Spinal Cord InjuriesNCT04883463
Neuromodulation to Improve Respiratory Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Epidural stimulation in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This is a phase 1 study of safety and feasibility of cervical spinal cord stimulator implantation in cervical SCI subjects who are ventilator dependent. The Investigators will be focusing on the safety and feasibility of this approach. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- What is being tested?
- Epidural stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 27 Sep 2021to 31 Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female 18-75 years
- At least 1 year from initial cervical spinal cord injury
- Non-progressive Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) at C2 - C7 (non-conus injury)
- Motor Complete ASIA Impairment Scale (A, B, or C)
- Severe respiratory function compromise requiring dependency on invasive or noninvasive ventilation
- Able to attend weekly testing sessions for up to 21 months.
- Have intact chest/lung, upper and lower extremity anatomy. The neuromuscular connections between the spinal cord and its effector muscles (respiratory and extremity) are required to be intact
- Have intact cognitive ability, able to follow commands/voice concerns, and give consent
Who cannot join
- History of severe autonomic dysreflexia
- Phrenic nerve or diaphragm pacer
- Phrenic nerve paralysis
- Musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure ulcer of grade 3 and above in the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Grading System, active infection
- Clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse as documented in the medical record
- Received lung surgery within one year prior to study enrollment or has active intrinsic lung disease (e.g. COPD, acute or chronic lung infection, moderate to severe asthma, emphysema, cystic fibrosis, etc.)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Cardiopulmonary disease that precludes training or rehabilitation
- Other implanted stimulation devices
- Pregnant
- Severe cardiac disease (e.g. heart failure, atherosclerosis, arrhythmia, stroke, etc.)
- Subjects involved in other clinical trials not associated with this trial
- Botox injections in respiratory associated muscles within the last 3 months
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Semel Institute of Neuroscience at UCLA
Los Angeles, California, 90024
Daniel Lu, MD,PhD, 310-267-0149, mailto:DCLu@mednet.ucla.edu
Sandra Holley, PhD, 3102671770, sholley@mednet.ucla.edu
- Recruiting
UCLA Clinical and Translational Research Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Daniel Lu, MD, 310-267-0149, DCLu@mednet.ucla.edu
About this study
This is a phase 1 study of safety and feasibility of cervical spinal cord stimulator implantation in cervical SCI subjects who are ventilator dependent. The Investigators will be focusing on the safety and feasibility of this approach. Participants may qualify for the study if they are male or female 18-75 years old, are at least 1 year after original injury, have injury at C2 to C7 level, and dependent on mechanical ventilation to help them breathe. Additionally, they need to be able to attend up to twice weekly testing sessions for up to 21 months.
Read the detailed description
There are five main phases to this study. The first phase is baseline testing, second phase is temporary implant, third phase is post-temporary implant mapping/treatment, fourth phase is permanent implant, and fifth phase is post-permanent implant treatment.
Phase 1. Screening and Baseline testing/training (up to 6 months, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior), the purpose of which is to ensure that each subject begins with the full benefits achievable by standard rehabilitative respiratory therapy and has stable baseline of function before they begin epidural stimulation. 12 subjects will undergo this phase. Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure, resting spontaneous respiratory activity, and respiratory muscle EMG will be measured during this phase. Subjects on ventilator assist mode (unless or until they can sustain adequate respiration on their own) will be monitored via pneumotachometer for respiratory frequency changes. Additionally, subjects will undergo motor and sensory testing. The subjects must show stable respiratory function before implantation, therefore if a subject is showing small improvements at 3 months the subject will continue training until they have reached their maximal effect from training (up to 6 months). Subjects that show stable baseline at 3 months will proceed to Phase 2. If a subject's health worsens, including non-respiratory functioning, subject will be assessed by appropriate physician and testing will be held until subject's health has improved and maintains stable for at least 2 months. Subjects will obtain preoperative clearance and general anesthesia clearance in preparation for Phase 2.
