ChildPeDiaNCT04882553
Pediatric Diaphragm Thickness Trial
A study testing Diaphragmatic echography, Measurement of esophageal pressure and Registration of respiratory mechanics in people with Child, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The evaluation of diaphragm function in ventilated patients is not easy. One option is to use esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements but recently, diaphragmatic ultrasound has proven itself as a useful tool in this setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 28 days to 13 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Child
- What is being tested?
- Diaphragmatic echography, Measurement of esophageal pressure and Registration of respiratory mechanics
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 11 Jun 2021to 30 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 28 days to 13 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- The patient is mechanically ventilated before start of the study.
- The patient is not anticipated to breathe spontaneously for a substantial amount of time prior to emergence from anesthesia
- The patient is known or suspected to have an anatomical malformation or surgical correction of the diaphragm.
- The patient suffers from a disease that may impair diaphragmatic function:
- Central neural disease at the level of the brain (Stroke, Arnold-Chiari malformation) and spinal cord (quadriplegia, spinal muscular atrophy, syringomyelia).
- Neural disease of the phrenic nerve (Guillain-Barré syndrome, tumor compression).
- Disorders of the neuromuscular junction.
- Muscular diseases (muscular dystrophies, myositis (infectious, inflammatory, metabolic).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Relation Between Oesophageal Pressure and Diaphragm Thickening Fraction in Spontaneously Breathing Sedated Children: a Feasibility Study.
The evaluation of diaphragm function in ventilated patients is not easy. One option is to use esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements but recently, diaphragmatic ultrasound has proven itself as a useful tool in this setting. In adults the thickening fraction (TF), which describes the difference in thickness between end-inspiration and end-expiration, correlates with the diaphragmatic pressure-time product per breath (PTPdi), an esophageal pressure-derived work of breathing parameter. There is a lack of data that tells us whether the same is true in children. This physiological study intends to look at the correlation between esophageal pressures and thickening fraction assessed by ultrasound in a pediatric cohort of patients.
Read the detailed description
The gold standard in evaluating lung mechanics is the esophageal pressure. And although diaphragm ultrasound has been reported to be feasible in assessing diaphragm activity in sedated patients, no study has thus far looked at the relationship between the ultrasound parameters (i.e. thickening fraction) and the esophageal pressure. This is a single-centre physiological cohort study to evaluate the feasibility of using the thickening fraction as a parameter for diaphragm activity during spontaneous breathing in sedated children. Data will be collected during an elective surgical procedure with a patient under general anesthesia. If the patient's legal representative provides written informed consent, the patient is enrolled in the study before start of the anesthetic procedure and the trial ends on the moment of removal of the laryngeal mask.The registration of the physiological data will not interfere with the surgery.The thickening fraction (using ultrasound) and pressure measurements will be performed simultaneously and repetitive during different loads on the respiratory system.Esophageal pressures (Pes) will be measured with a single air-filled balloon catheter(AVEA™ smarthcath pediatric 7 Fr, Vyaire Medical Inc., IL, USA). The balloon catheter will be inserted nasally after the induction of anesthesia. The catheter will then be connected to a pressure transducer (FluxMed, MBMED, Argentina). The appropriate placement will be checked by commonly used methods. Firstly, the appropriate depth of insertion will be estimated by measuring the nose-ear-xyphoid distance, which is the distance from the nose to the diaphragm. Secondly, the balloon catheter will be inserted more deeply than this predicted distance, placing it in the stomach, and a positive pressure swing when mild abdominal pressure is exerted on a slightly inflated balloon will be noted. Thirdly, when retracted into the esophagus, cardiac reflections on the pressure monitor will appear. Fourth, when applying positive pressure ventilation, we will look for a positive deflection on the pressure curve. The output from the pressure transducer will be saved from the Fluxmed respiratory mechanics monitor. Pes will be measured over at least five consecutive breaths selected at the end of the pressure recordings. Ultrasound recordings will be done with the BK 3500 ultrasound machine, using a linear high-resolution probe. The parameter measured is the distance between the pleura and peritoneum as seen