Malignant NeoplasmsPhase 1NCT04881981
A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety of Stereotactic Central Ablative Radiation Therapy (SCART) for Bulky Metastatic or Recurrent Cancer
A Phase 1 study testing SCART radiation therapy in people with Malignant Neoplasms, run by Baptist Health, Louisville at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
We aim to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of testing the tolerance and immunogenic effects of high-dose SCART radiotherapy in patients with bulky metastatic or recurrent cancer in the setting of a single-arm phase I clinical trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Malignant Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- SCART radiation therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 5 Jun 2021to 5 May 2022
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 3.1.1 Patients must have a history of histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent cancers.
- 3.1.2 Patients must have measurable disease documented by CT and/or PET that is amenable for SCART radiation with the shortest axis of 3 cm or longer.
- 3.1.3 Patients must be 18 years of age or older, as this is not a pediatric protocol. There is no maximum age restriction.
- 3.1.4 Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 6 months in order for the study endpoints to be evaluable.
- 3.1.5 Patients must have a Zubrod/GOG performance status of 0 or 1.
- 3.1.6 Patients must have normal organ and marrow function as defined below: leukocyte>3,000/m l absolute neutrophil count >1,500/m l platelets >100,000/m l bilirubin within normal institutional limits AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal Creatinine within normal institutional limits OR; Creatinine clearance > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for patients with creatinine levels above institutional normal.
- 3.1.7 Women of child-bearing potential will be asked to use adequate contraception.
- 3.1.8 Patients must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document.
Who cannot join
- 3.2.1 Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding will be excluded.
- 3.2.2 Patients must not have any co-morbidity with life expectancy ≤ 6 months, or any uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
- 3.2.3 Patients must not have active Crohn's disease or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
- -
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
United States3 sites
Baptist health
Corbin, Kentucky, 40701
Weisi Yan, M.D.,Ph.D., 646-763-2973, Weisi.Yan@bhsi.com
Weisi Yan, M.D.,Ph.D.
Innovative Cancer Institute
Miami, Florida, 33143
Xiaodong Wu, Ph.D.
Xiaodong Wu, Ph.D.
University of Kentucky Morehead Cancer Treatment Center
Morehead, Kentucky, 40351
Waleed Mourad, M.D.,Ph.D., 606-784-3443, waleed246@gmail.com
Waleed Mourad, M.D.,Ph.D.
China1 site
Foshan Chancheng Hospital
Foshan, Guangdong
Jun Yang, Ph.D., 3057930868, Junbme@yahoo.com
QIuxia Lu, M.D.
About this study
Official title: INT-SCART-001: A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety of Stereotactic Central Ablative Radiation Therapy (SCART) for Bulky Metastatic or Recurrent Cancer.
We aim to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of testing the tolerance and immunogenic effects of high-dose SCART radiotherapy in patients with bulky metastatic or recurrent cancer in the setting of a single-arm phase I clinical trial.
The primary endpoint of the study was to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)s and the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of SCART to bulky metastatic or recurrent cancers.
Read the detailed description
Despite advances in screening and surveillance, patients continue to present with both bulky primary and metastatic tumors. Some patients presented with recurrent bulky cancer in prior treated radiation fields. Spatially Fractionated Radiation therapy (SFRT) has a history of over 100 years. The principle of SFRT is distinctive from the standard radiation approaches, as it treats the total tumor with a non-uniform dose, effectively treating the tumor while staying within normal tissue tolerance of the surrounding structures. Historically, SFRT is frequently used to treat bulky malignant tumors with a high radiation dose in the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) dose range (10-20 Gy per fraction) using megavoltage x-ray beams. The application of SFRT, historically known as GRID therapy, has produced dramatic relief of severe symptoms, significant objective regression, above average local control rates and minimal toxicity in palliative settings.