Phase 2. Temporary Implant (1 day, 24 hours overnight stay, UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica). Subjects will undergo temporary stimulator implant surgery. CT scan may be collected prior for surgical planning if needed by PI. Up to 9 subjects with most connectivity and evidence of response to baseline testing will undergo this phase from the pool of 12 subjects in Phase 1 above. The electrode that will be used will be the same one that will be applied in subsequent permanent trial Phase 4, however a temporary connector will be placed to an external battery source and no permanent battery will be implanted. Connectivity of subject will be based on motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials done during baseline testing and evaluated by a clinical neurophysiologist
Phase 3. Post-temporary implant mapping/treatment. Respiratory ability will be assessed. Respiratory rehabilitation regimen with the stimulator will be used to re-enable respiratory function. The length of time of this phase will be dependent on the participant's response (as explained below) to the implant. The paddle will remain implanted until a comprehensive assessment of the participant's respiratory response is conducted by PI. Should the participant fail to exhibit a measurable respiratory response, the explantation of the paddle electrodes may be performed by the PI, provided that it is deemed safe to proceed. Extent and amplitude of evoked responses and motor pools activated from electrode pairs will be analyzed through EMG obtained. Response to the temporary stimulator implant will be based on tidal volume and spontaneous respiratory rate and respiratory muscle EMG. The same 9 subjects from Phase 2 will undergo this phase. Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure, and respiratory muscle EMG measurements will also be collected during this Phase.
Phase 4. Permanent implant procedure (1 day, 24 hours overnight stay, UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica). Subjects will undergo stimulator implant surgery. Up to 6 subjects with most connectivity and evidence of response to baseline testing will undergo this phase from the pool of 9 subjects in Phase 3 above. The functional respiratory circuit connectivity of the subject will be based on implanted spinal cord stimulator-induced spinal evoked respiratory muscle potential changes. Response to stimulator implant-induced respiratory facilitation will be evaluated based on intraoperative minute ventilation, tidal volume, and respiratory muscle EMG before and after the spinal stimulation. Subjects will be monitored overnight following surgery as a pre-cautionary measure. Ventilated subjects undergoing surgery are not at an increased risk over non-ventilated subjects.
Phase 5. Post-permanent implant mapping/treatment (up to 12 months, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior) in which the electrode pair or pairs that maximally activate the largest number of respiratory motor pools will be identified based on the extent and amplitude of evoked responses in the respiratory muscles. Connectivity of subject will be based on motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials done during baseline testing and evaluated by a clinical neurophysiologist. Response to respiratory training will be evaluated based on pulmonary function tests (including tidal volume, maximum inspiratory and expiratory effort, spontaneous respiratory activity) and respiratory muscle EMG. Once optimal parameters have been identified, electrode pairs that allow subjects to manipulate their respiratory frequency with concomitant diaphragm/intercostal EMG activity, subjects will be allowed to use stimulator at home (daily, with identified parameters) with respiratory training in addition to weekly (or monthly) testing. Each subject will undergo stimulation up to twice a week in the clinic and daily (with identified parameters) up to 12 months. Extent and amplitude of evoked responses and motor pools activated from electrode pairs will be analyzed through EMG. Respiratory rehabilitation regimen with the stimulator will be used to re-enable respiratory function. 6 subjects will be tested up to twice weekly in the clinic for up to 2 hours per session. Pulmonary function tests (including maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure, resting spontaneous pressure, and initiated breaths) will be evaluated weekly or monthly. Post-implant MEP/SSEP, SCIM3, FIM, ISNCSCI, SCI-QOL testing will be conducted at a minimum of one timepoint during this phase of the study. For patients with a ventilator, home use will involve turning on the stimulator, breathing with the ventilator, and turning the sensitivity of ventilator assist mode up, working to strengthen the muscles for initiated breaths. The same 6 subjects from Phase 4 will undergo this phase.
Timeline. The study is a safety and feasibility trial. This is a single arm implantation of permanent electrode to assess safety and early efficacy of cervical spinal epidural stimulation to improve respiratory function. It is conducted over a period of up to 6 months or 21 months in 1, 2, or 3 periods, respectively: Phase 1. Baseline training (up to 6 months), Phase 2. Temporary Trial Implant (1 day), Phase 3. Post-temporary trial implant treatment (the length of time of this phase will be dependent on participant's response to the implant), Phase 4. Permanent Implant (1 day, with up to 2 months for surgical recovery), Phase 5. Post-permanent implant treatment (up to 12 months). Therefore, 12 subjects will be involved for up to 6 months, while 9 subjects will be involved for up to 7 months, and 6 subjects involved for up to 21 months (18 months of testing with up to 2 months recovery).