on a 2D image. The thickness using B-mode ultrasound imaging at end expiration on 10cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and on zero PEEP (ZEEP) will be assessed. Furthermore, the thickness with Mmode imaging, both at end-inspiration (TEI) and end-expiration (TEE) will be measured. A transducer will be placed on the right side of the body in the midaxillary line at the level of the 8th and 9th intercostal space, the so-called zone of apposition. The probe will be positioned perpendicular to the skin, and temporary markings will be applied to the skin. Subjects are positioned in a supine position. TEE will be measured just before the thickening start and TEI measured at maximal thickening. Measurements will be averaged out of three or more consecutive breaths. The thickening fraction (TF) is calculated as (TEI - TEE)/TEE and expressed as a percentage. Digital images will be stored and re-interpreted by a separate, blinded interpreter.The thickening fraction recordings will be repeated during different loads on the respiratory system, with varying the depth of anesthesia (mean alveolar concentration of anesthetic vapor - MAC) and different added respiratory loads with a threshold valve and different levels of PEEP. An anesthesia circle circuit with standard pediatric tubing will consistently be used. The lowest dose of opioids will be used to the extent clinically possible.
Condition #1: during positive pressure ventilation, no spontaneous breaths Condition #2: spontaneous, MAC 1.5, PEEP, no added respiratory load Condition #3: spontaneous, MAC 1.5, PEEP 10, no added respiratory load (only Tdi, no TF) Condition #4: spontaneous, MAC 1.5, ZEEP, no extra added respiratory load Condition #5: spontaneous, MAC 1, ZEEP, no added respiratory load Condition #6: spontaneous, MAC 1, ZEEP, 7 cm H2O added respiratory load Condition #7: spontaneous, MAC 1, ZEEP, 15 cm H2O added respiratory load
These different conditions will alter the work of breathing the diaphragm has to perform and will allow us to better correlate thickening fraction with esophageal pressure.Preceding this study, a reproducibility study will assess intra-observer reproducibility for the researcher doing the ultrasound measurements.
A power analysis is not possible, as this is the first study comparing these parameters in children. Data will be analyzed using the SPSS statistical software package (SPSS Inc., IL, USA). Continuous variables will be reported as median (interquartile range). Friedman test and Wilcoxon paired tests (with post hoc Bonferonni correction) will be used to assess differences between related variables. Correlations between TF and Pes will be calculated using the Spearman method and performed for the entire data set (including all four respiratory conditions of each patient) because of the limited sample size. Two-tailed p values less than 0.05 will be considered significant.
All precautions will be taken to prevent complications due to placement of the balloon catheter but nevertheless all adverse events will be assessed.
- Conditions
- Child
- Being tested
- Diaphragmatic echography, Measurement of esophageal pressure, Registration of respiratory mechanics
- Keywords
- diaphragm thickening fraction, oesophageal pressure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diaphragmatic echographyProcedure or surgery
Echography of the diaphragm at the zone of apposition. End-inspiratory and/or end-expiratory thickness of the diaphragm will be measured in M-mode.
Measurement of esophageal pressureProcedure or surgery
Pressure will be measured in the lower third of the esophagus using an esophageal balloon and pressure transducer.
Registration of respiratory mechanicsDiagnostic test
Pressures and volumes will be registered by the Fluxmed respiratory monitor (MBMED, Argentina)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Incremental inspiratory effort | Experimental | Every participant will be subjected to a stepwise incremental inspiratory effort:
1. Ventilated
2. Baseline spontaneous breathing with deep anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.5)
3. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 10 and deep anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.5)
4. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and deep anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.5)
5. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and moderate anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.0)
6. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and moderate anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.0) and added inspiratory threshold of +7cmH2O
7. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and moderate anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.0) and added inspiratory threshold of +15cmH2O Receives: Procedure: Diaphragmatic echography; Procedure: Measurement of esophageal pressure; Diagnostic Test: Registration of respiratory mechanics |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Esophageal pressure (cmH2O) at increasing levels of respiratory effort in spontaneously breathing, sedated children.