High-dose GRID radiotherapy, sometimes termed spatially-fractionated GRID radiotherapy (SFGRT), is a treatment modality that was introduced in 1909 and commonly used through the 1930's . In 1909, Kohler in Germany described radiation delivered through a perforated screen with regularly spaced blocked areas that created an effect similar to treatment with multiple small pencil beams. This spatially fractionated radiation, in contradistinction to current approaches, does not attempt to treat the total tumor volume with a uniform dose. Instead, this technique allows the delivery of high doses of radiation in clusters of small areas without producing prohibitive normal tissue damage to skin and subcutaneous tissues. In its early applications, two-dimensional grid fields were used, typically with orthovoltage beams. The grids were usually composed of open/shield circular or square shapes ranging in size from 0.5 to 1.5 cm. The application was mainly for the treatment of advanced bulky tumors.
However, the technique of GRID radiotherapy has not evolved significantly since its inception in the early 1900's, and is not the optimal method of delivering spatially fractionated radiation in the modern era. GRID has the limitation of delivering relatively high doses of radiation to normal tissues, depending on tumor location, as it is delivered via a single beam that must pass through normal tissues to reach its target. Most importantly, the highest-dose regions of the grid are superficial, and often are outside of the tumor target itself.
The basic principle of the LATTICE Radiotherapy (LRT) is to create within tumor volume multiple localized high-dose islands (12 Gy and higher) with a certain degree of separation to form low dose regions (3 Gy or lower). In an extreme case, one or two focused dose islands could be introduced in a small tumor.
Modern radiotherapy methods are readily available to deliver 3D high-dose LATTICE radiotherapy with superior dosimetry compared to the 2D GRID technique . An array of focused high-dose volumes, in essence a lattice of doses in 3D, can be generated through modern techniques resulting in highly heterogeneous dose distributions within the tumor volume, leaving adjacent and peripheral normal tissue minimally exposed.
Similar to the core principles and concepts of LRT, SCART aims to stereotactically irradiate part of target volume (hotspot) located at the center of a large tumor target with an ablative dose (15Gy or higher) and the dose quickly falls off from the edge of hotspot to low dose (3Gy or lower) at the edge of tumor volume. The goal is to irradiate as large a volume as possible with ablative dose, while maintaining the dose to the border of the tumor at low dose.
SCART is a different approach which pursuits not only the dose escalation but also the idea of facilitating or promoting intra-tumoral bystander effect, thus increasing the biological effectiveness of the treatment. Published data reviewed by Peters, et al. strongly suggest that GRID therapy induces a rapid and higher rate of tumor cell apoptosis in bulky and hypoxic tumors. This technique is very appealing to treat patients with voluminous gynecological tumors.
These makes SCART Radiotherapy a practically achievable alternative to traditional GRID therapy and LATTICE, which delivers a highly heterogeneous dose distribution, anticipated to trigger the bystander effect of radiation. With high dose regions strictly contained within the target volume, normal tissue toxicity is practically avoided providing an increased therapeutic ratio.
SCART is a promising tool to achieve dose escalation which will lead to a higher local control without adding any extra toxicity in the peripheral normal tissue regions.
- Conditions
- Malignant Neoplasms
- Being tested
- SCART radiation therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SCART radiation therapyRadiation
We will deliver high dose radiation therapy using SCART method. Beam energies of 6Mv will be used. The high dose SCART therapy will be delivered using LINAC systems, as available and appropriate for each patient. The treatment plan used for each patient will be based on an analysis of the volumetric dose including DVH analyses of the PTV and critical normal structures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SCART Arm | Experimental | Single Arm patients will be treated with SCART to different dose levels. Receives: Radiation: SCART radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Toxicity
radiation treatment-related grade 3+ non-hematologic adverse events
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Assessment of the antitumor effect
PR or CR defined by radiology.
Measured: 12 months
Evaluation of quality of life (QoL).
Evaluation of quality of life (QoL).
Measured: 12 months
Biomarkers
T cell activities and/or NGS sequencing
Measured: 3-6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2021
- Study start5 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion5 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion5 May 2022 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Malignant NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- 3+3 phase one trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baptist Health, Louisville
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Drexel University, Innovative Institute, University of Kentucky, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Weisi Yan, Baptist Health, Louisville
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04881981
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INT-SCART-001
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 6 May 2021
- Last updated
- 11 May 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Physics plans and DVHs. Biomarker data from patients treated with SCART.