Home Use. To ensure safety, the ventilator will provide support for the patient during home use with stimulator turned on, just as it does when epidural stimulation is not on. The patient will not be completely disconnected to the ventilator unless independence from the ventilator is achieved through a gradual and very closely supervised weaning process in which the patient will demonstrate stable O2 saturation and adequate minute ventilation through the stages of weaning. Weaning (and evidence of improved respiratory muscle function) will consist of gradually reducing the level of support delivered by the ventilator while requiring that as weaning occurs, the patient maintains stable minute ventilation on his own.
To ensure safety, these weaning maneuvers will be conducted only with respiratory therapist being present, and an AMBU bag with supplemental O2 will be available. Additionally, for safety, the caregiver will obtain heart rate, blood pressure, temperature at 15 min intervals and O2 saturation continuously, or when there is a change in the ventilator setting. Additionally this will be performed only when the subject is fully conscious, awake, and following commands.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Being tested
- Epidural stimulation
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Respiratory SCI, Implant
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Epidural stimulationDevice
Epidural electrical stimulation implant weekly sessions for 21 months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural Stimulation for Respiratory Function | Experimental | Self-controlled longitudinal safety and feasibility of stimulation and respiratory training. Receives: Device: Epidural stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury/American Spinal Injury Association (ISNCSCI/ASIA)- Neurological motor and sensory function given a score A-E: Timeframe: completed at the beginning and end of the phases.
Measured: 2.5 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4
Resting Spontaneous Respiratory Activity (measured in Breathes per Minute), Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (measured in cmH2O) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (a score from 0-100) questionnaire: Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study. Data will be analyzed to compare each individual's function to their own at the beginning of the study, during the baseline period.
Measured: 2.5 years
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4
Blood Pressure (mm/Hg): Timeframe: completed at the beginning and end of each testing session.
Measured: 2.5 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20% increase in minute ventilation.
Tidal Volume = mL Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study.
Measured: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20% increase in minute ventilation.
Maximal Expiratory Pressure = cmH2O Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study.
Measured: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20%
Functional Residual Capacity = mL/kg Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study.
Measured: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20%
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate = mL/min Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study.
Measured: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20%
Minute Volume (measured in L/min): Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study. Data for all of the assessments mentioned above will be analyzed to compare each individual's function to their own at the beginning of the study, during the baseline period.Electromyography (EMG): Respiratory muscle activity will be assessed with common practice EMG recording and functional measurements. Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study.
Measured: 2.5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 May 2021
- Study start27 Sep 2021
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniel Lu, MD, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Daniel C Lu, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04883463
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-000994
- Other IDs
- UH3NS119772
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 24 Nov 2020
- Last updated
- 6 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neuromodulation to Improve Respiratory Function in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04883463
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-000994
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Keywords
- Neuromodulation, Respiratory SCI, Implant
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Study start
- 27 Sep 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 May 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase 1 study of safety and feasibility of cervical spinal cord stimulator implantation in cervical SCI subjects who are ventilator dependent. The Investigators will be focusing on the safety and feasibility of this approach. Participants may qualify for the study if they are male or female 18-75 years old, are at least 1 year after original injury, have injury at C2 to C7 level, and dependent on mechanical ventilation to help them breathe. Additionally, they need to be able to attend up to twice weekly testing sessions for up to 21 months.
Detailed description
There are five main phases to this study. The first phase is baseline testing, second phase is temporary implant, third phase is post-temporary implant mapping/treatment, fourth phase is permanent implant, and fifth phase is post-permanent implant treatment.
Phase 1. Screening and Baseline testing/training (up to 6 months, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior), the purpose of which is to ensure that each subject begins with the full benefits achievable by standard rehabilitative respiratory therapy and has stable baseline of function before they begin epidural stimulation. 12 subjects will undergo this phase. Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure, resting spontaneous respiratory activity, and respiratory muscle EMG will be measured during this phase. Subjects on ventilator assist mode (unless or until they can sustain adequate respiration on their own) will be monitored via pneumotachometer for respiratory frequency changes. Additionally, subjects will undergo motor and sensory testing. The subjects must show stable respiratory function before implantation, therefore if a subject is showing small improvements at 3 months the subject will continue training until they have reached their maximal effect from training (up to 6 months). Subjects that show stable baseline at 3 months will proceed to Phase 2. If a subject's health worsens, including non-respiratory functioning, subject will be assessed by appropriate physician and testing will be held until subject's health has improved and maintains stable for at least 2 months. Subjects will obtain preoperative clearance and general anesthesia clearance in preparation for Phase 2.