Esophageal pressures are measured in the lower third of the esophagus using an esophageal balloon and registered by an external pressure transducer.
Measured: Perioperatively
Diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) at increasing levels of respiratory effort in spontaneously breathing, sedated children.
The diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) is calculated as [thickness at end-inspiration (mm) - thickness at end-expiration (mm)] / thickness at end-expiration (mm) x 100%.
Diaphragmatic thickness is measured by ultrasound.
Measured: Perioperatively
Feasibility (% success) of measuring diaphragmatic thickening fraction in spontaneously breathing ventilated children
The rate of success of diaphragmatic ultrasound in children, calculated as count of successful measurements / [count of successful measurements + count of unsuccessful measurements] x 100%
Measured: Perioperatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
Diaphragm thickness (mm) at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in spontaneously breathing, sedated children.
Diaphragmatic thickness is measured by ultrasound.
Measured: Perioperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2021
- Study start11 Jun 2021
- Primary completion30 Nov 2021
- Study completion30 Nov 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ChildStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, AntwerpThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- a single-centre physiological cohort study to evaluate the feasibility of using the thickening fraction as a parameter for diaphragm activity during spontaneous breathing in sedated children.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Antwerp
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tom Schepens, MD, University Hospital, Antwerp
- Investigators
- Tom Schepens, MD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Antwerp
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04882553
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 21/15/208
- Other IDs
- 1653, 21/15/208
- Acronym
- PeDia
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 6 May 2021
- Last updated
- 24 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
De Meyer GR, Flamey L, Adriaensens I, Van der Aerschot M, Van de Walle H, Vanmarsenille I, Jorens PG, Goligher EC, Saldien V, Schepens T. The Relationship Between Esophageal Pressure and Diaphragm Thickening Fraction in Spontaneously Breathing Sedated Children: A Feasibility Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):652-661. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003248. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
PubMed 37092829
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Relation Between Oesophageal Pressure and Diaphragm Thickening Fraction in Spontaneously Breathing Sedated Children: a Feasibility Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04882553
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PeDia / 21/15/208
- Conditions
- Child
- Keywords
- diaphragm thickening fraction, oesophageal pressure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, AntwerpUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The evaluation of diaphragm function in ventilated patients is not easy. One option is to use esophageal pressure (Pes) measurements but recently, diaphragmatic ultrasound has proven itself as a useful tool in this setting. In adults the thickening fraction (TF), which describes the difference in thickness between end-inspiration and end-expiration, correlates with the diaphragmatic pressure-time product per breath (PTPdi), an esophageal pressure-derived work of breathing parameter. There is a lack of data that tells us whether the same is true in children. This physiological study intends to look at the correlation between esophageal pressures and thickening fraction assessed by ultrasound in a pediatric cohort of patients.