Publications
Yan W, Khan MK, Wu X, Simone CB 2nd, Fan J, Gressen E, Zhang X, Limoli CL, Bahig H, Tubin S, Mourad WF. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: History, present and the future. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct 22;20:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.10.004. eCollection 2020 Jan. No abstract available.
PubMed 31768424Jiang L, Li X, Zhang J, Li W, Dong F, Chen C, Lin Q, Zhang C, Zheng F, Yan W, Zheng Y, Wu X, Xu B. Combined High-Dose LATTICE Radiation Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Advanced Bulky Tumors: The Concept and a Case Report. Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 12;10:548132. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.548132. eCollection 2020.
PubMed 33643893
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- INT-SCART-001: A Phase I Study Evaluating the Safety of Stereotactic Central Ablative Radiation Therapy (SCART) for Bulky Metastatic or Recurrent Cancer.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04881981
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INT-SCART-001
- Conditions
- Malignant Neoplasms
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Baptist Health, LouisvilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Drexel University, Innovative Institute, University of Kentucky, Foshan Fosun Chancheng Hospital
- Study start
- 5 Jun 2021 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 5 May 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 May 2022 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
We aim to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of testing the tolerance and immunogenic effects of high-dose SCART radiotherapy in patients with bulky metastatic or recurrent cancer in the setting of a single-arm phase I clinical trial.
The primary endpoint of the study was to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)s and the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of SCART to bulky metastatic or recurrent cancers.
Detailed description
Despite advances in screening and surveillance, patients continue to present with both bulky primary and metastatic tumors. Some patients presented with recurrent bulky cancer in prior treated radiation fields. Spatially Fractionated Radiation therapy (SFRT) has a history of over 100 years. The principle of SFRT is distinctive from the standard radiation approaches, as it treats the total tumor with a non-uniform dose, effectively treating the tumor while staying within normal tissue tolerance of the surrounding structures. Historically, SFRT is frequently used to treat bulky malignant tumors with a high radiation dose in the stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)/stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) dose range (10-20 Gy per fraction) using megavoltage x-ray beams. The application of SFRT, historically known as GRID therapy, has produced dramatic relief of severe symptoms, significant objective regression, above average local control rates and minimal toxicity in palliative settings.
High-dose GRID radiotherapy, sometimes termed spatially-fractionated GRID radiotherapy (SFGRT), is a treatment modality that was introduced in 1909 and commonly used through the 1930's . In 1909, Kohler in Germany described radiation delivered through a perforated screen with regularly spaced blocked areas that created an effect similar to treatment with multiple small pencil beams. This spatially fractionated radiation, in contradistinction to current approaches, does not attempt to treat the total tumor volume with a uniform dose. Instead, this technique allows the delivery of high doses of radiation in clusters of small areas without producing prohibitive normal tissue damage to skin and subcutaneous tissues. In its early applications, two-dimensional grid fields were used, typically with orthovoltage beams. The grids were usually composed of open/shield circular or square shapes ranging in size from 0.5 to 1.5 cm. The application was mainly for the treatment of advanced bulky tumors.
However, the technique of GRID radiotherapy has not evolved significantly since its inception in the early 1900's, and is not the optimal method of delivering spatially fractionated radiation in the modern era. GRID has the limitation of delivering relatively high doses of radiation to normal tissues, depending on tumor location, as it is delivered via a single beam that must pass through normal tissues to reach its target. Most importantly, the highest-dose regions of the grid are superficial, and often are outside of the tumor target itself.
The basic principle of the LATTICE Radiotherapy (LRT) is to create within tumor volume multiple localized high-dose islands (12 Gy and higher) with a certain degree of separation to form low dose regions (3 Gy or lower). In an extreme case, one or two focused dose islands could be introduced in a small tumor.
Modern radiotherapy methods are readily available to deliver 3D high-dose LATTICE radiotherapy with superior dosimetry compared to the 2D GRID technique . An array of focused high-dose volumes, in essence a lattice of doses in 3D, can be generated through modern techniques resulting in highly heterogeneous dose distributions within the tumor volume, leaving adjacent and peripheral normal tissue minimally exposed.