Phase 2. Temporary Implant (1 day, 24 hours overnight stay, UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica). Subjects will undergo temporary stimulator implant surgery. CT scan may be collected prior for surgical planning if needed by PI. Up to 9 subjects with most connectivity and evidence of response to baseline testing will undergo this phase from the pool of 12 subjects in Phase 1 above. The electrode that will be used will be the same one that will be applied in subsequent permanent trial Phase 4, however a temporary connector will be placed to an external battery source and no permanent battery will be implanted. Connectivity of subject will be based on motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials done during baseline testing and evaluated by a clinical neurophysiologist
Phase 3. Post-temporary implant mapping/treatment. Respiratory ability will be assessed. Respiratory rehabilitation regimen with the stimulator will be used to re-enable respiratory function. The length of time of this phase will be dependent on the participant's response (as explained below) to the implant. The paddle will remain implanted until a comprehensive assessment of the participant's respiratory response is conducted by PI. Should the participant fail to exhibit a measurable respiratory response, the explantation of the paddle electrodes may be performed by the PI, provided that it is deemed safe to proceed. Extent and amplitude of evoked responses and motor pools activated from electrode pairs will be analyzed through EMG obtained. Response to the temporary stimulator implant will be based on tidal volume and spontaneous respiratory rate and respiratory muscle EMG. The same 9 subjects from Phase 2 will undergo this phase. Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure, and respiratory muscle EMG measurements will also be collected during this Phase.
Phase 4. Permanent implant procedure (1 day, 24 hours overnight stay, UCLA Medical Center, Santa Monica). Subjects will undergo stimulator implant surgery. Up to 6 subjects with most connectivity and evidence of response to baseline testing will undergo this phase from the pool of 9 subjects in Phase 3 above. The functional respiratory circuit connectivity of the subject will be based on implanted spinal cord stimulator-induced spinal evoked respiratory muscle potential changes. Response to stimulator implant-induced respiratory facilitation will be evaluated based on intraoperative minute ventilation, tidal volume, and respiratory muscle EMG before and after the spinal stimulation. Subjects will be monitored overnight following surgery as a pre-cautionary measure. Ventilated subjects undergoing surgery are not at an increased risk over non-ventilated subjects.
Phase 5. Post-permanent implant mapping/treatment (up to 12 months, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior) in which the electrode pair or pairs that maximally activate the largest number of respiratory motor pools will be identified based on the extent and amplitude of evoked responses in the respiratory muscles. Connectivity of subject will be based on motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials done during baseline testing and evaluated by a clinical neurophysiologist. Response to respiratory training will be evaluated based on pulmonary function tests (including tidal volume, maximum inspiratory and expiratory effort, spontaneous respiratory activity) and respiratory muscle EMG. Once optimal parameters have been identified, electrode pairs that allow subjects to manipulate their respiratory frequency with concomitant diaphragm/intercostal EMG activity, subjects will be allowed to use stimulator at home (daily, with identified parameters) with respiratory training in addition to weekly (or monthly) testing. Each subject will undergo stimulation up to twice a week in the clinic and daily (with identified parameters) up to 12 months. Extent and amplitude of evoked responses and motor pools activated from electrode pairs will be analyzed through EMG. Respiratory rehabilitation regimen with the stimulator will be used to re-enable respiratory function. 6 subjects will be tested up to twice weekly in the clinic for up to 2 hours per session. Pulmonary function tests (including maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressure, resting spontaneous pressure, and initiated breaths) will be evaluated weekly or monthly. Post-implant MEP/SSEP, SCIM3, FIM, ISNCSCI, SCI-QOL testing will be conducted at a minimum of one timepoint during this phase of the study. For patients with a ventilator, home use will involve turning on the stimulator, breathing with the ventilator, and turning the sensitivity of ventilator assist mode up, working to strengthen the muscles for initiated breaths. The same 6 subjects from Phase 4 will undergo this phase.