Detailed description
The gold standard in evaluating lung mechanics is the esophageal pressure. And although diaphragm ultrasound has been reported to be feasible in assessing diaphragm activity in sedated patients, no study has thus far looked at the relationship between the ultrasound parameters (i.e. thickening fraction) and the esophageal pressure. This is a single-centre physiological cohort study to evaluate the feasibility of using the thickening fraction as a parameter for diaphragm activity during spontaneous breathing in sedated children. Data will be collected during an elective surgical procedure with a patient under general anesthesia. If the patient's legal representative provides written informed consent, the patient is enrolled in the study before start of the anesthetic procedure and the trial ends on the moment of removal of the laryngeal mask.The registration of the physiological data will not interfere with the surgery.The thickening fraction (using ultrasound) and pressure measurements will be performed simultaneously and repetitive during different loads on the respiratory system.Esophageal pressures (Pes) will be measured with a single air-filled balloon catheter(AVEA™ smarthcath pediatric 7 Fr, Vyaire Medical Inc., IL, USA). The balloon catheter will be inserted nasally after the induction of anesthesia. The catheter will then be connected to a pressure transducer (FluxMed, MBMED, Argentina). The appropriate placement will be checked by commonly used methods. Firstly, the appropriate depth of insertion will be estimated by measuring the nose-ear-xyphoid distance, which is the distance from the nose to the diaphragm. Secondly, the balloon catheter will be inserted more deeply than this predicted distance, placing it in the stomach, and a positive pressure swing when mild abdominal pressure is exerted on a slightly inflated balloon will be noted. Thirdly, when retracted into the esophagus, cardiac reflections on the pressure monitor will appear. Fourth, when applying positive pressure ventilation, we will look for a positive deflection on the pressure curve. The output from the pressure transducer will be saved from the Fluxmed respiratory mechanics monitor. Pes will be measured over at least five consecutive breaths selected at the end of the pressure recordings. Ultrasound recordings will be done with the BK 3500 ultrasound machine, using a linear high-resolution probe. The parameter measured is the distance between the pleura and peritoneum as seen on a 2D image. The thickness using B-mode ultrasound imaging at end expiration on 10cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and on zero PEEP (ZEEP) will be assessed. Furthermore, the thickness with Mmode imaging, both at end-inspiration (TEI) and end-expiration (TEE) will be measured. A transducer will be placed on the right side of the body in the midaxillary line at the level of the 8th and 9th intercostal space, the so-called zone of apposition. The probe will be positioned perpendicular to the skin, and temporary markings will be applied to the skin. Subjects are positioned in a supine position. TEE will be measured just before the thickening start and TEI measured at maximal thickening. Measurements will be averaged out of three or more consecutive breaths. The thickening fraction (TF) is calculated as (TEI - TEE)/TEE and expressed as a percentage. Digital images will be stored and re-interpreted by a separate, blinded interpreter.The thickening fraction recordings will be repeated during different loads on the respiratory system, with varying the depth of anesthesia (mean alveolar concentration of anesthetic vapor - MAC) and different added respiratory loads with a threshold valve and different levels of PEEP. An anesthesia circle circuit with standard pediatric tubing will consistently be used. The lowest dose of opioids will be used to the extent clinically possible.
Condition #1: during positive pressure ventilation, no spontaneous breaths Condition #2: spontaneous, MAC 1.5, PEEP, no added respiratory load Condition #3: spontaneous, MAC 1.5, PEEP 10, no added respiratory load (only Tdi, no TF) Condition #4: spontaneous, MAC 1.5, ZEEP, no extra added respiratory load Condition #5: spontaneous, MAC 1, ZEEP, no added respiratory load Condition #6: spontaneous, MAC 1, ZEEP, 7 cm H2O added respiratory load Condition #7: spontaneous, MAC 1, ZEEP, 15 cm H2O added respiratory load
These different conditions will alter the work of breathing the diaphragm has to perform and will allow us to better correlate thickening fraction with esophageal pressure.Preceding this study, a reproducibility study will assess intra-observer reproducibility for the researcher doing the ultrasound measurements.
A power analysis is not possible, as this is the first study comparing these parameters in children. Data will be analyzed using the SPSS statistical software package (SPSS Inc., IL, USA). Continuous variables will be reported as median (interquartile range). Friedman test and Wilcoxon paired tests (with post hoc Bonferonni correction) will be used to assess differences between related variables. Correlations between TF and Pes will be calculated using the Spearman method and performed for the entire data set (including all four respiratory conditions of each patient) because of the limited sample size. Two-tailed p values less than 0.05 will be considered significant.