Similar to the core principles and concepts of LRT, SCART aims to stereotactically irradiate part of target volume (hotspot) located at the center of a large tumor target with an ablative dose (15Gy or higher) and the dose quickly falls off from the edge of hotspot to low dose (3Gy or lower) at the edge of tumor volume. The goal is to irradiate as large a volume as possible with ablative dose, while maintaining the dose to the border of the tumor at low dose.
SCART is a different approach which pursuits not only the dose escalation but also the idea of facilitating or promoting intra-tumoral bystander effect, thus increasing the biological effectiveness of the treatment. Published data reviewed by Peters, et al. strongly suggest that GRID therapy induces a rapid and higher rate of tumor cell apoptosis in bulky and hypoxic tumors. This technique is very appealing to treat patients with voluminous gynecological tumors.
These makes SCART Radiotherapy a practically achievable alternative to traditional GRID therapy and LATTICE, which delivers a highly heterogeneous dose distribution, anticipated to trigger the bystander effect of radiation. With high dose regions strictly contained within the target volume, normal tissue toxicity is practically avoided providing an increased therapeutic ratio.
SCART is a promising tool to achieve dose escalation which will lead to a higher local control without adding any extra toxicity in the peripheral normal tissue regions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- 3+3 phase one trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SCART Arm | Experimental | Radiation: SCART radiation therapySingle Arm patients will be treated with SCART to different dose levels. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 3.1.1 Patients must have a history of histologically confirmed metastatic or recurrent cancers.
- 3.1.2 Patients must have measurable disease documented by CT and/or PET that is amenable for SCART radiation with the shortest axis of 3 cm or longer.
- 3.1.3 Patients must be 18 years of age or older, as this is not a pediatric protocol. There is no maximum age restriction.
- 3.1.4 Patients must have a life expectancy of at least 6 months in order for the study endpoints to be evaluable.
- 3.1.5 Patients must have a Zubrod/GOG performance status of 0 or 1.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 3.2.1 Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding will be excluded.
- 3.2.2 Patients must not have any co-morbidity with life expectancy ≤ 6 months, or any uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
- 3.2.3 Patients must not have active Crohn's disease or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SCART radiation therapyWe will deliver high dose radiation therapy using SCART method. Beam energies of 6Mv will be used. The high dose SCART therapy will be delivered using LINAC systems, as available and appropriate for each patient. The treatment plan used for each patient will be based on an analysis of the volumetric dose including DVH analyses of the PTV and critical normal structures. | Radiation | SCART Arm |
Primary outcome
Toxicity
Time frame: 12 months
radiation treatment-related grade 3+ non-hematologic adverse events
3 secondary outcomes
Assessment of the antitumor effect
Time frame: 12 months
Evaluation of quality of life (QoL).
Time frame: 12 months
Biomarkers
Time frame: 3-6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2021.
- Background: PubMed 31768424Yan W, Khan MK, Wu X, Simone CB 2nd, Fan J, Gressen E, Zhang X, Limoli CL, Bahig H, Tubin S, Mourad WF. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: History, present and the future. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019 Oct 22;20:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.10.004. eCollection 2020 Jan. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33643893Jiang L, Li X, Zhang J, Li W, Dong F, Chen C, Lin Q, Zhang C, Zheng F, Yan W, Zheng Y, Wu X, Xu B. Combined High-Dose LATTICE Radiation Therapy and Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Advanced Bulky Tumors: The Concept and a Case Report. Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 12;10:548132. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.548132. eCollection 2020.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Physics plans and DVHs. Biomarker data from patients treated with SCART.
Related trials for Malignant Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cemsidomide + Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Health Belief Model Based Digital Nudge Intervention on Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening, Breast Cancer Awareness
Not yet recruiting
The AYA Oncology Self-care Movement
Acute Lymphobkastic Leukemia, Medication Adherence
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
177Lu-DOTA-EB-TATE in Adult Patients With Metastatic, Radioactive Iodine Non-Responsive Oncocytic (Hurthle-Cell) Thyroid Cancer
Thyroid Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing SCART radiation therapy in people with Malignant Neoplasms, run by Baptist Health, Louisville at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States, China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Weisi Yan, M.D.,Ph.D. (1-646-763-2973, Weisi.Yan@bhsi.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Toxicity (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04881981, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2021.