Timeline. The study is a safety and feasibility trial. This is a single arm implantation of permanent electrode to assess safety and early efficacy of cervical spinal epidural stimulation to improve respiratory function. It is conducted over a period of up to 6 months or 21 months in 1, 2, or 3 periods, respectively: Phase 1. Baseline training (up to 6 months), Phase 2. Temporary Trial Implant (1 day), Phase 3. Post-temporary trial implant treatment (the length of time of this phase will be dependent on participant's response to the implant), Phase 4. Permanent Implant (1 day, with up to 2 months for surgical recovery), Phase 5. Post-permanent implant treatment (up to 12 months). Therefore, 12 subjects will be involved for up to 6 months, while 9 subjects will be involved for up to 7 months, and 6 subjects involved for up to 21 months (18 months of testing with up to 2 months recovery).
Home Use. To ensure safety, the ventilator will provide support for the patient during home use with stimulator turned on, just as it does when epidural stimulation is not on. The patient will not be completely disconnected to the ventilator unless independence from the ventilator is achieved through a gradual and very closely supervised weaning process in which the patient will demonstrate stable O2 saturation and adequate minute ventilation through the stages of weaning. Weaning (and evidence of improved respiratory muscle function) will consist of gradually reducing the level of support delivered by the ventilator while requiring that as weaning occurs, the patient maintains stable minute ventilation on his own.
To ensure safety, these weaning maneuvers will be conducted only with respiratory therapist being present, and an AMBU bag with supplemental O2 will be available. Additionally, for safety, the caregiver will obtain heart rate, blood pressure, temperature at 15 min intervals and O2 saturation continuously, or when there is a change in the ventilator setting. Additionally this will be performed only when the subject is fully conscious, awake, and following commands.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural Stimulation for Respiratory Function | Experimental | Device: Epidural stimulationSelf-controlled longitudinal safety and feasibility of stimulation and respiratory training. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Male or female 18-75 years
- At least 1 year from initial cervical spinal cord injury
- Non-progressive Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) at C2 - C7 (non-conus injury)
- Motor Complete ASIA Impairment Scale (A, B, or C)
- Severe respiratory function compromise requiring dependency on invasive or noninvasive ventilation
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- History of severe autonomic dysreflexia
- Phrenic nerve or diaphragm pacer
- Phrenic nerve paralysis
- Musculoskeletal dysfunction, unhealed fracture, pressure ulcer of grade 3 and above in the European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Grading System, active infection
- Clinically significant depression or ongoing drug abuse as documented in the medical record
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Epidural stimulationEpidural electrical stimulation implant weekly sessions for 21 months. | Device | Epidural Stimulation for Respiratory Function |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4
Time frame: 2.5 years
International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury/American Spinal Injury Association (ISNCSCI/ASIA)- Neurological motor and sensory function given a score A-E: Timeframe: completed at the beginning and end of the phases.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4
Time frame: 2.5 years
Resting Spontaneous Respiratory Activity (measured in Breathes per Minute), Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (measured in cmH2O) and Spinal Cord Independence Measure (a score from 0-100) questionnaire: Timeframe: assessed weekly through the duration of the study. Data will be analyzed to compare each individual's function to their own at the beginning of the study, during the baseline period.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4
Time frame: 2.5 years
Blood Pressure (mm/Hg): Timeframe: completed at the beginning and end of each testing session.
5 secondary outcomes
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20% increase in minute ventilation.
Time frame: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20% increase in minute ventilation.
Time frame: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20%
Time frame: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20%
Time frame: 2.5 years
Evaluating Pulmonary Function Throughout the Duration of the Study; 20%
Time frame: 2.5 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Nov 2025.
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injuries
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Clinical Outcome Assessment for AT & BCI
Spinal Cord Injury, ALS (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis)
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Combined With 4-Aminopyridine and Intensive Rehabilitation in SCI
Spinal Cord Injuries
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating the Effect of the Zeen Mobility Device on Clinical Practicality, Safety, and Impact (Via Assessments of Walking, Standing Tolerance, Balance, Endurance, Effort, and Participation in Daily Tasks) in an Outpatient Rehabilitation Setting for Individuals With Mobility Impairments.
Stroke, Parkinson's Disease (PD)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of NVG-291 in Subjects With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Chronic Spinal Cord Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Daniel C Lu, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Epidural stimulation in people with Spinal Cord Injuries, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Daniel C Lu, MD, PhD (310-267-2975, DCLu@mednet.ucla.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events as assessed by CTCAE v4 (time frame: 2.5 years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Nov 2025.