All precautions will be taken to prevent complications due to placement of the balloon catheter but nevertheless all adverse events will be assessed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- a single-centre physiological cohort study to evaluate the feasibility of using the thickening fraction as a parameter for diaphragm activity during spontaneous breathing in sedated children.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Incremental inspiratory effort | Experimental | Procedure: Diaphragmatic echography, Procedure: Measurement of esophageal pressure, Diagnostic Test: Registration of respiratory mechanicsEvery participant will be subjected to a stepwise incremental inspiratory effort: 1. Ventilated 2. Baseline spontaneous breathing with deep anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.5) 3. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 10 and deep anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.5) 4. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and deep anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.5) 5. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and moderate anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.0) 6. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and moderate anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.0) and added inspiratory threshold of +7cmH2O 7. Spontaneous breathing with PEEP 0 and moderate anesthesia (minimal alveolar concentration 1.0) and added inspiratory threshold of +15cmH2O |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 28 days to 13 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- The patient is mechanically ventilated before start of the study.
- The patient is not anticipated to breathe spontaneously for a substantial amount of time prior to emergence from anesthesia
- The patient is known or suspected to have an anatomical malformation or surgical correction of the diaphragm.
- The patient suffers from a disease that may impair diaphragmatic function:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diaphragmatic echographyEchography of the diaphragm at the zone of apposition. End-inspiratory and/or end-expiratory thickness of the diaphragm will be measured in M-mode. | Procedure or surgery | Incremental inspiratory effort |
| Measurement of esophageal pressurePressure will be measured in the lower third of the esophagus using an esophageal balloon and pressure transducer. | Procedure or surgery | Incremental inspiratory effort |
| Registration of respiratory mechanicsPressures and volumes will be registered by the Fluxmed respiratory monitor (MBMED, Argentina) | Diagnostic test | Incremental inspiratory effort |
Primary outcome
Esophageal pressure (cmH2O) at increasing levels of respiratory effort in spontaneously breathing, sedated children.
Time frame: Perioperatively
Esophageal pressures are measured in the lower third of the esophagus using an esophageal balloon and registered by an external pressure transducer.
Diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) at increasing levels of respiratory effort in spontaneously breathing, sedated children.
Time frame: Perioperatively
The diaphragmatic thickening fraction (%) is calculated as [thickness at end-inspiration (mm) - thickness at end-expiration (mm)] / thickness at end-expiration (mm) x 100%. Diaphragmatic thickness is measured by ultrasound.
Feasibility (% success) of measuring diaphragmatic thickening fraction in spontaneously breathing ventilated children
Time frame: Perioperatively
The rate of success of diaphragmatic ultrasound in children, calculated as count of successful measurements / [count of successful measurements + count of unsuccessful measurements] x 100%
1 secondary outcome
Diaphragm thickness (mm) at different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in spontaneously breathing, sedated children.
Time frame: Perioperatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jan 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37092829De Meyer GR, Flamey L, Adriaensens I, Van der Aerschot M, Van de Walle H, Vanmarsenille I, Jorens PG, Goligher EC, Saldien V, Schepens T. The Relationship Between Esophageal Pressure and Diaphragm Thickening Fraction in Spontaneously Breathing Sedated Children: A Feasibility Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Aug 1;24(8):652-661. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003248. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
Related trials for Child
Not yet recruiting
Executive Function Play Opportunities for Children With Down Syndrome
Down Syndrome, Trisomy 21
Recruiting
Comparison of Uncomplicated Candidemia Therapy Duration in Children and Adults
Invasive Candidiasis
RecruitingObservational study
Psychotherapy for Irritability in Youth: Comparing Active Treatment to Nonactive Psychoeducation Supportive Psychotherapy
Irritability, Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
RecruitingPhase 1
A Clinical Study of Letermovir (MK-8228) in Children and Adolescents Who Receive a Kidney Transplant (KT) (MK-8228-077)
Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis
Active, not recruiting
Chicago Parent Program for Foster and Kinship Caregivers
Behavior Problem, Parenting
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tom Schepens, MD principal investigator
University Hospital, Antwerp
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diaphragmatic echography, Measurement of esophageal pressure and Registration of respiratory mechanics in people with Child, run by University Hospital, Antwerp at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Esophageal pressure (cmH2O) at increasing levels of respiratory effort in spontaneously breathing, sedated children. (time frame: Perioperatively). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04882553, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jan 2022.