assessment

    Pain is assessed using the VAS (Visual Analog Scale) immediate after the procedure.

    The score is ranging from 0 to 10 with higher numbers indicating a more painful procedure.

    Measured: About 2 years

  3. Diagnostic accuracy

    Cytology from FNAB is compared with histology in the subgroup of patients who undergo surgery during the course of the study

    Measured: About 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 May 2021
  2. Study start1 Nov 2021
  3. Primary completion1 May 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Eligible patients are randomised at a 1:1-ratio to one of two parallel groups, and all patients are included in the analysis on an intention-to-treat basis.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
350 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04879355
Sponsor's protocol ID
SJ-878
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
7 Mar 2021
Last updated
5 Jul 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data collected in this trial can be shared upon request from other researchers after publication.

Publications

  • Andersen TV, Bennedbaek FN, Pedersen J, Rosenorn MR, Kiss K, Lelkaitis G, Andersen L, Hegedus L, Lomholt AF, Hahn CH, Hvilsom GB, Homoe P, Todsen T. Spinal versus conventional fine needle for ultrasound-guided thyroid nodule biopsy: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial. Dan Med J. 2022 Jul 21;69(8):A03220165.

    PubMed 35959834

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Spinal needle (25G) and Conventional fine needle (25G) in people with Thyroid Nodule, run by Preben Homøe at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Tobias Andersen, MD (28409266 ext. 0045, tobiasnicolaiandersen@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic rate (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04879355, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in